User talk:79LuMoTo79

Welcome!

Hello, 320luca, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to AMD Radeon Rx 200 series. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -- intgr [talk] 18:05, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Personal experience and "the Internet" as "sources"

Hello. I wound up reverting your edit at Axe, as it was a large chunk of unsourced content and in light of your edit summary. Please see the guidelines regarding original research (in other words, "own experience") and regarding identifying and citing suitable sources (re "the Internet}. Let me know if you have any questions. Largoplazo (talk) 11:33, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. I edited the section "parts of the Axe", because i wanted to add more information. What i dont understand is how can there be the text not be removed, there is not one source in the Section (Head and Haft). Greetngs. --320luca (talk) 00:19, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That is true. From the Wikipedia point of view, this is undesirable. That's why the article is tagged at the top with a description of the problem and a request for people to help with it. Some of the sections are also tagged as problematic.

While there's a tendency to leave material for at least a while with a tag like that instead of removing it, especially if there doesn't seem to be anything debatable about it, large masses of material like that sometimes do get removed by somebody who's in the mood to clean it up. In this case, I happened to come across your edit and my attention was drawn by your summary.

I see that inline "citation needed" tags have been placed at three places in the article, dated to 2008 and 2012 (you can tell, in a desktop browser, by hovering the cursor over the tag, or else by going into the article's source and looking there). That tag is a way to draw attention to something specific that the tagger thinks really does need a source for verifiability, but chose to leave the assertion in place for a while to give others a chance to come up with a source. Well, 8+ years is a long time, so I'm going to remove the chunks of text behind those tags. Largoplazo (talk) 02:43, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Largoplazo. I now included a Source to my Text for the page "Axe" here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:320luca .--320luca (talk) 14:11, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Müller Hammerwerk

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Müller Hammerwerk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. – NJD-DE (talk) 13:36, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No wonder Wikipedia can not get new Authors or hold many old ones. --320luca (talk) 13:38, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thrive (Game) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Thrive (Game), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE💕 14:20, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Müller Hammerwerk

Hello, 320luca. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Müller Hammerwerk, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Thrive (Game)

Hello, 320luca. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Thrive (Game), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:12, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The Times Guide to the Peoples of Europe

I moved the article to draftspace because it only contained a listing of the ethnic groups in the book. Please add more content to the article. A guide for creating your first article can be found at WP:YFA. Sungodtemple (talk) 19:10, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Südtiroler moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Südtiroler, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?)

It also needs quite a lot of revision of the language. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. bonadea contributions talk 17:14, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: South Tyroleans (November 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Also needs quite a bit of revising in order to fix language errors, non-neutral tone, and unclear structure.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:South Tyroleans and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 17:19, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 320luca! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 17:19, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Southtyroleans moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Southtyroleansis not suitable as written to remain published. While it appears to be notable, it needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask on my talk page. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Or feel free to ping me to take another look.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:48, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Southtyroleans for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Southtyroleans is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southtyroleans until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—Kusma (talk) 16:16, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Südtiroler (March 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Almost entirely unreferenced – where is this information coming from?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Südtiroler and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:21, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of fatal bear attacks in Europe

The article List of fatal bear attacks in Europe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails LISTN. BEFORE showed nothing that show this category has been discussed as a group in IS RS. LISTCRUFT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. // Timothy :: talk 18:17, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:List of fatal bear attacks in Europe a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into List of fatal bear attacks in Europe. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 20:31, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ups, sorry and thank you for letting me know. 79LuMoTo79 (talk) 14:17, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited OpenAssistant, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bavarian, Catalan and Basque. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Times Guide to the Peoples of Europe

Hello, 79LuMoTo79. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Times Guide to the Peoples of Europe, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:07, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Times Guide to the Peoples of Europe

Hello, 79LuMoTo79. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Times Guide to the Peoples of Europe".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:28, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Südtiroler

Hello, 79LuMoTo79. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Südtiroler, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Südtiroler

Hello, 79LuMoTo79. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Südtiroler".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:13, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]