User talk:Algebraist/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Algebraist. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
- If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!
By the way, Ana Layevska is a copyright violation. CryptoDerk 21:03, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for help
Thanks a lot for replying . Ranjinikmenon (talk) 08:43, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Speedy Deletes
Nice move on catching all the speedy deletes; the more they're caught before they move into the mainstream, the less there'll be. Good job. ^_^ --Mitsukai 17:17, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
- From me too, thanks :) --Golbez 19:46, May 16, 2005 (UTC)
Hello
I was amazed how quickly you corrected the link error on the Jacopo da Bologna page. How did you find it?? --DrG 22:45, 2005 May 14 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing it up. I was going to look over Google, but then suddenly marked it as unimportant because I had to step out for a bit. Thanks again. 10qwerty 23:22, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
198.20.32.254
I don't know what happened to the block (it's possible that someone else had already blocked the address without placing a warning on the page, in which case my block would have expired when the earlier block dis — but I don't think so). Anyway, I've blocked the address for another month. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 15:16, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
Mongols
Hi there! I dispute this was a copyright violation -- I know how serious they are, and no one with any decency steals another's scholarship. But when you study the two articles, there is obviously no copyright violation! I worked very hard on my article, and while it agrees in principle with some of the conclusions of the cited copyrighted article, it is not a violation! Most of the similarity centers on the structure of the forces -- and there are not many ways to say that they structured in mandibles of ten, et al! Anyway, I wanted to protest the removal of my legitimate article for a violation that was not one... John
(note: posted on my user page by 68.50.125.89. Moved here as a record. Algebraist 16:22, 19 May 2005 (UTC))
Greetings again -- the page cited as the source for violation was originally written by me! I cannot violate my own work, so I again ask that you review the article, and note that it is in no way a violation. It is my own work, cullied from many a source, and rewritten so that it is my original work...JOHN PS THANKS FOR LISTENING!
- The site that John's article supposedly violated ([1]) actually has the explicit copyright notise: This article was derived fully or in part from the article Mongol invasion of Europe on Wikipedia - the free encyclopedia. All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. John's article is certainly not a copyvio. →Iñgōlemo← talk 18:01, 2005 May 24 (UTC)
Insulting edit
You marked Freud Museum for wikification, which I found insulting. Okay, I forgot to put the name in bold. Why couldn't you just do it yourself? There could be more links, but like many people I disapprove of irrelevant wikilinks, if you want some, please add them yourself. CalJW 16:55, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
A reminder: Redirects are quick, easy and cheap. And common misspellings are listed under What do we use redirects for?. Thanks. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 16:49, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
- Just so you know, in many American accents, the last "e" sounds more like a "u" sound. That is why many Americans misspell it as theorum. Happy editing. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 17:00, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
Sorry for the error
Sorry for my misperception. It doesn't matter that much, because John's article should probably be merged back into Mongol invasion of Europe, anyway. →Iñgōlemo← talk 23:38, 2005 May 24 (UTC)
New articles
I see you got to me before I was about to revert an article. Very good. • Thorpe • 17:47, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
Better dead than red
please see Talk:Operation August Storm#Better dead than red, we are discussing some edits you made to a page called Battle of Manchuria which were later merged into Operation August Storm, information on your source for these additions would be appreciated. --Philip Baird Shearer 16:56, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for editing my articles on the Bankes and for cleaning them up! —Preceding unsigned comment added by LordHarris (talk • contribs)
Removing tags
Please never remove copyvio tags from articles as you did with St John Of God Pathology. Follow the instructions in the template itself. And don't paste copyrighted work to Wikipedia. Conscious 13:55, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting
Hey, thanks for reverting the vandalism to my talk page so quickly. I appreciate it! Cue the Strings 17:57, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Autoblock removal request
- Done --pgk 18:03, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
23.4%
Hi
Is your answer to my question about the proportion of the earth that experiences sub zero temperatures a joke, a estimate, or a sourced statistic? It's hard to tell the tone of someone's voice in print...
