User talk:Aman rana420

Welcome!

Hello, Aman rana420, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Aman Rana, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kinetic37 (talk) 12:00, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creating a Page Need Help

I am creating a page but i am not able to add image on the infobox can anyone help me with that, i think i am not allowed to perform that action, will anyone upload the picture once my page will go live. I cant do it from side.

Speedy deletion nomination of Aman Rana

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Aman Rana requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kinetic37 (talk) 12:00, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Malana cream

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Malana cream, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Largoplazo (talk) 17:49, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rajendra Bhagwat for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rajendra Bhagwat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajendra Bhagwat until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Theroadislong (talk) 12:57, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse

Hello Aman rana420,

The answer that you gave at the Teahouse regarding wiring an autobiography was inaccurate and unhelpful. I see that you only have 21 edits to Wikipedia. You cannot possibly be familiar enough with our policies and guidelines to answer Teahouse questions properly. Please do not answer questions there until you have several months of experience, and are sure that your answer is correct. Thank you. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 20:47, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SwisterTwister (talk • contribs) 22:22, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the mistake will not give such opinions in future Aman rana420 (talk) 05:17, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rajendra Bhagwat

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rajendra Bhagwat, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 2607:FB90:6628:54BC:793A:1192:C45D:6572 (talk) 01:52, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please guide me throughout this situation i am trying to improve my knowledge about wiki and willing to learn wiki. Please suggest me what should i do next. Do i have to re-write the whole article or do some major changes. Will i be able to make another page or not.Aman rana420 (talk) 05:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aman rana420 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is a request please unblock me, i will not be doing any thing inappropriate in future. I assure you i will not perform any wrong actions. I am here to learn and enhance my skills and provide information to the wiki that i have. i promise i will doing everything under Wikipedia guidelines and will not post anything before consulting other wikipedians

Decline reason:

It's not at all clear you understand why your existing contributions have been inappropriate. You are welcome to request another unblock, but you need to convince us you have read and understood WP:PROMO and WP:COI and WP:NOTE. Yamla (talk) 12:06, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aman rana420 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear admin, I have thoroughly gone through the wikipedia guidelines in the past month and ensure you that such instance of violating the wikipedia guidelines will not happen again. If required, will approach another editor or admin if I have any query before updating or while creating a page. Please unblock me so I can start my work again with Wikipedia. Aman rana420 (talk) 14:34, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's still not clear to me that you know what guidelines you have violated. 331dot (talk) 17:00, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.