Jump to content

User talk:Akrasia25/Archive 7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1←Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
29 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Magister Juris (talk) Add sources
3,421 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Turtle (talk) Add sources
2,415 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Queen Elizabeth 2 (talk) Add sources
32 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Protostegidae (talk) Add sources
7 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Santanachelys (talk) Add sources
657 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Odd-toed ungulate (talk) Add sources
4 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Oscar Strasnoy (talk) Cleanup
13 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Piet Borst (talk) Cleanup
1,258 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Mercedes-AMG GT (talk) Cleanup
12 Quality: High, Assessed class: GA, Predicted class: GA Statue of Christopher Columbus (Providence, Rhode Island) (talk) Expand
108 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Cheloniidae (talk) Expand
89 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Kelenken (talk) Expand
2,201 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Internment of Japanese Americans (talk) Unencyclopaedic
6 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Motor skill consolidation (talk) Unencyclopaedic
54 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Rhodanic Republic (talk) Unencyclopaedic
13 Quality: Low, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: Start Desmatochelys padillai (talk) Merge
177 Quality: High, Assessed class: GA, Predicted class: FA Paranthropus boisei (talk) Merge
866 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Malaria vaccine (talk) Merge
1,144 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C Vertebral column (talk) Wikify
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Jorge Lavelli (talk) Wikify
46 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Blainville's beaked whale (talk) Wikify
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Learning enterprises (talk) Orphan
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Luo Niansheng (talk) Orphan
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Daniel F. Spulber (talk) Orphan
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Syllomus (talk) Stub
8 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Ctenochelys (talk) Stub
18 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Adocus (talk) Stub
8 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Carcinosomatoidea (talk) Stub
11 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Toxochelys (talk) Stub
13 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Kuehneotheriidae (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:38, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

National varieties of English

Information icon Hello. In a recent edit to the page Water Works Park (Tampa, Florida), you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Zeng8r (talk) 18:24, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

I usually default to ddmmyy. This is a local Florida park so better to go to mmddyyy. I live here in Tampa too. --Akrasia25 (talk) 19:01, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Excellent, I'm glad to see another local editor working on local articles. However, with regards to formatting, you've twice changed the dates in the references at Water Works Park (Tampa, Florida) to day-month-year, which is not standard American English, while you (properly) changed them to month-day-year at Cuban sandwich. Am I missing something? Zeng8r (talk) 19:24, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
opps. ok my bad--Akrasia25 (talk) 23:32, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

June 2021 at Women in Red

Women in Red | June 2021, Volume 7, Issue 6, Numbers 184, 188, 196, 199, 200, 201


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:48, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Featuring your work on Wikipedia's front page: DYKs

Thank you for your recent articles, including Michał Głowiński, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. This can be also done through this helpful user script: User:SD0001/DYK-helper. Let me know if you need help, Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:01, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages

Thank you for your recent articles, including Michał Głowiński, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like {{WikiProject Keyword}} to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Wikipedia:Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:01, 4 June 2021 (UTC) Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:01, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

July 2021 at Women in Red

Women in Red | July 2021, Volume 7, Issue 7, Numbers 184, 188, 202, 203, 204, 205


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 16:04, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

A barnstar for you!

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
I am aiming for 200 Good Articles by Christmas. I now have 169 Good Articles. Appreciate you reviewing my GANs. Doug Coldwell (talk) 12:33, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
I am aiming for 200 Good Articles by Christmas. I now have 169 Good Articles. Appreciate you reviewing my GANs. Doug Coldwell (talk) 12:33, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
I am aiming for 200 Good Articles by Christmas. I now have 169 Good Articles. Appreciate you reviewing my GANs. Doug Coldwell (talk) 12:33, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Introducing myself

Hi I just wanted to say it's great to meet other editors, and I wanted to let you know that your intentions are well-meaning regarding the editing of NCCIH article, and that I too, respect science, the scientific method, and believe many forms of alternative medicine can be harmful and it is in the public interest for them to know that. Regarding the examples box, however, it's one example of NPOV violations that occur on these alternative medicine articles, where a large portion of statements are cherry-picked, often from "skeptics" blogs and podcasts. In the examples, it makes sense to show examples of experiments that had no effect, and it makes sense, proportionately, to show at least one that did have positive effects. That would provide a better sampling for a reader. I would love to hear your thoughts about that, though. Pyrrho the Skeptic (talk) 18:00, 9 July 2021 (UTC)