Aaadddaaammm 04:23, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Merci
Thank you for your prompt answer to my question. --wpktsfs 20:01, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Brand Image
Well that works out, thanks! :) Wildthing61476 15:23, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Merci Beaucoup
Thank you for notifying me. Amphitere 17:51, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks and a question
Thank you for the solution. It took me some tim e to figure out, since I haven't learned about multiple integrals, but it was what I was looking for. I have a question, and you might not know the answer, but here it is. I have a TI-89 Titanium calculator, so I typed in the integral you gave, and it came out with the right answer, except it was multiplied by sin(infinity). Do you have any idea why? Thanks again. --71.185.134.107 01:28, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Deficency
You're right it was given by Alan Beardon. It's nice to meet someone who was also there. I was a prospective student looking around to see if it was the place for me. You looking around as well? Algebra man 14:38, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Yeah I did like it thanks - thought the lecture Beardon gave was great, it really interested me - as you can see from all the questions I'm asking. The other one though not so much - thought it was very boring. I'm not an applied mathematician! Cambridge is lovely though. I went to Clare and it had such a great setting. Actually I'd love to talk to you in a way that gets faster responses if you don't mind of course. If you don't then my email addy is. I'd really appreciate talking to a student. Whether you're going to add me or not though could you please take my addy off of wikipedia asap! Algebra man 19:28, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Disaster Area (fictional band)
Thanks!
Atlant 20:00, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
- No problem. Wikipedia needs many more redirects. Algebraist 20:49, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
embedding arbitrary groups in SO(n)
Hi Algebraist -- thanks for your simple counterexample to that claim. One note: since SO(n) can be viewed as a subset of Mat(n,n), which is isomorphic to Rn^2, the cardinality of SO(n) is at most the cardinality of R. (The existence of circle subgroups proves equality.) The reference to Weyl's unitary trick is also appreciated. Tesseran 19:23, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
Oh yeah!!! That's right!!! (ATx)T is the trick I was looking for. And since vectors in the GSL are stored in a row/column free notation, I could even save on the cost of the outer transpose. Thank you so much Algebraist. You truly are an Algebraist! 76.65.13.133 14:30, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Little context in Amy mackelden
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Amy mackelden, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Amy mackelden is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Amy mackelden, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 02:30, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Jal
Thanks for noting my mistake and correcting it!
--Bert612 21:19, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Civility
Please remember to be civil. Corvus cornix 19:25, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
MM Green Picture- thanks
After putting in the help me thingy I found the instructions on how to handle pix on wikipedia. I have now been able to adapt your work and make it a thumb pic with a caption. Thank you.
IceDragon64 22:26, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your Help with the Garstangs
It really helped out a lot! Ktrosvik 02:49, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Constant
Thanks for helping me with the box in the constant article. If you have any suggestions to improve the article, please send me a message! Randomblue (talk) 20:48, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Image copyright
Thanks for the help with my question, and even providing the write copyright tag thing I'll need to use. I really appreciate it.--revotfel★ 01:39, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your assistance
Hi, thanks for your assistance provided to me. lol.. im just like you.. just an editor. just don't have the spirit nor time to do researches.ADouBTor (talk) 07:17, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Thank you, good sir.
