User:SGGH/Archive12

HI!

Your a nice person. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Egyptia (talk • contribs) 20:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Sir Geoff

Hiya,

Unfortunately I've been a bit busy and haven't done much around here for a while. I'll try and pop back as often as I can and have a look, and am willing to copyedit/read through any work you do, but don't seem to have any reliable time to do any editing for myself at the moment.

However, if I can find another hour in the day, I'll have a look!

Let me know if you want anything checking...

Hope you are well, –MDCollins (talk) 23:27, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Retiarius

Thanks again for your peer review of retiarius. The article is currently at Featured Article Candidates, where your input would again be appreciated. — Dulcem (talk) 00:47, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

YouTube

I'm a bit dubious of the copyright status of that YouTube clip. We need to be really sure it's legit before linking to it, per WP:EL David Underdown (talk) 09:45, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Neuro Linguistic Psychotherapy and Counselling Association

Thank you for your interest in this page, currently the subject of an AfD here: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Neuro_Linguistic_Psychotherapy_and_Counselling_Association.

Your advice would be welcome. AJRG (talk) 12:49, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Fortress of Przemyśl

On 29 March, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Fortress of Przemyśl, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 08:19, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Review of Battle in Berlin

May I point you to the Talk:Battle_in_Berlin#Polish_troops and the tag at the top of the article. Removing this problem is on my to do list, but until it is completed by me or sb else, I don't think the article meets B-level criteria for comprehensiveness.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 00:50, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Re:Admin coaching (on my page)

Hello, SGGH. You have new messages at EvanSeeds's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Nasty chimp

What did it do? Blnguyen (vote in the photo straw poll) 06:37, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Hopefully the chimp didn't deter SGGH from writing Operation Castor for FA! Blnguyen (vote in the photo straw poll) 06:58, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

RE:Wikibreak

Have a good'un! Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs)☺ 18:09, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

As Police,Mad,Jack said I hope you have a great wikibreak!--Mifter (talk) 14:39, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXV (March 2008)

The March 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:39, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

Hi old buddy, how are you? As you noticed my son went ahead and wrote an article about me. I told him not to, because someone will post it for deletion since I am not notable, but he went ahead and did it anyway. Thank you for doing those fixes and for caring enough to look it over. You are a real friend. Tony the Marine (talk) 18:20, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Request for peer review

Hi! I was wondering if you'd be able to look over this peer review (article). It's got a long way to go, and any input would be greatly appreciated. :) This spam message brought to you on behalf of the current Tzatziki Squad collaboration. Thanks, Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 22:22, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Pippa Bacca -> Giuseppina Pasqualino di Marineo

FYI, I've moved Pippa Bacca to Giuseppina Pasqualino di Marineo.

LMB (talk) 18:55, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

• "Pippa Bacca" seems to have been her artistic pseudonym. I may have rushed with the moving of the article (see Madonna Louise Ciccone Ritchie), if you feel it was the case, do revert (then don't forget to create a redirect with her birth name). Thanks for understanding.

LMB (talk) 19:10, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Troubles with Law enforcement in Brazil

Hi! Me and some of Brazilian Municipal Guards are in trouble because an user delate the article Policing in Brazil to create another article (Law enforcement in Brazil).This guy is a former Brazilian Army officer and have a technical opinion about municipal guards:These corporations aren't police institutions.I sugest ( in the order) an international votation for this question, the recriation and the blocking of the old text, and the intervention of the Law enforcement project.Pals, this guy is a pin in the a...I will waiting for any decision.{Bryard 14:49, 14 April 2008 (UTC)}

Learning the ropes

SGGH,

As you know I am rather new at this Wikipedia game. If you come across any issues with what I am doing, for example the {{Infobox Law enforcement agency}} references gaff, please feel free to jump in early. Cheers. PS I have no Internet access at all for the next 4 or 5 days. Peet Ern (talk) 14:12, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

BCAD - thank you!

		Military history service award
		By order of the coordinators, for your good work assessing B-class military history articles, I hereby award you this Military history WikiProject Service Award. --ROGER DAVIES talk 18:48, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

DYK

On 18 April, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Roger Davis (cricketer), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Bobet 11:34, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Bruska massacre

Thx for helping out. I'm working on the refferences right now.--(GriffinSB) (talk) 11:14, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

I sourced everything,but somhow the refferences are not shown on the bootom of the page. Can you please fix that?--(GriffinSB) (talk) 11:39, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

"Edit war" watch

If you are so inclined, could you please keep an eye on the dispute between User:Domaleixo aka "Emerson", User:Gnangarra, and User:Merbabu stemming from Portuguese Timor (and possibly other articles).
I'm seeing varying degrees of hostility and incivility, with varying degrees of "justification".
I've made a few efforts to cool things off, but these were apparently not appreciated.
Thanks -- Writtenonsand (talk) 13:39, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

SGGH. Many thanks for your attention. Your focus on content rather than editors’ actions is refreshing. ;-) And thanks for the time taken to look into what the issue is actually about – ie, you’ve clearly look into the article. Kind regards --Merbabu (talk) 22:38, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

My thanks also. :-) -- Writtenonsand (talk) 16:47, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Autosigning templates

I have left a message for you at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Templates#Signature in templates.

