Jump to content

User talk:Anameofmyveryown

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Those of you who follow my edits (presumably a very small number) may have noted my tendency to whine about my limited internet access. Well, the whining has gotten a lot louder because my laptop has done what it threatened to do for the last two years: given up the ghost. Even sticking it in the cooler has failed to work, and I can barely get email access.

Whine, whine, whine...

Of course I'm going to get it repaired 'n' stuff, but realistically that's not going to happen until October or (more probably) November. Until then, I'm de facto retired. Any emergency enquiries slap them below and I'll try to help as best I can, but my ability to do so is severely compromised.

See y'all in November, Anameofmyveryown (talk) 22:59, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Libertas Austria and others

[edit]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated articles are Libertas Austria, 2009 Libertas European Parliament recognition application. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to the relevant discussion pages: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Libertas Austria for Libertas Austria, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 Libertas European Parliament recognition application for 2009 Libertas European Parliament recognition application. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Libertas article

[edit]

I supported a selective merge. The level of detail gone into was simply too much for an encyclopedia article and some of the use of sources was highly questionable - the article was too reliant on primary sources. It also read like a news report. Some information on the party's attempts to gain European Parliament recognition would be fine in the main article, but not the blow-by-blow account (WP:UNDUE) and not using questionable primary sources. If you want a copy of the article restored to your userspace, just ask. Fences&Windows 13:30, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You already did ask! Your wish is my command: User:Anameofmyveryown/2009 Libertas European Parliament recognition application. Fences&Windows 13:34, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your reply: I appreciate the promptness. To demonstrate my bona fides, I'll blank the article page on my userpage: since I just need the sources for other articles that'll still work for me because I can get them from the page history, and it'll hopefully settle your mind on partisanship. Once again, thank you. Regards, Anameofmyveryown (talk) 01:44, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I apologise about WP:SOAP if you were not in fact acting out of promotional intent for Libertas.eu, but you must understand it looks like that when a vast flood of articles appears all at once from a single author about a not-obviously-all-that-notable subject. As far as WP:WEIGHT goes, I am unrepentant. I doubt that even old-established governing parties like the US Democratic party and the British Labour party have as many different articles as you were trying to create all at once for Libertas.eu, which does not even seem to have got itself accepted as a party. In fact, I was disappointed with the result of the other AfD, and thought seriously of challenging the close: it seems to me ludicrous that, e.g., Libertas (Austria) should have even a redirect, when close inspection reveals that no such thing exists, the article content saying, in effect, "Libertas said they would like to find a candidate in Austria but they didn't". Regards, JohnCD (talk) 22:32, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your reply: I appreciate the promptness. Dealing with your points as follows:
POINT 1: US DEMOCRATIC PARTY
In your reply, you said "...I doubt that even old-established governing parties like the US Democratic party and the British Labour party have as many different articles as you were trying to create all at once for Libertas.eu...". Er, we do have that number of articles (more in fact) for the US Democratic Party. They are as follows:
That's not a joke, by the way: what you understand as the US Democratic Party is not a homogeneous party, but a collection of smaller parties grouped together under an umbrella party: each state-level party has its own legal identity.
POINT 2: UK LABOUR PARTY
Similarly, we do have that number of articles for the Party of European Socialists, the political party at European level of which the UK Labour party is a part. They are as follows:
My point being that Libertas was trying to create a political party at European level (Libertas.eu) and the member-state level parties (Libertas Austria, .... Libertas Slovenia, etc), all at once. Since political parties at European level (Europarties) and Political groups of the European Parliament are my areas of interest on Wikipedia, I found myself horrifyingly having to evolve a structure to cope with this (to be polite) quixotic attempt. Once it was over, we had a structure that could cope with Europarties. Yay!
POINT 3: NOTABILITY OF MEMBER-STATE LEVEL PARTIES
I take your point that given the lack of electoral success, most of the state-level parties no longer justify their own article. Your point is correct. However, some of them are notable because of the notability of the issues they raised (Libertas Poland raised issues about funding of Polish parties by non-Poles and government media interference, Libertas Bulgaria raised issues about whether non-party-affiliated candidates can stand in Bulgarian elections - they can't, btw - and so on). Since these are state-level notability issues, I can rely on the sense of Wikieditors to judge them accordingly. Please note that some postcommunist central European countries do not have a party tradition and have electoral committees (ad-hoc groups set up at election time gathering like-minded individuals) instead, which muddies the waters.
I hope that helps, regards, Anameofmyveryown (talk) 00:23, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
My 2 cents, no one could have been more balanced than User:Anameofmyveryown I was interested in writing many of these articles but as Anameofmyveryown excelled in organizational skills I left them at it and provided some sources from time to time. Plus the quality and presentation of fact in those articles and all his/her others are a standard rarely reached on this site. I think you should all get of his/her back and sit at the feet of a master for a while. I bet if we had a competition to produce a first rate article on an EU topic in under two hours that was completely readable and presented fact in an easily usable way the Anameofmyveryown would win hands down against anyone on this site. Anameofmyveryown contributions to complex articles on the EU and its institutions would be the type of material that consultancy firms would charge thousands to produce and yet he/she post it here for free, just look at the pages he/she has wither created or made major contribs to. re primary sources: articles on institutions/political parties must refer to e.g party charters , laws, protocols and agreements which though primary documents are all very much encyclopedical and Anameofmyveryown helped simplify these unwieldy documents for the "common man". If you examine the partisan editing around Libertas main article you will see that Anameofmyveryown did not engage in any activities unbecoming of a user here.

