User talk:Adhesivecobra17

August 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to San Jose del Monte has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: San Jose del Monte was changed by Adhesivecobra17 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.893728 on 2018-08-06T09:51:59+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:52, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Adhesivecobra17, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Adhesivecobra17! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2100 (June 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToBeFree was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2100&redirect=no instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You can edit the redirect at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2100&redirect=no
You can view the history and previous revisions of the article at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2100&action=history
You can discuss this at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:55, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2100 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2100, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:55, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2100 (June 13)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Dan arndt was: undefined

Dan arndt (talk) 09:41, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:2100 concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:2100, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:27, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2100

Hello, Adhesivecobra17. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2100".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 10:38, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Time formatting and storage bugs, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 19:36, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Time formatting and storage bugs, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The *Show preview* button is right next to the *Publish changes* button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 19:36, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm starting to learn on how to edit any pages in Wikipedia but the problem is I can't write a page about anything in both English and and my native language Tagalog. Please can you help me what can I do to contribute more here in Wikipedia. Thank you. Jessica Adhesivecobra17 (talk) 05:41, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Greater Manila Area, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. We don't add flags to most infoboxes, see MOS:FLAGINFOBOX. Regards, P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:56, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Miss Earth, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:31, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly giving my apologies to all Wikipedia users and editors. That my account was hacked without any traces of the suspect who done that to me and to Wikipedia community. Adhesivecobra17 (talk) 19:33, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Miss Earth. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:46, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Baitong Jareerat Petsom moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Baitong Jareerat Petsom, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 03:29, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Baitong Jareerat Petsom

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Baitong Jareerat Petsom requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Itcouldbepossible^Talk 13:48, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jareerat Petsom moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jareerat Petsom, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Aoyoigian (talk) 07:58, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jareerat Petsom moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jareerat Petsom, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Juggyevil (talk) 21:06, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jareerat Petsom for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jareerat Petsom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jareerat Petsom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

2pou (talk) 07:12, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dayanara Torres, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mira quién baila. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello, I'm Sciencefish. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Catriona Gray have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. See WP:NOSOCIAL Sciencefish (talk) 10:44, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Karolina Bielawska has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Sciencefish (talk) 13:04, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Editors are expected to treat each other with respect and civility. On this encyclopedia project, editors assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not appear to do at Karolina Bielawska. Here is Wikipedia's welcome page, and it is hoped that you will assume the good faith of other editors and continue to help us improve Wikipedia! Thank you very much! Star Mississippi 13:04, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Miss World 2021 has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. bonadea contributions talk 20:58, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Karolina Bielawska moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Karolina Bielawska, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 04:35, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Karolina Bielawska moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Karolina Bielawska, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page and wait for someone else to approve it or not. Star Mississippi 16:37, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I already made some efforts to put some reliable sources for the page I named to Miss World 2021 winner Karolina Bielawska as an honor to her. Adhesivecobra17 (talk) 18:23, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

then you're welcome to resubmit it, but you may not move it to mainspace yourself. Star Mississippi 18:27, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karolina Bielawska (March 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbrks was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Subject is certainly notable. However, the draft cannot be accepted as is. For one, Wikipedia cannot be used as a source. Moreover, there are far too many unsourced claims in the draft. For example, the entire "Personal life" and "Career" sections are unsourced, as well as the first two paragraphs of "Pageantry" (general rule of thumb: never end a paragraph without a source). Please fix these issues and resubmit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Karolina Bielawska and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Karolina Bielawska, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– Pbrks ^(t • c) 19:19, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Karolina Bielawska has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Karolina Bielawska. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 00:41, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But by the way I'm still trying my best. Adhesivecobra17 (talk) 00:46, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rizal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Morong.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft submission

Hey, I saw that you submitted one draft, which I created and wasn't ready to be submitted as it was moved back from mainspace. Please don't submit anyone's else draft unless you don't fix it or add additional information. Ask the creator before submitting cause sometimes it might affect the creator and the article will have a higher chance to get rejected. DIVINE 📪 05:18, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Priyanka Rani Joshi has been accepted

Priyanka Rani Joshi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DIVINE 21:31, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Adhesivecobra17

Thank you for creating Karolina Bielawska.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:19, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn: Thanks and thank you to all the Wikipedia communityAdhesivecobra17 (talk) 07:51, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Baitong Jareerat Petsom

Hello, Adhesivecobra17. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Baitong Jareerat Petsom, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Baitong Jareerat Petsom

