Jump to content

User talk:Aderksen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Aderksen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Talk Page Protocol

[edit]

Hi,

Regards this edit, I understand the impulse to delete an answered question but I give you the answer I got when I did exactly the same thing. Talk pages are used as a record of the discussion and issues raised in the past, so even when answered or obselete they should not be deleted. You are free to delete messages on your own talk page (this page), but for article pages, archiving is the only appropriate way to remove text from a page. It's only used when the page gets quite lonog, 60K or more. Feel free to comment or question on my talk page if you're curious or otherwise interested in doing so. Thanks, WLU (talk) 13:48, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Check out WP:ARCHIVE for instructions and general protocol. If you're worried about the comment you put up without signing, you can just add your sig now, or you can put an {{unsigned}} template, with a pipe and your username (i.e. {{unsigned|Aderksen}} which produces — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aderksen (talkcontribs) ). It's a bit tricky since the original comment was added a while ago, but thirps appears to be a low traffic page, so it's not much to worry about.
Generally you just leave the whole page up until it reaches a certain size (70-100K+) rather than age then archive the whole thing. Leave the old stuff in so people can see it has already been noted or whatever, plus blanking talk page contents looks like vandalism. It's not a big deal, everyone makes mistakes and in some cases it ends up being a good thing 'cause you learn something new. WLU (talk) 19:19, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Also of note, there's a format for spacing talk page postings, each post uses one level of indent more than the previous (with indents produced by the first character of a message being the ":" see WP:TP and WP:TPG for more information. You might also be interested in this essay for noobs I wrote. Some of it is funny and it's a broad overview of wiki's processes and mores. WLU (talk) 19:36, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed your edit summary. To this, all I have to say is BE BOLD!!!! Mistakes can be corrected. WLU (talk) 19:52, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your input! I've replied at Talk:Anomalocarid. If you're interested in Cambrian life, you might be interested in joining the Cambrian explosion taskforce which is trying to improve a number of related articles. Best, Martin (Smith609 – Talk) 01:04, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! And glad to see you've signed up on the task force page. Hopefully there's plenty to interest you on the "to do" list after we smarten up the "Anomalocarid" family. Let me know if there's anything I can do to help! Martin (Smith609 – Talk) 01:22, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Drop me an e-mail through WP and I'll reply with the Dzik paper. How important is the other one? I might be able to find and scan a paper version, but it would involve quite a lot of effort! Martin (Smith609 – Talk) 01:55, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

[edit]

You nominated a page for AfD, but it does not appear to have been listed there. cygnis insignis 04:53, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Forgive my inexperience - I did mark/nominate this page for deletion... but obviously I am doing something wrong. What else do I need to add to schedule it for termination? Aderksen (talk) 14:47, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing, someone sorted it out. It showed up as a redlink for me, but I see that the page has been created now. The discussion is at Articles for deletion/List of parasitic organisms. Your comments on the list's talk page have been copied over there. I happen to think it should be kept, per WP:Lists (i.e. not an article), but others may see it another way. Let me know if you need any assistance, or links to policy that might support your view. Oh!, and welcome to wikipedia. cygnis insignis 15:16, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You've been Invited!

[edit]

You have been invited to join WikiProject Insects!! Join today and work with me and other members (project just made 22:44, 19 November 2009 (UTC)) in a collaboration on improving insect orders and creating pages of insect families. Things like insect-related awards, userboxes, topicons, ect. are also coming soon.

Also, sense your interested in thrips, you would be pleasured to bring to GA status to me, just tell me when your ready!! Bugboy52.4 | =-= 23:03, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your view sought

[edit]

As a member of WP Arthropods, you might have a view on this discussion. Thanks in advance. Heds (talk) 03:53, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Scav Hynt

[edit]

Hi - thanks for your message. I've decided to use the Proposed Deletion procedure here. Gives it 7 days to improve or it's deleted but is less bureaucratic than Articles for Deletion and not as aggressive as Speedy Deletion. See what happens now. If they remove the Prod tag (which they can) I will AFD or Nominate for Speedy Deletion. Exxolon (talk) 15:46, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thrips palmi‎

[edit]

Hello, and thanks for your work on Thrips palmi‎. Regarding its categorization, please note that in WP:CSL#Categories it says that An article should usually not be in both a category and its subcategory..., so Category:Insects is redundant, since it's already in the child/grandchild categories of Category:Thrips, Category:Pest insects, Category:Insect vectors of plant pathogens and Category:Agricultural pest insects. Note that there are very few insect species articles in Category:Insects, for this very reason. Thanks, Nanodance (talk) 10:54, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A request for comment

[edit]

As a member of Wikiproject insects you maybe want to voice your opinion this discussion on the use of vernacular or scientific names in higher ranking taxa. Bugboy52.4 ¦ =-= 12:40, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Select agent, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nipah and Hendra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:24, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Rhynchophorus ferrugineus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kombai (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Science lovers wanted!

[edit]
Science lovers wanted!
Hi! I'm serving as the wikipedian-in-residence at the Smithsonian Institution Archives until June! One of my goals as resident, is to work with Wikipedians and staff to improve content on Wikipedia about people who have collections held in the Archives - most of these are scientists who held roles within the Smithsonian and/or federal government. I thought you might like to participate since you are interested in entomlogy! Sign up to participate here and dive into articles needing expansion and creation on our to-do list. Feel free to make a request for images or materials at the request page, and of course, if you share your successes at the outcomes page you will receive the SIA barnstar! Thanks for your interest, and I look forward to your participation! Sarah (talk) 18:23, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SIA project!

