User talk:73.60.41.24

February 2017

Hello, I'm NeilN. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ethics of eating meat, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 02:15, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Ethics of eating meat. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Jim1138 (talk) 01:57, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Recent edit to Parking brake

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Parking brake, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 23:06, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ethics of eating meat, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:27, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Slow edit warring

Hello, I'm BullRangifer. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Anti-abortion movements have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.

You made an unsourced change which has been reverted. It appears to be slow edit warring over a long time. You have made this same, and/or essentially same edit several times over many months. Please discuss the matter and seek a consensus before doing it again. Without a consensus, just don't even go there.

There is already a section which addresses this, but it has only one comment. I'm going to reactivate the discussion there, and I expect you will discuss the matter and defend your position with RS. Thank you. -- BullRangifer (talk) 02:46, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

August 2017

Hello, I'm Classicwiki. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Outhouse, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Classicwiki (talk) (ping me please) 21:46, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Outhouse, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Kid nation is not a Reliable Source nor are implications. Classicwiki (talk) (ping me please) 22:23, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Mary, mother of Jesus. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 16:30, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sex assignment, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Funcrunch (talk) 21:40, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

November 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Political correctness, you may be blocked from editing. Hummerrocket (talk) 16:42, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

I have also reverted you on PC, for reasons given in my edit summary. Go to talk, and 'learn the ropes' if you want really to edit constructively. Pincrete (talk) 19:03, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

December 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at United States pro-life movement. Binksternet (talk) 00:19, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

April 2018

Hello, I'm Oshwah. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Hansel and Gretel (opera) seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:41, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Female urinal. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:55, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

May 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Mr. Tambourine Man. Binksternet (talk) 03:14, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

June 2018

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Venison , but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 05:00, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Venison, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 05:11, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

References are required

Per wp:verifiability, wp:cite a wp:reliable source for significant edits. help:referencing for beginners Jim1138 (talk) 05:11, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

--Yamla (talk) 12:34, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

August 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Rob Manfred. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. BilCat (talk) 04:46, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Colorado Springs Planned Parenthood shooting. GorillaWarfare (talk) 04:06, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

3RR warning

Your recent editing history at chain letter shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.--Dmol (talk) 09:29, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Your edits in unisex public toilet

Thank you for your edits in unisex public toilet. Your additions appear valuable to me, however, can you please substantiate them with appropriate references to go with them? I see on your talk page that many people have asked you for references for content added. EMsmile (talk) 14:08, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

November 2018

When an edit of yours has been reverted once before at an article, as was the case at Voter ID laws in the United States, then it doesn't make any sense to do the exact same edit all over again, like you did in this edit. That one has been reverted as well. Persistence along this path could be deemed disruptive, so don't go there. Also, please read about the use of edit summary. Cordially, Mathglot (talk) 08:52, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

2019 Indigenous Peoples March Incident

I am politely asking you to converse with me about your recent additions before editing this article.

Wikipedia requires reliable sources, and looking at your additions, there does not seem to be any reliable sources to back up your claim. Also, youtube comments are NOT a reliable source (BTW, see Wikipedia:YOUTUBE for more information) - if you want these changes to be accepted into the article by the community, you need to provide sources that adhere to Wikipedia's policies. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 23:36, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019

Hello, I'm Nick Moyes. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2019 Indigenous Peoples March Incident, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please avoid adding content or commentary that appears to be a synthesis or original research. Base it only upon what other reliable sources have said, please. Nick Moyes (talk) 02:19, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2019

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 02:15, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

May 2019

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. El_C 22:19, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Unisex public toilet, you may be blocked from editing. Mathglot (talk) 08:55, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

June 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Mo'ne Davis. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 01:29, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Mo'ne Davis. I am One of Many (talk) 15:02, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/73.60.41.24, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

I am One of Many (talk) 15:46, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

July 2019

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Outhouse, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please do not add unsourced content Fuzheado | Talk 23:43, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Democrats for Life of America, you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 13:36, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Democrats for Life of America. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 19:01, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---