Jump to content

User talk:71.41.210.146/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
IPThis user thinks that accounts are overrated and would much rather edit from an IP address. ±


Articles Created

[edit]

(Redirects are not counted, so converting a redirect to a real article is counted,)

I think there are a couple of redirect-to-article conversions missed here...

Zegoma Beach

[edit]

Thanks for the hard work on SNO+, your efforts are appreciated! --Zegoma beach 03:44, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Deoxycytidine (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 00:40, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia!

[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions.

Currently, you are editing without a username. You can continue to do so, as you are not required to log in to Wikipedia to read and edit articles; however, logging in will result in a username being shown instead of your IP address (yours is 71.41.210.146). Logging in does not require any personal details, and there are many other benefits for logging in.

When you edit pages:

  • Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly.
  • Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
  • If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
  • Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as copyrighted text, advertisement messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such content or editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. For now, if you are stuck, you can click the edit this page tab above, type {{helpme}} in the edit box, and then click Save Page; an experienced Wikipedian will be around shortly to answer any questions you may have. Also feel free to ask a question on my talk page. I will answer your questions as far as I can! Thank you again for contributing to Wikipedia. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 01:38, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning for editing Glycine (diff). The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. // MartinBot 00:39, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning for editing Alanine (diff). The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. // MartinBot 00:42, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Misunderstanding

[edit]

Ah, reviewing your contributions more closely, I've found that the block was in error. Now, the reason why you were blocked in the first place was due to a report on WP:AIV by a bot named "User:MartinBot". This bot works as an anti-vandalism bot, reverting edits that it deems to be "nonsense". Your edits were reverted immediately by this bot, due to the somewhat random nature of the SMILES formulae. MartinBot automatically reports editors who have vandalized more than four times to the bot section of the Administrator Intervention against Vandalism page. Administrators rarely check the contributions of a user when it has been reported by MartinBot because the bot very rarely makes mistakes. I hope you accept my humblest apologies for this block; it was a general misunderstanding between the parties. Cheers, Sean William 03:19, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In the future, if you wish to be unblocked, place the {{unblock}} template on your talk page or send the blocking administrator an e-mail. Sean William 03:21, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MESSENGER

[edit]

Thanks very much for the excellently worded paragraph you added to the MESSENGER article. It does a great job of explaining both the reasons for, and consequences of, the gravity assist mechanism! (Sdsds - Talk) 07:04, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unicursal Hexagram

[edit]

Nice edit for grammar! Be encouraged! docboat 08:50, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Successful AFC

[edit]

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and Izana Observatory was created. Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia, and please consider registering an account. Thank you.--Xnuala (talk)(Review) 20:44, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AFC's on hold

[edit]

Hi there! Because your request requires a rename of an existing page, I'd like to make sure that there is consensus within the community to make the move. I posted on the article talk page, so perhaps if you would like to communicate with other users interested in the telescopes and point me to that I would be happy to do the move for you! Basically, I don't want to step on any toes if the move is controversial, and I requested expert assistance because I'm not at all knowledgable about the topic. Are you aware of any controversy that making the move might cause, or can you provide me with some resources so I can learn more about the topic? Thanks for staying involved, and I'd like to make sure that your requests are dealt with! --Xnuala (talk)(Review) 23:35, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You've definitely convinced me. I see no controversy evident, and appreciate the time you have taken to educate me on the topic! The move shall be performed shortly. Have you thought at all about registering for an account? No pressure, you are definitely welcome to contine contributing as an IP if you wish.--Xnuala (talk)(Review) 00:59, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, all done! Let me know if you have any other requests!--Xnuala (talk)(Review) 01:10, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

T.H. Huxley page

[edit]

Dear 71, Thanks for your input, which I've adjusted so that the article follows the same pattern right through (as per Wiki editing guidelines).

First, I've added a Hux-Wilberforce debate sub-section. As the article is much longer than it was these sign-posts are needed.

Lucas 1979 ref was already in the reference section under Links, and yes, I did read it! Now I've added it to the sub-section Hux-Wilberforce debate as a standard reference. The Browne and Desmond references already there contain a whole slew of previous refs to this topic (there are many), and are actually the best sources. But I'm happy to have Lucas in even though it's something of a minority view. And direct to the on-line version is still available in Links.

Because the article now has detailed accounts in sub-sections, details need not be put in the intro. Readability of intros is important. So you'll find the exact date of the debate in the sub-section. Everything in the intro is well justified by what follows. The Encyc Brit link is an exception, because that was the starting point for so many Wiki stubs. Macdonald-ross 15:13, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AFC

[edit]

Successful AFC

[edit]

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and Kcmil was created. Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia, and please consider registering an account. Thank you. Powers T 13:59, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits to Mistress Matisse

[edit]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, 71.41.210.146! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule libsyn\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! AntiSpamBot 23:53, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hyphens and n-dashes

[edit]

Is there any particular reason for your pathological hatred of hyphens? Why are you changing them to n-dashes? Grant | Talk 10:16, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Because they're often used incorrectly in Wikipedia, as people aren't used to typing the proper dashes, even though they're the first things available in the Insert box at the bottom of every edit page. See [Dash] for full details.
It just happens to annoy me, so since I'm improving wikipedia in a small but finite way, and the difficulty of making the edit is very low, I do it a lot. Most recently, I edited every link to Philippines campaign (1944-45), making it link to the page (that it already redirected to) whose title properly includes an en-dash, Philippines campaign (1944–45). 71.41.210.146 02:21, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
D'oh, I beg your pardon; you obviously know what you're doing :-) I'm too used to the reverse case, in which people use hyphens in place of n-dashes or even m-dashes.
As a hard-working and valuable contributor, I suggest you create a Wikipedia account, there are a lot of advantages if you do. Grant | Talk 02:59, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Another dash-fascist! I do in fact edit some articles solely to put en- and/or em-dashes where they belong, where previous editors have put hyphens (or used en dashes where em dashes should go). Well met, and I'm not going to pressure you to create an account. (If I had a static IP address, I might not have logged back in this year...) —GrammarFascist (talk) 10:42, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Style

[edit]

Note that ==See also== goes before references, and is written with small "a" in "also", so not ==See Also==. Would be nice if you make an account, since you contribute a lot. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 04:00, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies; thanks for fixing that. 71.41.210.146 15:19, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect accepted!

