User talk:AccordingClass

CONSIDERING RETIREMENT

AccordingClass is strongly considering retirement, although nothing is set in stone...

AccordingClass is busy and is going to be on Wikipedia in off-and-on doses, and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Due to personal issues, AccordingClass will be away from Wikipedia for an undefined period of time.

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, AccordingClass. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 08:58, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GANs

Please read through the Good articles criteria before nominating articles. Medina and Mecca both need reliable sources at the end of every factual statement (especially at the end of every paragraph). Your history sections are also divided into far too many sub-headings; ideally, an article should only have up to seven subheadings per major section. Sounder Bruce 02:46, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@SounderBruce: Hey! Thanks for the feedback! I have added more citations to the Medina article and merged some of the subsections in history as you suggested. I will do the same with the Mecca article when I am able, otherwise, I think Medina meets all of the criteria for a GA. --AccordingClass (talk) 04:23, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mecca and Medina

Those are the city names in English. Your change in usage to Macca and Madinah is inappropriate.--Khajidha (talk) 14:01, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Khajidha: I will take care of that but that does not justify your reverting of the article. --AccordingClass (talk) 15:32, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, AccordingClass. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by SuperGoose007 ^(Honk!) 20:31, 31 July 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Saudi administrative divisions.

"issued on 27 Sha'baan 1412 AH (March 2, 1992) by Royal Order A/92, amended by Royal Order No. A/21 on 30 Rabi' al-Awal 1414 AH (September 17, 1993)."

Thanks for updating these pages. But it strikes me that this is unnecessary to add to each of the pages you've added it to. This information simply needs to be provided in the title of the citation/source. Putting it in the actually article is redundant and rather clutters the articles. Also, if you can look at the questions I've left on the article of Subdivisions of Saudi Arabia and see if you could answer them, that would be great. It'd also be worth adding to the charts for the governorates on these various pages which are Category A and which are category B. that could simply be done by adding "(A)" or "(B)" by the name of the governorate. --Criticalthinker (talk) 02:07, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi AccordingClass! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Wikipedia Court, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirection

Hi, the redirect you placed at Tawaf didn't work. For a redirect to work, the redirect syntax needs to be at the very start of the page's code, with any templates placed after it. Furthermore, I'm not sure that {{italic title}} should ever be used on a redirect.... — Smjg (talk) 11:28, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
205	Rūḥ (talk)	Add sources
1,898	Ibn Saud (talk)	Add sources
1,069	Jeddah (talk)	Add sources
1,680	State of emergency (talk)	Add sources
986	Zamzam Well (talk)	Add sources
600	Shalom (talk)	Add sources
151	Once Upon a Time... Life (talk)	Cleanup
32	Al-Mawrid (talk)	Cleanup
221	Sub-replacement fertility (talk)	Cleanup
6,777	Hajj (talk)	Expand
149	Jizan (talk)	Expand
49	Modern history of Saudi Arabia (talk)	Expand
106	Hadith of Najd (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
2,131	Islamic eschatology (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
774	Saud of Saudi Arabia (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
83	Tayma (talk)	Merge
100	Islamization of Jerusalem (talk)	Merge
12	Siege of Diriyah (talk)	Merge
162	Muhammad's views on Christians (talk)	Wikify
103	Possessions of Muhammad (talk)	Wikify
121	Bidʻah (talk)	Wikify
2	Banu Mudlej (talk)	Orphan
10	Al-Khaldi (talk)	Orphan
11	Bader bin Saud bin Mohammed Al Saud (talk)	Orphan
40	The Present (film) (talk)	Stub
6	Highway 613 (Saudi Arabia) (talk)	Stub
45	Polygamy in Saudi Arabia (talk)	Stub
1,028	Mount Arafat (talk)	Stub
80	Mosque of the Jinn (talk)	Stub
507	Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:54, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello AccordingClass, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Transport in Saudi Arabia have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:01, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A friend in need?!

Hello, this is regarding the renaming discussion that you started a few weeks ago. I feel that your opinion isn’t shared by many Wikipedians so I have asked other Wikipedians who might be able to help us out and let our voice be heard. Feel free to look for people who might share our opinion and place the following text at the bottom of their talk page. Peace.
==Discussion at [[:Talk:Great Mosque of Mecca#Requested move 8 August 2020|Talk:Great Mosque of Mecca § Requested move 8 August 2020]]== [[File:Farm-Fresh eye.png|15px|link=|alt=]] You are invited to join the discussion at [[:Talk:Great Mosque of Mecca#Requested move 8 August 2020|Talk:Great Mosque of Mecca § Requested move 8 August 2020]]. ~~~~ {{Z48}}
Idell (talk) 13:36, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mecca

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mecca you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ovinus Real -- Ovinus Real (talk) 07:00, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mecca

