User talk:Acather96/Archive 8
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Acather96. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | → | Archive 15 |
The Signpost: 24 October 2011
- From the editors: A call for contributors
- Opinion essay: There is a deadline
- Interview: Contracting for the Foundation
- WikiProject report: Great WikiProject Logos
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Abortion; request for amendment on Climate Change case
- Technology report: WMF launches coding challenge, WMDE starts hiring for major new project
Membership of the Counter-Vandalism Unit
As you may know, the Counter-Vandalism unit is inactive. So for reviving the WikiProject, we will need to sort out the members. So if you are active, please put your username at the bottom of the list at Wikipedia talk:Counter-Vandalism Unit#Sort out the members.
You are receiving this message as a current member of the CVU.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Counter-Vandalism Unit at 00:02, 30 October 2011 (UTC).
File:Northern Ireland Election Map 2001.jpg
Hi. Thanks for sorting out the copyright status and other details for the NI Election Map 2001 file. As noted, I have no idea on how to determine the copyright status, and the guides were a little confusing last time I read. Would you be able to take a look at some of the other files I uploaded (though have since been deleted) in my upload log: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=upload&user=Jonesy1289 If you could tell me the copyright status and whether they are suitable for uploading then I'll upload them.--Jonesy1289 (talk) 15:38, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, as I'm not an admin I can't view deleted files, though if you re-upload them now I'll take a look and see what I can do :) Acather96 (talk) 15:44, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
- There is a map on page two of this source: http://www.cabinda.net/PROYARTS_Cabinda_1776.pdf as well as the flag for Loango from this source: http://www.worldstatesmen.org/Congo-brazzaville_native.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonesy1289 (talk • contribs) 15:46, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
- I'll take a look now. Acather96 (talk) 15:51, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
- There is a map on page two of this source: http://www.cabinda.net/PROYARTS_Cabinda_1776.pdf as well as the flag for Loango from this source: http://www.worldstatesmen.org/Congo-brazzaville_native.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonesy1289 (talk • contribs) 15:46, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
- What articles do you intend to use the images on? The second can easily be claimed under fair use (Template:Non-free symbol), but I'd need to know which article the first will be used on. Thanks, Acather96 (talk) 15:56, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
- Both images were to be used for the Kingdom of Loango article (and maybe for the articles of other kingdoms depicted in the map). Thanks for your continued help :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonesy1289 (talk • contribs) 16:00, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
- OK. Actually, the flag is {{PD-Old}}, one question - was the map used in the PDF document created in 1776, or is it more recent? Acather96 (talk) 16:03, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
- I believe the entire publication was in 1776, including a map, though I'm unsure if the map has been updated since. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonesy1289 (talk • contribs) 18:19, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
- I've now uploaded the Loango flag - you can see it in the article. Thanks for helping determine the copyright status. :) Any ideas on that map?--Jonesy1289 (talk) 13:15, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
- I believe the entire publication was in 1776, including a map, though I'm unsure if the map has been updated since. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonesy1289 (talk • contribs) 18:19, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 October 2011
- Opinion essay: The monster under the rug
- Recent research: WikiSym; predicting editor survival; drug information found lacking; RfAs and trust; Wikipedia's search engine ranking justified
- News and notes: German Wikipedia continues image filter protest
- Discussion report: Proposal to return this section from hiatus is successful
- WikiProject report: 'In touch' with WikiProject Rugby union
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Abortion case stalls, request for clarification on Δ, discretionary sanctions streamlined
- Technology report: Wikipedia Zero announced; New Orleans successfully hacked
Edting Change management (engineering) page
Hello Sir,
This is Sam (Ashaik), I'm a employee with PRITCHETTNET.COM
I would like to add some content on the WIKI page of Change management (engineering) and have that referred to one of our pages on our website (http://www.pritchettnet.com/Change-Management-Team-Critical-Priorities)
Let me know if you have any questions
Thanks, Sam — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashaik (talk • contribs) 18:26, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Ashaik and welcome to Wikipedia :). Please follow the instructions at DCM, you may also wish to review our conflict of interest policy. Thanks, Acather96 (talk) 15:14, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
Feedback Dashboard task force
Hi Acather96,
Since you were a part of the WikiGuides project, I thought I'd give you a heads-up about a new way you can help/mentor newbies on en.wiki: we've recently released a feature called the Feedback Dashboard, a queue that updates in real time with feedback and editing questions from new registered contributors who have attempted to make at least one edit. Steven Walling and I are putting together a task force for experienced Wikipedians who might be interested in monitoring the queue and responding to the feedback: details are here at Wikipedia:Feedback Dashboard. Please sign up if you're interested in helping out! Thanks, Maryana (WMF) (talk) 22:03, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 7 November2011
- Special report: A post-mortem on the Indian Education Program pilot
- Discussion report: Special report on the ArbCom Elections steering RfC
- WikiProject report: Booting up with WikiProject Computer Science
- Featured content: Slow week for Featured content
- Arbitration report: Δ saga returns to arbitration, while the Abortion case stalls for another week
spelling
Hi acather96
Please could I mention that ALLOT is not a word. It is two words spelt A LOT.
