User talk:Abspeaks

Welcome Abspeaks!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 48,290,742 registered users!

Hello, Abspeaks. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions! I'm Quinto Simmaco, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Some pages of helpful information to get you started:

Introduction to Wikipedia

The five pillars of Wikipedia

Editing tutorial

How to edit a page

Simplified Manual of Style

The basics of Wikicode

How to develop an article

How to create an article

Help pages

What Wikipedia is not

Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:

Do be bold

Do assume good faith

Do be civil

Do keep cool!

Do maintain a neutral point of view

Don't spam

Don't infringe copyright

Don't edit where you have a conflict of interest

Don't commit vandalism

Don't get blocked

If you need further help, you can:

Ask a question

or you can:

Get help at the Teahouse

or even:

Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page, and someone will try to help.

There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:

Fight vandalism

Be a WikiFairy or a WikiGnome

Help contribute to articles

Perform maintenance tasks

Become a member of a project that interests you

Help design new templates

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.

The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!
To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own private sandbox for use any time. Perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.

Sincerely, Quinto Simmaco (talk) 13:03, 14 April 2015 (UTC) (Leave me a message)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anti-Corruption Bureau, Gujarat (April 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikiisawesome was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anti-Corruption Bureau, Gujarat and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

wia (talk) 13:08, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! wia (talk) 13:08, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The

Adventure

Hi Abspeaks!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. Hope to see you there!

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by Quinto Simmaco (talk) 13:04, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Romance Complicated has been reverted.
Your edit here to Romance Complicated was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=https://www.youtube.com/user/romcomthefilm) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 05:42, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lamboo Rastoo

The article Lamboo Rastoo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet the threshold of WP:NFILM. Sources are just pre-release promotional material.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cabayi (talk) 12:27, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tari Maate Once More

The article Tari Maate Once More has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claim of notability, just a plot summary and credits.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cabayi (talk) 13:50, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Baap Re

I have moved the page to the new title, you can make changes accordingly there, but do not remove the sourced information. If you can update it with better or more recent sources, that's fine. Hope you understand. Coderzombie (talk) 07:52, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Have Thase Baap Re!

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Have Thase Baap Re!. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Have Thase Baap Re. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Have Thase Baap Re. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. BOVINEBOY2008 16:09, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright

It is almost never suitable to copy content from another web site to Wikipedia, for more than one reason, the most important being copyright. When you post anything to Wikipedia you release it for anyone in the world to reuse it, either unchanged or modified in any way whatever, subject to attribution to Wikipedia. It is very rare that the owner of a web site licenses content for such very free reuse, and in those few occasions when they do so, we require proof of the fact. We don't assume that content is freely licensed on the unsubstantiated say so of just anyone who comes along and creates a Wikipedia account. JBW (talk) Formerly JamesBWatson 14:06, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral point of view

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. No wikipedia article should express opinions, such as describing something as "interesting" or "hilarious", that a story is "told with utmost compassion", that a film is "a complete entertainment package", and so on. JBW (talk) Formerly JamesBWatson 14:42, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mister Kalaakar

The article Mister Kalaakar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, tagged since 2019. Nothing found in a WP:BEFORE except database sites, music sites, and videos.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 23:41, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of G (2020 film)

The article G (2020 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 23:16, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Vaishal Shah.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Vaishal Shah.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the non-free content guidelines, please add the appropriate non-free use tag and rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 12:00, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vaishal Shah moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Vaishal Shah. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 12:03, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hi Jeraxmoria,

The article of Vaishal Shah doesn't have any conflict of interest and he is one of the reputed producer from the Gujarati Film Industry, who have given the successful films, plus he has media article and supporting articles on his living and work. I understand you have proposed the deletion of his photo, that I have taken from Ahmedabad Mirror site and I believe media has put that as copyright free for the right use.

So I kindly request you to restore the page and guide me with what information is missing so relevancy can be provided.

Looking forward to having your support for the same. Abspeaks (talk) 12:22, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Where did you get the biography section on Vaishal Shah from? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 12:31, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

From Vaishal Shah it self. Abspeaks (talk) 12:32, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you not aware of Wikipedia's Wikipedia:Conflict of interest guideline? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 12:36, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As mentioned earlier that I got the information from Vaishal Shah it meant that I have cross verified the biography information which was available online and in media article, I don't know him personally or not having any commercial or personal benefits from any individual. I did that to have correct information listed on the living person information. Abspeaks (talk) 13:00, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Abspeaks. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Vaishal Shah, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 12:34, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jeegar Chauhan moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Jeegar Chauhan. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 12:59, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jeraxmoira,

I have no conflict of interest on Jeegar Chauhan, I have tried to list him based on the information available online using the available media links. So i request you kindly move the page back.

