Jump to content

User talk:1234r00t/Archive 5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 10

Hi

Was wondering if you could help with the layout of my userpage, I'll give you a barnstar for your work :), I just want a side-by-side layout where appropriate, the boxed content shouldn't be placed at the side, I did that last time and the results were catastrophic (mainly cause I use IE and FF, if I could it'd be FF 100% of the time). If you've done that leave a message on my talk page and give yourself credit on my userpage where I've done so. Thanks in advance. Fridae'§Doom | Spare your time? 07:38, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Alright, the problem is that I want to get boxes side-by-side but I did that with the boxed stuff, and that failed, (check history of my userpage and subpages). I don't know which boxes should go where. So I need help. Thanks. I'll await your response in August. Fridae'§Doom | Spare your time? 22:11, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

IRC cloak

Hey 1234r00t. I asked the staffers to set your cloak today, but unfortunately there was a problem. They can't use digits in cloaks. :-( Is there another username that you own that doesn't have digits that we can set your cloak to? (Feel free to register a new nick and redirect its user page to User:1234r00t.) If you could respond on my Meta-Wiki talk page that would be great. Again, sorry for the issues with setting your cloak! Cbrown1023 talk 16:00, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Editor review

Hi, 1234r00t, do you remember me from a little while ago? I became inactive for a relatively long time. Anyways, wondering why the editor review that you created wasn't transcluded onto either the Editor review page or the archives. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 18:20, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi

Was wondering if you could help with the layout of my userpage, I'll give you a barnstar for your work :), I just want a side-by-side layout where appropriate, the boxed content shouldn't be placed at the side, I did that last time and the results were catastrophic (mainly cause I use IE and FF, if I could it'd be FF 100% of the time). If you've done that leave a message on my talk page and give yourself credit on my userpage where I've done so. Thanks in advance. Fridae'§Doom | Spare your time? 07:38, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Alright, the problem is that I want to get boxes side-by-side but I did that with the boxed stuff, and that failed, (check history of my userpage and subpages). I don't know which boxes should go where. So I need help. Thanks. I'll await your response in August. Fridae'§Doom | Spare your time? 22:11, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Discussion got archived so I reposted it. Fridae'§Doom | Spare your time? 02:12, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

I'd be happy to do this for you as well, but it's up to R00t first if he has time. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 14:17, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Oh I see, I didn't notice that R00t's on wikibreak. Either way then, up to you Fridae. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 14:20, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks Arbitrarily, I managed to do it myself. Thanks to you both for offering to help. Fridae'§Doom | Spare your time? 23:42, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Oh great! Happy Fridae'sDoom's Day by the way! :) Best regards, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 01:08, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks, sorry for the late response. I was wondering if one of you could help me get the note about preferred browser and resolution to be on a bar connected to the main box, sort of like Phaedriel's user page. Thanks! Fridae'§Doom | Spare your time? 08:06, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Replied to message on my talk Arbitrarily. Fridae'§Doom | Spare your time? 04:22, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
Not quite what I wanted, sorry about that. User:Rlevse's userpage design is more of what I want for the attribution for userpage design. Thanks and sorry! Fridae'§Doom | Spare your time? 22:31, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Go ahead Arbitrarily. I was at camp till yesterday night and couldn't do anything. I also currently have a broken right hand so I can't type to well either. I'll help when I can but it won't be much. Mr. R00t Talk 17:36, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Editor review

Hi, 1234r00t, do you remember me from a little while ago? I became inactive for a relatively long time. Anyways, wondering why the editor review that you created wasn't transcluded onto either the Editor review page or the archives. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 18:20, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Probably I just forgot. I'll transclude to the archives some time today probably. Mr. R00t Talk 17:45, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

I think that you approved of this article (at Articles for Creation).. I placed the proposed deletion tag because the team is not notable. It's a community-based soccer team and it doesn't meet Wikipedia's guidelines for notability. (see WP:ATH). --Sweet xxTalk 16:41, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

I recall accepting that article. Thanks for the notice. It was kind of on the fence for me as for whether or not to accept. Mr. R00t Talk 18:22, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

-- Eraserhead1 <talk> 10:58, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank you.

I meant to get to you when it happened, but thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. - Donald Duck (talk) 14:37, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome. Mr. R00t Talk 17:19, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!

For your assessment of the Perry Como page. There are images and text I sort of "inherited" when I began working on it. Never wanted those who had made other contributions to feel I was sweeping out what they had done, so tried working with what was there when possible and incorporating the new material.