I noticed it as your spelling is generally excellent and your meaning very clear.
regards Toak20 (talk) 22:28, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks - technically, allot is a word - it means to allocate a task to a person. However, you are correct in saying that a lot and allot are not the same; may I ask where you have seen my misuse of a lot? I'd be very grateful if you can so I can rectify my grammatical error - this has given me an idea though, I might see if I can run a search on Wikipedia to correct incorrect uses of allot/a lot. Thanks, once again :) Acather96 (talk) 19:10, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Image updating
Hi acather96
I'm having some problems updating the information on a few images I uploaded. When I try to update the file description page it simply refuses to update the information. Any suggestions?
One of the files is Zombie_pandemic_main_game_screen.jpg
Also, i'm writing an article for wikipedia, and it's still a work in progress/draft stage. Is there any way to delete the draft history? I don't really need it.
Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheIceking (talk • contribs) 19:21, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
- Hi TheIceking, and welcome to Wikipedia :) I've got a couple pointers for you - 1) For each non-free image you upload, you must also include what's called a non-free use rationale - this is something that proves how an image meets our non-free content criteria. Sounds scary, but don't worry - use this template for a clear structure, and consider looking at other gaming article's screenshot rationales, to get a feel for exactly what type of image meets our non-free content criteria. For now the images have been tagged for deletion as they lack a rationale, but don't worry, you have seven days to 'save' the images. 2) Non-free images cannot be used in the userspace - even drafts. Until you move it into the mainspace, you can't have non-free images displaying, this can be rectified by simply placing a colon just inside the brackets (for example:
[[:File:Zombie pandemic main game screen.jpg|blah blah blah]]
) which means the image is there, but not displayed - you can then just remove the extra colon once it is moved into the mainspace. 3) Lastly, in regards to your actual question ('why can't I change the information on the file pages'), have you tried purging your cache? Recent edits to the pages show up in the page history, you probably just need to purge the page. And we don't usually delete history so that all content is attributed and all edits are logged, the only exception pertaining to revisions which contain blatant copy-vio's or extremely disruptive/libellous/insulting/degrading material (see CRD if you're interested). Hope that helps, and if you need a hand with anything, just leave me a message. Thanks, :) Acather96 (talk) 21:16, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
Notability on BioUML
messed up the last talk post sorry! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hi99ins (talk • contribs) 22:16, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
- Hi there! If you think you can find some reliable sources which can be used as citations in the article, please do add them to the article. You may find Referencing for beginners has some useful information on it - if you need any help, just leave a message :) Oh, and don't worry about the slip-up on my talk page, it's an easy mistake to make. Acather96 (talk) 22:18, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your understanding and assistance - how long do I have to find these references? ( I was going to do it today but may not have time)hi99ins (talk) 22:22, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
- Don't worry, seven days. And if for whatever reason you can't make the deadline, you can always request undeletion. :) Acather96 (talk) 22:23, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
I added some references if I need more I will add further ones tomorrow - also I cannot seem to remove the lines below the references - if I remove the references block, the lines disappear, but they do not appear in my editor...weird... anyway please let me know how I am progressing when you get a moment - thanks Tim hi99ins (talk) 23:40, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 November 2011
- News and notes: ArbCom nominations open, participation grants finalized, survey results on perceptions on Wikipedia released
- WikiProject report: Having a Conference with WikiProject India
- Arbitration report: Abortion and Betacommand 3 in evidence phase, three case requests outstanding
Input requested
WT:New editor feedback#Proposed office hours. Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 21:33, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
Image deletion
Hello again,
Could you please delete the following images so I can upload new ones with a correct usage rationale?
Zombie pandemic main game screen.jpg Zombie pandemic city map.jpg Zombie Pandemic combat screen.jpg
Thanks in advance.
