User talk:174.27.3.169

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Ted 2 into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 05:07, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

sorry. 174.27.3.169 (talk) 03:34, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Pontiac G5 have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Pontiac G5 was changed by 174.27.3.169 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953851 on 2022-07-30T23:59:49+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:59, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

stupid cluebot ng 174.27.3.169 (talk) 03:36, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is incorrect. 174.27.3.169, you added a text, which is believed to be a vandalism. ClueBot NG automatically detected that vandalism and reverted it. 95.134.111.98 (talk) 12:06, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Caillou episodes (August 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Completely unsourced

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Caillou episodes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 17:43, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok. 174.27.3.169 (talk) 03:36, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 174.27.3.169! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 17:43, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! 174.27.3.169 (talk) 03:37, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Revert on Toy Story 5

The page should be redirected to Lightyear (film) because the film is the fifth installment of the Toy Story franchise. Also, the Toy Story 4#Future says that "but Nielsen disclosed a possibility of a fifth film, as Pixar was not ruling out that possibility", meaning that Toy Story 5 is possible to be developed. Remember, it's just POSSIBLE, not definite. Therefore, the redirect Toy Story 5 should be temporally redirected to Lightyear (film) instead of Toy Story 4#Future, until the official confirmation of Toy Story 5. 137.189.90.241 (talk) 06:27, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not gonna change it so thank you. 174.27.3.169 (talk) 16:48, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at IPhone 10. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CLYDE FRANKLIN 16:30, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops! 174.27.3.169 (talk) 03:37, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Futurama: Bender's Big Score. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 01:04, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fine. 174.27.3.169 (talk) 03:38, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (2nd request)

It appears that you copied or moved text from Windows 8.1 to Draft:Development of Windows 8.1. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. DanCherek (talk) 01:03, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! 174.27.3.169 (talk) 03:38, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Development of Windows 8.1 (August 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

AfC is not for content split discussions - discuss on the Windows 8.1 talk page

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Development of Windows 8.1 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 17:03, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WAT THE? 174.27.3.169 (talk) 03:38, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Windows 12 (August 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Windows 12 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Akevsharma (talk) 01:58, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

okay. 174.27.3.169 (talk) 03:38, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ted 3 (August 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gusfriend was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Twitter and Instagram are not WP:RS.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ted 3 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 07:01, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is getting so old................. 174.27.3.169 (talk) 03:39, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rio 3 (August 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rio 3 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:10, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever. 174.27.3.169 (talk) 03:39, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edits on other users' sandboxes

Do not edit other user's sandboxes. If you want to experiment with edits, make an account and use your own. --Miamiheat631^Talk 18:15, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

no. 174.27.3.169 (talk) 03:39, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Hello, I'm Meters. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Socks (cat), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Meters (talk) 03:49, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

yo 174.27.3.169 (talk) 03:40, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Buddy (dog). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please don't invent a new headline for a news article. It does not matter if you think it is not grammatical. The title of the article is what they used, not what you think it should have been. Meters (talk) 03:52, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

wat up 174.27.3.169 (talk) 03:40, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Super Why!, you may be blocked from editing. CodeTalker (talk) 20:55, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What? 174.27.3.169 (talk) 03:40, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:PBS Kids Preschool Block

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:PBS Kids Preschool Block requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PBS Kids Preschool Block. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:29, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

nah. 174.27.3.169 (talk) 03:40, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: PBS Kids Preschool Block (September 2)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:30, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NaN 174.27.3.169 (talk) 03:40, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

-- Yamla (talk) 21:18, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

stupid block notice 174.27.3.169 (talk) 03:41, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not/Outtakes. Adakiko (talk) 00:00, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i won't. 174.27.3.169 (talk) 03:41, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Editing other editors's sandboxes again

You were told 4 days not to edit other editors's sandboxes, but you have done so at least twice since then, here and here. If you continue this behavior, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. CodeTalker (talk) 00:37, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

what the heck. 174.27.3.169 (talk) 03:41, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion contested: Draft:Wild Animal Baby Explorers

Hello 174.27.3.169, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Draft:Wild Animal Baby Explorers, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. BangJan1999 01:23, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

yes 174.27.3.169 (talk) 03:42, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your merge proposal.

Windows 93 is in no way an appropriate article to merge to Windows 95. It is a parody website that is not associated with Microsoft or the Windows operating systems. And your request to merge it without copying any of the content makes no sense. That's not what a merge is. If you think Windows 93 should be deleted then take the article to AFD. This is such a bad merge proposal that I can't tell whether you are trolling or simply incompetent to be making a merge proposal. I strongly suggest that you withdraw your inappropriate merge proposal.

Oh, and if you ever do propose another merge, you must tag both articles. Meters (talk) 07:35, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

why? 174.27.3.169 (talk) 03:42, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

-- Yamla (talk) 21:14, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! 174.27.3.169 (talk) 02:22, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Please take this time to decide if you wish to start adhering to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, including but most certainly not limited to, WP:COPYRIGHT. --Yamla (talk) 01:03, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

please change the blocking thing from 6 months to 1 month. 174.27.3.169 (talk) 01:23, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UNBLOCK NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 174.27.3.169 (talk) 15:20, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Windows 12 (September 28)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Chess was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This is a pretty clear failure of WP:NOTCRYSTALBALL. Wikipedia is not a website for unverified product rumours about future versions of Windows. Reading the sources, there's no real information about Windows 12. It hasn't even been announced yet. I'll quote the relevant paragraph of the linked policy here:

Wikipedia is not a collection of product announcements and rumors. Although Wikipedia includes up-to-date knowledge about newly revealed products, short articles that consist of only product announcement information and rumors are not appropriate. Until such time that more encyclopedic knowledge about the product can be verified, product announcements should be merged to a larger topic (such as an article about the creator(s), a series of products, or a previous product) if applicable.

Bold is from the original, italics are mine.

Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 23:04, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Development of Windows 8.1

Hello, 174.27.3.169. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Development of Windows 8.1, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:PBS Kids Preschool Block

Hello, 174.27.3.169. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:PBS Kids Preschool Block, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

tank you 174.27.21.219 (talk) 01:19, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Development of Windows 8.1

Hello, 174.27.3.169. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Development of Windows 8.1".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:15, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sausage Party 2

Hello, 174.27.3.169. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sausage Party 2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:04, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ted 3

Hello, 174.27.3.169. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ted 3, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:04, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sausage Party 2

Hello, 174.27.3.169. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sausage Party 2".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:07, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ted 3

Hello, 174.27.3.169. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ted 3".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:55, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.