Happy to have you here and please keep involved. It is an amazing hobby for me. Besides the other links I posted on the talk page I enjoy (re)reading WP:MEDRS for what constitutes reliable sources for health claims, and WP:FRINGE and WP:PSCI for guidance on neutrality for fringe topics such as this.

Not sure why one example would be a good thing to profile "show at least one that did have positive effects" --Akrasia25 (talk) 19:12, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

I'll give it another shot to explain. How is it helpful to anyone to have 100% of examples selected that show funded studies that were inconclusive or did not show results, when it might be helpful to know that a sizeable percentage resulted in interesting and helpful findings about meditation or yoga, etc.? In looking through the history of studies funded by the organization, only a very small percentage of them are studies of things like prayer, and distance healing, and those are given undue weight. There is nothing wrong with pointing out criticisms of the org in this article. But the box is intended for "examples" of their funded research, and those should not be cherry-picked (I'm sure you can admit that they are) to show 100% failure of the funding used, which is absolutely not the case. Pyrrho the Skeptic (talk) 19:32, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Chetsford (talk) 03:35, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Thank you for your helpful copyedits to William B. Jordan. — The Most Comfortable Chair 11:01, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

August Editathons at Women in Red

Women in Red | August 2021, Volume 7, Issue 8, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 206, 207


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:23, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Concern regarding Draft:Embassy of Ukraine, Belgrade

Information icon Hello, Akrasia25. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Embassy of Ukraine, Belgrade, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Short descriptions

G'day Akrasia25! I have noticed you changing some short descriptions on articles, and wondered if you had read WP:SHORTDESC? Importantly, WP:SDLENGTH which specifies that a short description should be short (ie no more than about 40 characters). Please try to stick close to those parameters and the other guidance on that page when making changes to short descriptions. Thanks so much, and enjoy your editing! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:55, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Sorry for reverting some of your edits ... I had no idea about Wikipedia:Short description#"None" as a short description until now! I've self-reverted. Graham87 03:56, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
Not a problem. I just found out about it myself reading the project page. Makes sense doesn’t it? Some titles the pages are the short description and pretty obvious. Must have been a lot of reverting. Akrasia25 (talk) 09:42, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
Yeah it does make sense. Fortunately I'd only reverted you on six pages before I came to my senses. Graham87 13:51, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

July drive bling

The Modest Barnstar
This barnstar is awarded to Akrasia25 for copy edits totaling over 4,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Miniapolis 13:55, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Short descriptions

You appear to be doing unhelpful edits to short descriptions, such as these:

  • 9 August 2021 1037841640 - «Changing short description from "A smooth, complex affine variety admits a Morse function" to "smooth, complex affine variety admits a Morse function" Shortdesc helper)»
  • 9 August 2021 1037841470 - «Changing short description from "A bound on the analytic rank of an elliptic curve in terms of its conductor" to "bound in mathematics" Shortdesc helper)»
  • 9 August 2021 1037840642 - «Changing short description from "A certain quartic has a solution if it has a solution in an extension of odd degree" to "mathematical theorem" Shortdesc helper)»
  • 9 August 2021 1037840606 - «Changing short description from "A smooth, complex affine variety admits a Morse function" to "mathematical theorem" Shortdesc helper)»

Please see David Eppstein's comment in this task. If I have made a mistake, please ping me and let me know. Thanks! ― Qwerfjkltalk 06:55, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

@Qwerfjkl: That is fine. I read WP:SDNOTDEF and specifically these
  • avoid jargon, and use simple, readily comprehensible terms that do not require pre-existing detailed knowledge of the subject
  • avoid duplicating information that is already in the title (but don't worry too much if you need to repeat a word or two for context)
  • start with the most important information (mobile applications may truncate long descriptions).