TheIceking (talk) 14:23, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
- Hi IceKing - sorry for the late response, I've had massive amounts of coursework at the moment so am somewhat inactive - they have been deleted by another user, so you can feel free to re-upload them. Thanks, Acather96 (talk) 19:09, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 November 2011
- Discussion report: Much ado about censorship
- WikiProject report: Working on a term paper with WikiProject Academic Journals
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: End in sight for Abortion case, nominations in 2011 elections
- Technology report: Mumbai and Brighton hacked; horizontal lists have got class
The Signpost: 28 November 2011
- News and notes: Arb's resignation sparks lightning RfC, Fundraiser 2011 off to a strong start, GLAM in Qatar
- In the news: The closed, unfriendly world of Wikipedia, fundraiser fun and games, and chemists vs pornstars
- Recent research: Quantifying quality collaboration patterns, systemic bias, POV pushing, the impact of news events, and editors' reputation
- WikiProject report: The Signpost scoops The Bugle
- Featured content: The best of the week
Feedback Dashboard upgrade
Hi Acather96,
Thanks for signing up for the Feedback Dashboard response team! I wanted to let you know that the tool just got an important update (see here for details). I also wanted to invite you to the IRC office hours session that Steven and I are going to hold this Sunday, December 4. Hope you can make it and share your experience/questions with us! Thanks again, Maryana (WMF) (talk) 23:56, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
Bacon Challenge 2012 Update
Hey! It's been a good few months since the Bacon Challenge 2012 kicked off in June, and I'm pleased to say that decent progress has been made. While we were a bit slow to start, bacon-related contributions have been picking up again, and scores have been rising in the Bacon WikiCup. Here's a quick rundown of the overall positions as they stand:
- 1st: Silver seren
- 2nd: Worm That Turned
- 3rd: Rcsprinter123
- 4th: Doh5678
- 5th: Cirt
Currently, only a handful of participants have reported contributions: to those who haven't, remember, there is still plenty of time left to contribute and rise up in through the positions, as the Challenge and WikiCup run up until March. Just like last year, all participants will receive a shiny medal which they can place on their userpages, or use as a self-esteem booster if need be (just joking...sort of). If you need ideas for what to work on, a list is available here.
One last thing! Per request, we are bringing back territory representation into the WikiCup! Editors can now represent nations, states, or provinces, just to add a bit of fun and Olympic-flair to the event. Simply reply to this message with the territory you wish to represent, if you choose to do so.
Thanks for reading! Good luck! ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 02:02, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 05 December 2011
- News and notes: Amsterdam gets the GLAM treatment, fundraising marches on, and a flourish of new admins
- In the news: A Wikistream of real time edits, a call for COI reform, and cracks in the ivory tower of knowledge
- Discussion report: Trial proposed for tool apprenticeship
- WikiProject report: This article is about WikiProject Disambiguation. For other uses...
- Featured content: This week's Signpost is for the birds!
The Signpost: 12 December 2011
- Opinion essay: Wikipedia in Academe – and vice versa
- News and notes: Research project banner ads run afoul of community
- In the news: Bell Pottinger investigation, Gardner on gender gap, and another plagiarist caught red-handed
- WikiProject report: Spanning Nine Time Zones with WikiProject Russia
- Featured content: Wehwalt gives his fifty cents; spies, ambushes, sieges, and Entombment
The Signpost: 19 December 2011
- News and notes: Anti-piracy act has Wikimedians on the defensive, WMF annual report released, and Indic language dynamics
- In the news: To save the wiki: strike first, then makeover?
- Discussion report: Polls, templates, and other December discussions
- WikiProject report: A dalliance with the dismal scientists of WikiProject Economics
- Featured content: Panoramas with Farwestern and a good week for featured content
- Arbitration report: The community elects eight arbitrators
Re:Users willing to offer advice
- Is it necessary to do sth more with this moved file? Bulwersator (talk) 09:47, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 December 2011
- Recent research: Psychiatrists: Wikipedia better than Britannica; spell-checking Wikipedia; Wikipedians smart but fun; structured biological data
- News and notes: Fundraiser passes 2010 watermark, brief news
- WikiProject report: The Tree of Life
- Arbitration report: Three open cases, one set for acceptance, arbitrators formally appointed by Jimmy Wales
- Technology report: Wikimedia in Go Daddy boycott, and why you should 'Join the Swarm'
The Signpost: 02 January 2012
- Interview: The Gardner interview
- News and notes: Things bubbling along as Wikimedians enjoy their holidays
- WikiProject report: Where are they now? Part III
- Featured content: Ghosts of featured content past, present, and future
- Arbitration report: New case accepted, four open cases, terms begin for new arbitrators
The Signpost: 09 January 2012
- Technological roadmap: 2011's technological achievements in review, and what 2012 may hold
- News and notes: Fundraiser 2011 ends with a bang
- WikiProject report: From Traditional to Experimental: WikiProject Jazz
- Featured content: Contentious FAC debate: a week in review
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, proposed decision in Betacommand 3
The Signpost: 16 January 2012
- Special report: English Wikipedia to go dark on January 18
- Sister projects: What are our sisters up to now?
