User talk:Aj indiana

Clean up

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Ranjit Singh, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. MoonlightVector^{Talk page} 15:19, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Sansi tribe. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 12:06, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to User talk:RegentsPark while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:RegentsPark&diff=1049222552&oldid=1048772549&diffmode=source RegentsPark (comment) 16:04, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Internet problem, Refresh process, automatically logout my account.Aj indiana (talk) 16:06, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I,m not used IP address.Aj indiana (talk) 16:09, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ranjit Singh. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. MoonlightVector^{Talk page} 12:55, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Ranjit Singh shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

I,m not reverting this page.I,m only Restore this page. Aj indiana (talk) 13:07, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please, fix your grammar. Its [I'm} not [I,m]. I restored it to the last stable version as i found neither of you guys in the right. MoonlightVector^{Talk page} 13:10, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

== Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Perryprog was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Aj indiana/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Aj indiana/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Perryprog (talk) 00:56, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aj indiana! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Perryprog (talk) 00:56, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About your sandbox

Hi Aj indiana, I noticed you tried to start an AfC for your sandbox. This is not necessary; you may freely create and modify anything within your own userspace (i.e. User:Aj indiana/ and User talk:Aj indiana/), provided that they don't breach some sort of policy (see here). You can create your sandbox yourself (you're already autoconfirmed) and play around in there as you please. Happy tinkering! Liamyangll (talk to me! | My contribs!) 01:28, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Again, you may freely play around and draft an article here; again, if you wanted to just create the sandbox, that has already been done, but since it is currently empty right now, it cannot be accepted for an AfC. Apologies for any misunderstanding. Liamyangll (talk to me! | My contribs!) 01:37, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced BLP edits

Hello, I'm Ohnoitsjamie. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:54, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions—such as editing restrictions or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 17:38, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Raghuvanshi Clan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raghuvanshi Clan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raghuvanshi Clan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Vanjagenije (talk) 08:19, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

clean up

Disambiguation link notification for October 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sukerchakia Misl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Amritsar. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hiraj tribe moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Hiraj tribe, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Htanaungg (talk) 07:00, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

hello i want to contact you Actually there are many admin editors of Rajput community, they are stealing the history of Ahir Jat community, erasing it, should some action be taken against them? my insta username @yadavanshi_kshatriya. 2409:4053:2E0D:67BE:0:0:5789:4210 (talk) 11:23, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

how can I help u.Aj indiana (talk) 11:25, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dhillon, you may be blocked from editing. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:52, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dhillon Vandalism ? What happened, What Vandalism in Dhillon, please check my Dhillon edit, Tell me changes. Aj indiana (talk) 12:12, 4 November 2021 (UTC) Wish you Happy Diwali wikipedia friend.[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Jat Clans

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on List of Jat Clans requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Jat clans. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GPL93 (talk) 17:41, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing. I'm sorry, Aj indiana, but competence and clear communication are required in order to edit here.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 01:25, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:MehmoodS always vandalism with my edits, please block this person also. Aj indiana (talk) 02:52, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you have blocked me then block this MehmoodS person also, please take action on this MehmoodS person also, please take person also. Because both individuals are blocked according to Wikipedia rules, unilateral action is not taken. Aj indiana (talk) 02:58, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aj indiana (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If you have blocked me then block this MehmoodS person also, please take action on this MehmoodS person also, please take person also. Because both individuals are blocked according to Wikipedia rules, unilateral action is not taken.Aj indiana (talk) 02:59, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

A complaint about someone else not being blocked is not a valid reason for us to unblock. Also, per below. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:07, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To the reviewing admin, please also be advised of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Naseeb2468 (permalink), on which basis I have tagged this account as a suspected sock. I usually don't bother doing a full sockpuppetry review when an account is already indeffed, but the filing presents solid circumstantial evidence, and I can do a more thorough review if desired by an admin considering an unblock. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 04:55, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
And, clerk hat off, please also note these mass unconstructive redirect changes that I've just reverted. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 05:01, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Hiraj tribe

Hello, Aj indiana. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hiraj tribe, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]