Thanks~ -Carados (talk) 15:45, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for help with GDFL tag
Big help with Robert Aitken, musician image tag. quick. greatStingdin (talk) 20:06, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your help with my Friendly Config
Thanks so much! :)
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! The Helpful One (Talk) (Contributions) 18:53, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks, re Chopin Etude
Thanks, Algebraist. I had actually cleared my cache a number of times, but the problem persisted. But now, all seems to be working well! Prof.rick (talk) 19:03, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Help me number 3
{{helpme}}
If there is a proposed or suggested merger of two articles that has been lingering on for three months (since October 2007) ... how and when does someone (an administrator?) officially come in and close the discussion and end the proposed merger? See Valediction. Please advise. Thanks. (Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 01:00, 7 January 2008 (UTC))
- This seems to be covered in WP:MERGE. Don't hesitate to ask again if that doesn't help. Algebraist 03:05, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Hi. Thanks for your response. Actually, though, I am still confused. So, who determines the consensus ... and when? Just anybody ... or some administrator? That proposal has been lingering around for 3 months ... and, frankly, I'd like to get it off my plate and out of my Watch List at some point. Are you an administrator ... if not, how do I contact one? Many thanks. Please reply at my Talk Page, so that I will be sure to see your reply. Thanks. (Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 03:34, 7 January 2008 (UTC))
- I am not an administrator, and all I know about merges is from WP:MERGE, which seems to suggest that an admin is not necessary. If you want to talk to an admin, the administators' noticeboard is the obvious place. Algebraist 03:37, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- OK. Thanks. I will try that link to the administrators' notice board. Thank you. (Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 05:36, 7 January 2008 (UTC))
Thanks
Thanks for your advice. I will keep a note of that for later times. It is truly appreciated. Unfortunately, I'm too dumb to find articles that already have the code and to just copy it. But thanks a lot! Cheers! -- penubag 04:11, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Just to let you know, I responded to the already archived question at Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Mathematics/2008 January 15#Iterated automorphisms, and gave a very partial answer to your followup question. JackSchmidt (talk) 05:51, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Help me
Re: Allan Melvin - (Rest in Peace)
I really don't know too much about how info-boxes work. I tried to fix this problem, but I could not figure out how to do so. So, can anyone out there figure this out? In the actor's info-box in the Allan Melvin article ... when you are in "editing mode" ... it has the following three lines:
- occupation = Actor, Impressionist, Voice Over
- notable role = "Sam Franklin" on The Brady Bunch and "Barney Hefner" on All in the Family
- spouse = Amalia Melvin (1943-2008)
But, when you look at the actual article, that middle line (notable role) does not appear at all. Can anyone fix this? I have no idea how to do so. Thanks. (Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 17:30, 19 January 2008 (UTC))
- The problem is simple: the template {{Infobox actor}} does not have a parameter titled 'notable role' and as far as I can see it never has. Thus any value assigned to that parameter is simply ignored. The only solution (if you wish this information to appear in the box) is to rewrite the template. Since the template is both protected and complicated, this probably involved asking someone else to do it. Algebraist 17:59, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- On close inspection, the field did once exist, but was removed following discussion here. Looks like you'll have an argument on your hands if you do want it back. Algebraist 18:04, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- OK. That makes sense. So, it is a "dead" field, and it will not appear (even when typed in). I was absolutely sure that I had seen some "Notable Roles" in actor info-boxes before. But, that may have been before the Wiki decision to remove the field. Thanks. You were helpful in resolving this. Thank you. (Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 18:23, 19 January 2008 (UTC))
Thank You
Thanks for your help on my Talk Page, when I posted a Help Me request to change colors for column headings. Your solution worked perfectly, and I was able to implement it. Many thanks. (Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 17:16, 28 January 2008 (UTC))
Portal
I have created a portal called Portal:Animal and I am lacking of experience to edit it. Could somebody help me to improve it?--Mark Chung (talk) 14:15, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Help Me Response
Thank you, Algebraist-- I found the previous response where you said it was. One day I hope to get a grasp of Wikipedia's modus operandi.Wugo (talk) 17:37, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Your help with my problems in editing the article on Louis Auchincloss
Many thanks for your help with the footnotes and with making the link to the radio interview work. I shall try yet again to master the rules for inserting footnotes, preferably with more success this time.CWO (talk) 12:08, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
Hi. Thanks for your help with Abraham Kuyper. I couldn't figure that out for anything - such a dumb mistake on my part too :(
Much appreciated! Tjbergsma (talk) 13:19, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Yellow Cabin request for help
Hi Algebrist, Thanks for getting back to me so quickly.