[edit]

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and Alitrunk was created. Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. Thank you for helping Wikipedia! --EoL talk 01:58, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfC

[edit]

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and Template:Cleanup-reorganize was created. Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. Thank you for helping Wikipedia! MSGJ (talk) 19:38, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Could you possibly edit the page Wikipedia:Template messages to list and describe the template you have designed? If this is a problem please let me know. Thanks. MSGJ (talk) 19:41, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and Template:AT power connector was created. Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. Thank you for helping Wikipedia! Tiptoety talk 01:21, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wombat

[edit]

You are right, a wombat is in fact a boring machine. the result was a long, thin tunnel in which a mine change was laid, thus creating a Wombat mine. I don't have a whole lot of academic sources, but will see about adding some. You should add this subject discussion to the Battle of Vimy Ridge talk page so that further discussion becomes possible.Labattblueboy 17:11, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

{{editsemiprotected}}

[edit]

Your request for template creation has been granted. I have also created the Category associated with the template. Let me know if there's anything else you need. On an unrelated note, you should consider registering so the bots stop harassing you. Adam McCormick (talk) 01:03, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mersenne prime 45?

[edit]

I have removed [1] the leading digits you added for the size. Do you have a reliable source (forum speculation not allowed) for them? PrimeHunter (talk) 02:47, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. One or more of the external links you added in this edit to Killer NIC do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. You may wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alexius08 (talk) 06:46, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

6b/8b encoding‎

[edit]

Thank you for your useful and factual filling out of the 6b/8b encoding‎. Much appreciated! —Sladen (talk) 14:30, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

8b/10b encoding‎

[edit]

Further to your earlier work on the 6b/8b encoding article, thank you for your recent clean-ups to the 8b/10b encoding‎ article. Appreciations! —Sladen (talk) 03:07, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: WWVB

[edit]

I made this edit so it matched up with the time code diagram above and the weighting of the other fields in the time code. --  Denelson83  07:34, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your last change. The statements "as of 24:00Z today" and "as of 00:00Z today" don't make any sense. My wording makes sense to me because you're "adding up" the values of the DST status bits. --  Denelson83  07:07, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The reversion to the coordinates table was accidental, and has been undone. The DST status explanation as you put it doesn't match up with the status explanation in the graphic. The wording that I use explains the sequential nature of the DST status bits in a clear and concise way. Plus, I don't think very many readers are going to want to wrap their heads around ISO 8601. --  Denelson83  08:13, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Addition to Kill A Watt

[edit]

Please note that I moved your recent addition to the Kill A Watt article to the talk page for improvement talk:Kill A Watt#Claim about reading errors (needs better sources, needs clarification). Please contribute to improving it there before restoring it to the article. Thanks. 00:36, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: Nice work on Template:Time signal stations!

[edit]

Thanks. I thought the columnar format was much more legible. You'll also notice that I added a link to another time signal station, HLA. --  Denelson83  05:12, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

Thanks for your constructive edits on DDR3 SDRAM (amongst several others in the last while). It's been appreciated. :) 03:59, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

PCI bus protocol

[edit]

OK, I will read the new section. I'll post a reply tonight or tomorrow. JMiall₰ 16:26, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies but I've not finished this yet and I'm about to go away for the week. It's possible I won't be able to post a reply until a week on Monday. Hope you can wait this long. JMiall₰ 06:03, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
And a second lot of apologies for the long delay. I hope to have some time at the weekend to get back to this. JMiall₰ 23:28, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Comments on new section for PCI article

[edit]

(please post these to the talkpage there if you wish):

  • You asked first of all if it read well to someone unfamiliar with the specs. I think that basically it does.
  • I'm a bit worried though that there is too much detail, I'm not sure where is a good place to draw the line though. Possibly all this information should be split off to (an)other article(s) and summarised within this one?
  • I've not looked at everything you have put on the talkpage yet, I'll come back with some more comments if you found these useful.

Specific questions/issues to be going on with:

  • Why is "asserted" in quotes?
  • 'controlled by 5 main control signals' etc - is signal the right word here? ie are FRAME# etc the name of a particular line or the signals that are present on that line?
  • Also the when the lines/signals are mentioned they sometimes are put in brackets, sometimes commas and sometimes nothing.
  • 'will remain high' - add 'voltage', also voltage needs linking in the main article
  • 'each bus line be undriven' - given the potential for confusion for someone not too familiar with English is it possible to reword?
  • Link Pull-up resistor
  • 'Signals nominally change' - should this be 'nominally' or 'normally'? Is the spec not specific about precisely when they should change?
  • The wording rather implies at that all the PCI devices are concious intelligent beings. It is probably worth toning this down a bit. ie 'decides', 'promise', 'generally attempt', 'desire'
  • '(There are rules for how it is supposed to behave, but they will be mysterious to any single device.)' - is this necessary?
  • link 'bus master'?
  • 'but may not start one unless it observes GNT# asserted the cycle before it begins a transaction' - unclear 'it's
  • 'so there are actually three signals' - fairly colloqial language
  • 'Actually, it has 2.5 cycles' - 'they' not 'it'?
  • 'On the fifth cycle...' - I'm unsure what this paragraph means.
  • 'Access to PCI configuration space is a special case' - of what?
  • 'enables' - link or explain?
  • 'In case of a write' - missing 'the'
  • 'more purely'?
  • Several times you use 'read' or 'write' when it would probably be clearer to use 'read signal' or something similar
  • 'line turns around during' - what does turns around mean here?

