Jump to content

User talk:ثعلب شبه الجزيره

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Eikichi Kawasaki, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Eikichi Kawasaki has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://snk.wikia.com/wiki/Eikichi_Kawasaki. If the external link you inserted or changed was to an external Wiki, then please note that these links should generally not be included (see 'links to avoid' #12).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:13, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in this edit to Eikichi Kawasaki. Inappropriate links include links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that serve as advertising or promotion. Thank you.  Hazard-SJ  ±  03:14, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links, as you did with this edit to Eikichi Kawasaki. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.  Hazard-SJ  ±  03:17, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you add inappropriate external links, as you did with this edit to Eikichi Kawasaki.  Hazard-SJ  ±  03:19, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Eikichi Kawasaki do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.  
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://snk.wikia.com/wiki/Eikichi_Kawasaki. If the external link you inserted or changed was to an external Wiki, then please note that these links should generally not be included (see 'links to avoid' #12).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 06:16, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to M'alayah, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to M'alayah, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 22:21, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Muhammed Al-Arifi

[edit]

The article Muhammed Al-Arifi has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Maher-shalal-hashbaz (talk) 03:44, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Muhammed Al-Arifi for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muhammed Al-Arifi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammed Al-Arifi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Maher-shalal-hashbaz (talk) 01:55, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Squad

[edit]

Hello

Can you make the Squad for Al-Raed and Al Taawon

Thank youSlmcom (talk) 23:44, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

[edit]
cheers Neogeolegend (talk) 01:16, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

[edit]
ظبيانية (talk) 17:07, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

[edit]

Sorry? What are you talking about? Officially Mr X (talk) 17:24, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Hello Neogeolegend! I hope you enjoy this cookie as an amicable greeting from a fellow Wikipedian, SwisterTwister talk 07:17, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lives of the Saints (2012 film)

[edit]

See you just created this article. Thanks. --BweeB (talk) 18:49, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MV5BMTczNTA3Njc3N15BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwOTk4ODU5Mw@@. V1. SX97 SY140 .jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MV5BMTczNTA3Njc3N15BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwOTk4ODU5Mw@@. V1. SX97 SY140 .jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:37, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wildside (U.S. TV series)

[edit]

Hello Neogeolegend, I just thought I'd let you know that I saw your article Wildside (U.S. TV series) in the New Articles list-- The information is presented clearly and is easy to understand. However, I noticed there are some holes that may need filling: the article currently does not contain any references. As a new article, the most important thing is to find reliable references for all existing information.It would be great if you could also improve the related article Hangar 17.

Have a fun and productive day! Cheers,Amy Z (talk) 20:18, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

[edit]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Cop Land. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Do not remove ref maint tags unless you are replacing them with references. Srobak (talk) 05:42, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Cop Land, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Your random insertions and deletions of blank lines in the article do not serve any purpose. Be sure to use the sandbox for testing - not live articles. Srobak (talk) 05:43, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page Cop Land. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. As you have had a past history evidenced by warnings - further such edits will be escalated. Srobak (talk) 05:45, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Cobra (1986 film). It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Srobak (talk) 05:53, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Cobra (1986 film), you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Srobak (talk) 05:53, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Dude - seriously - STOP testing on live articles. Use the WP:SANDBOX, proofread your changes before submitting them, and use the WP:PREVIEW function as well. This really is enough. Srobak (talk) 05:58, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at 50 cent, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Use correct, English grammar when editing articles. Srobak (talk) 20:47, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alonso

[edit]

Thanks for the note. There are more pictures in the article than I would put there and I felt that the one I took out didn't add much. It might be an idea to ask an admin to take the ban notice off your page as it seems to have expired a long time ago. Britmax (talk) 20:33, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

pic status

[edit]

this pic

Hi you can't take pictures of newspaper front pages and claim ownership of them. You are going to need some kind of fair use rationale. Wikipedia:Non-free content - Off2riorob (talk) 17:28, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't worry much about the picture speedy request below if I was you - you can easily re upload it with the correct license. - or you can contest it and add the necessary rationale and templates. Off2riorob (talk) 19:02, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:سيف الإسلام القذافي نوفمبر2011.JPG

