Jump to content

User talk:A520/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2

The Signpost: 7 March 2011

The Signpost: 14 March 2011

The Signpost: 21 March 2011

The Signpost: 28 March 2011

The Signpost: 4 April 2011

The Signpost: 11 April 2011

The Signpost: 18 April 2011

Reply

How is my edit unconstructive last I checked Twitter can not be used as a source.--FuinnForever 18:51, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Because you put "POWER UPS" before "Girltrash :" and that is unconstructive.A520 | Talk me away! 18:56, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

What no I didn't I removed power up from it as its self promotional.--FuinnForever 18:58, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 April 2011

DOMA

Hi A520, can you explain what exactly was unconstructive about my edits? Thanks, NYyankees51 (talk) 19:25, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Hello A520! I'd like to acknowledge you for the great work you're doing fighting vandalism. It's admirable when new users such as yourself take on the dirty work of cleaning this place up. I took a look at DOMA and the edits in question are fully supported by the sources. So, I'm going to revert. Btw, we usually don't template established users (see WP:TEMPLAR). Keep up the good work! Lionel (talk) 04:53, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Hidden Page

While hidden pages are not specifically forbidden in wikipedia, they are discouraged. This is an encyclopedia, not a chat site. As I think you know, actually. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 15:43, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 May 2011

Pioneer Valley

The page "Pioneer Valley" had been a skeleton page without any illustrative photos, or even much information about the region. As a Pioneer Valley resident, I am attempting to fill it in. PLease refrain from reverting edits. I am actively working on sourcing the information; however, I believe that it is better to have information on the page than a sparse, skeletal page that mentions very little about the geographic region. JWM83 (talk)

You put the following emoticon: ;) into the article and it is considered vandalism.A520 | Talk me away! 16:42, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Craig Raine

My edits to Craig Raine were all relevant and reliably sourced. Why delete them? Farrtj (talk) 11:46, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

}}

The Signpost: 9 May 2011

Rick Mercer

There's no question that Rick Mercer is gay, so why revert the edit?! --174.95.190.13 (talk) 10:10, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Arman Cagle

Are you patrolling recent pages and are you an administrator? Arman Cagle (Contact me EMail Me Contribs) Please remember if you have any questions, please reply on my talk page. 19:28, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

I am not an administrator and no,I do not patrol recent pages.

A520 | Talk me away! 16:17, 17 May 2011 (UTC) }}

The Signpost: 16 May 2011

Arman Cagle

Are you patrolling recent pages and are you an administrator? Arman Cagle (Contact me EMail Me Contribs) Please remember if you have any questions, please reply on my talk page. 19:28, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

I am not an administrator and no,I do not patrol recent pages.

A520 | Talk me away! 16:17, 17 May 2011 (UTC) }}

May 2011

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Good Luck Charlie. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 09:15, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 09:16, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Arman Cagle

Are you patrolling recent pages and are you an administrator? Arman Cagle (Contact me EMail Me Contribs) Please remember if you have any questions, please reply on my talk page. 19:28, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

I am not an administrator and no,I do not patrol recent pages.

A520 | Talk me away! 16:17, 17 May 2011 (UTC) }}


The Signpost: 23 May 2011

Hi. I've begun a discussion about your reversion of my edits. May I ask why you did it? - Richard Cavell (talk) 12:33, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 May 2011

Stop Undoing My Edits

I'm in the middle of reordering the history in History of Alchemy into chronological order. You have just messed up my editing by reverting it in the middle. There was only a few seconds gap where you managed to revert and screw everything up. Please check the history first before doing something like this. Now I have to start again. Will Timony, Ph.D (talkcontribs) 09:37, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Stop removing my edits - that part of Afrika Korps article was removed because its claims are only sourced by few blog posts - none of them contain or reference verifiable information - http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10007312 and http://www.zchor.org/libya/libya.htm contain information which was proven to be false, such as SS units in afrika etc. - also two of his sources directly contradict each other in some important cliams. Also every major documentary about Afrika Korps confirm that there was no Gestapo or SS in afrika. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.213.212.248 (talk) 21:09, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Rebel44 23:09 3.6.2011

Barnstar

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
You keep on beating me! I dream of horses @ 20:35, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for the barnstar!
A520 | Talk me away!/sign it! 20:39, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
You're very welcome! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 20:41, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

San Juan High School Page

Before you call my edit vandalism, I suggest that you research the content that I deleted. The content I removed was someones idea of a joke. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.171.49.164 (talk) 13:55, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion versus proposed deletion

Hi, I think you should consider nomination for speedy deletion rather than proposed deletion when no evidence of notability is presented in the article. Thanks, WWGB (talk) 14:14, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Hello, A520. You have new messages at Sbsodhi's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Edit Warring Warning

