User talk:American Eagle/Archive 5

Archive 1

←

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Thank you

• I just want to thank for the award on the Left Behind Series. I hope you have a good day, jvcdude (talk) 09:31, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Midwest Christian Outreach

Just to let you know, this organization is much larger than "Vision Forum" and it's article has more sources, so your "small outreach group" comment was a little inaccurate. Just letting you know, thanks. ;) --SuaveArt (talk) 04:34, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Alright, thanks for explaining. American Eagle (talk) 04:41, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

BTW, I added "allegedly" to the article, because you were actually right that it WAS worded as though their views about "demeaning women, sexism, etc" were a fact.--SuaveArt (talk) 04:42, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

I'll changed it around again. Adding "allegedly" doesn't changed the fact other groups haven't criticized them for it. I've left note on talk page and in edit summary. American Eagle (talk) 04:51, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Are you feeling any déjà vu?

Regarding HiLo, or is it just me? Seregain (talk) 16:04, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

If you mean a similar POV, then yes. If you mean SuaveReborn, who knows? The user is probably just anti-Focus on the Family and wants to discredit them (I expected this after the Super Bowl). American Eagle (talk) 18:34, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Wow, I just found out that Sauve is gone... Who am I going to try and practice WP:CIVIL with? Invmog (talk) 19:39, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Just be nice. You don't really have to practice being nice... ;) American Eagle (talk) 23:02, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Exactly what I meant. I don't think SA would be so bold. Seregain (talk) 17:50, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Ray Comfort

Hello! I was just browsing and came across this article, to which you are listed as a main editor. When was the last time it was assessed? I'm not terribly experienced with such things, but considering the coverage and references, I think it could probably be raised to at least C-class. Just a thought! PrincessofLlyr (talk) 14:42, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

After re-scanning the article and looking at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Assessment#Quality scale, I would agree that the article should be upgraded to C-class (it nearly mirrors the example C-class article). I've now reaccessed it. I'm not extremely experienced at it either, so feel free to override my decision. Thanks for the heads-up! :) American Eagle (talk) 17:33, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

I think that's good! I didn't actually feel comfortable changing it myself since I'm not involved with any of those projects, but I definitely thought it was more than start! PrincessofLlyr (talk) 17:54, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Windows Rot

I have nominated Windows Rot, an article that you have edited, for deletion. I do not think that this article (now a redirect) satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2010_February_25#Windows_Rot. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Meewam (talk) 22:02, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Courageous.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Courageous.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

• If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:33, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Adminship

Hello American Eagle.
You seem to be responsible and experienced user, so would you like me to nominate you for adminship? If you think your your ready, just let me know. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 23:29, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Might you be the same American Eagle as the one on simple Wikipedia? @The High Fin Sperm Whale - if he is, he used to be a Simple Wiki admin :). Airplaneman ✈ 00:22, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

I am indeed that user, Airplaneman. I was also an admin and beaurucrat on the Simple English Wikiquote (which is now closed). To Fin Whale, I'll have to think about it. I know I'm ready, have policy experience and would do fine here as well, but the only thing that troubles me is activity. I've been semi-active for a while, so I can see people not supporting solely based on that. I'll try to increase my activity, ask for a second opinion, and get back to you. Thanks for the offer. :) American Eagle (talk) 03:29, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Sleive gullion

Hi American Eagle - I just wanted to drop you a note that I changed the speedy tag on Sleive gullion to a redirect to Slieve Gullion as a possible spelling mistake. --Kateshortforbob _talk 10:48, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Alright, that's correct. Thanks for working it out! American Eagle (talk) 16:20, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

!?!?!