I put a help tag on my talk page because someone put a {{Welcomespam}} tag on it, and as it was unsigned I was unable to discuss the matter with whoever put it there. So I was hoping for a third-person viewpoint. Basically, I have created a website, Wikipopuli, to be a potential home for Wikipedia bio articles that fall afoul of WP:BIO. (As well as any biographical material that people would like to put up on their own.) What I've been doing is visiting the talk pages of users who have created articles undergoing AfD for non-notability and suggesting that they transwiki such articles to Wikipopuli. While I can see how this can be considered using Wikipedia to promote another site, I was hoping that my intentions would be seen as wiki-friendly in that I'm helping frustrated users find a new home for their content, while Wikipedia is kept free of material that editors deem unsuitable.
In short, I'm seeking advice and guidance on how best to proceed. I'd like to offer helpful suggestions to those who might benefit, without falling afoul of Wikipedia rules or generally creating a nuisance. TheYellowCabin (talk) 16:56, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
- I appreciate your help TheYellowCabin (talk) 17:19, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
You expressed interest in this. I have done a draft translation into English which you can find in one of my user pages here. I suggest we keep it there until people feel it is good enough to replace the actual article. Please check it with great care, and leave any comments at the head of the page. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 22:42, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thanks
you helped a lot. there are some riddles on my user page now.Chubbennaitor (talk) 15:11, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Pronunciation
I asked for clarification of the MoS page regarding pronunciation entries. Your input at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (pronunciation)#Referencing would be appreciated.—RJH (talk) 23:03, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanking you
Thanks for answering my query. Astonishing how easily you overlook the obvious.Skteosk (talk) 23:37, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
I hereby award you the extremely rare Titled-in-Polish,-Southern-Marsupial-Mole-Shaped Barnstar of Taxobox Help (pictured here in its natural sandy habitat).
--Shirt58 (talk) 09:02, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the help
Thankyou for helping me it really helped. Chubbennaitor (talk) 18:12, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Border
Hey, thanks for responding to my request for some help. I'm having a problem with the border, though. Whenever I set the parameter for the text to be bordered, I get {{{1}}} instead. Check here to see what I mean. Is it not possible to draw a border around something that big? Thanks for the help. -- JTHolla! 23:16, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
RE: Moving images
Hmm, now why didn't I notice that? Anyway, thanks for telling me.--Sunny910910 (talk|Contributions|Guest) 02:31, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
- Looks like there isn't an easy way out of this. ;-)--Sunny910910 (talk|Contributions|Guest) 02:32, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks, but I don't create other people's talk pages.Kitty53 (talk) 02:27, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, I usually let people do it themselves, but if I have to warn a vandal, I will keep your advice in mind. Thank you, Algebraist.Kitty53 (talk) 02:29, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Kitty53 (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Thank you so much for warning that anonymous user. He (or she) should know better than to vandalize my hard work.Kitty53 (talk) 02:43, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Admin
Hi. I'm seeing you everywhere. Are you an admin? If not, why not? Imagine Reason (talk) 22:00, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Question for you
Hi! I just added a picture on the Glenn Strange article. Can you check to see I did everything correct.
Thanks Electric Japan (talk) 16:56, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
For you answer on 13 points :) --Molobo (talk) 22:23, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Re:Template talk:Cquote#A little help needed :)
You genius - thank you!
Now you've told me, I remember reading it, but I just didn't realise that was the problem! Well, since you were willing to be nice for me:
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | ||
For helping me with my silly little coding problem without a second thought. Drum guy (talk) 21:47, 31 March 2008 (UTC) |
Have a nice day :) Drum guy (talk) 21:47, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Re: Enigmaman
[2] - "...we aren't normally this careless." - Not such a great thing to say towards/about a fellow contributor, friend. I think it's one of those occasions where you can AGF User:Enigmaman. He, quite clearly, believed the user to be a vandal. If the user is actually a positive contributor then I'm sure Enigma would apologise, but from the evidence available to him at the time he had no choice but to warn him. Best regards, ScarianCall me Pat! 15:36, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- Replies: Blanking pages is improper whether the user thinks the content is appropriate or not. There are ways of going about things. Going around repeatedly blanking pages is not the way to go. 68.237.250.13 (talk) 17:19, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- Enigmaman replied as an IP on my talk page. ScarianCall me Pat! 17:22, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Award
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | ||
Thanks so much for the help on WikiProject Commonwealth realms! Another user had already tried to fix it and failed! Thanks again!--Cameron (t|p|c) 14:46, 15 April 2008 (UTC) |
Thanks for your help!