[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:سيف الإسلام القذافي نوفمبر2011.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Srobak (talk) 18:56, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:سيف الإسلام القذافي نوفمبر2011.JPG

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:سيف الإسلام القذافي نوفمبر2011.JPG, which you've sourced to http://www.alkhaleej.ae/portal/47091154-cdc4-4c17-a8fe-23a50e3608a2.aspx. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:06, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WPF1 Newsletter (November)

[edit]

This newsletter is being delivered to you because you signed up to this list. If you wish to stop receiving it, please remove your name.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Formula One at 21:10, 5 December 2011 (UTC).[reply]

December 2011

[edit]

First, while no one is presuming to know more than you about Meheri people, please read WP:EXPERTISE (along with WP:CIVIL). Now then, there is nothing in the article that says they are Somali. Meheri people do live in Somalia, so {{Somalia-stub}} is appropriate. They are an ethnic group who live in Africa, so {{Africa-ethno-group-stub}} is appropriate. (The only time those 2 templates need to be removed, is if and when the article grows beyond stub length.) And they are an ethnic group who live in Somalia, so Category:Ethnic groups in Somalia is appropriate. None of these suggest that Meheri are Somalia — "living in Somalia" is not the same thing as "being Somali." Furthermore there is nothing written in the text which says they are Somali. Thank you, -- Gyrofrog (talk) 16:05, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page Art of Fighting. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Srobak (talk) 17:26, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Art of Fighting, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Srobak (talk) 19:02, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page WP:WikiProject_Video_games/Members. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Srobak (talk) 19:09, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Erik, you may be blocked from editing. Srobak (talk) 19:09, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page User talk:Erik. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Srobak (talk) 19:10, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Amanda Bynes, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Do not re-write quoted material so it reflects inaccurately. Srobak (talk) 19:48, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Universal Soldier, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Srobak (talk) 19:52, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Diego Forlán, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Srobak (talk) 20:01, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page The Revenge of Shinobi. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Srobak (talk) 14:48, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WPF1 Newsletter (December)

[edit]

This newsletter is being delivered to you because you signed up to this list. If you wish to stop receiving it, please remove your name.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Formula One at 19:56, 3 January 2012 (UTC).[reply]

I noticed that you have posted comments to the page User talk:Lemonade51 in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. 3rd warning. Next one get you WP:ANI. Srobak (talk) 21:14, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2011

[edit]

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 4, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2011
Previous issue | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q4 2011, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation
To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 06:31, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Salwa al Mutairi appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this. Thank you. Zzarch (talk) 06:03, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fahad Khamees

[edit]

That's a nice picture; thank you for donating it. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 15:06, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Salwa al Mutairi for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Salwa al Mutairi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salwa al Mutairi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Zzarch (talk) 23:47, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Salwa al Mutairi

[edit]

One of the articles you cited identifies her occupation as television host, so it wasn't necessary to remove that. We need to use the information that is in the sources. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:06, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Weird declares" is not grammatically correct in English. It also is your own opinion: the word "weird" is not a factual statement. That's why I'm removing it. Please see WP:NPOV for more information about that rule- it's one of the most important rules at Wikipedia. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:23, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Six Bullets (2012 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romanian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Miyazaki Nichinichi

[edit]

I looked over Miyazaki Nichinichi Shinbun as you requested. Beyond changing the name, I edited the text and added a reference. Let me know if you see anything wrong. Michitaro (talk) 13:33, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It depends on what skin you are using, but there should be a tab or an option in a menu that says "Move." You don't need to be an administrator to use it. Michitaro (talk) 13:54, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Name Of Abu Dhabi

[edit]

Hello Neogeolegend, I was hoping to resolve our disagreement over the name of Abu Dhabi on this page rather than conduct an edit skirmish. My concern is that facts in Wikipedia should be verifiable, and I couldn't see anything in your source that specifically referred to the meaning of Abu Dhabi, although it was an interesting article about the oryx (they are magnificent creatures). In fact, I think the article contradicts that meaning because it says that oryx roamed Al Dhafra and the Liwa, not Abu Dhabi island which was where the original settlement began. Thanks for reading this, I hope we can come to an amicable solution, all the best Rama226 (talk) 08:23, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bad edits

[edit]