Where the heck was I!? When did you come out of retirement?--Ezekiel 7:19 ^{†Go Canucks! (sign)} 11:45, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

I don't know! I've been fairly active for several months now, so it's a wonder we haven't crossed paths since that time! Hope all is well with you. :) American Eagle (talk) 16:10, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

"A man of many companions may come to ruin, but there is a friend who sticks closer than a brother."-Proverbs 18:24 --Ezekiel 7:19 ^{†Go Canucks! (sign)} 16:39, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Wow, I just looked at that verse over and over again, and just relized that it sort of fits your prior situation. How convenient.--Ezekiel 7:19 ^{†Go Canucks! (sign)} 13:17, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Very cool! Blessings on your day, American Eagle (talk) 22:23, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Help

Can you help me edit this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_theatrical_film_production_companies to follow the same format as the distributors page, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Theatrical_Film_Companies? It is a lot of work and I would appreciate your help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Misterix (talk • contribs) 02:28, May 2, 2010

Sure! I'll take care of that tomorrow afternoon, Lord willing (probably about 12 hours from now). Goodnight! :) American Eagle (talk) 06:39, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

After checking over this again, it appears everything has been taken care of by others. American Eagle (talk) 21:07, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

RE: Liberal Democrat Friends of Israel

Hello, American Eagle. You have new messages at Talk:Liberal Democrat Friends of Israel.
Message added 19:17, 5 May 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, American Eagle. You have new messages at Uncle Dick's talk page.
Message added 20:12, 5 May 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your mistakes

Hey what about that signature debate we had with Xeno that one time, about using subpage templates as signatures rather than abiding by the rules of sig length. That was a big debate and it probably was the highlight of my first year on Wikipedia.--Ezekiel 7:19 ^{†Go Canucks! (sign)} 16:53, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Oh, I remember that. I don't remember it being very embarrassing to me personally, so I don't think I'll add it. Note: that page doesn't have all the mess-ups I've done; just the worst ones. ;) American Eagle (talk) 19:14, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Ah, now I see.--Ezekiel 7:19 ^{†Go Canucks! (sign)} 16:37, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

SuaveArt IP blocked 1 week

I saw on my watchlist that our little friend was back...since I used to clerk SPI, I asked for someone to look at it ASAP. If he comes back in a week on the same or very similar IP, you can ask the blocking admin Shirik to extend the length. If he pops up again later or on another IP, you can make another case, though next time file it under SuaveArt so we can keep the reports together. Cheers, Auntie E. (talk) 01:29, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

My sock-puppet know-how has gotten a little rusty. ;) I'd forgotten about Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SuaveArt, and was in a hurry to get it filed before leaving. Thanks for the information! American Eagle (talk) 04:04, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

What an idiot. Seriously. There's simply no other way to describe it. Seregain (talk) 03:31, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Some people just have too much time on their hands... :) American Eagle (talk) 04:04, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Courageous

Okay I read what you posted and I won't revert it myself. I think policy requires a deletion review before the article can be re-created, but if it's notable now, then it should meet those requirements without problem. If I were you, I would just file one at Wikipedia:Deletion Review and have this formally resolved. Thanks.--ParisianBlade (talk) 04:26, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Okay, case closed: Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 May 25#Courageous (film) (closed). :) American Eagle (talk) 16:47, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Good. I left a note on the article's talk page that the old AFD decision no longer applies. Thanks for clearing this up.--ParisianBlade (talk) 21:51, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

No problem, and thank you. American Eagle (talk) 21:57, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:11, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Alright, thank you very much! I will not abuse the tools given to me. American Eagle (talk) 18:20, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Improvements to Sherwood Pictures

Wow, nicely done. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 17:52, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! It's still a bit sketchy, will need copy-editing and the "History" is short. However, I agree that the article is looking better now. ;) American Eagle (talk) 18:05, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Clash Entertainment

The article Clash Entertainment has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

notability not established

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Griseum (talk) 13:20, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

• The two sources given don't establish notability. Hopefully you will improve sources and remove tag. --Griseum (talk) 13:20, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Clash Entertainment.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Clash Entertainment.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:37, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Fine by me. Thanks for the notification. American Eagle (talk) 05:41, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Happy Birthday

Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 01:59, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

--Sweet xx^Talk 12:20, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks so much to you both! :) American Eagle (talk) 15:48, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

The Wager

Belatedly, nice work on The Wager (2007 film) - the vast bulk of deleted and userfied articles never make it back again, but your exhaustive hunting about for references looks like it paid off. So congratulations on making the effort! Euryalus (talk) 23:45, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Hey, thanks! I had nearly forgotten about that. American Eagle (talk) 00:43, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

AE from ToO?