Hello, Adhesivecobra17. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Baitong Jareerat Petsom".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:14, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Jenny Ramp. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. WP:DOB is one of the more serious aspects of WP:BLP. Toddst1 (talk) 21:51, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, sorry for the unwell act I did. I think I forgot to add the link of a biographical content that I searched last time. Adhesivecobra17 (talk) 02:28, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And I want to please you to remove the deletion notices on the pages I made here in Wikipedia. My works will be lost Adhesivecobra17 (talk) 02:33, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jareerat Petsom birthdate

In this edit you said she confirmed her birth date on Instagram. That's great! But can you give the link so we can use that as a citation?--GRuban (talk) 18:39, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proper way to insert images in infoboxes

Hello @Adhesivecobra17. I am @Archer1234. I noticed your recent edit to Valeria Ayos where you added an image to the infobox. I want to let you know that the way you added the image was not done according to Wikipedia's Manual of Style (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE).

When adding an image to an infobox, thumbnails should NOT be used. Simply supplying the file name will work. For example, to use File:Image PlaceHolder.png, you can simply use |image=Image PlaceHolder.png. Captions should be specified with the |caption= parameter. Every infobox is different and the documentation for the infobox in question should be consulted for the proper parameters to match the image and caption.

To fix

Do not use the full image syntax:

|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]

Instead, just supply the name of the image. So, in this case you can simply do:

|image=SomeImage.jpg

and optionally:

|caption=Some image caption.

Hopefully you will find this information useful for your future editing. If you have any questions about this, feel free to ask. — Archer1234 (talk) 16:23, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this message and I learned a lot from you. Adhesivecobra17 (talk) 16:34, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable source for 301,129 sqkm area of Philippines?

Hello. You added a claim of 301,129 square kilometers area of the Philippines in place of 300,000 sqkm. Could you cite a reliable source for that claim? Unless a reliable source is cited, the 300,000 sqkm will be used since it has already been cited by credible sources. Sanglahi86 (talk) 13:20, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The number 301,129 sq. Km. I have that from a 2009 calendar copy of Mercury Drug. Which was stated on the map behind the monthly calendar.

But according to a Wikipedia page titled: Island groups of the Philippines. The land area stated there is 301,896 Sq. Km. Not exactly 300,000 sq. km. Adhesivecobra17 (talk) 14:29, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Just informing that I have posted about the (new) land area figures at Talk:Philippines to get more feedback from other contributors. The change may need consensus since the 300,000 has long been the commonly known figure. Regards. Sanglahi86 (talk) 15:53, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alaska Time Zone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nome.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Venezuela at the Big Four international beauty pageants (November 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lightoil was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Draft is too pro Venezuelan.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Venezuela at the Big Four international beauty pageants and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lightoil (talk) 14:46, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Morbidthoughts (talk) 02:18, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nikki Benz

The main issue is that IMDB is not a reliable source per WP:RS/IMDB to establish birthdates or birthplaces. Morbidthoughts (talk) 02:23, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced biographical content, again

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Đỗ Thị Lan Anh. ☆ Bri (talk) 07:18, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll apologize for that action. Since this is Wikipedia and I will try to avoid any misinformation in order to keep the accountability and credibility of Wikipedia to all internet users. Adhesivecobra17 (talk) 15:09, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miss Earth 2024 2 (January 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by TechnoSquirrel69 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

It's way too soon to be creating an article about the 2025 pageant. We're going to have to wait a little bit until the subject starts getting covered in reliable sources. Let me know if you have any questions.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Miss Earth 2024 2 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 19:33, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sierra Valley Gardens (February 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Additional references from reliable sources are essential to demonstrate notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sierra Valley Gardens and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 08:38, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sierra Valley Gardens (February 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No evidence of notability, two of the three sources cited are the developer's own website.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sierra Valley Gardens and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:36, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andok's (February 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Resubmitted without any improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andok's and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:36, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sierra Valley Gardens has been accepted

Sierra Valley Gardens, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Toadette^Edit! 07:09, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Lindsey Coffey. You have been cautioned about this before. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:49, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Southeast Metro Manila Expressway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MRT Line 4.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:56, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Miss Shqipëria, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. You have been warned a number of times about adding unsourced material and still you keep doing it. Sciencefish (talk) 08:03, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miss Earth 2025 (November 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hey man im josh was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Miss Earth 2025 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hey man im josh (talk) 14:43, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]