Main article:

  • 'However, they are not wired in parallel as are the other traces' - this needs explaining. Traces have not been mentioned yet and it is unclear what this means any way due to the 'are not...as are...' JMiall₰ 23:16, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AFC accepted: Template:Densely packed decimal

[edit]

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and Template:Densely packed decimal was created. Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia, and please consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself. Thank you for helping Wikipedia! ∙ AJChamtalk 00:03, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"proper minus sign" at WWVB

[edit]

Unfortunately if someone now does a text search on the page for "-17", they won't find it. Jeh (talk) 10:13, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it's a bit of a pain. Using a hyphen sure looks a lot worse. Hopefully, browsers will start considering the variants different "cases" and so will match if case-insensitive matching is desired. I don't know a perfect solution. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 23:28, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The time code format table WWVB

[edit]

One thought I had was to add a fourth column, "value of bit from example diagram." Put an M in those cells for the markers. One thing that has stopped me from doing that is that I can't think of a concise column heading. Is it ok to use an asterisk and explain it in a footnote to the table? Jeh (talk) 18:31, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I used "Ex" as a column header, which I think is good enough. Done. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 23:29, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely so, with the added text in the "meaning" column. Better than I'd envisioned! Thanks! Jeh (talk) 01:48, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
So based on your example I did the analagous thing at WWV (radio station). Would not have tackled the table munging without seeing what you'd done. Thanks again. Jeh (talk) 04:20, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Conflicted licensing on image File:ApolloLunarEscapeSystemExample.jpg

[edit]

The above noted image or media file appears to have conflicted licensing. As an image cannot be both 'free' and 'unfree', a check of the exact status of this media/image concerned is advised.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:21, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Er, why can't it be both free and non-free? As the Template:PD-Pre1978 says, it's in the public domain in the United States. It might be non-free in other jurisdictions; I'm not certain enough to remove the other notice. (If you are, feel free.) 71.41.210.146 (talk) 06:55, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If it has ANY non-free component that it cannot be tagged as PD, but if you can prove it was first published in the US prior to 1978 then only the PD-Pre 1978 is applicable...
Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:34, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Easily enough done, as the image description links to the original source as a scanned PDF, which is dated June 1970 and does not bear a copyright notice. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 12:59, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New tables at WWV

[edit]

Great work, again! Jeh (talk) 05:54, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Changes and requested change

[edit]

First, let me say how happy I am that someone is using it.

With that out of the way, I made it so long ago that I'm not quite sure why I put the trailing brs, I think it was something to do with a spacing problem. That aside, as said, it's been awhile since I've made it, but I'm fairly certain you should be able to specify a custom color. I'll check the code after this message to check.— Dædαlus Contribs 23:14, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The parameters you want should be fontcolor1 and fontcolor2, as well as background2 for the blue part of the bar being something other than blue. As to the computed percentage, I'll get to work on that.— Dædαlus Contribs 23:37, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Done.— Dædαlus Contribs 06:34, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Account?

[edit]

Presumably the current user of this IP has seen {{welcome-anon}} already. Thanks for your contributions. -Atmoz (talk) 16:18, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FFU

[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your request at Files for Upload! The file has been uploaded. You can find it at File:SpongeConstruction.svg. See Wikipedia:Images#Using images to learn image syntax, or Wikipedia:Creation and usage of media files for other types of files. Regards, Armbrust Talk Contribs 02:38, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating File:SpongeConstruction.svg, but it looks like the original CC-by-3.0 license got changed to by-sa, and the (um, legally required) attribution to the original authors got lost. I'd do it myself, but I'm not sure if you intend to claim any interest in the converted file. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 08:39, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
In accordance with WP:BB, I went ahead and made the changes to commons:File:SpongeConstruction.svg. I hope I did it right; I'm not really familiar with the Commons' annotation standards and standard templates. If I was too aggressive in removing your credit or something else, please fix or revert as you see fit. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 09:32, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lists of earthquakes

[edit]

Hi, thanks for taking the discussion on this to the talk page. Would you consider removing or rewording the "This list is heavily biased to recent years or due to the development and widespread deployment of seismometers. Large earthquakes were not less common in the past, just records detailed enough to make magnitude estimates." text from the main page until this is resolved, since it reads like a personal viewpoint? (At least the second sentence, and perhaps change "This list is" to "This list may be".) I agree your statement is correct, just not worded well. The article is likely being heavily hit at the moment due to links from the Japanese earthquake article, so it's important it look good, thus me contacting you instead of letting this work itself out more leisurely. –flodded ☃ (gripe) 16:20, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Someone else found a reference, so I edited it lightly enough to not break WP:3RR... I think it's mostly fine now, though still reads slightly biased but that could just be me. –flodded ☃ (gripe) 17:46, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, 71.41.210.146. You have new messages at User talk:Sitush/Archive_1.
Message added 21:07, 22 March 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

End of validity of IDEA patent

[edit]

In International_Data_Encryption_Algorithm 71.41.210.146/you wrote, circa May 19, 2009 about U.S. Patent 5,214,703, issued May 25, 1993, that is has an expiry date of January 7, 2012.

That date was later justified by another user with this reasoning:

"Note that the PGP FAQ still claims the expiry date of the US patent to be May 25, 2010. However, US patent law was changed in 1995 such that patents now expire 20 years after filing, not 17 years after issuing. This holds retroactively for all patents that had not yet expired at the time the changed law came into effect, and it thus holds for IDEA."

Agreed, the stated change in patent law did occur and does applies retroactively to U.S. 5,214,703. But IMHO the patent still expires 17 years from issue date, that is after May 25, 2010 as claimed in the PGP FAQ.

The key point is that the protection under the new law, as defined by 35 U.S.C. 154(a)(2), lasts "20 years from the date on which the application for the patent was filed in the United States or, if the application contains a specific reference to an earlier filed application or applications under section 120, 121, or 365(c) of this title, from the date on which the earliest such application was filed.". The patent claims priority w.r.t. a Swiss patent filed May 18, 1990, and that is the start of the 20 years period, which thus ends May 18, 2010, that is slightly before the end of the 17 year period which ends May 25, 2010. The protection afforded to the licensee by the old law is NOT removed retroactively, and thus protection ends May 25, 2010.

I located the Swiss patent by checking under foreign priority in the status of the US patent 5214703 at <http://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal/pair>

I am open to contradiction, and more than willing to examine any reference to the January 7, 2012 date.

