User talk:Adibens

October 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Extreme Rules (2019), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. GoldMiner24 ^Talk 18:51, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GoldMiner24 you're mistaken I only added further details of the match and removed a false statement so my edit wasn't unconstructive in any way. I watch WWE regularly so I'm well aware of how these matches panned out. Adibens (talk) 06:36, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Karunamoyee Rani Rashmoni. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ButterCashier (talk) 13:54, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ButterCashier I accidentally published my edit before it was completed. It wasn't unconstructive and I was fixing some typos and information in the article. Please take some time to figure out my edits instead of blindly reverting them. Adibens (talk) 13:57, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for editing Wikipedia. I commend you for helping edit articles, just try to make sure they're finished before submitting them in the future. I've reverted falsely before and had to undo my reverts so such a mistake is understandable. ButterCashier (talk) 14:01, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove maintenance templates without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Maria Lawton, you may be blocked from editing. Do not interfere with the history merge. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:38, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Robert McClenon, I didn't copy the article from any draft I created it myself so why should it be merged? Adibens (talk) 17:47, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mayar Badhon (TV series) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mayar Badhon (TV series), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 18:34, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Adibens. Thank you for your work on Maria Lawton. User:Pyrrho the Skipper, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for your your contribution. It might be wise to rewrite some parts to be a bit more neutral in tone, without terms such as "best selling" and "notable figures"

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Pyrrho the Skipper}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Pyrrho the Skipper (talk) 20:08, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copy-Paste

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give draft:Maria Lawton a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Maria Lawton. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:25, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mayar Badhon (TV series) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mayar Badhon (TV series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mayar Badhon (TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:29, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Articles are placed back into the Draft namespace for a reason. That reason was to Gove you the opportunity to do the work top prove it to be notable. Since you have moved it back to mainspace without even making the attempt it is now being discussed for deletion. Please contribute to that discussion with policy based arguments if you wish it top be kept. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:31, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Timtrent, I really think it's ready to be an article and there are no further improvements I can make. Adibens (talk) 13:43, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The community will decide. You have created an article with negligible referencing and chosen to force it into main space. I think it unlikely to be kept 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:14, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kundo Phooler Mala moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kundo Phooler Mala, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:11, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kundo Phooler Mala for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kundo Phooler Mala is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kundo Phooler Mala until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

W 42 17:59, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October blitz bling

		The Modest Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to Adibens for copy edits totaling over 2,000 words (including rollover words) during the GOCE October 2022 Copy Editing Blitz. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Miniapolis 20:32, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kundo Phooler Mala for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kundo Phooler Mala is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kundo Phooler Mala (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Oaktree b (talk) 14:48, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cody Gakpo

Hello, Adibens. It appears that you reverted my edits (18:02, 18:03, 21 November 2022‎) on Cody Gakpo, may I ask you what was wrong with my edits on Cody Gakpo? If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.--Arkaitz1974 (talk) 08:18, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Spain - France in Euro 2024

Why do you keep changing the order of Spain-France? The source, Uefa, clearly shows that Spain is the "home team", home team is on the left, away team on the right. DenSportgladeSkåningen (talk) 11:13, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Hello, I'm Frost. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Yamla that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Frost 15:18, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]