[edit]

Hey Aderksen! So happy that you came by the Smithsonian Institution Archives project and signed up to participate! We've got a great list of subjects that need to be improved upon or written about. I do hope you'll visit the to-do list and dive in - do let me know if you need anything. And of course, your contributions can earn you the official oh so fancy SIA barnstar :) Thanks again! So happy to have you on board! SarahStierch (talk) 23:04, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Rhynchophorus palmarum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vector (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:17, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oxycarenus hyalinipennis, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sida and Pavonia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Oxycarenus hyalinipennis may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • host,<ref name=Adu-MensahandKumar1977 /><ref>Kirkpatrick, TW. 1923. The Egyptian cotton seed bug (Oxycarenus hyalinipennis (Costa). Its Bionomics, damage and suggestions for remedial measures.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:27, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Neoleucinodes elegantalis may have broken the syntax by modifying 3 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ], [[Ecuador]], [[Guyana]], [[Paraguay]], [[Peru]], [[Suriname]], [[Uruguay]] and [[Venezuela]].]]<ref name=EPPO> http://www.eppo.int/QUARANTINE/Alert_List/insects/neoleucinodes_elegantalis.htm
  • ref name=EPPO> http://www.eppo.int/QUARANTINE/Alert_List/insects/neoleucinodes_elegantalis.htm EPPO]</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:56, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rhynchophorus ferrugineus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dynamis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Xyleborus glabratus-dorsal+lateral.jpg listed for deletion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Xyleborus glabratus-dorsal+lateral.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. TLSuda (talk) 18:40, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Orobanche aegyptiaca may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Chemical control can be achieved via soil fumigation with [[methyl bromide\\. This method is effective yet is rarely used because only a shallow layer of the

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:21, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Orobanche aegyptiaca, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Peppers and Mustard. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

= Recruitment for Wikipedian Interview

[edit]

Hello Aderksen,

We’d like to invite you to participate in a study that aims to explore how WikiProject members coordinate activities of distributed group members to complete project goals. We are specifically seeking to talk to people who have been active in at least one WikiProject in their time in Wikipedia. Compensation will be provided to each participant in the form of a $10 Amazon gift card.

The purpose of this study is to better understanding the coordination practices of Wikipedians active within WikiProjects, and to explore the potential for tool-mediated coordination to improve those practices. Interviews will be semi-structured, and should last between 45-60 minutes. If you decide to participate, we will schedule an appointment for the online chat session. During the appointment you will be asked some basic questions about your experience interacting in WikiProjects, how that process has worked for you in the past and what ideas you might have to improve the future.

You must be over 18 years old, speak English, and you must currently be or have been at one time an active member of a WikiProject. The interview can be conducted over an audio chatting channel such as Skype or Google Hangouts, or via an instant messaging client. If you have questions about the research or are interested in participating, please contact Michael Gilbert at (206) 354-3741 or by email at mdg@uw.edu.

We cannot guarantee the confidentiality of information sent by email.

Link to Research Page: m:Research:Means_and_methods_of_coordination_in_WikiProjects — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pgrobison (talkcontribs) 20:28, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rhynchophorus ferrugineus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maluku. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to the African Destubathon

[edit]

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most geography, wildlife and women articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 55 African countries, so should be enjoyable! Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African wildlife articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance. If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing any article related to a topic you often work on, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Might be a good way to work on fleshing out articles you've long been meaning to target and get rewarded for it! Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 04:52, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Aderksen. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you're an expert in the domain ... Cwmhiraeth and I are working to bring Thrips up to GA standard (she seems to specialise in pests!) alongside some of the other insect orders that we've done. I notice that Terebrantia is embarrassingly redlinked at the moment. Personally I couldn't create more than a stub really, but it does seem a shame that even the suborders aren't properly covered. Would that be a project of interest to you? All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:36, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aw, man. Terebrantia is never going to happen. It has one extant family, and while there are a lot of interesting thrips in there, I think that they are better addressed elsewhere. That said, I agree that thrips needs to make its way up to GA standard. I'll see what I can do in my spare time, but they're an under-appreciated group in spite of their hidden and diminutive diversity. Aderksen (talk) 08:31, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I'll look forward to that. Many thanks, Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:44, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ugh, no late night editing. Tubulifera has one extant family. Terebrantia is the big one under which most modern thrips fall. I'll see what I can do to upload photos of damage on fruit and leaves. I haven't seen any good diagrams of arolia; do you know anyone who is a somewhat talented artist? Aderksen (talk) 18:28, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
User:CheChe seems to be a wizard with diagrams, at least where there's something to work from. I've actually drawn quite a few myself, where excessive artistic skill doesn't seem to be necessary. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:56, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Aderksen. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Standard Wikipedia article naming and lead conventions

[edit]

Dear User:Aderksen. Please click here: Betula dahurica (the "black birch"), for an example of standard Wikipedia article naming and lead conventions. That is all I am trying to achieve: the text of the article beginning with the article name in bold italics, and the common name, when there is one, following in bold. This is not a contentious matter, nor one of individual preference. It is MOS. Yours, Wikiuser100 (talk) 12:07, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Aderksen. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Aderksen. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Page review

[edit]

Hi Aderksen,

I am currently working on the Eurycnema goliath page for a university course at the University of Sydney. I saw you were an active member of Wikiproject insects, and I was wondering if you could have a look at the article to give me some feedback? --Lrak21 (talk) 06:22, 25 May 2021 (UTC)Lrak21[reply]