You have been asked to provide reasons for your edits which you have denied and instead insist on edit warring, and threatening me. Your actions are not acceptable, and my rewrite of the article is valid and fully referenced using reliable and verifiably references. You will be reported if you continue your course of action. I don't take nonsense in any form mate. 27.33.143.93 (talk) 09:30, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Edit Warning

Please refrain from abusive behaviour and making edits to the talk pages of other users. It creates a rather negative atmosphere on Wikipedia and will not be tolerated. Troll elsewhere. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.40.56.38 (talk) 15:48, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

You have been behaving in an abusive manner on my talk page. Refrain from further edits or you will be reported. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.40.56.38 (talk) 15:54, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 June 2011

Removal of an agreed upon revision

We had agreed in the discussion page of the Paul Revere article to revert it to the previous version, prior to comments by Sarah Palin and the subsequent editing of the article. You reverted the page despite an agreement by multiple editors towards this move.

Also, I have been on wikipedia for years, do not tell me to sandbox something, ok? I just don't edit very often. Scryer_360 (talk) 15:08, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

I agree with Scryer that his revision should be restored, but I doubt you (A520) had no idea of the discussion and merely reverted because you saw removal of content. I assume it was just an honest mistake on your part Purplebackpack89≈≈≈≈ 15:24, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Hoaxes

Neither McIntosh Run nor Long Pond (Herring Cove, Halifax, NS, Canada) are hoaxes, and references are in fact available, despite claims to the contrary in your "prod" reasoning. Even dumping "Long Pond (Herring Cove, Halifax, NS, Canada)" into Google returns results. Hairhorn (talk) 15:52, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 June 2011

The Signpost: 20 June 2011

The Signpost: 27 June 2011

The Signpost: 4 July 2011

The Signpost: 11 July 2011

The Signpost: 18 July 2011

The Signpost: 25 July 2011

The Signpost: 01 August 2011

AntiA520

Stopit you. you must cancel your account — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.125.96.157 (talk) 23:26, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 August 2011

The Signpost: 15 August 2011

The Signpost: 22 August 2011

Would you tag User:A520/Sandbox2 and User talk:A520/Sandbox2 for deletion with {{db-userreq}}? In a July/August 2010 policy discussion (at Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not/Archive 34#Does WP:NOTMYSPACE apply to secret pages?), community consensus was that the policy Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not prohibits secret pages. Thank you, Cunard (talk) 01:24, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Thank you, a520, for tagging those pages for deletion. By the way, User:A520#Hidden page is now outdated. Cunard (talk) 16:48, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
I have added a notice on User:A520#Hidden page saying that it is outdated.

A520 | Talk me away!/sign it! 20:18, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

WTF?

Huh? I've given him 3 warnings. Why are you giving him a level 1 warning? Pdfpdf (talk) 13:58, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 August 2011

The Signpost: 05 September 2011

The Signpost: 12 September 2011

The Signpost: 19 September 2011

The Signpost: 26 September 2011


The Signpost: 3 October 2011

The Signpost: 10 October 2011

The Signpost: 17 October 2011

The Signpost: 24 October 2011

The Signpost: 31 October 2011

The Signpost: 7 November2011

The Signpost: 14 November 2011

The Signpost: 21 November 2011

The Signpost: 28 November 2011

The Signpost: 05 December 2011

The Signpost: 12 December 2011

The Signpost: 19 December 2011

New Page Patrolling

Hi. Thank you for patrolling new pages. If you come across a new page that duplicates an existing article, please apply the correct CSD tag (WP:A10) for speedy deletion, and remember to include the name of the existing page. You may wish to return to WONSAN KI DONG KIM and apply the correct template. For more information please see WP:NPP. If you ever need any help or advice for patrolling new pages, don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. Happy editing!--Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:33, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Barnstar for you.

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For beating me to a revert Mrlittleirish 10:48, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Thank you! A520 | Talk me away!/sign it! 10:50, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

You beat me again!!! Good work ;) Mrlittleirish 12:57, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Please stop

Users are allowed to remove comments and warnings from their own talk pages, as that is an acknowledgement that they have read them (see WP:DRC). Please stop edit-warring them back on with rollback as you did here, or it may be removed. Thank you. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:47, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Ok, I will never do that again. A520 | Talk me away!/sign it! 14:10, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

This is not vandalism. This info is correct. Previous one was also true statement but I guess it was kind of an opinion than a fact.114.143.7.226 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:02, 22 December 2011 (UTC).