Hey There! Was just wondering, same American Eagle from the ToO? If so, then I'm Connie K. from the ToO!Connie Kendall (talk) 19:10, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

And to meet you as well! Hey, best luck on the election! I actually might still vote for you! It's just such a hard decision! Hey, how do you make a guest book?Connie Kendall (talk) 13:28, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Cars 2 vs. Courageous

It's odd that the page for Cars 2 has not been deleted since April 2008 even though it has not begun primary production yet. Courageous was set to start primary production mere weeks after the page was created, yet it ended up being deleted anyway. 71.49.81.124 (talk) 02:49, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

IT'S A CONSPIRACY! ;) I'm just glad the article is up now. American Eagle (talk) 04:59, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

I'm glad too. (^: -Invmog (talk) 19:36, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Courageous

Hey, American Eagle! I just wanted to say thanks for all of your work on the Courageous article. I got to be at the Christian Filmmakers Academy (in San Antonio, Texas) this week and Stephen Kendrick showed us awesome scenes from 'Courageous' and it's definitely well-done, well-acted, and even more awesome than Fireproof! -Invmog (talk) 05:23, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome, Invmog. :) I'm glad to hear positive things about the movie! I can't wait to see it next year! American Eagle (talk) 15:30, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Audio theatre an article to audio dramas

Please if you have time and you know anything to it (I have seen that you have made edits in the article area which owns relations on it) , please look on the article Audio theatre, somebody placed a erase discussion on it. after we have had a merge discussion. It would be interesting what you would say to the merge and the delete discussion. And possibly it could help to contact other people that they should help also. )-: Merry Xmas --Soenke Rahn (talk) 17:01, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:A Thief in the Night.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:A Thief in the Night.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:10, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Poster Question

• I noticed you uploaded a picture for the film "Bella." How can I do this for another film ("The Human Experience") with a copyright protection? I don't want to say it's free for all, because it's not. But it would be nice to have a picture in the article that doesn't get deleted every other day. Thanks! Elianarra (talk) 12:44, 13 January 2011 (EST)

Elianarra (talk) 17:45, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Replying on your talk page... :) American Eagle (talk) 22:32, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Ganfyd for deletion

The article Ganfyd is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ganfyd until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Burhan Ahmed | Penny for your thoughts? 10:26, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Note, this should be linked to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ganfyd (2nd_nomination) instead. —Soap— 12:23, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fireproof soundtrack.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fireproof soundtrack.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:32, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

American Eagle, I have removed the speedy. There are some problems with the servers today. See here for details. Cunard (talk) 05:06, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Hmm, alright. Thank you, Cunard. American Eagle (talk) 06:02, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Apocalypse (film).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Apocalypse (film).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 03:18, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Ron Miller (politician) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ron Miller (politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron Miller (politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mtking (talk) 02:33, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Please accept this invite to join the Conservatism WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to conservatism broadly construed. Lionel (talk) 01:30, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:What If....jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:What If....jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:24, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jonah- A VeggieTales Movie.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jonah- A VeggieTales Movie.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:43, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dave Christiano

The article Dave Christiano has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. No significant coverage of the subject found nor any reviews of his work in reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mileworth (talk) 18:45, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Minor barnstar
	This barnstar is for creating the page National Bible Bee. Though it was a small thing and probably did not take much effort, you still deserve something for it. Legolover26 (talk) 16:43, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Better image and source for "Courageous" poster

I don't know how to do this, but I saw that the filmmakers have a poster image available for download on their website:

http://www.courageousthemovie.com/share

It's bigger, has a better resolution, and is obviously available for fair use. 67.233.238.244 (talk) 16:55, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Actually, fair use images are supposed to be small. We are encouraged not to use the full size versions. Thanks for your suggestion, but I think the picture should stay as-is for now. :) American Eagle (talk) 01:29, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Courageous references

Please see my concerns about the references you added to Courageous (film) at Talk:Courageous_(film)#References. Your additions yesterday need to be fixed. only (talk) 11:45, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Archive 1

←

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6