Fgrieu (talk) 16:44, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It sounds like you're right (you considered a detail I didn't), but you could explain the logic better: patents pending when the change was made (like this one) got the benefit of both rules, so the later of the two dates applies. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 19:46, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Correction: which of the three named sections (120, 121, or 365(c)) do you think applies? I see how 365(a) applies, but I'm not sure about 365(c). Do you understand that bit about "designating"? 71.41.210.146 (talk) 20:03, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have started a discussion at Talk:International Data Encryption Algorithm#Patent expiration date. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 20:47, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
In my reading of 35 U.S.C. 154(a)(2), the applicable section would be 120 referencing 363: "An application for patent for an invention disclosed (..properly..) in an application previously filed (..) as provided by section 363 of this title (..reading:) An international application designating the United States shall have the effect, from its international filing date under article 11 of the treaty, of a national application for patent regularly filed in the Patent and Trademark Office except (..)". I am not at all sure about all this, but at one point was told (on another case) by a real patent lawyer that the "foreign priority" section is precisely here to record which foreign patents shall serve as reference for both the start and end of the protection period, that is 20 years from the moment the first patent on the subject was submitted. My reasoning depends heavilly on that. At any rate, if the Swiss patent does not suit, the WIPO/EPO patent could, and that would put the reference filing date on May 16th, 1991, and expiry on May 16th, 2011 together with the EP patent. As of "designating", I understand this as the statement to the patent office of what foreign patent the applicant ask shall serve to establish the start (and end) of the protection period, which is to be performed as required in section 120.Fgrieu (talk) 05:37, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
RBU (radio station), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
  • The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
  • Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia, and please consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.
  • If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia!

Alpha Quadrant talk 22:40, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Files for upload

[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your request at Files for Upload! The file has been uploaded. You can find it at File:Opera LNGS timing.jpg. See Wikipedia:Images#Using images to learn image syntax, or Wikipedia:Creation and usage of media files for other types of files. Regards, Armbrust Talk to me about my editsreview 02:10, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Template:Codon table, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Template-Class, which is recorded on the article's [[Talk:Template:Codon table|talk page]]. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Hallows AG (direct your questions on your article here) 07:43, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Template:Inverse codon table, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Template-Class, which is recorded on the article's [[Talk:Template:Inverse codon table|talk page]]. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

A412 (Talk • C) 02:09, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
SOML, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

WheresTristan 16:45, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, 71.41.210.146. You have new messages at WheresTristan's talk page.
Message added 19:01, 9 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

WheresTristan 19:01, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
VHB, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— The Earwig (talk) 05:39, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, 71.41.210.146. You have new messages at Talk:TRIAC.
Message added 23:24, 29 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—Vitaltrust (talk) 23:24, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback #2

[edit]
Hello, 71.41.210.146. You have new messages at Talk:TRIAC.
Message added 23:24, 29 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Sorry for my being late. — Vitaltrust (talk) 20:44, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Gareth Griffith-Jones

[edit]
Hello, 71.41.210.146. You have new messages at Gareth Griffith-Jones's talk page.
Message added 09:22, 26 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 09:22, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied to your reply

[edit]

-- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 15:40, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

EM6600 core

[edit]

EM Microelectronics, part of The Swatch Group makes a series of ultra-low-power 4-bit microcontrollers, the EM66xx series. These are Mask ROM microcontrollers, although higher-power EEPROM versions (EM65xx) are available for development purposes.

These processors have 16-bit instructions, 12-bit ROM addresses (up to 4096 instruction words), and 7-bit (128 nibble) RAM space, of which up to 96 nibbles (48 bytes) are available as general-purpose RAM.

The instruction set is accumulator based, with most instructions operating on the accumulator and a specified RAM locations. Additionally, two RAM nibbles (0x6E=IXLow and 0x6F=IXHigh) make an 8-bit index register which may be used as a pointer register to select arbitrary RAM locations.

Three 12-bit program counters make up a hardware stack. This allows one level of subroutine calling plus an interrupt, or up to two levels of subroutine calls when interrupts are disabled.

A status register provides Z and C flags. All registers which write the accumulator also set the flags. Logical and move-to-accumulator instructions clear the carry bit. Stores do not affect the flags.

There are no add-with-carry instructions; the only instructions which depend on the carry flag are the conditional jumps.

Non-immediate operands use an 8-bit register specifier field. The most significant bit is the I bit:

  • If I=0. the operand is one of 128 RAM nibbles, selected by the least significant seven bits.
  • If I=1, the operand is specified by the IX register pair. The mnemonic has "X" appended, and no register operand is provided. (E.g. ADDX)

Because the unused register bits are conventionally set to 1, indexed instructions always end in hex FF and it would be easy to extend the architecture to 255 nibbles of RAM by assigning addresses 128–254.

ALU operations may also be modified by the S bit. If this is set, the menmonic has S appended, and the instruction performs a 5-bit rotate right through the carry bit after the ALU operation. The carry in is from the ALU result (0 for logical operations), and the carry out is the lsbit of the ALU result.

The 32 ALU instructions include all 16 2-input binary operations. Not all are documented, but it is clear that 4 bits of the instruction are used as a lookup table.

Judging by the small number of the 16 possible addition opcodes which are documented, there are additional undocumented instructions, but the pattern is not as clear.

