User talk:108.56.139.120

Welcome!

Hello! I noticed your contributions to Chennupati Jagadish and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! iMahesh (talk) 08:13, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

template:Marriage

Can you please stop adding death dates of the subject to the {{Marriage}} template? Please read Template:Marriage/doc § Syntax and parameters. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 16:00, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

@Neveselbert:, the guidance in the {{Marriage}} template ("If the marriage ended because of the death of the article's subject, do not provide a date.") appears to contradict the guidance in the {{infobox person}} template, which says "For deceased persons still married at time of death, close the date range with death year" (see Template:Infobox person/doc § Parameters). Or am I misreading that?

Since the {{Marriage}} template is "intended for use in infoboxes; specifically {{Infobox person}} and templates calling Infobox person", I would think that the infobox guidance would govern, but that's just my view. Has there been any previous discussion on the conflict? If not, maybe there needs to be a discussion on how best to resolve the conflict, perhaps at Template_talk:Infobox_person or Template_talk:Marriage? – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 17:01, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

No, you're not misreading that, you're right that the advice does appear to be contradictory, and should be amended/clarified. I'd say a discussion on the matter at Template talk:Infobox person, which is watched by more people, would be in order (with a note on Template talk:Marriage notifying watchers about said discussion). In the meantime, please avoid adding these death dates until this matter has been resolved. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 17:11, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

November 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Tara Smith—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 13:55, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Note that Materialscientist promptly (within a minute or two) reverted their revert of my edit. There was nothing disruptive about my edit. I reverted vandalism (editors twice overwrote a disambiguation page with new content). Too bad, though, that Materialscientist did not revert their uw on this talk page. – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 08:32, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Neelofa, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Fuzheado | Talk 07:44, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Fuzheado, I gave a reason ("remove names from infobox of non-notable persons") and the reason is valid. See the documentation for {{infobox person}} which says: |parents= "Names of parents; include only if they are independently notable or particularly relevant. " and |relatives= "Names of siblings or other relatives; include only if independently notable and particularly relevant." See also WP:NOTPUBLICFIGURE and WP:BLPNAME. Also the addition is completely unsourced to independent reliable sources and so has not been verified. – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 08:12, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Yates High School, you may be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:16, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Oshwah, please help me understand what you think was disruptive about my edit. – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 04:19, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

I think I took some changes you made out of context. I apologize; I'll restore your changes. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:22, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Oshwah, np. thanks. – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 04:25, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Message to nice and kind wikipedia user

Hello, thank you for your message, and also the information s regarding the infobox's i added, it is very much appreciated, i was wondering if you can help me with and article for Vincent Ball and add relevant military information, thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.43.249.174 (talk) 09:00, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

External link

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to John de Lancie have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.  
Your edit here to John de Lancie was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062400247790362624, https://web.archive.org/web/20201121153317/https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1062400247790362624) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:35, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

In this case, the use of a reference to twitter is within WP:PG:

Self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources of information about themselves, usually in articles about themselves or their activities, without the self-published source requirement that they be published experts in the field, so long as:

1. the material is neither unduly self-serving nor an exceptional claim;
2. it does not involve claims about third parties;
3. it does not involve claims about events not directly related to the source;
4. there is no reasonable doubt as to its authenticity; and
5. the article is not based primarily on such sources.

The information in the tweet helps to understand the birth day and year of de Lancie, which is not self-serving nor an exceptional claim, does not involve claims about third parties, is directly related to de Lancie, there is no reasonable doubt to its authenticity, and the article is not based primarily on this tweet or other similar social media. – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 03:44, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Birthday

Hi, I saw you removed the birthday from the page for Kerry Butler due to IMdb not being a reliable source. What would be a reliable source for that as that seems to be a strange reason to remove it. The date removed is in fact Kerry Butler’s birthday.

209.171.88.82 (talk) 13:32, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi 209.171.88.82. WP:DOB gives some guidance on sourcing personal information like date of birth. Also read through Wikipedia:Reliable sources to learn more about what is and is not a reliable source. Some sites that are generally considered unreliable can be found at WP:RSP (it is not an exhaustive list). Sometimes the subject of an article will publish their DOB on their own website or they will reveal their birthdate in an interview published from a reliable source (note, "fan" sites" are not generally reliable). Be careful about citing social media as a source for information (see WP:SOCIALMEDIA). You also have be careful of sites that are copies of information that comes from unreliable sources (like IMDb and Wikpiedia itself (see WP:MIRROR). In some cases, primary sources can be used (see WP:PRIMARY). I know this can be frustrating when a person "knows" something is true, but Wikipedia only cares about what can be verified by reliable sources (generally independent secondary sources) and no editor (you, me or anyone else) is considered a reliable source. Good luck. – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 14:08, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Many thanks for your edit on Paolo Bonolis‎. Denisarona (talk) 06:12, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Taft family. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it.  
Your edit here to Taft family was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (https://www.nndb.com/people/124/000054959/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:57, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

For the record, I did not add the nndb link to Taft family. The link was already in the article. I merely used Refill2 to fill out all of the bare urls, of which there were 33, only one of which was the nndb link. I've gone ahead and removed the nndb link (along with the unreliable findagrave links), but this is not a case of me spamming. – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 18:48, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I greatly appreciate your constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Recent changes patrol

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits, such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (108.56.139.120) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page.