But that is fine. I don't really care.--Akrasia25 (talk) 10:10, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

Short Description Barnstar
Thanks so much for helping out with my task at the Reward Board! 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk, FAQ, contribs) 23:54, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Short descriptions (cont'd)

In case you missed Peacemaker67's post above, thought I'd mention again that per WP:SDFORMAT, we should try to keep short descriptions at 40 characters or less as much as possible. Your recent addition here has been shortened to comply with that. Thank you. --GoneIn60 (talk) 19:24, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Zipline (drone delivery)


Double-tuned amplifier

This is the third time you have added an unacceptable short description to this article, and the second time you have added exactly the same thing. Please don't edit war over this. SpinningSpark 20:46, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Sorry I didn’t remember that I had already tried to put in a short description to this article. Can you put one one in since I obviously don’t know what it is? The article is a GA and we are trying to put in a SD for every article and this one keeps coming up in the list. Someone else is likely to come along and attempt it too. Akrasia25 (talk) 21:03, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

I did (and a shorter one than yours), but it immediately got overwritten with the same inane stuff by somebody else. I'm not saying it is not a tuned amplifier. It is. I'm saying that is worthless as a short description. The article title already tells you that. SpinningSpark 21:32, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
I think I see the problem. Your SD edit is not actually being published (?!). So it still shows up as being empty and I come along with my list and see an empty SD. I can publish it for you but "tuned amplifier with transformer coupling between the amplifier stages" is 70 characters long and SD should be less than 40 characters. What would you like it to say?--Akrasia25 (talk) 19:33, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
That "somebody else" was me, and you're right, it was rather inane now that I think about it. However, your proposal "Amplifier tuned on both sides of the stage coupling transformers" at 64 characters wasn't any better than the one originally inserted by Akrasia25. The solution here is to insert "{{Short description|none}}". Some articles simply don't need one when their title is self-explanatory. --GoneIn60 (talk) 04:17, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
I’ve done that before by putting in "none" so I’m open to do that here as well. Maybe I should cut and paste this to the talk page of the article as well so it doesn’t get reverted again. Everybody OK with that? Akrasia25 (talk) 08:13, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Go for it, but realize that drive-by editors rarely look at the talk page first. --GoneIn60 (talk) 19:19, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Serengeti National Park copyedit


Welcome aboard!

The SPFLT Achievement Patch
For service to Project Spaceflight. Neopeius (talk) 13:55, 24 August 2021 (UTC)


I would definitely love to work with you on the early days of spaceflight. :) Do you have any particular special interests? Also, if you are on Discord, we have a sub-group of early spaceflight enthusiasts. My username is Galactic Journey#0837. --Neopeius (talk) 13:55, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

That is awesome. Thanks for the response. I guess I like the sixties history. I have David Baker's History of Manned Spaceflight on my desk right now and want to go through it and add to articles. I especially like creating new articles but filling out infoboxes is less exciting (but needed effort). I see more redlinks on the Russian side of things so tell me what you need help with. Also, I am good with ce.--Akrasia25 (talk) 16:37, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

September 2021 at Women in Red

Women in Red | September 2021, Volume 7, Issue 9, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 207, 208


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 22:28, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

"None"

Akrasia25, that four-letter word is possibly not the most helpful short description imaginable, and there are many imaginable replies to its creation. I'll just say that it would be much appreciated if you could either write a few words of short desc based on each article's lead – not difficult, and not time-consuming, if you feel like editing such things – or to leave well alone if you do not. Many thanks for your understanding and co-operation, Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:52, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