Break out the medal boxCatapla (talk) 13:31, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 6, 2010

[edit]

Oh yes, the fight is on. Here goes the editing frenzy...doktorb wordsdeeds 07:09, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:46, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

You know me very well ;) Thanks for that, I will have a look at that link, see what will come from it.... doktorb wordsdeeds 11:09, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quick question on opt out protocol

[edit]

Quick question. I was wondering if you know anything about the Lisbon opt-outs (Irish guarantees and the Czech charter opt out) protocol which we were told would be attached to the next treaty amendment? No one has mentioned it and we've had the transitional provisions protocol which is almost ratified, the EFSM/EFSF things, the ESM amendment, the ESM treaty itself and now Croatia's treaty but no sign of the protocols. Did they forget about it? - J.Logan`t: 16:37, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My reply here, Regards, Anameofmyveryown (talk) 21:40, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited History of The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages April Fool and Weird Science (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:08, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply] 

==DYK nomination of Jade Bailey (footballer)==

Hello! Your submission of Jade Bailey (footballer) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! LauraHale (talk) 11:33, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Ask for help expanding Jade Bailey (footballer)

[edit]

I've had a dig around but I can't find anything else to add to the article. I did find a page on the Britol City womens team about a Jade Bailey - but comparing the photographs I don't think its the same player and so I didn't add anything to the article. Miyagawa (talk)

Hi, much as I don't think she is notable (just my view!) I admire your efforts. This is probably her but I do not have a paid subscription ........ http://www.findmypast.co.uk/search/all/results?recordCount=-1&forenames=Jade+Helen&_includeForenamesVariants=on&surname=Bailey&_includeSurnameVariants=on&fromYear=1995&toYear=1995&region=&county=&mothersMaidenName=&_useMothersMaidenNameAsSurname=on&sortOrder=RK%3Atrue&_performExactSearch=on&event=B&recordType=ALL&route=

--Egghead06 (talk) 06:34, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jade Bailey (footballer) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jade Bailey (footballer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jade Bailey (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. GiantSnowman 18:11, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Anameofmyveryown. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 July 12.
Message added 04:40, 31 July 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your template has been threatened with deletion. Is the template really necessary, considering that {{Infobox election}} exists? Cheers! Unforgettableid (talk) 04:40, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Current European Parliament party groups

[edit]

Category:Current European Parliament party groups, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 04:51, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited What Remains (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alex Arnold (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Under Milk Wood (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Tom Ellis, Nia Roberts, Tom Jones and Sophie Evans

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox European Parliament election

[edit]

Template:Infobox European Parliament election has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox election. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Alakzi (talk) 17:05, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Top Gear France

[edit]

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 22:37, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piggate

[edit]

An AfD is not a vote; making summaries based purely on numbers is misleading and unhelpful. I've removed your latest one. RichardOSmith (talk) 05:55, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see your WP:NOTAVOTE and raise you WP:VINE. Deletion was excessive when an existing compromise (the "collapse field") existed. Consequently I've restored the summary and enclosed it in a "collapse" field. That field should address your points without deletion. Regards, Anameofmyveryown (talk) 09:19, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
WP:AFDEQ: "Do not add tally boxes to the deletion page". RichardOSmith (talk) 09:22, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Anameofmyveryown. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rusty Schweickart, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hardscrabble. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:EU apportionment per capita January 1 2007

[edit]

Template:EU apportionment per capita January 1 2007 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 20:17, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Anameofmyveryown. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Anameofmyveryown. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Anameofmyveryown. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1979 European Parliament election results templates

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:1979 European Parliament election results templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:47, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1984 European Parliament election results templates

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:1984 European Parliament election results templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:47, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1989 European Parliament election results templates

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:1989 European Parliament election results templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:47, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1994 European Parliament election results templates

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:1994 European Parliament election results templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:47, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1999 European Parliament election results templates

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:1999 European Parliament election results templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:47, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2004 European Parliament election results templates

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:2004 European Parliament election results templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:47, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:European Parliament constituencies 1979–1984

[edit]

Template:European Parliament constituencies 1979–1984 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:54, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Huffty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Word. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Charles III requested move discussion

[edit]

There is a new requested move discussion in progress for the Charles III article. Since you participated in the previous discussion, I thought you might like to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 05:51, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Other British monarch requested move discussions currently taking place

[edit]

Since you recently participated in the Charles III requested move discussion, I thought you might like to know that there are two other discussions currently going on about other British monarch article titles here and here. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 22:29, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Atwood's duck" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect Atwood's duck has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 26 § Atwood's duck until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 03:04, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of the Group of Independents for a Europe of Nations.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of the Group of Independents for a Europe of Nations.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Anameofmyveryown&oldid=1249002293"