Thanks for pointing me to WP:CATSCAN it was exactly the tool I've been looking for. I really appreciate it.Lot49a (talk) 11:02, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Adminship
Hello Algebraist, this is Surfer-boy94 and you being an experienced wikipedian and you are probably an administrator, what chance would you say that I would have of becoming an administrator if i requested for adminship? I have made lots of constructive edits to wikipedia recently and can you please tell me if I have any chance of becoming one, because I don't want to request and be dissapointed with the results. Thanks, Surfer-boy94. Surfer-boy94 (talk) 15:12, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Congratulations
For this. What a brilliant leap of logic. --Major Bonkers (talk) 09:32, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Memory pairs
Algebraist, thanks for your response to my query on the name of the game. I'm writing an English-language text about it for distribution in various countries and only knew of it as "Concentration" (1950s/60s U.S.A.). -- Deborahjay (talk) 13:21, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Help me
I wondered how i put an uncatagorised article into a catagory using this hotcat that I have seen around and about on the recent changes. Do you know how to do it? Computermadgeek (talk) 15:16, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
I cant seem to get it to work. I have ticked it off on the list and I have also installed the twinkle because that sounds really good. Computermadgeek (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 15:40, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for helping me
Thanks for the speedy response —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr.whiskers (talk • contribs) 12:00, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Nice work
Nice work, I missed that one.
Cheers, JaakobouChalk Talk 16:12, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for help 2
Wow!
fast reply! Thank you so much - that is PRECISELY the page i meant (where do you find such pages? you cant get them on wiki-search!)
and that link for the post-log return to...that was great!
you're my friend for life - i'm bookmarking you! :-)
A.Aryadne (talk) 15:02, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thank you again! it's a useful page. A. Aryadne (talk) 16:36, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for Replying
Hey Algebraist, you are the only one who has even replied to my question. Thanks for that and thanks for catching the mistake I made. The purpose of reproducing this is that this was a homework question in my Real Analysis class a while ago. The teacher asked us to prove that the integral of f(x) (as defined there) is infinite. We went and asked him if there was a mistake. Maybe he meant to write f(x)=[1/x] instead. He said no, he wrote what he meant to write. The teacher and I kept arguing back and forth. I tried convincing him by drawing the graph and by actually finding the integral. He was convinced for a short while but then he came back the next day and said that we made a fool out of him and confused him. English is not his first language so he thought that we confused him with the language. He said that was originally right and the integral is infinite. And then, he told me not to use "too much English" nor to use pictures in my argument. And he told me to write up all of my arguments on paper using rigorous Mathematics and then defend it in front of him. So, for the last few days, I have been preparing my arguments and I put them here to get some feedback. This is not for points, credit, or even extra credit. Just a little something on the side but he is very particular, so I can't just handwave anymore (I tried that). I think that this much detail is enough. I don't want to leave any shroud of doubt in his mind so that tomorrow he may come back with a counterargument.A Real Kaiser (talk) 19:55, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Hey, I actually did think about that and I proved an additional property showing exactly what you described so that I can find the Riemann integral the way I did. Thanks again!A Real Kaiser (talk) 06:04, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for rearranging things at the proposals discussion. I'm replying here instead just because I didn't want to take any more attention away from the actual proposal in that section. So thanks again. Equazcion •✗/C • 01:13, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
deleted article
I listed it in a subpage, and I am fairly positive I would not have put it there as a red link. I seldom do not copy and paste these sorts of things. I do not know if I have edited it. Oh well. --Emesee (talk) 22:03, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
TX
Thank you for response. Ivans Lisicins (talk) 13:23, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
I noticed he had vandalised, just reported him at WP:ANI at the Avril vandalism thread. Anonymous101 (talk) 20:13, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
Troubling comments on David Strother
Hi Algebraist. You helped me to get David Strother up and running here, but someone named Longhair criticized the article. Search David Strother violinist. Please advise on how I should proceed. Thanks a million! Dragonfly213 (talk) 02:01, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
sharp edges
Your post to Talk:Jūminhyō was deleted by you. Algebraist 10:02, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
- Good thing there are no sharp edges on this software. I could hurt myself.--Mak Allen (talk) 10:56, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Why e?