This edit in particular, which is the second time you have done that, could be considered vandalism. Stop editing articles to falsify content, it is not acceptable. Doc Tropics 23:23, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Herman Hoth.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Herman Hoth.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:18, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PROD

[edit]

Regarding your continued addition of the PROD tag to the article Obscenity the other side of Aisha: you need to stop. A PROD tag, once contested, may not be replaced.
Furthermore, your edits to this article show a very disturbing pattern: the removal of sourced content without explanation, dishonest editing and deliberate lies, even to the extent of moving the article and reversing the meaning of the title. Any further editing of this type will result in a full report of your activities being filed at WP:ANI, along with a request that action be taken. Doc Tropics 18:39, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

[edit]

Your recent editing history at Obscenity the other side of Aisha shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. You are technically already in violation of 3RR. As has already been noted, you cannot use PROD more than once for the same article. If you feel the article should be deleted, bring it up at WP:AFD. Gyrofrog (talk) 00:36, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User:AwamerT, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Do not edit other people's userpages, except perhaps with their permission. It is clear that you do not in this case. Syrthiss (talk) 11:04, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit-warring at Obscenity the other side of Aisha and User:AwamerT.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:38, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You know that edit-warring is against the rules, because you have been blocked and warned about it before. You know that it is against the rules to restore a {prod} template that has been removed, because it says that on the template. And you should know that someone else's user page is theirs, not yours, to edit. If User:AwamerT doesn't choose to link between her English and Arabic talk pages, she doesn't have to. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:42, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Notification

[edit]

I started an AfD discussion that may be of interest to you at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Obscenity the other side of Aisha. As a side note, please remember that contributions to deletion discussions are more likely to be considered in the closing decision if they are policy based and civil, rather than based on repetition or an emotional appeal. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions about the deletion process! VQuakr (talk) 06:01, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WPF1 Newsletter (January)

[edit]

This newsletter is being delivered to you because you signed up to this list. If you wish to stop receiving it, please remove your name.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Formula One at 21:05, 6 February 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Zionism

[edit]

Re this edit: please note that there is a 1 rule revert on this article. The edit summary here also suggests a degree of soapboxing.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 20:13, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please revert yourself

[edit]

All the I/P conflict articles including Zionism are subject to 1RR 24HR if you will not revert I will report you.Also you should read this

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read in the Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles#Final decision section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page.

--Shrike (talk) 20:15, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Kuru (talk) 22:15, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. AlexiusHoratius 20:50, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WPF1 Newsletter (March)

[edit]

This newsletter is being delivered to you because you signed up to this list. If you wish to stop receiving it, please remove your name.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Formula One at 12:05, 3 April 2012 (UTC).[reply]

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2012

[edit]

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 5, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2012
Previous issue | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q4 2011, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation
To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 19:32, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Herman Hoth.jpg listed for deletion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Herman Hoth.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:37, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All non-free images must meet every one of the non-free content criteria. Because we have several free images of this man, the non-free image fails criterion #1. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:19, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Barasat Euro Musketeers

[edit]

Mate, I am sorry but the article is not notable. Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Notability, but basically it states that because Barasat has never played in a national competition and that the Bengal Premier League Soccer is only a state league that Barasat is not notable. Please keep it that way and if you do disagree please say so on the AfD. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 22:14, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Crespo

[edit]

Okay, I dont think the best way to solve this is through and edit war and see us get blocked. So anyway, I dont think that should be there in the infobox. When the auction happened it was agreed that we would not add the team yet as technically none of the players are signed. The teams only have the rights to offer them a contract. It is like with Robbie Fowler who left the BPLS easily because he was never signed by a BPLS team, he was still free to go where he wanted. Anyway that is how I feel. Oh and you dont have to reply on my talk page. I got you on my watchlist for now. Oh and sorry about my comment yesterday. It was a frustrating day on wikipedia with a bunch of Indian Football pages vandalized. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 23:09, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No need to be an arse about it. I said I was sorry and that I was having a bad day. It happens. And yes I archive these things because I just archived everything else and that was recently. Why not add to it? Anyway lets stick to the subject. Please. And teenager does not insult me as I am in fact a teenager (16 years). --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 02:14, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Hernán Crespo. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Alexf(talk) 23:11, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WPF1 Newsletter (May)