The article Mecca you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mecca for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ovinus Real -- Ovinus Real (talk) 20:40, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited King Fahd International Airport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern Province.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Battle of Badr

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Badr you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vice regent -- Vice regent (talk) 13:40, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have given some suggestions at Talk:Battle of Badr/GA1.VR _talk 14:49, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I passed the article for GA. Mabrook! VR _talk 02:05, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Battle of Badr

The article Battle of Badr you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Badr for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vice regent -- Vice regent (talk) 02:22, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mecca

The article Mecca you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Mecca for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ovinus Real -- Ovinus Real (talk) 04:03, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you are not too discouraged by this. The article does need some work, but it definitely deserves attention from someone passionate about the subject like you are. Sincerely, Ovinus (talk) 04:33, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ovinus Real: Oh, that's fine. Thanks for going through the article and highlighting the flaws, I'll make sure they're fixed before I nominate it again. AccordingClass (talk) 06:37, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Medina

Hello there. I thought I'd let you know that I had to quickfail your nomination of Medina. Please see Talk:Medina/GA2 for why it was quickfailed. I hope this review does not discourage you from improving this article. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:57, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
1,350	Medina (talk)	Add sources
251	Dhahran (talk)	Add sources
75	Celtis australis (talk)	Add sources
35	Qurayyat, Saudi Arabia (talk)	Add sources
320	Asr prayer (talk)	Add sources
496	Fajr prayer (talk)	Add sources
1,364	Digital rights management (talk)	Cleanup
24	Prince Naif bin Abdulaziz International Airport (talk)	Cleanup
134	Al-Ahsa Governorate (talk)	Cleanup
290	King Abdullah Economic City (talk)	Expand
15	SAR North–South Railway line (talk)	Expand
20,052	Mike Pompeo (talk)	Expand
333	Beast of the Earth (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
112	Tawassul (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
657	Twelver (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
85	Islamic view of miracles (talk)	Merge
1,461	McDonnell Douglas F-15E Strike Eagle (talk)	Merge
173	ʿĀd (talk)	Merge
18	Rock Art in the Ha'il Region (talk)	Wikify
226	Shia view of Ali (talk)	Wikify
56	Ma'ariful Qur'an (talk)	Wikify
4	Gyula Shakespeare Festival (talk)	Orphan
3	Radi Dikici (talk)	Orphan
1	El-Abry Museum for Heritage and Classic Cars (talk)	Orphan
2	Charlotte Karlsson (talk)	Stub
13	Yemen Football Association (talk)	Stub
13	Hotat Bani Tamim (talk)	Stub
16	Theatre in Saudi Arabia (talk)	Stub
178	Zuhr prayer (talk)	Stub
14	Saudi–Rashidi War (1903–1907) (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 07:02, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ta'if

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ta'if you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Femkemilene -- Femkemilene (talk) 20:20, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ta'if

The article Ta'if you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Ta'if for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Femkemilene -- Femkemilene (talk) 20:42, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
3,001	Alhamdulillah (talk)	Add sources
165	Buraidah (talk)	Add sources
792	Eid Mubarak (talk)	Add sources
104	Tourism in Saudi Arabia (talk)	Add sources
252	Jubail (talk)	Add sources
114	Ḥaʼil (talk)	Add sources
49	Qassim University (talk)	Cleanup
189	Dawat-e-Islami (talk)	Cleanup
175	Muqattaʿat (talk)	Cleanup
2,838	Riyadh (talk)	Expand
296	Taif (talk)	Expand
10	Transport in the Arab world (talk)	Expand
51	Human trafficking in Saudi Arabia (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,743	Prophets and messengers in Islam (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
36	Al-Burooj (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
132	Timing of Sahabah becoming Muslims (talk)	Merge
430	Divorce in Islam (talk)	Merge
3,295	Business (talk)	Merge
61	Saudi Railway Company (talk)	Wikify
55	Al-Qamar (talk)	Wikify
5,146	Hagia Sophia (talk)	Wikify
4	Susku Ekim Kaya (talk)	Orphan
2	Musaid al-Rashidi (talk)	Orphan
2	Carroll Snow Wales (talk)	Orphan
9	Abu Hadriyah Highway (talk)	Stub
32	Shammar Mountains (talk)	Stub
94	Darkness in music (talk)	Stub
64	Bicorn and Chichevache (talk)	Stub
85	Sila (mythology) (talk)	Stub
13	Jubbah, Saudi Arabia (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:46, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of Saudi Arabia

Hi! I saw that you were a member of WikiProject Saudi Arabia and wanted to let you know that there's currently an RFC going on on the talk page for the flag of Saudi Arabia on Commons which you might be interested in participating in. Your input would be appreciated. Thanks! HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 18:08, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Muhammad's eclipse

The article Muhammad's eclipse you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Muhammad's eclipse for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 21:05, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]