1
5		 1
4		 1
3		 1
2		 1
1		 1
0
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0		 Menmonic Function
0 cond address Jumps
0 0 0 0 address JMP addr Unconditional jump
0 0 0 1 address JPV1 addr Jump if TestVar[1] = 1 (usually PA0)
0 0 1 0 address JPV2 addr Jump if TestVar[2] = 1 (usually PA1)
0 0 1 1 address JPV3 addr Jump if TestVar[3] = 1 (usually PA2)
0 1 0 0 address JPC addr Jump if Carry = 1
0 1 0 1 address JPNC addr Jump if Carry = 0
0 1 1 0 address JPZ addr Jump if Z = 1
0 1 1 1 address JPNZ addr Jump if Z = 0
1 0 opcode S I reg ALU operation: A ← source op A
1 0 opcode 0 0 reg ALUop reg A = reg op A
1 0 opcode 0 1 — ALUopX A = RAM[IX] op A
1 0 opcode 1 0 reg ALUopS reg A = SHR(reg op A)
1 0 opcode 1 1 — ALUopXS A = SHR(RAM[IX] op A)
1 0 0 opcode S I reg Addition operations (carry is set)
1 0 0 0 0 1 1 S I reg INC[X][S] reg A = source + 1
1 0 0 0 1 1 0 S I reg SUB[X][S] reg A = source − A = source + ~A + 1
1 0 0 1 0 0 1 S I reg ADD[X][S] reg A = source + A
1 0 0 1 1 0 0 S I reg DEC[X][S] reg A = source + 15
1 0 0 1 1 1 1 S I reg SHL[X][S] reg A = source + source
1 0 1 a b c d S I reg Bitwise logical operations
1 0 1 0 0 0 0 S — LDZ* A = 0
1 0 1 0 0 0 1 S I reg NOR[X][S] reg A = ~(source | A)
1 0 1 0 0 1 0 S I reg NORN[X][S] reg* A = source & ~A = ~(~source | A)
1 0 1 0 0 1 1 S I reg CPLR[X][S] reg A = ~source
1 0 1 0 1 0 0 S I reg ANDN[X][S] reg* A = ~source & A
1 0 1 0 1 0 1 S — CPLA[S] A = ~A
1 0 1 0 1 1 0 S I reg XOR[X][S] reg A = source ^ A
1 0 1 0 1 1 1 S I reg NAND[X][S] reg A = ~(source & A)
1 0 1 1 0 0 0 S I reg AND[X][S] reg A = source & A
1 0 1 1 0 0 1 S I reg NXOR[X][S] reg A = ~(source ^ A)
1 0 1 1 0 1 0 S — LDA[S]* A = A
1 0 1 1 0 1 1 S I reg NANDN[X][S] reg* A = source | ~A = ~(~source & A)
1 0 1 1 1 0 0 S I reg LDR[X][S] reg A = source
1 0 1 1 1 0 1 S I reg ORN[X][S] reg* A = ~source | A
1 0 1 1 1 1 0 S I reg OR[X][S] reg A = source | A
1 0 1 1 1 1 1 S — LD1[S]* A = 15
1 1 0 o data I reg Store: dest ← value
1 1 0 0 data I reg STI[X] reg,data Store immediate data in register
1 1 0 1 — I reg STA[X] reg Store accumulator in register
1 1 1 0 address CALL addr Increment SP, Jump to address
1 1 1 1 opcode — Miscellaneous instructions
1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 — NOP No operation
1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 — RTI Return from interrupt
1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 — HALT Halt processor
1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 — data LDI data Load immediate to accumulator
1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 — RET Return from subroutine

*: Instruction not documented, extrapolated from others. Mnemonic hypothetical.

EM66xx 4-bit Micro controller family (PDF), 4.5, EM Microelectronic-Marin SA, October 2005, pp. 35–43

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
JN53DV, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

hmssolent\You rang? ship's log 03:59, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, 71.41.210.146. You have new messages at Gmt2001's talk page.
Message added 00:24, 23 October 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Gmt2001 (talk) 00:24, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edit to Very Large Array constitutes vandalism and has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 21:52, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please go ahead; these things can happen when someone like me sees a partial change before the entire change is made and takes it as a complete change. Luckily, it does not happen often but it can happen without ill purpose from either the writer or editor. My initial message is still largely valid: My mistake. I jumped the gun. Go ahead and complete the work, which will undoubtedly fix what I thought I saw in the partial change. I apologize for the inconvenience and delete the warning. Donner60 (talk) 22:03, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your explanation on my talk page. Donner60 (talk) 22:13, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm glad it was just a misunderstanding! 71.41.210.146 (talk) 22:15, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Basalt fiber, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.  
Your edit here to Basalt fiber was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N18HcPfKv1E) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 09:00, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

About talk page protection

[edit]

(For reference, here's the original message from WP:RFP#Current requests for edits to a protected page)

User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

[edit]

==It's really hard to talk to you...==

I was going to question the semi-protection on Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Putin khuilo! (edit | project page | history | links | watch | logs), as protecting a discussion page seems pretty extreme, but then I hit a roadblock because your user talk page is also semi-protected, leaving me no way to contact you. This appears to violate two rules in WP:PP#User talk pages:

  1. "are semi-protected for short durations only in the most severe cases of vandalism from IP users", and
  2. "should have an unprotected user talk subpage linked conspicuously from their main talk page"

You might want to fix those. Or at least put a note at the top explaining your disagreement with WP policy and indicating if you'd like people to skip over discussion with you and, e.g. go straight to WP:RPP. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 05:46, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Re your note: my talkpage is semiprotected because of long-term intense harassment from certain vandals, and will remain so while that problem persists. I have never seen any use for the measure recommended in that guideline, of having an unprotected alternative page. If you need to keep your front door locked against burglars, you don't put a notice up telling the burglars the back door is open.

If this occasionally creates problems for good-faith newcomers, that's regrettable. In your case, however, I have no such regrets – you are an experienced long-term user and have deliberately chosen not to avail yourself of the obvious and easy solution to such problems, of creating an account. If you insist on editing as an IP despite all recommendations, don't complain of the disadvantages that sometimes entails, and don't expect us others to bend over backwards to accommodate you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:38, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It has some disadvantages, but it's not supposed to be impossible. And when talking about administrative actions, it is all the more important to be able to contact the person. As I said, you might want to at least have some sort of discussion of the issue and workarounds at the top of your talk page. Even if I did want to create an account, it wouldn't have helped, because there's a significant (I forget how many days) timeout on editing semiprotected pages.
Anyway, the point of a talk subpage is the same as having a mailbox rather than opening your front door: vandals can still stuff it with junk mail, but they can't damage your library in doing to. And you also get to find out when they've given up; in the current situation, how will you know? 71.41.210.146 (talk) 16:05, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

comparison_optical_telescope_primary_mirrors.svg

[edit]
Hello, 71.41.210.146. You have new messages at User:Cmglee#comparison_optical_telescope_primary_mirrors.svg_.E2.98.8E_7_Jul_2014.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Barnstar of Diligence
Many thanks for finding the sizes of apertures of telescope primary mirrors for File:comparison_optical_telescope_primary_mirrors.svg — great work! cmɢʟee⎆τaʟκ 13:25, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot suggestions

[edit]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Add sources
Amplifier
PCI configuration space
Voltage regulator
Capacitor
Dynamic random-access memory
Aleksey Kochetkov
Cleanup
Baikal Deep Underwater Neutrino Telescope
Corpus of Contemporary American English
Syrian Civil War
Expand
2012–14 Iraqi protests
Orbital mechanics
Yuri Ilyenko
Unencyclopaedic
Annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation
State of Shinshi
Tube sound
Wikify
Pseudorandom number generator
Processing (programming language)
Limpopo
Orphan
Kazimierz Lux
Outline of electronics
Hassan Mohamed Shehata Moussa
Merge
Operational amplifier applications
2014 Israel–Gaza conflict
Wang tile
Stub
Air Cargo Mongolia
High impedance
Executive actions of the CIA
Malenkovskaya
Nasmyth telescope
Halpern v. Canada (Attorney General)