[edit]

This newsletter is being delivered to you because you signed up to this list. If you wish to stop receiving it, please remove your name.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Formula One at 02:27, 5 June 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Crespo (2)

[edit]

See Talk:Hernán Crespo#Protected. Jenks24 (talk) 08:11, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

3RR violation block

[edit]
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for violation of 3RR after being warned., as you did at Hernán Crespo. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Alexf(talk) 15:43, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is all your fault

[edit]

I told you this would happen. I told you we would get blocked. Now here I am wrongly blocked... I CANT EVEN EDIT MY TALK PAGE BECAUSE OF WILSON! I hate this rule to and I warned you. I told you to come on and look at the talk page. I told you. Now I have no time left to finish my projects on a Sunday because I cant edit till Monday morning. THINK NEXT TIME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! --98.109.10.148 (talk) 15:18, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 60af4b596be7a131607dca440c32b69d

[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

TUSC token fa904c0e7e9d5d5d2a991646eddd524f

[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! fa904c0e7e9d5d5d2a991646eddd524f

Proposed deletion of The 4th Reich (film)

[edit]

The article The 4th Reich (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Future film failing WP:NFF - photography "due to begin in August"

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 17:25, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The 4th Reich (film) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The 4th Reich (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The 4th Reich (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. PamD 21:24, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WPF1 Newsletter (June)

[edit]

This newsletter is being delivered to you because you signed up to this list. If you wish to stop receiving it, please remove your name.

EdwardsBot (talk) 20:10, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2012

[edit]

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 5, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2012
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q2 2012, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation
To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 21:37, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kalervo Kurkiala

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kalervo Kurkiala requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Rcsprinter (warn) @ 15:16, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, ثعلب شبه الجزيره. You have new messages at Noq's talk page.
Message added 17:03, 29 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

noq (talk) 17:03, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nazi Germany Portal

[edit]

Hi: as to the addition of the Nazi Germany Portal link onto article pages; if the article page already has some other portal listed, it presents better to add in the Nazi Germany portal icon into the grouping of the existing ones. BTW-if you know how to add the Nazi Party flag to the portal icon in question that would be helpful. Kierzek (talk) 16:27, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good job on the portal icon. I have noted that I can't get the "Things you can do" section to line up correctly on my screen; does it fit properly and completely when you view it? Kierzek (talk) 21:19, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WPF1 Newsletter (July)

[edit]

This newsletter is being delivered to you because you signed up to this list. If you wish to stop receiving it, please remove your name.

EdwardsBot (talk) 22:59, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Unwisely provocative badges

[edit]

A userbox is essentially a badge, that you're walking around wearing on your lapel. If you were to walk around wearing the Nazi flag on your lapel in public whilst working at a volunteer organization, you'd expect other volunteers to make a fuss. Repeatedly. And that's what's going to happen here. This won't be the last time that this comes up, especially when it's against the law to wear badges like this in some countries and people from many countries edit here. If you're really going to wear this badge in public, have the wisdom at least to use a different image that approaches being scholastic. I've changed your badge to one. Uncle G (talk) 19:55, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copy and paste of WP:AN

[edit]

I have removed this from your talkpage and replaced it with a link to the conversation; you cannot copy and paste other user's comments as it loses the attribution. Thanks, Black Kite (talk) 20:39, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

no problem.--Neogeolegend (talk) 20:43, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:User interested in Nazi Germany

[edit]

Template:User interested in Nazi Germany has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 22:09, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

[edit]

I suggest you let sleeping dogs lie; if you keep commenting after the issue has been closed then things are likely to WP:BOOMERANG; that is, your post to ANI will backfire against you. You are making a mountain out of a mole hill and it is best to forget about the small comment. IRWolfie- (talk) 22:33, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How ...

[edit]

... did you get so close as to take this picture? I'm a journalist, and I don't even get those chances dangerouspanda 22:53, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kalervo Kurkiala for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kalervo Kurkiala is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kalervo Kurkiala until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The Banner talk 02:19, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free content policy

[edit]

Please read WP:NFCC#9 carefully. There is no exception or general allowance to use non-free images in portal blocks or other navigation or gallery templates. Thank you for your cooperation with this wikipedia policy. DMacks (talk) 05:34, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

[edit]
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for misusing Wikipedia for Nazi advocacy. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:15, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

hello admins

[edit]

can anyone undo this edits at my page[1] because there a miss understand with the block. the user who is blanking my page has no rights to do it.