diff. Zain Ebrahim (talk) 13:39, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
- Probably because I'm much more into analysis than geometry. Of course, the two numbers (and the two fields) are intimately related. Algebraist 13:41, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
- Please don't restore that thread without Lara's consent. It gives her last name. If she wants it to be displayed, she can restore it. Shapiros10 contact meMy work 15:51, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
Template:Otherplaces
Thanks for this. I'm not sure why I stuck that in. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 22:56, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
Help
I noticed you're online. Would you please fix my formula on the Maths desk? Thanks. Zain Ebrahim (talk) 13:36, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot! I struggle with that code. Zain Ebrahim (talk) 13:43, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Da Da!
The Reference Desk Barnstar | ||
For his phenomenal work at the Reference Desks, I hereby award User:Algebraist The Reference Desk Barnstar Zain Ebrahim (talk) 14:03, 21 June 2008 (UTC) |
- I was going to go with the Random Acts of Kindness but you're probably bored of those now. Zain Ebrahim (talk) 14:03, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | ||
Thanks for your hard work adding cateogries to the Smith/Colbert/O'REilly feud page today Smith Jones (talk) 01:06, 29 June 2008 (UTC)! Smith Jones (talk) 12:40, 25 January 2008 (UTC) |
With appreciation
(After receiving TWM'sB) Well thank you - very much appreciated especially coming from someone with your rep at RD-town. Oh, and as for the time consumed, I should mention that I type telekinetically ;-) Now get hoppin' on that long overdue thing of yours! hydnjo talk 14:10, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
- Do I have a rep at RD? I hadn't noticed. My userpage'll come into existence when I think of something useful to put there. It'll probably describe my DPhil work once I work out what that's on. Algebraist 16:15, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
- Your RD rep isn't something you can see, it's something that we all imagine about you. I didn't mean to put pressure on you, I was just kidding around :-) hydnjo talk 20:59, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for backing me up on this persistant vandal. Bearian (talk) 14:06, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | ||
For preventing a persistant vandal from returning to do more evil. Bearian (talk) 14:08, 30 June 2008 (UTC) |
Scottish captains
Thanks for answering my question on the reference desk. - X201 (talk) 21:47, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Username signature question of ref desk
I've deleted/redirected that question to the users talk page, and hopefully given them enough links to work out what to do when customising their signature. I would have replied on 'Zain Ebrahim's' talk page but that appears to be blockedto my editing. See User_talk:Earthan_Philosopher#Hello_and_welcome should you need to give further info to them...87.102.86.73 (talk) 16:44, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Don't know how to deal with new topic - End Times Round Table and other entries
Hi! Thanks for getting back to me on this. There's an interesting phenomenon based around Christian internet web sites, where it appears as if either doctrinal bias or attempts to control communication are spawning new boards.
I blundered into this based on the popular site Rapture Ready. After a day or so on the board, I was banned from it, based on a sweeping purge of users who had been involved in a particular thread. The thread showed over 150,000 hits when it was shut down by the moderators. At first, I thought I was banned because of something I did or said, then I found out that I was lumped in with another user who got banned, then shortly found out that over 100 users were banned from the site. I was surprised to find that this had happened before - perhaps more than once; my research isn't complete - creating another board called Walking With Jesus.
The whole process is one that would be of great interest to those who are comparing world events to biblical prophesy.
My initial thought is that there should be topics on the Christian boards and references on a few existing topics, eschatology, end times, and perhaps further mention in the Christian Internet category.
I added the initial entry for the End Times Round Table as a starting point, knowing it was not terribly complete, but using it as a starting point to present the information I've found.
I'm very new to Wikipedia and I'm not sure what the right way is to do this. Do you have any suggestions for how to do this?
Thanks