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:21, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nested tags in Gott erhalte

[edit]

Looks fine, thank you. Opus33 (talk) 10:12, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

USB cable plugs table

[edit]

Thank you for your edit on the USB article. Simply awesome! :) — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 07:10, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to DC connector may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {{

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:44, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Winkelvi. I noticed that you made a change to an article, IEC 60320, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- Winkelvi ● ✉ ✓ 01:31, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, 71.41.210.146. You have new messages at Winkelvi's talk page.
Message added 02:49, 26 August 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

-- Winkelvi ● ✉ ✓ 02:49, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison_optical_telescope_primary_mirrors.svg

[edit]

Many thanks for bringing it to my attention! cmɢʟee⎆τaʟκ 10:22, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 17 September

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:31, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 01:19, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks much

[edit]

Thank you for your helpful contribution to the article Hitachi Magic Wand.

Most appreciated,

— Cirt (talk) 02:37, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It was nothing, just finding a URL for an article I was curious about. (If you want to be nice, though, feel free to review Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Template:Underground_laboratories, which is a much more substantial edit.) 71.41.210.146 (talk) 08:39, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry not familiar with that subject matter and have never done that process before as of yet. Perhaps when life is less stressed I'll learn about how to do that. — Cirt (talk) 14:56, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:Underground laboratories has been accepted

[edit]
Template:Underground laboratories, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Template-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Fiddle Faddle 09:00, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

China Jinping Underground Laboratory

[edit]
The E=mc² Barnstar
Thanks for creating the thoroughly detailed and meticulously sourced China Jinping Underground Laboratory, and the accompanying navbox! I'm also a big fan of File:comparison_optical_telescope_primary_mirrors.svg. This wiki needs more editors link you! —Swpbtalk 15:51, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Wow. Actually I thought it was a pretty low-quality article; I just found every decent reference I could and dumped it all together on a page, like an essay I hope will get me a C. But the lab is clearly notable (and will become more so), and I had created some redlinks to it a few months ago in places like SNOLAB, so I needed to write something.
If you don't mind my asking, what led you to notice its creation? I just realized (will fix!) I didn't put it in any categories. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 18:08, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Although it's not long on prose, you hit the key facts with proper citations, which is more than can be said for most new articles. I created PandaX a few weeks ago, and I created China Jinping Underground Laboratory as a redirect to that page, so it was on my watchlist. Watchlists are a nice benefit of having an account, as is the ability to create pages yourself (since, clearly, Articles for Creation is beneath your level). —Swpbtalk 19:00, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, D'oh! Yes, I saw that redirect to a paragraph you'd included in PandaX and decided to fill it in. Er, what do you mean AfC is beneath my level? I use it often. Is that a joke about my most recent use of it, Template:Underground laboratories? 71.41.210.146 (talk) 19:07, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, freel free to help add a bit of meat to China Dark Matter Experiment if you're interested in the area. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 19:10, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 15 December

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, was a typo. Fixed. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 01:58, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:comparison_optical_telescope_primary_mirrors.svg Suggestion Reply

[edit]

Hi! Thanks for keeping an eye out and letting me know! In case you're interested in such comparison graphics, I've made another... cmɢʟee⎆τaʟκ 01:09, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of side elevations of some notable bridges to scale

thank you.

[edit]

Thank you for the merge User talk:DavidCary#Merge of PEM nut into Swage nut complete.

p.s.: I see from #EM6600 core that you are interested in 4-bit processors.

I suspect there is a lot of "hidden history" around 4-bit processors that would make a great Wikipedia article. Much of that history was kept secret for years because of NDAs and other secrecy agreements. I suspect many of those agreements have a time limit that has already expired, and I hope that people will tell their piece of the story before it is forgotten.

There's a little more discussion of 4-bit processors at Talk:List of common microcontrollers.

--DavidCary (talk) 17:55, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Schuppan 962CR, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.  
Your edit here to Schuppan 962CR was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=51VJgvZ7Hxg) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 05:52, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Thank you, LinkBot, but as the edit comment said, I meant to do that. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 09:46, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WWVB, again

[edit]

Thank you again for your continued work on this article, in particular your recent additions to the details of the phase-modulated time code. Jeh (talk) 08:28, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Meter water equivalent

[edit]

Hi, I'm afraid I had to undo your move of this article to Metre water equivalent. Pages shouldn't be moved without the history because our licence requires attribution, and I'm also not sure how uncontroversial it is -- these spelling changes require consensus, I think, and I got more google hits for "meter water equivalent" than "metre water equivalent". Wikipedia:Requested moves/Controversial seems to be the correct process here. ekips39 (talk) 20:29, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notice; if there were a way to move the page with history, I would have done it. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 23:24, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

[edit]

This is a warning that this IP was used to vandalize the Thirty Meter Telescope article by removing accurate, sourced content. It was unconstructive and only brings more eyes upon this page and the above information about the IP's owner.--Mark Miller (talk) 08:17, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WTF does that even mean? Which page is "this page"? This talk page here? By the way, WP:ATWV.71.41.210.146 (talk) 09:10, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[2].--Mark Miller (talk) 19:16, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I know which edit; I only made one recently. Obviously, I felt it was constructive; I felt the phrasing I changed was giving an WP:UNDUE impression of the "global" protests, so I kept the fact (there were protests outside the islands) while trying to describe the scale better.
The part I completely failed to understand is the one I quoted: "only brings more eyes upon this page"... it's almost phrased as if it's a threat or intimation of undesired consequences. A warning that people might read Wikipedia? Does not compute.
71.41.210.146 (talk) 22:42, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 4 May

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed; thank you. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 00:54, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your request at Files for upload