Again, welcome! Pahunkat (talk) 20:37, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Dean Bandinelli
Hello User 108.56.139.120, I have noticed our back and forth regarding David Bandinel's information. I will admit that I am new to this Wikipedia "Academia", however I did provide two reliable sources relating to the birth/death dates, nationality and family of David Bandinel - the only references in the entire page may I add! Why did you conclude that these sources were unreliable? Furthermore, I am a direct descent of David Bandinel and have been researching him on and off for the last 10 years - so I am confident with the facts I am putting forth.
Regards, D-FRIEZ99 (talk) 23:17, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to David Bandinel, you may be blocked from editing. Fuzheado | Talk 23:43, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

.

Hello, may I ask why you keep deleting the Moonbyul pic? We, as fans, want to change it, with a new and better photo, is there any problem with the photo we put? Why do you keep deleting it? Yil3an7ayeteplzzbat (talk) 23:07, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Yil3an7ayeteplzzbat, start a discussion at Talk:Moonbyul to seek consensus for the change you want. – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 23:11, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Got your message, dooly noted. Will be more mindful in the future.--Black BIC Ballpoint (talk) 22:14, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 16:50, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hi CLCStudent, would you provide some more information on what you consider was vandalism at George Mantello? There were two errors from the previous editor's contribution [1] (missing equals signs for two infobox parameters), which I fixed [2]. In my second edit I cleaned up the infobox, including adding short description, removing fields that had values which are not in keeping with the MOS and the {{infobox person}} documentation. If I made a mistake or if you disagree with the edits I made, I am happy to discuss, but to say the edits are vandalism appears to me to be a stretch. Maybe this is just a content dispute or just a case of my having made a mistake in one of my edits. Appreciate your constructive feedback. Thanks. – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 17:04, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Infoboxes

Hi, I notice you do a lot of infobox cleanup. I was just about the make the same changes at Benedetta Dubini. I also removed the caption because we don't give photo credits normally (MOS:CREDITS). MB 01:47, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi MB, thanks for sharing about MOS:CREDITS. I'll be on the lookout for instances of that and will make appropriate adjustments. –108.56.139.120 (talk) 03:02, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Got Your Message

I got your message, and I have something I would like too say. I didn't mean to intentionally be disrupted. Plus, on Marguerite Ray her IMDb bio referenced her burial and my reason for not using that per citation is because some may not take that as a reliable source on her. Had you given it a chance perhaps I could have found a more sincere citation. Also, I refused too be blocked by YOU, or anyone else for that matter, because I know my edits were done per innocence and good will! Finally, I can take a hint so with that said... 1) you're first message a week ago was enough! 2) NEVER contact me again and leave me be please! 3) I am OFFICIALLY retiring therefore after today there will be no more edits per my username because I can live without people like you constantly bothering me over diddly-squat. 4) Per the number 3 and 4, don't bother reciprocating too this for I don't care too hear from you or be bothered by your rudeness ever again. That's all I have to say and I encourage you too not be a harasser with somebody else and, in addition, taking into consideration the current state of our world right not on top of the time of year we're in, you could have been a bit a little bit more pleasant towards me. Goodbye and good luck in improving on your human qualities since you proven today that you lack them.--Black BIC Ballpoint (talk) 12:52, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

SalvadHistory of the Jews in Hungaryoran

What, honestly, you've never heard before of the SalvadHistory of the Jews in Hungaryoran?!!

Thank you 108..., that was embarrassing, good that you've spotted it so quickly :) Happy whatever-you-choose-to-celebrate! Cheers, Arminden (talk) 17:01, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	ip i really love you Regards, Jeromi Mikhael (marhata) 13:44, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I greatly appreciate your constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Recent changes patrol

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits, such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (108.56.139.120) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page.

