User talk:62.189.19.125

Attention:

This IP address, 62.189.19.125, is registered to Verizon UK Limited. In the event of persistent vandalism from this address, efforts may be made to contact them to report abuse. Contact information may be available in the WHOIS report.

If you are editing from this IP address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. Sometimes, in response to vandalism, you may be temporarily unable to create an account.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it may be possible for the owner of the IP to determine who was making contributions from this address at any given time.

If you are the owner of this address responding to reports of inappropriate conduct from this address, you may find the contributions history and block log for this address helpful. Please feel free to contact any administrator who has blocked this address with questions (blocking admins will be listed in the block log).

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.

The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it.

This is a Call Centre

This is the IP for a rather large call centre in Manchester with a frequently changing staff. Make of that what you will.

September 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to January 31, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Figureskatingfan (talk) 15:55, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page 31 January worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --CalendarWatcher (talk) 16:32, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to June 9

Dear 62.189.19.125,
Some of your edits on the page June 9 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:

The person you added doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia page.

If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. Please see this page for help. PseudoBot (talk) 15:46, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to West Melton constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Closedmouth (talk) 15:50, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Chelsea F.C. has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Epbr123 (talk) 18:46, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ray Quinn, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ray Quinn was changed by 62.189.19.125 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-10-23T16:20:39+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:20, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page One Night Only (band). Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Jusda fax 16:21, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Watergate scandal, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Watergate scandal was changed by 62.189.19.125 (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2009-10-24T13:56:38+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 13:56, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Sam Nixon. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Piano non troppo (talk) 14:04, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Serj Tankian. Rkr1991 ^{(Wanna chat?)} 14:06, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 3 days from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Master of Puppets 11:29, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Lindsey Fawcett, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Wikipelli ^Talk 15:27, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dave Benson Phillips, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. January (talk) 18:42, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Black metal with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. –MuZemike 18:43, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Nicky Law (footballer born 1988) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 12:40, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Nicky Law (footballer born 1988) constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 12:42, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Stan Collymore. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 12:52, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sheffield Wednesday F.C.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Basement12 (T.C) 13:44, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Caramel color. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. VMS Mosaic (talk) 21:59, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Geoff Horsfield, you may be blocked from editing. Struway2 (talk) 16:15, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Rotherham United F.C.

I do not know what your issue is with the squad list on the Rotherham United F.C. article, because you neither use edit summaries or have discussed the matter on the talk page. This makes it very difficult for other editors to know what you are thinking. What I do know is that continuing to edit war on the the article is going to get you blocked. Please discuss your changes on the talk page. Thanks. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 16:14, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to Tanner Mayes, especially if it involves living persons. Thank you. Sincerely, He's Gone Mental 13:46, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Tanner Mayes with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Sven Manguard Wha? 13:47, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Tanner Mayes. Sven Manguard Wha? 13:50, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 13:55, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Mark Wright (television personality). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. ⊃°HotCrocodile…… + 20:25, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Shaun Derry. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ⊃°HotCrocodile…… + 20:29, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Bradley Cooper, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ⊃°HotCrocodile…… + 20:31, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 604800 seconds for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Nyttend (talk) 19:02, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Moo shu pork. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. James086 ^Talk 13:12, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Razzmatazz (song) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. DVdm (talk) 13:18, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Democratic Republic of the Congo ‎ , even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:37, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Democratic Republic of the Congo with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 12:05, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Democratic Republic of the Congo. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 12:08, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Massimo Cellino because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 12:40, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2014

Hello, I'm Apparition11. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Valley of Flowers National Park because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 12:53, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ricardo Gabriel Álvarez. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. ALittleQuenhi (talk to me) 11:07, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2014

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Ham , even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:51, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Dokha— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — MusikAnimal ^talk 18:23, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tesco, you may be blocked from editing. DBaK (talk) 19:18, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2015

Hello, I'm Bentogoa. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Back Chat with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Bentogoa (talk) 10:27, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Back Chat with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. (t) Josve05a (c) 10:35, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Back Chat with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. (t) Josve05a (c) 10:36, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chicken tikka masala. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Deli nk (talk) 13:03, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chicken tikka masala, you may be blocked from editing. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 18:21, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2017

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Data Protection Act 1998— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:30, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

You have had 4 edits reverted today - on the same article - for petty 'vandalism'. You'll likely be facing a ban. Grow up. Woodlandscaley (talk) 13:24, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Hello, I'm Martinevans123. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mexborough have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:14, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wath-upon-Dearne. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Keith D (talk) 19:49, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, David Howell, Baron Howell of Guildford, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 07:59, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Dirty Little Secret. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Jim1138 (talk) 08:46, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Julio Lopez. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jim1138 (talk) 09:41, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Tommy Black. Jim1138 (talk) 09:42, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:21, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Donald Cerrone—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:09, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.