User talk:Amitavanath12

November 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bird migration. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:26, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://bloggerkolkata.blogspot.com/2018/12/courtship-of-birds-some-amazing-facts.html. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

User:Amitavanath12/sandbox may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 12:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Amitavanath12! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 12:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Purbasthali has been reverted.
Your edit here to Purbasthali was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://bloggerkolkata.blogspot.com/2019/02/chupir-char-kasthashali-home-of-water.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 10:20, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of How bird is identified

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on How bird is identified requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:39, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of How bird is identified

The article How bird is identified has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is written more like an essay or a personal advice article rather than an encyclopedia article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mz7 (talk) 12:50, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May I resubmit my article after proper editing? Amitavanath12 (talk) 16:58, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Resubmission of my article

I have submitted an article "How bird is identified" and got a notification that the submitted article is 'Like an essay or personal opinion, not an article, so it will be deleted after 7 days' . Now my question is can I resubmit it after proper editing and in proper way for 2nd review ? Waiting for kind reply. Amitavanath12 (talk) 16:19, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You can edit the existing article to make it like a Wikipedia article. Perhaps it could later be re titled "Bird identification", but you really need to learn how Wikipedia works and how Wikipedia articles are written. I would suggest looking at other Wikipedia articles and following their format and style. You might find Wikipedia:Your first article or Wikipedia:Teahouse useful. Best regards.20:50, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Resubmission of article

I have edited my article How bird is identified and submitted it for review. But this article has got PROD Tag when I submitted it first time. Now the question is will the Tag be removed automatically if the resubmitted article nominated or I have to remove it. If I have to do it please write me how to do. Amitavanath12 (talk) 13:29, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: How bird is identified (February 21)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Wikipedia is Wikipedia:NOTGUIDE.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:25, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft Singling at Sikim

Sir,

I have submitted an article named"Singling at Sikkim" for review yesterday and got the notification that it is under review. It is said that I will get notification if it is nominated and if not, the cause will also be notified. But since 1 hour ago I am not finding any article under that heading and it is showing when I search in Wikipedia that there is no such article. Kindly write me what happend. Why there is no such article and please inform me what to do next. Amitavanath12 (talk) 05:03, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Singling (Sikim) has been accepted

Singling (Sikim), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 11:37, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Bird identification

Draft:Bird identification, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Bird identification and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Bird identification during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:43, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bird identification (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See Wikipedia is not a how-to guide. This draft contains only a general set of instructions and not even specific information, and so is not useful.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bird identification and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bird identification, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:03, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Amitavanath12

A tag has been placed on User:Amitavanath12 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Theroadislong (talk) 18:14, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome! (February 2019)

Hello User:Amitavanath12, Thank you for your Contributions to Wikipedia! the article you created recently Kanad bhattacharya is appreciated. let me know if you need any help though I'm also still learning, you need to learn about citing & format of writing. MrZINE 15:23, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hi User:Laziness 13, Thanks for your message. You are absolutely right. I know nothing about formatting. Please format my article"Kanad Bhattacharya" and write me how to submit it for review. Waiting for your kind reply. Amitavanath12 (talk) 15:59, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your article is already in review. and I have fixed some of your sources. to learn editing on wikipedia click here -- MrZINE 16:03, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks a lot User:Landline 13 for your help. It would be better if I could add a photo of Lt.Kanad. Can you help me in this regard. Amitavanath12 (talk) 16:30, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Article Submission

Created an article named"Latpanchar". Please help me to submit it for review Amitavanath12 (talk) 12:37, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Article creation

I want to create an article on "Neheru Institute of Mountaineering". But as I searched the name , I found that a page with this title has previously been moved or deleted. Can I recreate the page with similar to this page? Amitavanath12 (talk) 02:29, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Kanad bhattacharya

Hello, Amitavanath12,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Kanad bhattacharya should be deleted. Your comments are welcome over Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kanad bhattacharya .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:19, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Birds of India blog

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Birds of India blog, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Daiyusha (talk) 12:51, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Hello, I'm Daiyusha. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Daiyusha (talk) 12:52, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Latpanchar (May 11)

{{subst:Afc decline|full=Draft:Latpanchar|cv=no|reason=adv|details=|reason2=|details2=|comment=Please fix the tone of the article. See [[WP:FORMAL].|sig=yes}}

May 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Long-tailed broadbill, you may be blocked from editing. Daiyusha (talk) 10:39, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Trying to add your blog to wikipedia articles is considered promotion, and that is not at all allowed on wikipedia. Daiyusha (talk) 10:44, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Latpanchar (September 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Latpanchar may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Missvain (talk) 17:22, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Draft:Latpanchar

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Draft:Latpanchar, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.darjeeling-tourism.com/darj_000128.htm, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Draft talk:Latpanchar and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Draft:Latpanchar, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Draft talk:Latpanchar. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Draft talk:Latpanchar with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Draft talk:Latpanchar saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Missvain (talk) 17:23, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Latpanchar (October 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Mirror Cracked was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sorry, but the article as it stands is a mess. It has a bunch of statistical data just dumped into it, which is almost impossible to read. It has an attempt to include a picture of a "Rufuous-necked hornbill" which is inappropriate. The information in the infobox is unsourced. While the village is likely notable enough for an article, this one needs a major overhaul before it is ready to be accepted.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Latpanchar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Latpanchar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Mirror Cracked (talk) 05:46, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Latpanchar concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Latpanchar, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:20, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Latpanchar

Hello, Amitavanath12. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Latpanchar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 09:48, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]