- News and notes: WMF on the looming SOPA blackout, Wikipedia turns 11, and Commons passes 12 million files
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Beer
- Featured content: Lecen on systemic bias in featured content
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, Betacommand case deadlocked, Muhammad images close near
Orphaned non-free image File:Journalism Education Association logo.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Journalism Education Association logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 07:34, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 January 2012
- News and notes: SOPA blackout, Orange partnership
- WikiProject report: The Golden Horseshoe: WikiProject Toronto
- Featured content: Interview with Muhammad Mahdi Karim and the best of the week
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, proposed decision in Muhammad images, AUSC call for applications
- Technology report: Looking ahead to MediaWiki 1.19 and related issues
Orphaned non-free image File:Brambletye School.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Brambletye School.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:12, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
Article about Restaurant Week
Hi. You were involved in a deletion discussion of the previous version of this article I had created. It was deemed low-key and not of notable value and eventually deleted. I have recreated the article with more information, citations and press mentions. Just wanted your feedback on it. Does it meet Wiki standards? Would appreciate your comments and feedback (and help!). Here's the link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Bangalore_restaurant_week.Varunr (talk) 10:25, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 January 2012
- In the news: Zambian wiki-assassins, Foundation über alles, editor engagement and the innovation plateau
- Recent research: Language analyses examine power structure and political slant; Wikipedia compared to commercial databases
- WikiProject report: Digging Up WikiProject Palaeontology
- Featured content: Featured content soaring this week
- Arbitration report: Five open cases, voting on proposed decisions in two cases
- Technology report: Why "Lua" is on everybody's lips, and when to expect MediaWiki 1.19
About File:CARICMOLD.JPG
Hi ! Manoliu has been my first wikipedian pseudonyme. If you want delete this old drawing, you can, because times passed since 20 years and it's no more so funny today... <:-( Wishes, --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 09:22, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited The Missing Coach, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Egmont (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Articles for Creation Appeal
Articles for Creation urgently needs your help!
Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently the are 1272 submissions waiting to be reviewed.
If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. |
The Signpost: 06 February 2012
- News and notes: The Foundation visits Tunisia, analyzes donors
- In the news: Leading scholar hails Wikipedia, historians urged to contribute while PR pros remain shunned
- Discussion report: Discussion swarms around Templates for deletion and returning editors of colourful pasts
- WikiProject report: The Eye of the Storm: WikiProject Tropical Cyclones
- Featured content: Talking architecture with MrPanyGoff
- Arbitration report: Four open cases, final decision in Muhammad images, Betacommand 3 near closure
Please can you delete a file?
Please, if possible, can you delete this file: File:United States Navy Band - Der er et yndigt land.ogg
(It was uploaded by mistake, and will probably be automatically deleted soon anyway. The same file, with complete licensing information is uploaded on Wikimedia commons.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 000peter (talk • contribs) 20:02, 12 February 2012
- The answer to that is "no", as Acather96 is not an administrator, and can't delete files. However, I have deleted it. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:36, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- Ah, I assumed they were. But thanks for deleting the file! --Peter (Talk page) 14:40, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry I wasn't able to reply earlier, and thanks James :)! Acather96 (talk) 19:25, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 13 February 2012
- Special report: Fundraising proposals spark a furore among the chapters
- News and notes: Foundation launches Legal and Community Advocacy department
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Stub Sorting
- Featured content: The best of the week
Kumarrajendran CCI
Hi there, I was just going through the Kumarrajendran CCI (I'm looking to get more involved in file related CCIs) and I noticed that you've marked a few as clear in part because "EXIF data shows that the photo was taken with a standard camera". I have a concern about that:
- File:Chennai Mayor.jpg uses a Nikon D70s
- File:Mgr99home.jpg uses a Nikon D60
- File:Nonkudri.jpg uses a Sony DSC-W7
- File:Mkspicture.jpg uses a Nikon D100
- File:Msv224.jpg uses a Fujifilm FinePix S3Pro
Now I'm not saying that it's not possible that he's had five cameras in as many years, however it's suspicious. Also suspicious is how the three Nikons are in totally different price/quality classes from one another. All in all, it just dosen't feel right. What are your thoughts on the matter? Sven Manguard Wha? 03:06, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
- Oooh, now that’s a good point, I didn't spot that. Always nice to have an extra set of eyes run over something for this very reason; it's nice to hear that you're getting involved in CCI's as well, there's a massive backlog of enervating and time-consuming work to be done that is also quite important! You're right in that it does sound a little suspicious, especially with the three different Nikon models - maybe it would be worth going through the rest of the files and compiling a full list of all cameras use before taking it to PUF to somewhat beef up our claim, as we don't really have many solid facts to justify deletion at the moment. I'm going to be working on that CCI frequently this week, so will be able to see if this pattern of different camera usage is present in other uploads. Cheers, Acather96 (talk) 18:50, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
- Unless the essay fairy visits me and I'm able to power through my work faster than I anticipate, I won't have time to help you with that today. I recommend you find an admin with some time on their hands and ask said admin to look through the deleted files. BTW, I'll be getting more involved in CCI, but for now only in the file related ones, so that's this one, the Billy Hathorn one, the Arab League one, and one of the two Richard Arthur Norton ones. Sven Manguard Wha? 21:21, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Nuisance deletion of models??