I guess you do not know aboutWP:SDNONE If an article title is sufficiently detailed that an additional short description would not be helpful, e.g. Alpine skiing at the 1960 Winter Olympics – Men's downhill, a description of "none" should be used to remove the article from the missing-description tracking categories, thus: .--Akrasia25 (talk) 13:56, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Well, removing an article from a missing-description list by supplying an intentionally-null and totally useless description is actually worse than useless. Other editors may be using the missing-description list to find articles that need a description, and if so, you might be fouling up their search, don't you think? I'd say this was rapid progress in a backwards direction. Also, please don't split discussions across 2 or more talk pages, as it makes them hard to follow. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:05, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
I am using the missing-description list to find articles that need a description and clearing out a WP project to put short descriptions on good articles.https://petscan.wmflabs.org/?&project=wikipedia&ns%5B0%5D=1&sortby=title&edits%5Bbots%5D=both&templates_yes=Good%20article&interface_language=en&since_rev0=&edits%5Banons%5D=both&negcats=Articles%20with%20short%20description&cb_labels_no_l=1&search_max_results=500&cb_labels_yes_l=1&active_tab=tab_output&language=en&edits%5Bflagged%5D=both&cb_labels_any_l=1&doit=%7Cadd

If you have a specific article that could have used a better SD please go ahead but my point stands that NONE is the agreed WP policy on many articles with good descriptive titles. NONE is not a totally useless description in many cases. --Akrasia25 (talk) 14:11, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you!

Short Description Barnstar
Thanks for joining the collaboration to add short descriptions to all good articles; you've helped them live up to their moniker! Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}} talk 18:57, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
For your valued work in the July 2021 GAN Backlog Drive, which, in a single month, helped to reduce the backlog by nearly 50%. --Usernameunique (talk) 04:43, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Opson (operation)

Information icon Hello, Akrasia25. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Opson (operation), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:02, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Bibliography

Bibliographies, often combined with shortened inline footnotes linked by Template:Sfn, are found in a great many articles in Wikipedia. They are all but standard for articles about significant aircraft types (eg Airbus A340, Boeing 767) and ships (eg SS Normandie and RMS Olympic), and are also common in articles about automobile models (eg Brabham BT49 and Lexus LS).

Over many years, I have added many bibliographies to Wikipedia articles about automobiles and ships, and never once has such a bibliography been deleted.

Combining shortened inline footnotes with a bibliography is usually superior to having nothing more than inline footnotes, partly because a bibliography provides a more easily accessible list of printed sources than a references section populated only by a mess of assorted inline references (compare, eg, the Brabham BT49 article with the 300 SL article in its present state), and partly because a bibliography can include other sources that are not (yet) the subject of inline footnotes.

I do not consider WP:NOTDIRECTORY to be relevant to bibliographies, except where it says, right at the end, that "... for example, Wikipedia should not include a list of all books published by HarperCollins but may include a bibliography of books written by HarperCollins author Veronica Roth." That comment, in fact, simply emphasises the whole point of a bibliography in Wikipedia: to provide the reader with an easily accessible list of books on, or written by, the subject of the article. I have been a Wikipedia editor for more than a decade, and when I tell people that I edit Wikipedia, they often reply that the aspect of Wikipedia they find most useful is that Wikipedia articles provide them with easily accessible information about reliable sources on the subject matter of the relevant article.

I cannot agree that the articles on the Mercedes-Benz 300 SL and the 300 SLR are not candidates for GA or higher. The 300 SL is one of the most famous road cars ever made, and the 300 SLR is a more famous race car than the Brabham BT49, which has long been the subject of a GA article. Adding a bibliography to the 300 SL and SLR articles is one of the steps editors would normally take to improve an article that might eventually be GA. With that in mind, I intend, in the near future, to rearrange the references section of the 300 SL article, to add to the bibliography most of the books presently included in the inline references, and to link those books with the inline references using Template:Sfn. The 300 SLR article is even more in need of a referencing upgrade (as stated in the hatnote to that article): at the moment, almost none of its content is properly referenced, and a copyeditor could therefore justifiably delete almost all of that content. If you want to link the bibliography in either article to inline footnotes, then you are welcome to do so, preferably using Template:Sfn to make it easier for readers to move from the inline citation to the cited work in the bibliography.