Until you have a successful unblock request, I see nothing wrong with the edit that identifies you as an indefinitely-blocked former editor. As such, no need to reverse it because it's a fact dangerouspanda 18:27, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
believe me dangerous the block action was fast and didn't give me a chance to reply. Yes you were right all you guys about putting a no Israel flag and it's template, but it was punishing for about 1 week, this was in June then I have been making good edits since then.--Neogeolegend (talk) 18:35, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fast? IIRC it was based on a significantly-detailed discussion at WP:ANI that you also took part in. Remember, your list of contributions is permanent: we can all see them. Also know that Wikipedia does not do punishment: we do prevention to both the articles AND to the editors that create/read them dangerouspanda 18:39, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
perventing from what dangerous! I was accused of being Nazi advocacy. I am not Nazi. All these problems came when I created the portal and templates. Finish, no more templates no more portals.--Neogeolegend (talk) 18:52, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The portal was not the problem. It was the templates, your continual reversal of changes to them, added to some of your edits that were horrifically inappropriate and truly Nazi-esque. They're all in your contributions. As such, we're protecting a lot of people from such actions. Racism is a weakness. If you feel you want an unblock (as per WP:GAB) follow the directions in the block notice above. I don't see it happening. As yo umay not use your talkpage to chat while blocked - only for unblock - I'll leave you to follow the process if you decide that you're able to follow Wikipedia's core rules dangerouspanda 18:59, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If you wish to seek unblock, the instructions are in the block notice, above. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:57, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You said, "All these problems came when I created the portal and templates." I'm not sure about that: you had been blocked four times (for other reasons) before the current block, so I can't say that I've seen any improvement in behavior. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 19:07, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ثعلب شبه الجزيره (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

hello admins! there were templates created by me and deleted as per discussion, then I created another I thought may be reasonable. But the actions of these was block. I apologize for what i have made and I will never return to these type of edits. I even didn't make any personal attacks. I apologize again to all English Wikipedia community> Yes you were right Gyrofrog but that was in june after everything was good until these events happenedNeogeolegend (talk) 19:15, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

At first glance the userboxes looked like they were created by someone who maybe just a little misguided, but when other edits of yours are taken into context, a different picture emerges. A picture of a user advocating Nazism. From your comments here it still seems that you do not grasp the gravity of the situation. I have to tell you it is very unlikely you can come up with any explanation compelling enough for an unblock so soon after such an incident. Your best bet at this time is to follow the terms of the standard offer. Wikipedia does not tolerate hate speech, you are going to need to earn back the trust you lost. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:08, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Or just cut to the chase by looking at these:[2][3][4] . Put thos together with the "I admire nazis" userboxes and an agenda is pretty clear. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:01, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

hello admins again

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ثعلب شبه الجزيره (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is why am writing this. I want to earn back the trust I lost from English wiki community.--Neogeolegend (talk) 21:07, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I agree with Beeblebrox's suggestion in your last unblock request that Wikipedia:Standard offer is probably your only chance of getting back now - but even after six months you'll still have some convincing to do. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:19, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ثعلب شبه الجزيره (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have read the offer template but this will not help because the admin will open a new topic at notice board where users are not Neutral. I will not create anything that harm wiki English, promise. I apologize, and am responsible for this.--Neogeolegend (talk) 21:42, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You miss the point. The standard offer is for the benefit of the encyclopedia, not for the benefit of any specific editor. Acceptance of the offer is the only way in which you will be unblocked here.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 11:49, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