Will be "de-linking" some of those Wikilinks, working on the rest, checking the images not uploaded by me and correcting whatever copyright issues may be there. Am fairly sure I know the source of those other images, so it shouldn't be difficult to correct any issues there might be.

Again, thanks for your time!

We hope (talk) 19:53, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

GA reassessment

An article that you have been involved in editing, Mount Greylock has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments here . If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article.

Your work on the review was very counter-productive, seeing it was rushed to GA in only 16 minutes. I highly urge you to visit the reassessment page for further details on why it was not "good to go". EricLeb01 (Page | Talk) 04:47, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

It's not really a problem, as the end result is that the article is being reviewed. Regards. EricLeb01 (Page | Talk) 19:06, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi

How is it? I just patrol the new pages. And someday you can become an admin. Hinata talk 01:13, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

What are you talking about? I'm not exactly sure what you're talking about. If you are asking about how is Wikipedia, I love it. Otherwise I don't know. Mr. R00t Talk 01:18, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

not a constructive edit?

What are you talking about? I added a source to it. How about you format the source on the page appropriately? 24.32.48.86 (talk) 04:00, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Re: Bolivia fires

Hi. I'm not sure how big each of those fires are, but I don't think that as much land has been destroyed as in the fires in Russia or Bolivia. I could create some articles myself, but if you would like to create them, please take a look at the references and incorporate that information and statistics in the article. Here are some links:

Alright, I'll take a look at these sometime today. Thanks for the quick response. I'd actually love to collaborate on this article with you as I think it would be good experience. Cheers, Mr. R00t Talk 18:56, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
No problem, just drop me a line when you create one of those articles. ~AH1(TCU) 19:44, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I'm sorry to hear about your family emergency. I'll work on the article today, and add more information about the more recent fires in BC, as the Quebec fires were covered by news sources back in May and June. I don't think it's ready yet for ITN however, as the article still does not show the fires' significance and needs more focus on more recent events. Thanks. ~AH1(TCU) 14:19, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Adopt me! :)

Will you adopt me please? I have a lot of questions I want to ask. --Devourer09 18:36, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

I'd love to adopt you. Please feel free to ask any questions you may have on my talk page. Cheers, Mr. R00t Talk 20:00, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks again!

Was just going to take another look at Perry Como to see if I'd missed anything related to MoS when my A/V insisted it was time for a total program update. Did that and was just returning to have that look at the page when I saw your post that Perry made GA ! :-)

Once again, thank you for your time and effort!

We hope (talk) 20:46, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Well, I haven't actually had a chance to make it a GA or add it to the list. I'll do it before tomorrow UTC. Mr. R00t Talk 20:50, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Re: Wikicode

It is alot of trial and error. You have to look at pieces of the code and use the "Preview" button alot. If something works, go for it. If you try every conceivable way to do something and it fails, try a different template. Codes of some sort, like templates, have background color codes and such built in. Check out the template page for all the built in codes and how to use them. For colors, check out List of colors (in alphabetical order) and Web colors (grouped by color). For small things or something specific, please let me know and I will give you a step-by-step. :) - NeutralhomerTalk21:20, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Minor edit

Would adding a tag or template to an article be considered a minor edit? --Devourer09 16:14, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

No. A minor edit is fixing a typo or grammar. Otherwise, something that doesn't actually affect the way the page works. Additions of content are not minor edits. If you forgot to sign something on a talk page and went back to do it, you could mark that a minor edit. Mr. R00t Talk 16:17, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks. --Devourer09 17:27, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

New MDB Feature

Hello! I have just added a new feature to MessageDeliveryBot. It is now possible to have the message delivered on behalf of a WikiProject instead of a specific user. The user who requested the delivery will still be visible in a comment, as well as in the welcome message given to a user if the bot is creating his talk page, however, the bot's edit summary and signature will use the WikiProjects name. To use this new feature, fill in the optional 'WikiProject Name' field when making a request (leave out the Wikipedia: namespace prefix). If this field is left blank, then your username will be used to sign requests, as the bot previously did. Happy editing!

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of EdoDodo at 16:02, 1 September 2010 (UTC).

Nomination

Hi Mr.R00t. I've archived your nomination at WP:ABUSE as no consensus was reached. However, I welcome your re-nomination in a few months time. Thank you for your interest, and for contributions to Wikipedia. Cheers!  :-)   Thorncrag  00:09, 2 September 2010 (UTC)