Again, welcome! Pahunkat (talk) 19:13, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Create an account - then you can use gadgets and help the counter-vandalism unit :-) Pahunkat (talk) 19:14, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

January 2021

Hello, I'm Cupper52. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Carl Reese (driver) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. No worries, it’s just because it was tagged vandalism. –Cupper52^Discuss! 11:41, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hi Cupper52, would you be specific about which parts of my edit you believe were not constructive or that you consider to be vandalism? Perhaps I made a mistake, in which case I would appreciate your help in identifying where that was so that I can learn and do better. Thanks. – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 11:46, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

@108.56.139.120: I have made vandalism mistakes before. I revert what is tagged vandalism. –Cupper52^Discuss! 11:47, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello again, Cupper52, it was not tagged as vandalism. It was tagged as "possible vandalism". There's a difference between those. Before you revert a case of "possible vandalism" you need to review the specific edit and determine if there is any actual vandalism. If you can't identify the specific change that is vandalism, then you don't really have a case for reverting it. Is it possible that you made a mistake and pulled the trigger too soon on reverting a valid edit without really looking at the edit? I appreciate your good-faith helping to rid Wikipedia of vandalism, but I think you've made a mistake here. Mistake happen. I make them, too. I ask that you review and that if you cannot identify any specific change that is vandalism, that you revert your reversion of my edit. Thank you. – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 11:55, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!

Thank you for your tidying work on Tomos Roberts Theroadislong (talk) 12:39, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Tomos Roberts

UK is overkill? I'd agree that United Kingdom would be, but UK is an abbreviation that may be less familiar to non-native English speakers.
Ryan (Ryancoke2020 (talk) 02:31, 19 January 2021 (UTC))

flory jagoda

There is no point to revert a true edit. I have mentioned the source in edit remark. https://www.facebook.com/FloryJagoda/ You may watch it yourself instead of reverting edits — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.53.128.191 (talk) 22:10, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi there, thank you for cleaning up after the last two editors at Gabriella Charlton. Much appreciated. I warned Mickeydkop about BLP sourcing. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:39, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

A brownie for you!

Thanks for cleaning up articles like you just did in Metawin Opas-iamkajorn! ~ Ase1estet@lkc0ntribs 12:41, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2021

Hello, I'm Kemalcan. An edit that you recently made to Iggy Azalea seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Kemalcan (talk) 10:46, 12 February 2021 (UTC)--Kemalcan (talk) 13:21, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Kemalcan, First, that was not a test edit by me. An editor (Yikes2004) added to the |associated_acts= list without discussing on the talk page as directed by the comment in the source which reads: "Please do not change this list without first discussing your proposal on the talk page. Do not include one-time collatorators." Here's Yikes2004's edit that added to the list without first discussing on the talk page. Second, I'd appreciate your not templating me for a good-faith edit that is not and was not contrary to any policy and that came with an explanation. You might disagree with my edit, but as long as I'm not violating policy that makes it a content dispute and not something worthy of templating me. – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 10:55, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello thank you for your response, as it is clearly seen from your edit, you deleted "associated acts" without giving a specific reason. Next time, please support your deletion with sources and valid explanation. Thank you. --Kemalcan (talk) 12:28, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Kemalcan, with respect, you need to look at my edit again, which was reverting an editor who added to the |associated_acts= parameter without discussing it first on the talk page. My edit only reverted a single addition to the parameter. It did not delete the |associated_acts= parameter. [3] There is clearly an explanation there in the edit summary. It reads "Please do not change the 'associated_acts' list without first discussing your proposal on the talk page. Do not include one-time collatorators." That explanation is just reciting, word-for-word, the direction given in the article for the |associated_acts= parameter. So, I ask you to restore my edit and leave a note here acknowledging your mistake in reverting my edit. There is no shame in acknowledging a mistake. I have made many mistakes myself and had to acknowledge them. Sometimes we jump the gun without adequately and carefully assessing the situation. Thank you. – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 12:44, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Blocks on Sydney-area IP address ranges

Drmies, thank you for blocking the Sydney-area IP address ranges: 1.129.104.0/21 and 1.145.0.0/19. Another Sydney-area range also exhibits the same disruptive editing by IP-hopping editor(s) with previous block history: 1.144.0.0/16. I think it should be similarly blocked. – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 03:52, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Raghav Juyal

Don't edit dance based Pages and people. Because I know the things and you don't know. I'm not requesting, I'm just warning you don't edit the page without knowing anything about him. FDMD04 (talk) 15:45, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

I have opened a discussion at the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring at this entry. – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 16:12, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Archive of AN3 discussion here. – 108.56.139.120 (talk) 08:38, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Cookies for you

		Cookies!
		BrxBrx has given you some cookies! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else some cookies, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookies}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Thanks for your work! Any reason you prefer to edit as an IP? BrxBrx(talk)^{(please reply with {{SUBST:re|BrxBrx}})} 06:20, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

AKL - Surname

Dear sir,

Ashwin Kumar Lakshmikanthan - In this Indian name, the name Lakshmikanthan is a patronymic, and the person should be referred to by the given name, Ashwin Kumar. If you agree, I'm replacing his surname with his given name.