That's just weak. The third request is often the make-or-break request, meaning you are coming close to having your talk page access revoked so that you can no longer appeal on this way and will be forced to deal with WP:BASC. In light of that you might want to reconsider this request, I can't imagine any reasonable admin accepting it. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:42, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The user is not showing that he has understood and accepted that he has done something wrong. This is obvious because on arab Wikipedia, he still has a Rommel box on his user page Ar:User:Neogeolegend and he hasn't taken any steps either to delete his notorious Ar:بوابة:ألمانيا_النازية. If the user ever wants to be unblocked, he should clean Arab wikipedia from his Nazi advocacy completely, wait for six months and follow WP:OFFER --rtc (talk) 00:41, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Yoshitora Tokugawa Samurai Shodown V.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Yoshitora Tokugawa Samurai Shodown V.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:12, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Shiro Tokisada Amakusa.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Shiro Tokisada Amakusa.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:12, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Andrew Samurai Shodown VI..jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Andrew Samurai Shodown VI..jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:13, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Gaira Caffeine.jpg)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Gaira Caffeine.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:14, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lives of the Saints (unreleased film) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lives of the Saints (unreleased film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lives of the Saints (unreleased film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lady Lotus (talk) 16:40, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Article Incubator/The 4th Reich (film)

[edit]

Wikipedia:Article Incubator/The 4th Reich (film), a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Article Incubator/The 4th Reich (film) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Article Incubator/The 4th Reich (film) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. SL93 (talk) 00:08, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi Neogeolegend,

I work for AFAR Media, a travel media company whose mission is to inspire and enable travelers to have richer, deeper and more authentic travel experiences around the world. We publish AFAR Magazine, which has twice been named America's best travel magazine, and AFAR.com, an online travel guide that has been recognized by the New York Times, Time magazine and many others as breaking new ground in inspiring and enabling great travel experiences (see www.afar.com/).

I’m creating content to recommend that travelers visit Abu Dhabi and would like to use the image in the following link. I would like to request your authorization and approval to do so.

http://www.afar.com/highlights/suit-up-and-drive?context=wanderlist&context_id=23746

AFAR also provides destination guides for partners, such as Westin Finds from AFAR, in which AFAR recommends places for Westin Hotel guests to visit. (See westinfinds.com/) We would also like to include your image in these recommendations.

If this is acceptable to you, I need you to reply to me that you are in agreement with the following provision, have the rights to the image and are authorized to provide this consent:

CONSENT AND AGREEMENT

AFAR Media is hereby granted royalty-free authorization and license to publish, display and use the image in AFAR Magazine, on AFAR,com, on WestinFinds.com, mobile variations thereof, and in such other electronic, digital, and print channels as AFAR and its partners shall determine, including in social media and collateral marketing materials. It is understood that you retain copyright ownership over the image, and this is a license only.

We will share our recommendation with you after it is complete. Thank you very much for your consideration.

All the best, Lara

community@afar.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.158.248.111 (talk) 00:24, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:10 Kuwaiti Dinar.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:10 Kuwaiti Dinar.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:12, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bodo Spranz.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bodo Spranz.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Helmut Wagner.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Helmut Wagner.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Luftwaffe Honor plate

[edit]

The article Luftwaffe Honor plate has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources listed and unclear whether this award existed; nothing comes up in Google books.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:18, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Luftwaffe Honor plate for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Luftwaffe Honor plate is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luftwaffe Honor plate until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:26, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Saif al-Islam Gaddafi2011.JPG

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Saif al-Islam Gaddafi2011.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

i want to come back

[edit]

i would like to come back! it's been 4 years.--ثعلب شبه الجزيره (talk) 14:35, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Coplandsoundtrackcover.gif

[edit]
Notice

The file File:Coplandsoundtrackcover.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-free album cover being used in a decorative manner in Cop Land#Soundtrack. Non-free album cover art is generally allowed to be used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about albums, but its use in other articles is generally only allowed when the cover art itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary as explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-3 and the context for non-free use required by WP:NFCC#8 is evident. There is no such commentary for this particular album cover anywhere in the article, and the use of soundtrack album cover art in articles about films or TV programs is generally not allowed for this reason as explained in WP:FILMSCORE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:53, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Super Shinobi.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Super Shinobi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Nazism portal

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Nazism portal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 01:18, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:User Good article Arabic

[edit]

Template:User Good article Arabic has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Tom (LT) (talk) 23:49, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:FA-Class Nazi Germany articles has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Category:FA-Class Nazi Germany articles has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 13:32, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ثعلب_شبه_الجزيره&oldid=1198950330"