What is up with deletion of images of models? How is it different that an image of an actual airplane or automobile? These are nuisance deletions, not copyright violations Bachcell (talk) 21:34, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
File:King Charles spaniels.jpg has been nominated for deletion
Dear Acather96,
I don't think that this picture should be deleted, because I contacted the author of this picture and I have a written certification for publishing of this picture on Wikimedia Commons, you can give me your email and I can to forward you our conversations and there will be a authorized request permission to use photographies from website.
Best regards and thank you very much.
Wikidu7 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikidu7 (talk • contribs) 11:33, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
hello can you help me editing a page about the germany presidential elcetion 2012 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justiceforme123 (talk • contribs) 22:44, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
Cup Noodle
Hi, I've been on Wikibreak this month, and still don't plan to return for a week, but I noticed you tagged my image File:CupNoodle.jpg for deletion. I originally tagged it as PD because I took the picture myself, but I realize a picture of a logo or a product may need a different rationale. Please check the fair use rationale I added, and let me know if anything else needs fixing.
All this made me wonder how Andy Warhol's famous paintings of Campbell Soup cans are tagged here. After checking some of those images (see File:Campbell's Soup with Can Opener.jpg for example, I am curious if I should tag my photo with {{Non-free 2D art}} or something similar. Any advice is welcome. Thanks. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:56, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 February 2012
- Special report: The plight of the new page patrollers
- News and notes: Fundraiser row continues, new director of engineering
- Discussion report: Discussion on copyrighted files from non-US relation states
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Poland
- Featured content: The best of the week
The Signpost: 27 February 2012
- News and notes: Finance meeting fallout, Gardner recommendations forthcoming
- Recent research: Gender gap and conflict aversion; collaboration on breaking news; effects of leadership on participation; legacy of Public Policy Initiative
- Discussion report: Focus on admin conduct and editor retention
- WikiProject report: Just don't call it "sci-fi": WikiProject Science Fiction
- Arbitration report: Final decision in TimidGuy ban appeal, one case remains open
- Technology report: 1.19 deployment stress, Meta debates whether to enforce SUL
New University Project
Hi Acather! I am a university professor who did a Wikipedia University Project last year in my editing class. We enjoyed it so much that I am doing it again this year. If there are ways to alert Wikipedians to my project so that they might keep an eye out for my students' edits--and cut them a little slack at first :-) --please let me know. I really appreciated your support last year!
I have started updating my User Page to reflect the new project, and I will continue to add links to article the students have their eyes on, as well as to their User Pages and Talk Pages.
Thanks again! --Mportolano (talk) 17:43, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 05 March 2012
- News and notes: Chapter-selected Board seats, an invite to the Teahouse, patrol becomes triage, and this week in history
- In the news: Heights reached in search rankings, privacy and mental health info; clouds remain over content policing
- Discussion report: COI and NOTCENSORED: policies under discussion
- WikiProject report: We don't bite: WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles
- Featured content: Best of the week
- Arbitration report: AUSC appointments announced, one case remains open
The Signpost: 12 March 2012
- Interview: Liaising with the Education Program
- Women and Wikipedia: Women's history, what we're missing, and why it matters
- Arbitration analysis: A look at new arbitrators
- Discussion report: Nothing changes as long discussions continue
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Women's History
- Featured content: Extinct humans, birds, and Birdman
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision in 'Article titles', only one open case
- Education report: Diverse approaches to Wikipedia in Education
Request
Sir plz arrange the material of Article Gharsana Tehsil to make it readable in computer side.I tried my best but i cudn't. Shemaroo (talk) 13:06, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Formatting error fixed and I've also requested a copy-edit. Thanks, Acather96 (talk) 15:41, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
Estanislau Basora
Hi. Wikipedia page on the Spanish player Estanislau Basora, who died on Friday aged 85, says he scored five goals at the 1950 World Cup but according to FIFA.com he only scored four times at the tournament. Can you correct this please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.165.213.236 (talk) 19:50, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
- Good catch - error fixed on Estanislao Basora and reference added. Thanks, Acather96 (talk) 15:59, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi andrew
Hi andrew
from adam — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skunkman3118 (talk • contribs) 14:46, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
- Afternoon. Acather96 (talk) 15:49, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 March 2012
- News and notes: Chapters Council proposals take form as research applications invited for Wikipedia Academy and HighBeam accounts
- Discussion report: Article Rescue Squadron in need of rescue yet again
- WikiProject report: Lessons from another Wikipedia: Czech WikiProject Protected Areas
- Featured content: Featured content on the upswing!
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence 'review' opened, Article titles at voting
embed youtube videos?