As for the particular books I have so far included in the two bibliographies I added, these are all well-known books written and published this century by a well-known and respected author the subject of a Wikipedia article of his own (Karl Ludvigsen). They are all still available for purchase brand new. No doubt there are other books that could be added to at least the 300 SL bibliography and linked to inline citations using Template:Sfn, but even so, that would not justify the deletion of the sources I have added. Bahnfrend (talk) 14:02, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

October 2021 at Women in Red

Women in Red | October 2021, Volume 7, Issue 10, Numbers 184, 188, 209, 210, 211


Online events:


Special event:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 01:34, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Mercedes-Benz 300 SL copyedit

Thanks a lot. You did a real number on the ce. Very well done. Thank you. --Akrasia25 (talk) 14:19, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Glad to help. All the best, Miniapolis 23:31, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

November 2021 at Women in Red

Women in Red | November 2021, Volume 7, Issue 11, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 212, 213


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:27, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

December 2021 at Women in Red

Women in Red | December 2021, Volume 7, Issue 12, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 214, 215, 216


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:10, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Invitation to take part in a survey about medical topics on Wikipedia

Dear fellow editor,

I am Piotr Konieczny, a sociologist of new media at Hanyang University (and User:Piotrus on Wikipedia). I would like to better understand Wikipedia's volunteers who edit medical topics, many associated with the WikiProject Medicine, and known to create some of the highest quality content on Wikipedia. I hope that the lessons I can learn from you that I will present to the academic audience will benefit both the WikiProject Medicine (improving your understanding of yourself and helping to promote it and attract new volunteers) and the wider world of medical volunteering and academia. Open access copy of the resulting research will be made available at WikiProject's Medicine upon the completion of the project.

All questions are optional. The survey is divided into 4 parts: 1 - Brief description of yourself; 2 - Questions about your volunteering; 3 - Questions about WikiProject Medicine and 4 - Questions about Wikipedia's coverage of medical topics.

Please note that by filling out this questionnaire, you consent to participate in this research. The survey is anonymous and all personal details relevant to your experience will be kept private and will not be transferred to any third party.

I appreciate your support of this research and thank you in advance for taking the time to participate and share your experiences! If you have any questions at all, please feel free to contact me at my Wikipedia user page or through my email listed on the survey page (or by Wikipedia email this user function).

The survey is accessible through the LINK HERE.

Piotr Konieczny
Associate Professor
Hanyang University
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:24, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Survey about History on Wikipedia (If you are resident in the United States)

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. You must be 18 years of age or older, reside in the United States to participate in this study. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 18:06, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

January 2022 Women in Red

Happy New Year from Women in Red Jan 2022, Vol 8, Issue 1, Nos 214, 216, 217, 218, 219


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

  • Encourage someone to become a WiR member this month.
Go to Women in RedJoin WikiProject Women in Red

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:01, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Mercedes 300 SL

Hello

Why was the reference regardig Karajan ownership of a Mercedes 300 SL was taken out ? The reference as very clear ? Am I wrong? Regards Mcbranco — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcbranco (talk • contribs) 15:34, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

The reference listed is a bare URL and does not have things like title, author, date. Can you see the template pull down menu? That makes it easier to enter these. I hope that helps.--Akrasia25 (talk) 02:29, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

February with Women in Red

Women in Red Feb 2022, Vol 8, Issue 2, Nos 214, 217, 220, 221, 222


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

March editathons

Women in Red Mar 2022, Vol 8, Issue 3, Nos 214, 217, 222, 223, 224, 225


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:36, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Rejuvenate WikiProject Skepticism

Hello - my name is Susan Gerbic (Sgerbic) and I'm writing to you because at some point you joined Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism. This might have been months ago - or even years ago. With the best of intentions the project was created years ago, and sadly like many WikiProjects has started to go dormant. A group of us are attempting to revitalize the Skepticism project, already we have begun to clean up the main page and I've just redone the participant page. No one is in charge of this project, it is member directed, which might have been the reason it almost went dormant. We are attempting to bring back conversations on the talk page and have two subprojects as well, in the hopes that it might spark involvement and a way of getting to know each other better. One was created several years ago but is very well organized and a lot of progress was made, Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism/Skeptical organisations in Europe. The other I created a couple weeks ago, it is very simple and has a silly name Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism/Skepticism Stub Sub-Project Project (SSSPP). This sub-project runs from March 1 to June 1, 2022. We are attempting to rewrite skepticism stubs and add them to this list. As you can see we have already made progress.