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thank You Jaipuneetsingh (talk) 16:28, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Thank you! A520 | Talk me away!/sign it! 17:13, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Updating Pages

Hi,A520, How can I contribute to Classical Movements' wikipedia page, so that the following banners might be removed: "A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. Please discuss further on the talk page. (December 2011) This article may be written like an advertisement. Please help improve it by rewriting promotional content from a neutral point of view and removing any inappropriate external links. (December 2011). Many Thanks! (AbigailFason (talk) 18:46, 22 December 2011 (UTC))

The first banner says that the article needs clean-up. That is how you need to contribute to the article. Read Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more information. The second banner says that the article is written like an advertisement. To remove this banner you should modify the page so it becomes encyclopedic. If you need help again, place {{help me}} on your user talk page. A520 | Talk me away!/sign it! 18:57, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your prompt reply! I read over the page and it appears to be very neutral, so I moved to Clean Up. When I looked at the clean up, and there is nothing listed for Classical Movements. I tried to add the history to Blue Heart travel by adding an article from Seattle Times saying that it was one of the first touring companies to arrange tours to Croatia and the post was immediately taken down...please advise! Thank you very much (AbigailFason (talk) 19:03, 22 December 2011 (UTC))

Thanks

...for the revert and the AIV report. Filing Flunky (talk) 11:17, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome! A520 | Talk me away!/sign it! 11:18, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi

I think emworks article is a useful article for people in electromagnetics circle. specially, when their educational version is free. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ali bostani (talkcontribs) 22:47, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

RfA

I am sorry, but I have closed your Request for adminship prematurely. Simply put, you only have 2100 edits on Wikipedia; while your edit count isn't the only determining factor, and numerous people have their own personal standards by which they judge RfA candidates, this particular RfA was all but assured of not passing.

I am sorry about this, and I hope you don't take it personally. If you continue to contribute to the project in a positive fashion, I am confident that you would be able to submit a successful RfA in the future. You may wish to consider applying for an evaluation by other Wikipedia editors for feedback on how to obtain the necessary experience. Once you are ready to request adminship again, there is a great admin coaching program available, as well as a guide to requests for adminship.

Most of your If you have any other questions about becoming an administrator, please don't hesitate to ask other admins. Good luck! HurricaneFan25 — 15:35, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 December 2011

The Signpost: 02 January 2012

Why my page was deleted.

I would like to know why my page was deleted. The content of the page was about my company and is all fact. The content that is up about my company is not fact and is very misleading to people reading it. The old Company who printed Psychic news was liquidated and no longer exists. When I registed my company in 2010 their was no company trading in that name, however a company which had used the name in the past was liqiudated at a later date and the name was not sold as part of the asets as the company no longer held that right to the name. the post about psychic news being soled to JV Trust is misleading and doing harm to my company. The only bought the arcives of Psychic Press 1995 LTD not Psychic News, as I own that company. Sandra McFadden — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sandramcfadden (talkcontribs) 17:02, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

You should probably take a look at WP:NOTE. I think there is a rule somewhere about origional research too. In short, don't create an article about your own business. When it gets big enough, or noteable enough, someone will do it for you. Mrlittleirish 08:12, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 January 2012

The Signpost: 16 January 2012

The Signpost: 23 January 2012

The Signpost: 30 January 2012

A Discussion that may be of interest to you

Hey there, Alpha CCL, there is a discussion that may interest you at Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit/Re-formatting/Discussion#CVU Guideline Proposal. As one of the hardest working Anti-vandals that I've run into, I'm sure the Project would love to hear your imput. Cheers! Achowat (talk) 19:05, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 February 2012

IPS Supported Employment

It looks like you may have flagged "IPS Supported Employment" for speedy deletion, then removed that flag. Is that correct? If not, I would like to contest this deletion and request both clarification on how this article is appropriate for speedy deletion and advice on how to improve it. If it is too short, by how much? If there is in sufficient context, how so? The topic is worthy of inclusion on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Willhaslett (talkcontribs) 04:13, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 February 2012

The Signpost: 20 February 2012

The Signpost: 27 February 2012

The Signpost: 05 March 2012

The Signpost: 12 March 2012

The Signpost: 19 March 2012

The Signpost: 26 March 2012

The Signpost: 02 April 2012

The Signpost: 09 April 2012

The Signpost: 16 April 2012

The Signpost: 23 April 2012

The Signpost: 30 April 2012

The Signpost: 07 May 2012

The Signpost: 14 May 2012

The Signpost: 21 May 2012

do ur homework, kid.

And do something constructive on the Wikipedia. Are you aiming for the police force?--174.2.8.221 (talk) 13:52, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Vandalism and edit war on Studio 54 and The Rascals

Hi, the user you ended up reigning in on the Studio 54 and The Rascals articles is most likely a sockpuppet of WikAdvisor. If you have any information you would like to contribute from your dealings with anonymous user: 66.65.134.176 [1], please feel free to contribute to the discussion about the SPI case [2]. OliverTwisted (Talk) (Stuff) 07:36, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 May 2012

The Signpost: 04 June 2012

The Signpost: 11 June 2012

The Signpost: 18 June 2012

The Signpost: 25 June 2012

The Signpost: 02 July 2012

The Signpost: 09 July 2012

The Signpost: 16 July 2012