Are youtube video embed allowed in wikipedia? One entry is of a visual artists, who created localized-persdspective works. It is beneficial to have a video showing it. Pls advice? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gil Dekel (talk • contribs) 17:38, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 March 2012
- News and notes: Controversial content saga continues, while the Foundation tries to engage editors with merchandising and restructuring
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Rock Music
- Featured content: Malfunctioning sharks, toothcombs and a famous mother: featured content for the week
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence review at evidence, article titles closed
- Recent research: Predicting admin elections; studying flagged revision debates; classifying editor interactions; and collecting the Wikipedia literature
- Education report: Universities unite for GLAM; and High Schools get their due.
Request for picture
Greetings, fellow Wikipedian. I'm working on completing the wiki article, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_pies and I've had no luck finding a photo for the famous "Bedfordshire clanger" amongst the Wikimedia Commons images. As you're from the area, might I be so bold as to request that should you have the time, please stop in (at your convenience) to Gunns Bakery in Sandy, Bedfordshire (http://www.gunns-bakery.co.uk/bedfordshire_clanger.htm) to purchase and photograph a clanger to add the the Commons? I'd do it myself, but being in Japan makes for a rather long journey for a meat pie. Although, I'll admit they do look worth the trip. Cheers, Markmark28 (talk) 01:33, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
- Can and will do :) Acather96 (talk) 17:56, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Many thanks. If it's not too much trouble, do you mind uploading a picture of the clanger as a whole, and then cut in two to show us the two different halves? Before you eat it, that is. :)
Markmark28 (talk) 17:04, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, of course. I'll try and do it over the weekend :) Acather96 (talk) 18:06, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 02 April 2012
- Interview: An introduction to movement roles
- Arbitration analysis: Case review: TimidGuy ban appeal
- News and notes: Berlin reforms to movement structures, Wikidata launches with fanfare, and Wikipedia's day of mischief
- WikiProject report: The Signpost scoops The Signpost
- Featured content: Snakes, misnamed chapels, and emptiness: featured content this week
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence review in third week, one open case
The Signpost: 09 April 2012
- News and notes: Projects launched in Brazil and the Middle East as advisors sought for funds committee
- WikiProject report: The Land of Steady Habits: WikiProject Connecticut
- Featured content: Assassination, genocide, internment, murder, and crucifixion: the bloodiest of the week
- Arbitration report: Arbitration evidence-limit motions, two open cases
re Orphaned non-free image File:Opel-z-37.jpg
Was this message generated automatically by a bot? The only time I see this image not being used on the page was a short period when some vandalism, or at least misunderstood editing was taking place. --Traveler100 (talk) 15:06, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 April 2012
- Arbitration analysis: Inside the Arbitration Committee Mailing List
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Facilitator: Silver seren
- Discussion report: The future of pending changes
- WikiProject report: The Butterflies and Moths of WikiProject Lepidoptera
- Featured content: A few good sports: association football, rugby league, and the Olympics vie for medals
Page is said to be removed/deleted
Hi Acather96, Since, you are highly active user so I thought you will be reliable source to ask the question.I need your help for the following article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calderys
It says that it's going to be deleted because of the not enough notability. I edited it for two days. finding relevant references and all but still it says the same. Today also I edited it. Will it take time to analyse the article again and tell whether still it can be deleted or not OR it ususally displayes the result instantly ? What your suggestions would be about this article ? According to you what else could be included ?
Thank You in advance! Calderys Employee. Calderysfrance (talk) 13:04, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
- Unfortunately I'm not active enough to review the page in full, though I have given the page a cursory examination and agree with you that the subject appears notable. Thus, I have removed the notability tag - may I suggest that you submit the article for a more detailed review at Wikipedia:Peer review? Thanks, Acather96 (talk) 19:56, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Thank You
Thank You Acather96, I will reach to wikipedia peer review. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Calderysfrance (talk • contribs) 09:10, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 April 2012
- Investigative report: Spin doctors spin Jimmy's "bright line"
- WikiProject report: Skeptics and Believers: WikiProject The X-Files
- Featured content: A mirror (or seventeen) on this week's featured content
- Arbitration report: Evidence submissions close in Rich Farmbrough case, vote on proposed decision in R&I Review
- Technology report: Wikimedia Labs: soon to be at the cutting edge of MediaWiki development?
The Signpost: 30 April 2012
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Consultant: Pete Forsyth
- Discussion report: 'ReferenceTooltips' by default
- WikiProject report: The Cartographers of WikiProject Maps
- Featured content: Featured content spreads its wings
- Arbitration report: R&I Review remains in voting, two open cases
The Signpost: 07 May 2012
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia Pay? The Communicator: Phil Gomes
- News and notes: Hong Kong to host Wikimania 2013
- WikiProject report: Say What?: WikiProject Languages
- Featured content: This week at featured content: How much wood would a Wood Duck chuck if a Wood Duck could chuck wood?
