User talk:Amgisseman(BYU)/Archive 1

DYK nominations

DYK nomination of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Ireland

Hello! Your submission of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Ireland at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:10, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in French Polynesia

Hello! Your submission of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in French Polynesia at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! CeeGee 19:08, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Priddy Meeks has been nominated for Did You Know

Hello, Amgisseman(BYU). Priddy Meeks, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 12:01, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Victor Milner

Hello! Your submission of Victor Milner at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Random86 (talk) 02:51, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Victor Milner

Hello! Your submission of Victor Milner at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 23:30, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

These issues were "citation needed" tags. I easily found sources, so that situation is resolved. Don't worry about it. — Maile (talk) 00:47, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Josi S. Kilpack

Hello! Your submission of Josi S. Kilpack at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:24, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of John L. Harmer

Hello! Your submission of John L. Harmer at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 20:36, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Annette Lyon

Hello! Your submission of Annette Lyon at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:49, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Michael Van Wagenen

Hello! Your submission of Michael Van Wagenen at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 19:22, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Baruch Korff

Hello! Your submission of Baruch Korff at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! EdChem (talk) 14:18, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Henry S. Kesler

Hi; I've left a comment. Josh Milburn (talk) 09:22, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Howard Rusk Long

Hello! Your submission of Howard Rusk Long at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 14:09, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Theodore Wassmer

Hello! Your submission of Theodore Wassmer at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Intelligentsium 01:41, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of E. Keith Eddington

Hello! Your submission of E. Keith Eddington at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Borsoka (talk) 11:40, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Aplets & Cotlets

Please see note on your DYK review. Yoninah (talk) 16:52, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Mary Alice Powell Lindsay

Hello! Your submission of Mary Alice Powell Lindsay at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — Maile (talk) 21:22, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Wingfield W. Watson

Hello! Your submission of Wingfield W. Watson at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! HazelAB (talk) 14:19, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Mary Ellen Edmunds

Hello! Your submission of Mary Ellen Edmunds at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 18:53, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Mary Alice Powell Lindsay

Hello! Your submission of Mary Alice Powell Lindsay at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — Maile (talk) 15:01, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Mary Field Garner

Hello! Your submission of Mary Field Garner at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — Maile (talk) 22:24, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi, just a reminder to please maintain the thread on your DYK nomination templates by listing new hooks as ALT1, ALT2, etc, and striking through rather than overwriting the original hook. This maintains the thread for other editors to view the progress of the nomination. See what I did for you on this nomination. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 21:34, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Also, please be aware that hooks should have a space between the ellipsis and "that". Yoninah (talk) 21:38, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

DYK nomination for Mary Elizabeth Rollins Lightner

I rose an issue at the DYK nom page. Can you fix that issue? --George Ho (talk) 01:36, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Mary Mostert at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 11:46, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Ignore this message. It was the result of another editor messing up the addition of a nomination and accidentally commenting out several templates on the DYK nominations page. No action needed from you. ~ Rob^Talk 11:57, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/George P. Hammond

Hi, thanks for your DYK nomination. FYI, when you propose a new hook, you should put it at the bottom of the thread prefaced by a new number, in this case ALT1. (Later revisions can be numbered ALT2, ALT3, etc.) This retains the history of the nomination and helps prep builders like myself see the hooks that were rejected and approved. You can see how I reformatted the nomination and added your signature line to the time that you proposed ALT1. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 21:44, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

GA Review

Your GA nomination of Howard Hawks

The article Howard Hawks you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Howard Hawks for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DionysosProteus -- DionysosProteus (talk) 02:21, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Howard Hawks

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Howard Hawks you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DionysosProteus -- DionysosProteus (talk) 03:40, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Howard Hawks

The article Howard Hawks you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Howard Hawks for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DionysosProteus -- DionysosProteus (talk) 04:00, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Images

Image tagging for File:HowardHawks.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:HowardHawks.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jack polito edited.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jack polito edited.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Jack polito edited.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jack polito edited.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:36, 2 July 2016 (UTC) The Rambling Man (talk) 07:36, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Jack polito edited.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jack polito edited.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:05, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Other

DYK transclusion

Hi... Re this edit when you added 'template' before the DYK nomination for Six Dance Lessons in Six Weeks, the transclusion was actually correct without the 'template' prefix. Your edit summary noted that the nomination is not appearing correctly, and thanks for trying to fix it, but FYI that problem occurs when there are too many templates on a single page. In other words, it happens when the page gets too long, and is then fixed when all the nominations from an earlier day have been completed so they are all removed from the page. No need to worry when this happens (or that the same problem is now affecting your nomination as other nominations have been added ahead of it); all will be fixed in time.  :) Regard, EdChem (talk) 00:42, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Brigham Young University residence halls has been accepted

List of Brigham Young University residence halls, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Naraht (talk) 11:27, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Heber Robert McBride for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heber Robert McBride is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heber Robert McBride until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 17:02, 22 September 2016 (UTC) =

COI

HI, I've read your user page and appreciate your forthrightness regarding declaring the conflict of interest with BYU. That's good and you seem also to have some sort of GLAM mentor. Still, I am concerned because COI is an issue and you seem to say that you are actually being paid to promote BYU here on Wikipedia. You really, really should not be editing articles about it, in my opinion. Has anyone else addressed this? - Sitush (talk) 19:01, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

@Sitush: Are there any specific articles that you are concerned about? Amgisseman(BYU) (talk) 19:14, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