[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your request at Files for Upload! The file has been uploaded. You can find it at File:Tel two parts AZ and ALT test 3.png. See Wikipedia:Images#Using images to learn image syntax, or Wikipedia:Creation and usage of media files for other types of files. Regards, Nick⁠—⁠Contact/Contribs 18:07, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also, File:Tel two parts AZ and ALT profile.png. --Nick⁠—⁠Contact/Contribs 18:11, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Um, RFU instructions suggest renaming files to make names less ambiguous (like including "LSST" in the name!); going to request a rename before using.71.41.210.146 (talk) 18:28, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Replied on my talk page. --Nick⁠—⁠Contact/Contribs 18:34, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox telescope "bodystyle" parameter

[edit]

Please see Template talk:Infobox telescope#"bodystyle" parameter. Alakzi (talk) 19:37, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Convert

[edit]

Re you post at Template talk:Convert, one school of opinion is that the template should force people to follow the MOS guidelines at WP:UNIT. If you don't share that view, try:

  • This old revision of Help:Convert.
  • {{convert|6.5x6.5x42|m|ft|abbr=on}} → 6.5 m × 6.5 m × 42 m (21 ft × 21 ft × 138 ft)
  • {{convert|6.5xx6.5xx42|m|ft|abbr=on}} → 6.5 × 6.5 × 42 m (21 × 21 × 138 ft)
  • {{convert|6.5*6.5*42|m|ft|abbr=on}} → 6.5×6.5×42 m (21×21×138 ft)

Johnuniq (talk) 02:21, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ooh, exactly what I wanted. Thank you very much! 71.41.210.146 (talk) 02:26, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse reply

[edit]
Hello, 71.41.210.146/Archive 1. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Cordless Larry (talk) 07:00, 15 September 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Coordinates question at Teahouse

[edit]

Thank you for your follow-up to my answer to Action Hero's question over at the Teahouse! You're right that I (or someone) should have linked to the coordinates template page for its documentation. Thanks for taking care of it. —GrammarFascist (talk) 10:59, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I do a fair bit of adding ISO 3166-2 region codes and similar hidden metadata to coordinates. (Along with, as you noted, fixing up dashes!) 71.41.210.146 (talk) 11:07, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recognition of your good, quasi-anonymous work

[edit]

Hello again! I thought you might like to know that you're one of the IP users identified on my user page as "longstanding editors who use a static IP address rather than a Wikipedia account yet make many valuable contributions to Wikipedia". Thanks for all you do to make Wikipedia a better encyclopedia and a better place. —GrammarFascist contribstalk 02:54, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to SHA-1

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Intgr. I noticed that you made a change to an article, SHA-1, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- intgr [talk] 08:17, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I know all about referencing. I assumed the reference to "The Fappening" and "Snapchat#The Snappening" was so glaringly obvious that it was unlikely to be challenged, and thus per WP:V did not need a citation. I was only documenting it for later years when the those terms are no longer current. But since you have challenged it, I'll try to find something. The problem is, some things are so obvious that news writers do not feel it's necessary to document them explicitly. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 08:37, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! Thanks for replying. I don't find it "obvious", personally; all of these terms are derived from "happening". And I think this is a very relevant place for WP:OR and Verifiability, not truth: WP should not claim something just because "it seems that way". Either a source exists, or we don't have a basis for that claim.
A consensus on Talk:SHA-1 would probably be OK too, but I don't think you'll find many people agreeing with you.
PS: You don't need to copy your response to my talk page. You should reply here and use {{ping|intgr}} to automatically send a notification about your reply. -- intgr [talk] 09:03, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well, you said "leave me a message on my talk page", so that's what I did; I just also wanted to include at least a brief reply here, too. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 09:09, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ah ok, sorry, that comes with the "unsourced" template. :) -- intgr [talk] 09:24, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gray code

[edit]

Please do not optimize C code as was done at Gray code. Articles are to explain concepts and a short program can be helpful for that, but not if it uses syntax like num ^= num >> 2. The loop was clear, and inserting clever code will only result in it being removed as unhelpful. Johnuniq (talk) 01:09, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't a micro-optimization; it reduced 32 steps to 5, and got rid of a bunch of hard-to-follow loop control as well. I can avoid op= syntax if you think that's confusing, but it seems like an important and useful change, not a stylistic one. Note that I also added a comment explaining it as well. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 01:12, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
How does that change look? The two versions correspond to the optimization cited in the preceding text. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 01:28, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have time/energy to look now, but might later. I just wanted to alert you in case you start on other articles. Stuff which looks too much like a program (that is, it deviates too far from understandable pseudocode) is routinely deleted. Johnuniq (talk) 01:44, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that certainly hasn't been my experience. I agree that WP is not a place to dump source code, but the goal of example code is to be useful, which includes reasonably efficient. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 05:24, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
From an algorithmic perspective, I think you confuse conciseness with efficiency. For algorithms, the focus is usually on something countable such as comparisons and often ignores overhead issues. Efficiency is minimizing the count. For the Gray code, we can compare doing 32 shift-XORs versus 5 shift-XORs. That's the gem. Trying to minimize the number of instructions is not an algorithm issue but rather a programming/compiler issue. It may be very important for an actual implementation, but it's not about the algorithm. Glrx (talk) 16:10, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, 71.41.210.146. You have new messages at I dream of horses's talk page.
Message added 15:37, 4 November 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Your expertise with coordinates

[edit]