The reason I'm writing to you now is because we would love to have you come back to the project and become involved, either by working on one of the sub-projects, proposing your own (and managing it), or just hanging out on the talk page getting to know the other editors and maybe donate some of your wisdom to some of the conversations. As I said, no one is in charge, so if you have something in mind you would like to see done, please suggest it on the talk page and hopefully others will agree. Please add the project to your watchlist, update your personal user page showing you are a proud member of WikiProject Skepticism. And DIVE in, this is what the work list looks like [1] frightening at first glance, but we have already started chipping away at it.

The Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism/Participants page has gone though a giant change - you may want to update your information. And of course if this project no longer interests you, please remove your name from the participant list, we would hate to see you go, but completely understand.

Thank you for your time, I hope to edit with you in the future.Sgerbic (talk) 06:46, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

April Editathons from Women in Red

Women in Red Apr 2022, Vol 8, Issue 4, Nos 214, 217, 226, 227, 228


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:44, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Delano

Thanks for the help on that article. I was on mobile at the time, which doesnt have the undo shortcut that the computer has, so that was a rough edit on my part. thanks.--ADHD and i hate speedy accusations of bs ChiserYT (talk) 15:26, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Confederate Flag page

Why do you keep undoing my edit on the "confederate flags" page? I am trying to get rid of any accusation of racism. The flag is not "a symbol of racism", but it is true that many believe it to be as such. Please stop reverting that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aceplante (talk • contribs) 23:38, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

My talk page is not the place to discuss a particular edit. I am not the only editor who disagrees with you so please watch out for the three revert rule which you are now against. Reach consensus on this issue on the article's talk page.--Akrasia25 (talk) 12:28, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
I was not aware of that rule, all I know is you keep reverting my removal of accusatory/inflammatory language for some reason. Again, please stop reverting. I am also not the only person against your continual reverts. Aceplante (talk) 03:27, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
You mean the IP whose edit looks very similar to yours and whose other edits to other articles were also reverted? Doug Weller talk 08:57, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

May Women in Red events

Women in Red May 2022, Vol 8, Issue 5, Nos 214, 217, 227, 229, 230


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:51, 30 April 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Hello, I'm in the process of reverting some links you made on Lepidoptera articles. Where either the scientific or common name is already linked it's not necessary or helpful to link the other one. A reader would see two links and think they must go to different places, then would be confused. Sorry to be lighting up your revert list. SchreiberBike | ⌨  21:38, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks. I wondered about that. I stopped part way too. Appreciate you telling me in such a nice way too. Sorry you have to correct my edits.--Akrasia25 (talk) 22:36, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive
  • On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives.
Click here to opt out of any future messages.

(t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

June events from Women in Red

Women in Red June 2022, Vol 8, Issue 6, Nos 214, 217, 227, 231, 232, 233


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:19, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Welcome!

Hi Akrasia25, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Because I saw you are working on spaceflight-related articles, I thought the general intro, spaceflight collaboration and the Constellation program pages would be helpful to you. Happy editing! Starship SN20 (talk) 18:48, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hi Akrasia25, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Because I saw you are working on spaceflight-related articles, I thought the general intro, spaceflight collaboration and the Constellation program pages would be helpful to you. Happy editing! Starship SN20 (talk) 18:48, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

List of museums in Kosovo moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of museums in Kosovo, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MB 17:40, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

List of museums in South Ossetia moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of museums in South Ossetia, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MB 17:45, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

List of museums in the Republic of Artsakh moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of museums in the Republic of Artsakh, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MB 17:46, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Hey, They all do have references. Can you not see them? Also they have links to the actual articles in wikipedia. Akrasia25 (talk) 17:48, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