No, it is just a general observation. COI, and especially paid editing, is a contentious thing here. I realise that you are churning out DYKs, GAs etc but, for example, it isn't that long ago that there was a project here called Gibraltarpedia or something similar that involved creating loads of articles about Gibraltar and got mired in a mess of paid COI etc concerns. I'm surprisingly unfamiliar with GLAM but I see a big difference between galleries etc opening themselves up for access to resources and actually writing about the galleries etc themselves. I may be in the minority here, I'm not sure. - Sitush (talk) 19:22, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

BTW, in your case and that of your BYU colleagues (Rachel Helps (BYU) etc), while it is understandable that the BYU resources concentrate on LDS members, you are "sort of" promoting the LDS when writing all these articles. I'm not trawling through them to see if it is explicit promotion, and indeed it probably is not, but that is roughly what got Gibraltarpedia into trouble. If the people etc matter then they will almost certainly get articles sooner or later anyway. - Sitush (talk) 20:06, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello @Sitush:. We do try to adhere to notability standards and NPOV, as well as the guidelines at Wikipedia:The Wikipedia Library/Cultural Professionals. We also do have many collections related to Mormon history. For many collections, we simply add a link to the individual's papers from their already-existing page. We also try to improve existing pages related to our collections with improved citations. Amgisseman(BYU) has been submitting a lot of DYKs related to Mormon topics, but it's not in excess of one per day (and there are other topics that have received a similar amount of attention because of interested editors). Please let me know if you have specific concerns with our editing. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 20:24, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

I have already raised my concern. Put bluntly, I think you are in breach of our terms of use because of being paid to edit. However, I have emailed a couple of people whom I consider to have far more knowledge about this sort of thing than myself. I may well be missing some nuance in the terms or indeed in WP:COI. - Sitush (talk) 20:31, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Well, it turns out those people are uncomfortable in principle with what is going on but uncertain of what to do about it. A bit like me! There is, of course, also WP:MEAT, although you're definitely mostly editing pretty obscure people and so unlikely to need to gang up against some other contributor. The entire thing is a mess but it looks like it might be a mess caused by acceptance of GLAM. - Sitush (talk) 06:13, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

@Sitush: After reviewing the Gibraltarpedia story, I think there are significant differences between their editing and ours. Firstly, the library itself doesn't benefit monetarily from our edits. There is increased visibility for some items in our collections, and those are free for public viewing. We do often edit on Mormon topics, but we are removed enough from church headquarters that we are free to make edits like on Leonard J. Arrington's page and Battle at Fort Utah. We've also worked on Mormon women's pages, which haven't received the attention they deserve, not because they lack notability, but because previous editors haven't written much about them, like Annie Poon and Lucinda Lee Dalton.

I also don't have any history of working for Wikimedia. I've tried to develop procedures for ensuring that we don't create false consensus. For instance, I never review Amgisseman's DYK submissions or GA nominations, and my other student worker doesn't either (nor do they review mine or each others'). I'm guessing the main concern is the frequency of LDS topics on the DYK page. Since there are other topics that frequently appear on the DYK feature because of enthusiastic non-paid editing, if this is an issue, perhaps a new regulation on frequency of specific DYK topics should be created? If you have future concerns, please address them on my talk page, as Amgisseman pursues other employment soon.Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 16:49, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

@Rachel Helps (BYU): no, my main concern is breach of our terms of use and COI. I don't even look at DYK and wasn't aware of what had been going on until I fixed up an article that Amgisseman had edited. This is not a "future concern" but rather a current one. Although, obviously, it will also apply to whomsoever you may employ next. - Sitush (talk) 17:16, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Article on Dr. Pankaj Naram

Hi, this is Mani from Germany. I had a review of your Article about Pankaj Naram. I have actually copied it into my sandbox and have applied changes there (User:Mgu59/sandbox) Please have a look and use it to your likings. Mgu59 (talk) 14:10, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Many Thanks

Many thanks for expanding the article Wingfield W. Watson and my congratulations for receiving the DYK for expanding article. I started article for the WP Wisconsin project. Also in the Utah State Legislature website, there is a historical listing section about people who had served in the Utah Legislature. You may want to take a look at this. Again my thanks-RFD (talk) 12:39, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Wasatch Front Wicnic 2016

Please join the discussion regarding a Wasatch Front Wicnic for 2016. We'd love to have you come. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 00:02, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for supporting our editathons

	Thank you for contributing to our June 2016 editathons There were over 350 articles on Women in Entertainment, 55 on Jewish Women's History and 50 on Women in LGBTQ Host: Women in Red June 2016 #wikiwomeninred Our next event: Women in Halls of Fame

--Ipigott (talk) 15:58, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

• Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

GA review for Tarlac State University

@Amgisseman(BYU): I made some changes on the page Tarlac State University based on your comments. Please review the edits I've done. Thank you! Jcmpineda (talk) 17:25, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Sources for Leslie Norris page

Hi Alyssa, you mentioned to me that the two biographies the library has on Leslie Norris are checked out, but when I searched Ancestry I found that he has been included in the Biography & Genealogy Master Index (BGMI) and there is a long list of books that have biographical information about him. You can search the library's catalog for any of those titles to see if we have any of those books that you can then use to get some of your citations filled in while you're waiting for those books to be turned back in. Here's the list: http://search.ancestryinstitution.com/cgi-bin/sse.dll?db=bgmi&gss=sfs28_ms_db&new=1&rank=1&msT=1&gsfn=george%20leslie&gsfn_x=0&gsln=norris&gsln_x=0&msbdy=1921&msbdy_x=1&MSAV=0&uidh=r42 Mssarchcat (talk) 19:29, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Amgisseman(BYU), you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Amgisseman(BYU)! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 30 March 2016 (UTC)