Hello again! I was hoping you could help me add coordinates to Shooting of Jeremy Mardis — either by making the edit yourself, or by walking me through the process. Both an intersection and a building with a known address are substantiated as the location where the shooting occurred... do I just go to Google Maps and input that information to find the coordinates? Thanks in advance, GrammarFascist contribstalk 01:19, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's one way that works fine. Template:Coord explains most of it; it's just the "coordinate parameters" that are weird. They're all glommed together in one template argument right after the coordinates proper, in the form "name:value_name:value_...". I started from an existing location Marksville State Historic Site, used GeoHack to pull that up on both Google maps and OpenStreetMap.
The I'm guessing the dead end is 31°07′30.4″N 92°02′59.7″W / 31.125111°N 92.049917°W / 31.125111; -92.049917 (Dead end near intersection of Martin Luther King Drive and Taensas Street), the stub between the intersection and the gate visible on satellite view. Does that seem right to you?
Coordinate parameters I added are:
  • type:event — this is a one-time event, not a landmark.
  • region:US-LA — The ISO 3166-2 region code for the U.S. state of Louisiana.
  • dim:50 — Show a 50 m diameter are around the coordinate; it's a pretty local event.
If you want to cut & paste that in, decide if you want it displayed in line, at the top of the article, or both, and adjust the "display=" parameter accordingly: "i" or "inline", "t" or "title", or "it" or "inline,title".
Also change the "name=" parameter, or delete it entirely if the article title is fine.
71.41.210.146 (talk) 09:59, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. I went ahead and WP:BOLDly edited the article. Please check if it's okay! 71.41.210.146 (talk) 10:07, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That's fantastic, 71.41.210.146, thanks so much! I did move the title display into the infobox, because I at least find that my eye ignores title-level coordinates if there's also an infobox in the article in question. This way the infobox display will also be preserved if some other editor boldly removes the inline coordinates template entirely. Anyway, thanks again, and let me know if there's ever anything I can give you a hand with. —GrammarFascist contribstalk 13:16, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, didn't see the infobox. Made the infobox coord have the extra info (why'd you delete it when copying?), removed the one in line with the text, added a comment describing how the coordinate was derived. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 13:31, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks again! I think the info is most accessible yet least intrusive the way you did it. (As for why I left out the other info when I put the coordinates into the infobox, it was entirely because I didn't actually know what I was doing. ) You are a peachy keen Wikipedian. —GrammarFascist contribstalk 02:39, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

More discussion at Talk:Shooting of Jeremy Mardis

[edit]

Hi 71.41.210.146! I responded to you over at Talk:Shooting of Jeremy Mardis about the circa issue, and also started a new section I hope you'll comment on. Thanks again for your continued contributions to this article, they've been very helpful. —GrammarFascist contribstalk 23:35, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SNOLAB

[edit]

I have made one edit to SNOLAB and also responded to you at Talk:SNOLAB. —GrammarFascist contribstalk 20:09, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 71.41.210.146. You have new messages at Talk:ACCC conductor.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hyphens

[edit]

WP:HYPHEN is quite clear: "A hyphen is not used after a standard -ly adverb (a newly available home, a wholly owned subsidiary)". I see no reason not to follow that guideline in the case of ACCC conductor. Do you have some problem with that guideline? Chris the speller yack 22:29, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I did not see that you left a message on its talk page. I will answer there. Chris the speller yack 22:40, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
(For anyone following along, it's at Talk:ACCC conductor#That hyphen....) 71.41.210.146 (talk) 02:19, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Gareth Griffith-Jones. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Dark matter has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 14:40, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Further discussion at Talk:Dark matter#revert, discuss... 71.41.210.146 (talk) 20:17, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Later

[edit]

Posting here in case you're still working there, so as not to cause more EC. Time for my sleep period, back in about 8 hrs. ―Mandruss ☎ 14:04, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Mandruss: It wasn't a serious complaint; just after the second edit conflict I noticed how often you'd revised your comments and felt entitled to grumble slightly. The thoughtful reply is worth more than the pique. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 02:55, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 24 January

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you, I know. The work has a long subtitle, which I included as |subtitle=The Normal and Transverse Mercator Projections on the Sphere and the Ellipsoid with Full Derivations of all Formulae= which I wish I could include in the citation, but it a bit unwieldy to append to the main title. So I left it as an obviously-named parameter to let another editor figure out what to do. The error is fundamentally harmless. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 01:29, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Coords precision

[edit]

Hey, I hope you intend to return to our mini-project. We've invested a lot in it, we're close to something good for the project (but not quite there), and you're the key player. See my latest comments, if you haven't already. Shane, come back! ―Mandruss ☎ 02:35, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely! Sorry, I was sick for a few days, which led to a backlog on non-wikipedia tasks, which I'm trying to dig out from. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 08:37, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello again. After seven months, is it safe to assume that your interest in this has evaporated? Is that because you disagree that a one-peer review is needed? I could seek that review myself, but the request would likely be ignored coming from me. If anyone were going to speak up in favor of accepting the table without a review, I think they would have already done so in that thread. Convenience link: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Geographical coordinates#"Prime" symbols vs straight apostrophes. ―Mandruss ☎ 06:05, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Mandruss: No, it's just embarrassment about having dropped the ball. No disagreement of any sort at all. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 17:22, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The cure for that is to pick up the damn ball again. :) But, should you choose not to, I won't bother you about it again. ―Mandruss ☎ 03:10, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, 71.41.210.146. You have new messages at Talk:Golden ratio.
Message added 13:37, 7 July 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

 B E C K Y S A Y L E S  13:37, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free logo usage

[edit]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to a page, specifically List of political parties in Austria, may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:59, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just to clarify, the logo files you re-added to the article are non-free which means that each use of them is required to satisfy all 10 non-free content criteria listed in WP:NFCCP. Non-free logos are not allowed to be used like "pseudo-icons" because such usage is primarily decorative as explained in MOS:LOGO and WP:NFTABLES/WP:NFLISTS. Such usage typically does not provide the context required by WP:NFCC#8 or satisfies the minimal use required by WP:NFCC#3. The use in the list article also failed WP:NFCC#10c. If you disagree, and feel that such use does satisfy WP:NFCC, please provide a non-free use rationale explaining how for each use. If you're not sure, feel free to ask for the opinions of others at WP:MCQ or WT:NFCC.
FWIW, linking to non-free files is something that is allowed and is often prferred by some editors over outright removal; in this case, however, the use of even freely licensed logos as "icons" is something not recommended by MOS:LOGO, so all the logos should probably be removed. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:12, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Marchjuly: Thanks for the info. I always assumed that political parties would want to be associated with their logo, so it wasn't a big deal, but you're right WP has to be careful in general. Even though it is clearly "fair use", you're right that it doesn't meet the stricter WP:NFCC#8; while it's nice to have, it doesn't "significantly increase readers' understanding". As for WP:NFCC#3, I think you're misreading it. The minimalism addressed is the amount of source material used (3a: the number of items or 3b: the size/extent of each item), more than the number of times it is used. 71.41.210.146 (talk) 16:22, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Dogged" usage in RATAN-600

[edit]
Discussion moved to Talk:RATAN-600#BTA-6: "plagued by technical problems" or "dogged by technical problems"?
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:71.41.210.146/Archive_1&oldid=1136402630"