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision in Rich Farmbrough, two open cases
- Technology report: Search gets faster, GSoC gets more detail and 1.20wmf2 gets deployed
The Signpost: 14 May 2012
- WikiProject report: Welcome to Wikipedia with a cup of tea and all your questions answered - at the Teahouse
- Featured content: Featured content is red hot this week
- Arbitration report: R&I Review closed, Rich Farmbrough near closure
Possibly unfree File:Green and Yellow Present.gif
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Green and Yellow Present.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 11:32, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:National Housing and Planning Advice Unit logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:National Housing and Planning Advice Unit logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:19, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
Recent deletion
Just to let you know, that even though it states that was my IP, not me, nor did anyone with access to my computer edit comments in about the British Empire and it certainly doesn't reflect my political stance, I have no idea as to how this could have happened.
--78.148.21.118 (talk) 20:58, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 May 2012
- From the editor: New editor-in-chief
- WikiProject report: Trouble in a Galaxy Far, Far Away....
- Featured content: Lemurbaby moves it with Madagascar: Featured content for the week
- Arbitration report: No open arbitration cases pending
- Technology report: On the indestructibility of Wikimedia content
The Signpost: 28 May 2012
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation endorses open-access petition to the White House; pending changes RfC ends
- Recent research: Supporting interlanguage collaboration; detecting reverts; Wikipedia's discourse, semantic and leadership networks, and Google's Knowledge Graph
- WikiProject report: Experts and enthusiasts at WikiProject Geology
- Featured content: Featured content cuts the cheese
- Arbitration report: Fæ and GoodDay requests for arbitration, changes to evidence word limits
- Technology report: Developer divide wrangles; plus Wikimedia Zero, MediaWiki 1.20wmf4, and IPv6
The Signpost: 04 June 2012
- Special report: WikiWomenCamp: From women, for women
- Discussion report: Watching Wikipedia change
- WikiProject report: Views of WikiProject Visual Arts
- Featured content: On the lochs
- Arbitration report: Two motions for procedural reform, three open cases, Rich Farmbrough risks block and ban
- Technology report: Report from the Berlin Hackathon
The Signpost: 11 June 2012
- News and notes: Foundation finance reformers wrestle with CoI
- WikiProject report: Counter-Vandalism Unit
- Featured content: The cake is a pi
- Arbitration report: Procedural reform enacted, Rich Farmbrough blocked, three open cases
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
--AussieLegend (talk) 04:06, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
time out for editors with no etiquette??
I, and many other people find this user's comments and general etiquette to be extremely offensive and unhelpful.
[[1]]
User_talk:Niemti/Archive#Bare_URLs
I would like to know if there are any measure that can be taken to warn this user of their etiquette?
Please look at our dialogue on Max Payne 3 and notice how he resorts to being offensive and unhelpful with my question about information which is not contained in an article that he/she linked to me.
I might have came across as being a bit pompous, but if you read the users talk page, you'll see that they have a problem with being polite to other users. Telling someone to 'go away' when undoing someone else's editing on a wiki page is not helpful information. Can you help? Spiderliam (talk) 17:37, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Good evening sir, and welcome to Wikipedia :) I agree that Niemti does appear to be sometimes uncivil manner, and one that is not in line with collaborative and helpful ethos that this project aims to extol - this especially was way out of line, and I hope has not deterred you from contributing. Let me assure that Wikipedia, and all volunteers like me, would not want you to go away or shut up, and discourage such negative language. With regards to your question about timeouts - Wikipedia does not have any such systems, and a block would not be issued considering the circumstances (no proper warning to the user, and no very serious policy breaches). However, in light of the concerns you have raised and the user's seeming continued failing to work in a collaborative environment positively, I will leave a message on his talk page gently cautioning him about his behaviour, and offering words of advice. If the user continues to behave in an uncivil manner, than the next step would be to raise the matter at Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance, and failing that, Wikipedia:Administrators noticeboard/Incidents. Once again, apologies for the rough initial treatment you have received here, welcome to Wikipedia, and if I can be of any further help in any capacity please leave me a message and I'll get back to you as soon as possible. Regards, Acather96 (talk) 19:11, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Many thanks for your input on this matter! I was beginning to worry that the site might be being maintained by people who like act like young, insolent teenagers, based on Niemti's conduct. You have thrown my first impression right out of the window with your civil, pleasant and mature response! Thanks again! Spiderliam (talk) 19:50, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 June 2012
- Investigative report: Is the requests for adminship process 'broken'?