Looking forward to having your support for the same. Abspeaks (talk) 13:11, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeegar Chauhan (July 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All these sources read like adverts.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jeegar Chauhan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 13:24, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vishal Vada Vala for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vishal Vada Vala is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vishal Vada Vala until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:36, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Few suggestions

Thank you for taking interest in Gujarati cinema topics. I have been writing/editing articles related to Gujarati cinema for long time and am happy to have more hands on the topics. You are doing good work here. There are few suggestions which I would like to make.

Checkout WP:NFILM. Most Gujarati films would not qualify the criteria to have an article on Wikipedia so don't waste your time in creating articles on films which might get deleted in future. Baseline is to have at least two reviews in trustworthy and independent media such as newspapers and magazines (no portals, influencers or social media) in any language (e.g. Gujarati or English). If the film fails to have 2 reviews, it is not important film at all to have an article here. They should be better covered in the year-wise list instead (e.g. List of Gujarati films of 2024) For example, I added 2 reviews (from TOI and Mid-Day) in Builder Boys which you had created. You should try to add 2 reviews in other film articles you created before. More reviews are better for film. You may find film article without any reviews but it does not necessarily mean that it may survive in future.
Checkout WP:NFILMMAKER. Most Gujarati directors/producers may fail the criteria unless they have created very popular major films or won national award. Same applies to many Gujarati actors too. So most of them will be deleted, wasting your efforts and time. And repeatedly creating articles of such non-notable people makes you suspect that you have either some conflict of interest with these people or you are editing for some reward or some favours.
If you are associated with Gujarati film industry in any capacity, be careful and DO NOT edit article in conflict of interest. See #Managing a conflict of interest above. And if you paid or rewarded in any way, see Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. If you keep editing against the guidelines, you might get blocked from editing even if you are suspected of paid editing or COI editing. So better not edit in violation guidelines. Do not edit from multiple accounts too as it is also prohibited. DO NOT RISK TO GET BLOCKED.

Feel free to ask any question or confusion. I will be happy to answer and help. Please keep contributing to Gujarati cinema topics. Regards,- Nizil (talk) 07:39, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Nizil for the suggestions and inputs and will implement the same. Looking forward to having your suggestions and inputs in the future as well. Also meanwhile I would appreciate if you can help on the one of the listing on Vishal Vada Vala which I did and have been nominated for the deletion, I am not able figure out the challenge and reason for that delete. Looking forward to hearing from you. Abspeaks (talk) 07:51, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vishal Vada Vala has reference issue. Look, all the references are primarily about films, not about Vishal. The references should be about Vishal himself. Find new references and replace. If there are no references about Vishal himself, he is not important/notable even if his films are. Independent news media interviews (not social media) or article about him can be references. At least 3 of films should be notable (having at least 2 reviews in those film articles under Reception section). This is bottomline to qualify as a borderline notable filmmaker, in my opinion. If you can't find references, let it get deleted. If you can improve as i told, comment Keep with your opinion and defence with references on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vishal Vada Vala. If most votes are Keep and references satisfy, it will not be deleted. - Nizil (talk) 08:13, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Abspeaks. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Vishal Vada Vala, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 09:49, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jeraxmoira, I don't have any external relationship with Vishal Vada Vala. I have created the page based on the information available internet and media articles. As it got nominated for the deletion so I was just looking for the help what could be the reason, which I got to know that the person doesn't have enough citations to qualify the same. Abspeaks (talk) 11:33, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vishal Vada Vala was born in Nanavada village, Ta: Padadhari, Dist: Rajkot , Gujarat. He has done his schooling from Nanavada Prathmik Shala (Primary school). Vishal Vada Vala made his directorial debut with film Fillam, which got released 2016. Then he made Raghu CNG which released in 2019,which was acclaimed by crtics. After that he came up with Saiyar Mori Re in 2022, Samandar (film) in 2024 and Ram Bharosey in 2024. He is one of the raising talent who have vision in cinema and tell his stories with passion. - Where did you get this information from? I hope you are aware of WP:V and WP:COI. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 11:50, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I got the information from few of the YouTube podcast video which I came across few months ago on YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xK-5M92snOg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqbGL3nsULM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJlhjqaIhbs Abspeaks (talk) 12:02, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeegar Chauhan (October 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All the sources are press releases, or churnalism based on press releases. Some of the sources are indeed the same press release (1 press release published in 3 places = 1 source). Press releases are not indepedent and not secondary.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jeegar Chauhan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 16:22, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]