User talk:141.131.2.3

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

This IP address, 141.131.2.3, is registered to Cirrus Logic (Austin, Texas, USA) and may be shared by many users of an enterprise network, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators monitoring this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create an account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Create new pages and rename pages
Edit semi-protected pages
Upload images
Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without an account, your IP address (141.131.2.3) is used to identify you instead.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 22:36, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 6 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Cursive page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 9 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Saint Sophia Cathedral in Harbin page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Brad v 22:57, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2017

Hello, I'm 1989. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Great Vowel Shift, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Please note that the verifiability policy mandates that unsourced material that has been challenged, such as by a "fact" tag, or by its removal, may not be added back without a reliable, published source being cited for the content, using an inline citation. The cited source must clearly support the material as presented in the article, and the burden is on the person wishing to keep in the disputed material. So if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so, following these requirements! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MCMLXXXIX 18:30, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2017

Hello, I'm 172.58.40.255. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! 172.58.40.255 (talk) 17:09, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Jared Kushner, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. This page is not Charles Kushner. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 17:22, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Jared Kushner. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
This article is under "ACTIVE ARBITRATION REMEDIES". As a result of this All editors must obtain consensus on the talk page of this article before reinstating any edits that have been challenged (via reversion).. Please revert your edit or you will likely be blocked. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 20:51, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Tone (linguistics). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 18:30, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In response

Hello. I read your message. You can read the essay Wikipedia:WikiBullying, which raises the matter that you raised there. --George Ho (talk) 21:35, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

I very much appreciate this edit to the lead of the article Nevertheless, she persisted. It was brilliant! Thanks for contributing to improve the clarity of the most-often read part of any article. Cheers! — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 17:14, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:32, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

POV editing at Mary Kay Letourneau article

Do not re-add this bit that I reverted. Stating "romantic relationship" is pure POV and is not at all supported by the WP:NPOV policy. An editor was already warned about adding such wording. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 21:40, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:15, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Your recent edit to Western United States had neither a source for the information nor an Edit summary. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 20:18, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:44, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments on BeenAroundAwhile

@141.131.2.3: Just to let you know...what BeenAround has accused you of - a misleading edit summary - he does himself. Look at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Typewriter&diff=771455917&oldid=771455760. He deleted an Estonian band from the music section, but in the summary he cited the reason as "Puffery". I had questioned this deletion at the Teahouse, and was told the reason didn't fit and that I should question BeenAround myself. Why bother, I figured. I already knew that he plays by one set of rules, but tries to enforce another set of rules on everyone else. Sorry you crossed paths with him. Phatblackmama (talk) 05:19, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:22, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chifa

If you want to add the claim that "Chifa cuisine cannot be said to be entirely separate from Chinese cuisine, American Chinese cuisine, or other Chinese-influenced culinary traditions." you need to back it up with citation. --Voidvector (talk) 23:03, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Hello, I'm Shellwood. I noticed that in this edit to Saint George, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 14:57, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

With regard to your original edit to the League of Nations article, I didn't make an arbitrary decision - I reverted because it was unsourced and I marked this on my edit.. Denisarona (talk) 15:56, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kamikaze. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 17:32, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 141.131.2.3, please excuse my mistake, I am really sorry. Also the warning was not ok. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:10, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Serols, this did not "appear" to constitute vandalism. Sorry. Drmies (talk) 17:45, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with Plasma (physics). Your edits appears to avoid WP:GF and just added other previous edits that had been corrected, so the edit reverted. Furthermore, the WP:OWN was explained but you didn't respond on the Talkpage. Repeated changes like this can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Arianewiki1 (talk) 02:04, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Yes California, you may be blocked from editing. -★- PlyrStar93. _{→Message me. ←} 16:26, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing and write text from a WP:NPOV. It is clear that this article is This article is about a historical period. For the wider history of Galveston, see History of Galveston, Texas. Your many edits are seemingly unsourced and quite irrelevant in this case. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Free_State_of_Galveston, you may be blocked from editing. Arianewiki1 (talk) 04:40, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Hello, I'm Tarl N.. I noticed that you made a change to an article, OK, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Your source for what abbreviation was used in 1838? Tarl N. (discuss) 01:32, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Red-light district, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Kendall-K1 (talk) 17:47, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Henrietta Lacks

You appear to be involved in an ongoing WP:Edit war, and are also up against WP:3RR. Take it to the talk page. Continuatin may get you blocked from editing. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:43, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Positioning of reference for a blockquote

Would you care to explain your edits at Talk:Humphry Davy? Many thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:43, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ollagüe

Greetings,

do you have a source for your recent addition on Ollagüe? It's not exactly common knowledge. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:14, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding the sources. I am not sure if they all support the claims made, however - the 103 page here does not appear to mention the ll pronunciation. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:50, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New discussion on Black comedy

Hi, someone (not I) apparently have a problem with what you did in merging Black comedy with Gallows humor. Perhaps you may want to respond to his concerns. Just being a messenger. Drow (talk) 12:28, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Ukraine has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Dishonest edit summaries will cause me to believe you are a bad-faith editor. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:56, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

False allegation made for some unknown reason ...

July 2018

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Gun culture in the United States. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Nosebagbear (talk) 16:56, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Coryphantha. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Gun culture in the United States seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Coryphantha Talk 17:17, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Wikibullying. I assume there is some backstory about this article I am not aware of.

-- MC 141.131.2.3 (talk) 17:20, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

141.131.2.3: Please find my reply here. Coryphantha Talk 21:20, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mid-Atlantic accent

Hi! Can you give me a gist please of exactly what it says on pages 25-26 of Milla, Robert McColl (2012). English Historical Sociolinguistics? Thanks. Wolfdog (talk) 11:36, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Chaheel Riens (talk) 22:01, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Merging is explained at Wikipedia:Merging. Feel free to follow the process. I don't think the two should be merged, otherwise I would do it myself. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:35, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: this edit, placing a warning on your Talk page concerning edit warring is not WikiBullying. General Ization ^Talk 03:22, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Faster-than-light, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Note: you already tried this ([1]) here, and it was reverted. A talk page discussion was started on the article talk page at Talk:Faster-than-light#Who are these people?. See also wp:CONSENSUS, wp:BRD, and wp:Edit warring- DVdm (talk) 19:34, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm DVdm. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Blouson, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 19:35, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. - Altenmann >talk 04:16, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In-line external links

Please do not delete in-line external links. Instead, convert them to refs. Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:26, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also, a wikilink is not a substitute for a reference. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:28, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As poorly formatted as that article was, it does appear to be correct that does links were intended as refs. This [2] explicitly says "Adding or removing transistors and interconnect on rubylith was definitely a manual task" and "The coordinates and lengths had to be measured and transferred by hand to the cutter." which seems to support the claim in our article "Initially rubylith was manually separated". This [3] says "By 1966 James Koford and his colleagues at IBM Fishkill were capturing SLT hybrid circuit module (1964 Milestone) designs on graphical displays, checking them for errors and automatically converting the information into mask patterns" which seems to support the claim "direct computer output at the initial stages of the CAD revolution". To be fair, the bit about "later automated via diamond-tip equipped x-y drafting machines driven by NC tape systems" does seem to be unsupported, the closest is "Later, a Xynetics plotter with knives, instead of pens, was used to cut more quickly and precisely." which doesn't say anything about diamond tipped or NC tape systems. Nil Einne (talk) 22:35, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.