- News and notes: Ground shifts while chapters dither over new Association
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: The Punks of Wikipedia
- Featured content: Taken with a pinch of "salt"
- Arbitration report: Three open cases, GoodDay case closed
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Message from you RE image
Hello,
Not sure I understand your note to me regarding the image I uploaded (JKardong Performing With Sera Cahoone.jpg). I entered all copyright information when uploading as it directed me, so not sure why you see an issue. It is legally owned and I entered that in the Wiki copyright input form. Can you please clarify what it is you are seeing?
thanks! Bud — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jkard883 (talk • contribs) 16:08, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- While I can't find out what the precise problem was with the image (as it was deleted two years ago), File:JKardong Performing With Sera Cahoone.jpg appears to have been deleted as the source was not clearly specified, and a license tag was not applied. If you would like to have the image undeleted, the appropriate forum to request such action is WP:REFUND. Thanks, Acather96 (talk) 14:10, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 June 2012
- WikiProject report: Summer Sports Series: WikiProject Athletics
- Featured content: A good week for the Williams
- Arbitration report: Three open cases
- Technology report: Second Visual Editor prototype launches
The Signpost: 02 July 2012
- Analysis: Uncovering scientific plagiarism
- News and notes: RfC on joining lobby group; JSTOR accounts for Wikipedians and the article feedback tool
- In the news: Public relations on Wikipedia: friend or foe?
- Discussion report: Discussion reports and miscellaneous articulations
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: Burning rubber with WikiProject Motorsport
- Featured content: Heads up
- Arbitration report: Three open cases, motion for the removal of Carnildo's administrative tools
- Technology report: Initialisms abound: QA and HTML5
The Signpost: 09 July 2012
- Special report: Reforming the education programs: lessons from Cairo
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Football
- Featured content: Keeps on chuggin'
- Arbitration report: Three requests for arbitration
The Signpost: 16 July 2012
- Special report: Chapters Association mired in controversy over new chair
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: French WikiProject Cycling
- Discussion report: Discussion reports and miscellaneous articulations
- Featured content: Taking flight
- Technology report: Tech talks at Wikimania amid news of a mixed June
- Arbitration report: Fæ faces site-ban, proposed decisions posted
Article about Radha Thomas
I am currently working on the Wiki page for Ms Radha Thomas. She is an Indian jazz singer and songwriter. In fact, she is known as a diva in the Indian jazz scene. She previously was with the band Human Bondage and has sung and performed globally. The article is still under development. I haven't completed it or submitted it for review yet. You can have a look at it at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Radha_Thomas. I will be requesting your help and advice (as usual) in making it conform to all Wiki standards. If you do a Google Search for Radha (https://www.google.co.in/#hl=en&output=search&sclient=psy-ab&q=Radha+Thomas&oq=Radha+Thomas&gs_l=hp.3..0l2j0i30l2.1190.3159.0.3385.12.12.0.0.0.0.282.1949.0j11j1.12.0...0.0...1c.dYmnNUlMsQM&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=f6ee012440c72a74&biw=1024&bih=509) you will find dozens of articles and links to her work. As of now, the article is still under development and I will come bug you for help soon! Varunr (talk) 06:44, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Luton and Dunstable Hospital Logo.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Luton and Dunstable Hospital Logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:01, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 July 2012
- Paid editing: Does Wikipedia pay? The skeptic: Orange Mike
- From the editor: Signpost developments
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Olympics
- Arbitration report: Fæ and Michaeldsuarez banned; Kwamikagami desysopped; Falun Gong closes with mandated external reviews and topic bans
- Featured content: When is an island not an island?
- Technology report: Translating SVGs and making history bugs history
The Signpost: 30 July 2012
- News and notes: Wikimedians and London 2012; WMF budget – staffing, engineering, editor retention effort, and the global South; Telegraph's cheap shot at WP
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Horse Racing
- Featured content: One of a kind
- Arbitration report: No pending or open arbitration cases
The Signpost: 06 August 2012
- News and notes: FDC portal launched
- Arbitration report: No pending or open arbitration cases
- Featured content: Casliber's words take root
- Technology report: Wikidata nears first deployment but wikis go down in fibre cut calamity
- WikiProject report: Summer sports series: WikiProject Martial Arts
Orphaned non-free image File:Go-compare.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Go-compare.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 22:11, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 13 August 2012
- Op-ed: Small Wikipedias' burden
- Arbitration report: You really can request for arbitration
- Featured content: On the road again
- Technology report: "Phabricating" a serious alternative to Gerrit
- WikiProject report: Dispute Resolution
- Discussion report: Image placeholders, machine translations, Mediation Committee, de-adminship
What do you think?
Hello!
The great debate is right now going on on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Concert_Tours page. I would be very grateful if you could say something about the topic on this page.
The main question is about numbering the tour dates and I would be very interested in your opinion. What do you think? Do you like the idea of numbering the tour dates or not? Please post your reasonable opinion on the above mentioned page.
Thank you! Lassoboy (talk) 15:03, 15 August 2012 (UTC)