User talk:Peter Philim

Welcome!

Hello, Пётр Филимонов, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Lee Grant does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Betty Logan (talk) 03:11, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Agatha Christie bio photo

Hi and thanks for adding the Christie photo to her bio. I would suggest using a cropped version such as below in the Christie bio information box, what do you think? RLO1729 (talk) 10:22, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello RLO1729! I think you're right. But miss Christie has a strange expression on her face. And the most decent photo was removed. Maybe you will be interested in this problem. Look at this site, there are some very nice photos of Christie. And the copyright on some photos belongs to this site, and as far as I understand, there is a possibility of free use of these photos. Here they are: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11. --Пётр Филимонов (talk) 05:53, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanks! Also many thanks for the NPG links, I'll explore the copyright issues. In addition, I've asked Agatha Christie Ltd for their advice on a suitable image for the biography information box that can be used under Creative Commons. Hopefully, they will respond next week and then we can go from there in terms of choosing the best images. RLO1729 (talk) 06:12, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, the CC licences associated with the NPG images have an NC (Non-Commercial) attribution that is not compatible with Wikipedia image requirements. RLO1729 (talk) 11:58, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RLO1729: I'm sorry about your wasted time. By the way, about the Agatha Christie Ltd. On their website, they link to a The Christie Archive Trust that provided them with an image with Christie. maybe we should develop this direction. But I can't find the Trust's website. --Пётр Филимонов (talk) 11:22, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, it was good to see the NPG photos. I'll see what I can find out about The Christie Archive Trust - thanks! RLO1729 (talk) 11:49, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Lilian Jackson Braun.png

A tag has been placed on File:Lilian Jackson Braun.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 14:32, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Molly Thynne moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Molly Thynne, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:46, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kt postnom

You are wrongly adding "Kt" to article: this is only for knights bachelor that have higher titles and need differentiation (eg a higher knighthood or lordship), the vast majority will only have the title "sir" and no associated postnom. For example, "Sir Jimbo Wales [no postnom]", "Sir Jimbo Wales, KBE, Kt" or "Jimbo Wales, Baron Wikipeida, Kt". Gaia Octavia Agrippa ^Talk 19:44, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gaia Octavia Agrippa. I'm sorry, but could you please indicate what your statement is based on? You see, I proposed to introduce a postnominal Kt in the style of Laurence Olivier, and in the discussion of the article in the discussion of this proposal, we reached an impasse. Thank You. --Peter Philim (talk) 06:31, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Laurence Olivier is a case where Kt should be used; I've commented on the talk page. There is a fully referenced section at Knight Bachelor#Honorifics and post-nominal letters, but see here. Post-nominal letters are signposts, and Kt has particular restrictions on its use. Gaia Octavia Agrippa ^Talk 09:27, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Molly Thynne

Hello, Peter Philim. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Molly Thynne, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:03, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Sir Harry Llewellyn, Bt.png

A tag has been placed on File:Sir Harry Llewellyn, Bt.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please add the appropriate fair use tag and rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 12:41, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Hamlet, Revenge!.png

A tag has been placed on File:Hamlet, Revenge!.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 10:36, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:POSTNOM

Hi, as per MOS:POSTNOM: If a baronetcy or peerage is held, then commas should always be used for consistency's sake, as the former are separated from the name by a comma. Eg, the removal of commas at Caroline Dinenage was incorrect. Please don't remove commas if they are already there. Gaia Octavia Agrippa ^Talk 22:12, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve List of awards and nominations received by Joanne Woodward

Hello, Peter Philim,

Thank you for creating List of awards and nominations received by Joanne Woodward.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Plese fix the copyright problems in the article. See here for help identifying copied sections.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bruxton (talk) 00:47, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Joanne Woodward into List of awards and nominations received by Joanne Woodward. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 01:09, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DanCherek Good afternoon. Initially, I entered information about Joanne Woodward's awards and nominations on her page, but then I decided to create a new article and transferred the information myself. I don't think this is a copy. Or do you mean the information at the beginning of the article? Peter Philim (talk) 01:50, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I meant the introductory paragraphs. Since that text was originally contributed by many other editors, the edit summary should be used to point back to that article and provide attribution to them. I've done this for you in the edit summary of this diff, so this is just a reminder for any future copying. Please let me know if you have any questions about that. Thanks, DanCherek (talk) 01:54, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DanCherek Thank you!--Peter Philim (talk) 01:56, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:E. C. Bentley.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:E. C. Bentley.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Elspeth Dudgeon

Hello @Peter Philim: could you please create an article for English actress Elspeth Dudgeon, best known for playing the role of "Sir Roderick Femm" (credited as "John Dudgeon") in the 1932 film The Old Dark House and later appeared in the 1935 film Becky Sharp? 181.179.30.97 (talk) 16:38, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

181.179.30.97. Look what happened. This is your concern now.

Elspeth Dudgeon moved to draftspace

Thanks for creating Elspeth Dudgeon. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:06, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kelly Curtis edit

I have reverted your addition of an unsourced date of birth to Kelly Curtis. In addition to Wikipedia's basic principle of citing sources (Wikipedia:Citing sources), a special need for citations applies with regard to elements of a biography of a living person (WP:BLPPRIVACY). Feel free to add a date of birth when it is accompanied by a citation to a reliable, published source. Eddie Blick (talk) 02:16, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Teblick I took this information from an article about Janet Leigh. You can delete it there too if there are no sources. Peter Philim (talk) 07:31, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointed out where you found the date. After reading your reply, I saw the date of birth in Janet Leigh. It is cited to a book listed under "Sources" at the end of that article, but unfortunately I do not have access to that book to verify that the date is in the source. If you have access to it, please restore the date to Kelly Curtis with an appropriate citation. Eddie Blick (talk) 01:05, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Hi Peter Philim! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of List of awards and nominations received by Cate Blanchett several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:List of awards and nominations received by Cate Blanchett, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Indagate (talk) 17:18, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Indagate Good afternoon. My edit was aimed at bringing the article to a common style. But you are obviously not interested in that. Why? Peter Philim (talk) 17:23, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Indagate your silence looks like the absence of objective arguments in favor of your point of view. If you have nothing to say, I will return my edits to the article. Peter Philim (talk) 19:27, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Give people more than 2 hours to respond, people have lives other than Wikipedia. Use edit summaries, when you make edits and when you revert. Assume good faith, don't assume people don't have a reason especially when they've given one in edit summaries. Follow WP:BRD, start a discussion on the talk page of the article when it is reverted instead of just reverting. Non-nested rowspan impairs readability, has WP:ACCESS issues and makes it harder to follow the rows. That whole table needs sourcing, could be removed per WP:Verifiability. Indagate (talk) 20:34, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]