Thank you. Adapongaiya (talk) 12:38, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

@Adapongaiya:, Sounds okay to me. Thanks for letting me know. 108.56.139.120 (talk) 21:01, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Thank you sir Adapongaiya (talk) 22:56, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Sucharita Tyagi have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.  
Your edit here to Sucharita Tyagi was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/user/sucharitatyagi) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 10:51, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Shalabh Kumar. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ashleyyoursmile! 12:23, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

@Ashleyyoursmile: are you sure about that? I reverted the vandalism by Kumar yashanshu (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Your revert has restored vandalism to Shalabh Kumar. I think you've made a mistake and suggest you undo it and ask that you acknowledge your mistake here so that other editor's do not reach a conclusion that I vandalized that article. Thank you. 108.56.139.120 (talk) 12:30, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi, you are correct. I have reverted my edit and restored the correct version. I have struck the warning above. My apologies and happy editing! --Ashleyyoursmile! 12:35, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your prompt action and reply. Cheers! 108.56.139.120 (talk) 12:38, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

FYI, the user has been blocked. :) Ashleyyoursmile! 12:42, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The BLP Barnstar
		For your clean up at Krithi Shetty and other WP:BLP articles. I think you should consider creating an account as it would allow using gadgets that aid you while you are editing. Keep up your good work! Ab207 (talk) 15:00, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

• +1 --Titodutta (talk) 19:12, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Excuse me.

www.californiabirthindex.org Is it a reliable source of information? you can add it if you want. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NovaPlaycer (talk • contribs) 16:10, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

@NovaPlaycer:, it is not a question of reliability. Per WP:BLPPRIMARY, primary sources cannot be used to support assertions about living persons. See the discussion at WP:RSN regarding its use. 108.56.139.120 (talk) 18:17, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Gunsanad Kina listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems

Per header. I'm going to CSD Wikipedia talk:Copyright problems/2021 May 28 now. Thanks for the report. ◢  Ganbaruby!  (talk) 05:25, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Thank you...

...for your reverts at Shelby Lindley, Marc Diraison etc. Much appreciated! -- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:54, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

You're doing good work. One question though!

You seem to be doing a lot of advanced editing. Why haven't you created a username? I understand it is not required, but I typically patrol for vandalism and often times anonymous users' intentions get misinterpreted as vandalism. No worries either way, just figured I'd ask. Thanks for the contributions! - PabloMartinez (talk) 02:13, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Help in undo

Dear sir,

Massive deletes to the page AKL by an unknown IP addr. Could you pls undo all his edits and help restore the page. Thank you Adapongaiya (talk) 17:27, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Thank for your contributions in wikipedia :) HurricaneEdgar 01:31, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	I'm impressed by the constant, steady high quality of your contributions. Thank you very much for your long-term committment. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:52, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Found references

Found source for Ben Pronsky agent and other.

https://www.deanpanarotalent.com/benpronsky https://www.linkedin.com/in/ben-pronsky-79978212/

Sam Riegel and Taliesin Jaffe Birthday Source

actually twitter is not an unreliable source to be honest because sam riegel's birth date information is not wrong. because it is a reliable source. If it were unreliable, it would be false information. but unfortunately this information seems correct. There is no wrong information in this. sam riegel's brandy is right and there is nothing wrong with that. Taliesin Jaffe information source effort is right, not wrong.

Taliesin Jaffe information is correct.: https://twitter.com/critrolenews/status/1351544076949102594

Sam Riegel information is correct.: https://twitter.com/critrolenews/status/1314677839396892672

I'm not sure this information is false information.

It does not matter if the information is correct or not. It only matters if it can be verified by reliable sources. There is a lot of "correct" information that cannot be added to Wikipedia because it has not been documented by reliable sources. As Pongo has described on your talk page, the use of tweets in this manner is not an acceptable use as a source of the information. Tweets are not reliable except for some narrow exceptions which do not apply in this situation. 108.56.139.120 (talk) 20:53, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Apologize

I'm so sorry for bothering you and for going too far.

Cine 2021 and 20222 leedohyun won twice in a row and its not added in his awards and achievement

It is not added in his awards and achievement while for some actors who were second place or even fifth place their award achievement js added in awards and nominations while lee do hyun won for 2 years consecutively as best new actor of the year by cine 21 and was featured in their magazine cover this year. Please add it. 212.175.35.12 (talk) 11:34, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

---