User talk:7deadlyconsulting

Welcome!

Hi 7deadlyconsulting! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! AntiDionysius (talk) 13:28, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charlie Cart Project (July 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Charlie Cart Project and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 05:56, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 7deadlyconsulting! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 05:56, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charlie Cart Project (July 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Charlie Cart Project and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 14:32, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charlie Cart Project (July 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Charlie Cart Project and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:00, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charlie Cart Project (July 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

hardly any improvement

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Charlie Cart Project and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 20:55, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

paid editing

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:7deadlyconsulting, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=7deadlyconsulting|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 20:55, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that I have done that, but I may need some extra support in learning if I did so correctly. I am a brand new Wikipedia user who is trying to learn how to use the program for professional development purposes. 7deadlyconsulting (talk) 16:24, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You say on my user page that "I am trying to support a colleague in getting set up with a wikipedia page." this means you have a clear conflict of interest and you need to make the necessary disclosure on your user page. Theroadislong (talk) 01:40, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this feedback, this not a co-worker this is a friend I know in the industry. I don't work for her company. We are professional acquaintances. 7deadlyconsulting (talk) 01:42, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You STILL have a conflict of interest. Theroadislong (talk) 01:43, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that feedback. Just for my own clarification, this is still the case even if I am not being paid and I am just wanting to help a friend whose nonprofit I admire? 7deadlyconsulting (talk) 01:44, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely YES! Theroadislong (talk) 01:46, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! I believe I just adjusted my page accordingly. 7deadlyconsulting (talk) 01:49, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Charlie Cart Project has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Charlie Cart Project. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 01:50, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, 7deadlyconsulting. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Charlie Cart Project, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 01:52, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charlie Cart Project (August 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CFA was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No improvement since last decline.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Charlie Cart Project and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

C F A 💬 03:31, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your account has been blocked from editing because your username gives the impression that the account represents a group, club, organization, company, or website. Your username is the principal reason for the block. You are welcome to continue editing after you have chosen a new username that complies with Wikipedia's username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable, regardless of the username that you choose. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid or compensated in any way, you must disclose who is paying you to edit here. You may also read our FAQ for article subjects.

Please take a moment to either create a new account, or request a username change to this account.

To create a new account with a different username, simply log out of this account and then click here to make a new one.
If you prefer to change the username of this account, you may do so by adding the following text to the bottom of your user talk page (this page): {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Important items to note:

The new username that you choose must represent you as an individual person, and it must comply with Wikipedia's username policy.
The new username you choose cannot already be taken and used by another account. You can search here to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns, "There is no global account for [username]", that means it is available.
Please also note that you are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it also identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".

Appeals: If your username does not represent a group, organization, website, or other entity described above, and if you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the following text to the bottom of your user talk page (this page): {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Thank you. Cabayi (talk) 09:00, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

7deadlyconsulting (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

new username (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

requesting to take the word consulting out of my username to have it read just 7deadly as a I am not being compensated directly or indirectly for creating pages. I just want to create pages for nonprofits I admire. 7deadlyconsulting (talk) 03:54, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

See below. JBW (talk) 23:03, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please select a new username. You should not write about subjects you admire as it creates a conflict of interest. Your current username implies not so much admiration as paid advocacy. Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:20, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, please edit your request to remove the words "new username" and put your choice of username in their place. This makes the rename process easier. While a good new username is sufficient to get unblocked, you will need to formally declare your conflict of interest. You said you were editing about a "colleague" which suggests you and the colleague have the same employer; you don't need to be specifically paid to edit to be a paid editor. 331dot (talk) 08:24, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

7deadlyconsulting (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

7Deadly (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

prevous username gave the impression I was being paid directly or indirectly. I am training on wikipedia for personal professional development purposes.

Decline reason:

You are here for the purpose of promoting your clients/colleague/friend/whatever. Even if we were to take your word for the fact that you are not doing so for pay, there is no place on Wikipedia for an editor who is here to promote. Nothing you have said suggests that you intend to do any other kind of editing. You were told that if you changed your username you could continue editing, but the nature of your comments during the block have made it clear that that is not an acceptable option, so it is withdrawn. JBW (talk) 23:03, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

7deadlyconsulting (talk) 21:19, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! There seems to be a problem with the formatting here. Would you like me to try and fix it for you? QwertyForest (talk) 11:30, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please I would really appreciate that. I am still learning. 7deadlyconsulting (talk) 12:24, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed the request. Unblock requests should not be indented and should not have the nowiki and code markup. You can look at the page history to see what I did. Since you should only have one unblock request at a time, I suggest that you merge the contents of this one into the other one. Best regards, QwertyForest (talk) 12:36, 28 August 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Thank you I appreciate your help! 7deadlyconsulting (talk) 14:40, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]