List of museums in Transnistria moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of museums in Transnistria, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MB 17:46, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Hey, They all do have references. Can you not see them? Also they have links to the actual articles in wikipedia. Akrasia25 (talk) 17:48, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of museums in Transnistria (June 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 18:06, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Akrasia25! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:06, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of museums in South Ossetia (June 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mcmatter was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
A list article of a single entry is not viable as a list, especially if that item doesn't have it's own article. Please see WP:SAL and WP:NLIST
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 18:23, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of museums in Kosovo (June 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CookieMonster755 was:
This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
cookie monster 755 05:34, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
33 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B History of Nagorno-Karabakh (talk) Add sources
12 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Guana Tolomato Matanzas National Estuarine Research Reserve (talk) Add sources
47 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Inner Mongolian independence movement (talk) Add sources
439 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Yuri Knorozov (talk) Add sources
10 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Cypress Creek Preserve (talk) Add sources
61 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Galician independence movement (talk) Add sources
34 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Vojvodina Autonomist Movement (talk) Cleanup
124 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Pan-nationalism (talk) Cleanup
10 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C San Elijo Lagoon (talk) Cleanup
416 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Hillsborough County, Florida (talk) Expand
109 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Han nationalism (talk) Expand
14 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Wallmapuwen (talk) Expand
106 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Siberian regionalism (talk) Unencyclopaedic
110 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Vietnamese nationalism (talk) Unencyclopaedic
103 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Armenian-occupied territories surrounding Nagorno-Karabakh (talk) Unencyclopaedic
5 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Morgan Territory (talk) Merge
123 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Assyrian independence movement (talk) Merge
94 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Assyrian nationalism (talk) Merge
9 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Kashubian Association (talk) Wikify
46 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C Finnish nationalism (talk) Wikify
11 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C Cosumnes River Preserve (talk) Wikify
7 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Se7en Wetlands (talk) Orphan
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Shirin Su bathhouse (talk) Orphan
4 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Raguf Orujov (talk) Orphan
56 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub USS Paul Ignatius (talk) Stub
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Wolf Branch Nature Preserve (talk) Stub
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Alafia River Reserve (talk) Stub
20 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Alafia River (talk) Stub
13 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Lithia Springs Regional Park (talk) Stub
53 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Aragonese nationalism (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:43, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Women in Red in July 2022

Women in Red July 2022, Vol 8, Issue 7, Nos 214, 217, 234, 235


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

AfC notification: Draft:List of museums in the Republic of Artsakh has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:List of museums in the Republic of Artsakh. Thanks! – 333-blue at 06:47, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Women in Red in August 2022

Women in Red August 2022, Vol 8, Issue 8, Nos 214, 217, 236, 237, 238, 239


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:57, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

AfC notification: Draft:List of museums in the Republic of Artsakh has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:List of museums in the Republic of Artsakh. Thanks! Spudlace (talk) 15:46, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of museums in the Republic of Artsakh has been accepted

List of museums in the Republic of Artsakh, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 07:39, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:List of museums in Transnistria

Information icon Hello, Akrasia25. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of museums in Transnistria, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:00, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:List of museums in South Ossetia

Information icon Hello, Akrasia25. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of museums in South Ossetia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:List of museums in Kosovo

Information icon Hello, Akrasia25. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of museums in Kosovo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:02, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of museums in Transnistria

Hello, Akrasia25. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of museums in Transnistria".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:33, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of museums in South Ossetia

Hello, Akrasia25. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of museums in South Ossetia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:33, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of museums in Kosovo

Hello, Akrasia25. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of museums in Kosovo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:35, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment

You are receiving this message because you were a Good article reviewer on at least one article that is part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 or you signed up for messages. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of Good articles for copyright and other problems, unless a reviewer opens an independent Good article reassessment and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information. A list of the GA reviewers can be found here. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. You can opt in or out of further messages at this page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:20, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Friedreich's ataxia

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Friedreich's ataxia, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:44, 8 May 2023 (UTC)  Done--Akrasia25 (talk) 16:59, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

Hello! Sorry to be so late in getting back to you. You expressed interest in working on old spaceflight articles? I always enjoy company! :) Neopeius (talk) 20:29, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Embassy of Ukraine, Ljubljana for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Embassy of Ukraine, Ljubljana, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of Ukraine, Ljubljana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Akrasia25/Archive_7&oldid=1241908528"