Wikipedia:Peer review/List of Formula One circuits/archive1
Appearance
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I would some feedback before I take the list o WP:FL. The layout of the table is the main concern for me, could it be improved? should i just include first and last race instead of listing all the seasons the circuits have hosted a Grand Prix? All suggestions are welcome, thanks, NapHit (talk) 11:25, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Comments
- Lead image is so small I can't make out the locations at all. I would suggest ditching or moving the Formula One navbox and increasing the image to the max allowable per MOS (300px I think?).
- "and cars must" would prefer "vehicles" but I guess it's a matter of taste.
- "Silverstone, since" think a semi-colon here.
- " 22 kilometres (14 mi)" vs " 25.800 km (16.031 mi) " be consistent in the accuracy of the conversions.
- " a safer and shorter" perhaps just "a shorter, safer .."
- A couple of sentences have run-ons which would be better suited to either new sentences or semi-colons rather than commas.
- "The most recent circuit to have hosted a Grand Prix was the Buddh International Circuit, which hosted the Indian Grand Prix in 2011" not true.
- "become the latest circuit " the latest different circuit?
- Put the Pescara Circuit into context, i.e. where it is and when the longest laps took place (i.e. which Grands Prix).
- Length column, be consistent with accuracy, i.e. similar number of decimal places.
- Not often do I see "United States of America", normally just United States.
- I would reduce width of the Seasons column to give more space to the "Grands Prix" column which pretty much always spreads onto two lines.
- Circuit Charade appears to be really called Charade Circuit.
- Was the Indianapolis 500 part of the Grand Prix calendar some time? I think that's what you're implying. Add a note if so, tell me if I've got the wrong end of the stick.
- "Spa-Francorchamps" ->"Circuit de Spa-Francorchamps"?
- Proposed circuit table is unreferenced, and you could force the col widths to be the same as the preceding table (omitting the number of GPs col of course).
- 2010 Autocar external link seems superfluous.