--David Göthberg (talk) 17:12, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

News! Tag & Assess 2008 is coming ...

Milhist's new drive – Tag & Assess 2008 – goes live on April 25 and you are cordially invited to participate. This time, the task is housekeeping. As ever, there are awards galore, plus there's a bit of friendly competition built-in, with a race for bronze, silver and gold wikis! You can sign up, in advance, here. I look forward to seeing you on the drive page! All the best, --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 13:18, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

One Stripe (200 articles) Two Stripes (400 articles) Three Stripes (600 articles) Tireless Contributor Barnstar (1000 articles) Chevrons (2000 articles) Working Man's Barnstar (3000 articles) Barnstar of Diligence (4000 articles) Third place overall Second place overall First place overall

Deleted Article BRAC Bank

Hi, I was looking through list of bangladeshi bank and found that you have deleted Brac Bank Ltd. Delete log is:

19:21, July 1, 2007 SGGH (Talk | contribs) deleted "Brac Bank Ltd" ‎ (G11)

Can you please give me the reason of deleting? I want to re-create it. Thanks

Bauani (talk) 19:01, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

FT of the Invincibles

If it is anyone's project it is Blnguyen's but Dweller, The Rambling Man and Phanto282 among others are also major contributors. Johnlp and I worked together on Colin McCool. I am sure that anything you can contribute to the FT drive and Saggers would be welcome. There is sort of a coordination page at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Australian biography worklist for what it is worth. The best person to see about images would be Phanto282 who is a dab hand and finding them. Pre-1955 Australian images are generally public domain. Good luck with Saggers! Cheers, Mattinbgn\^talk 04:30, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

We always need more Poms toiling away building the wealth of the colony! Blnguyen (bananabucket) 05:55, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

If we can't find any more on personal life, and it seems as though we won't, can't we just move onto GAC? What are your plans? Blnguyen (bananabucket) 06:30, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Honestly? I don't think it would make GA with such a gap in his personal life, unfortunately. I might trawl through the times digital archive (got access at Uni) for the invincibles tour and see what they say about him. Anything else you want me to look for while I'm there? Got lectures this morning so will leave that time for you to reply. SGGH ^speak! 07:46, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, at least with me I don't care. Murali Kartik is GA and so are a whole pile of other things. I don't think it's that important at all. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 02:16, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Images

Images of modern players are harder to source than the older players; most of what I have uploaded are PD, which in Australia is pre-1955, but I don't know the rules in the UK. There are two pics of Boycott batting in the 65-6 Ashes series at [1] and [2]. However, they are not very good ones but if you apply for permission for GFDL use, in all likelihood you will get them. Another suggestion is to upload a low-res scan of one of Boycott's book covers, discuss the book in the text and claim fair use for the image - easy to do considering Boycott's controversial writing & commentary. This was done for Ian Chappell and received no objection at FAC.

Phanto282 (talk) 00:24, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

DYK

On 29 April, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Johann Myburgh, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Royalbroil 03:22, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

George Blumenthal.jpg delete?

The Image:George Blumenthal.jpg image was licensed under GFDL which I think is a free license. Please un-delete if you get a chance. Or I can re-upload it under the GFDL... peace, Mdale (talk) 20:43, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

WP:LE Barnstar Proposal

Hi SGGH :) as you know, my barnstar proposal has been sitting on the WP:LE talk page for about a week now, and I am asking your permission as project coordinator to go ahead and set up a consensus poll in which all project members would be invited to participate in to decide wither or not to make the Barnstar the official Barnstar of our project, the poll would run for two weeks, and when the two weeks were up, you would have the final decision of wither or not the proposal has achieved consensus, and as such you or another project coordinator could close the poll as successful or un-successful. If you have a better way to decide wither or not to make the Barnstar official, I am open to suggestions. Thank you, --Mifter (talk) 19:16, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Ok, I have created Template:WP:LE Barnstar Prop to distribute to every member of the project, and I also have created Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Law Enforcement/Barnstar Proposal for the poll itself. If you want to change the wording of the template before I start distributing in you are more then welcome too, just tell me when I have the Ok to start distributing the template and then I'll make sure it gets to every member of the project, and you are also more than welcome to change the layout or content of Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Law Enforcement/Barnstar Proposal to make it look, perform better. Thanks,--Mifter (talk) 19:52, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Also, if you chose not to use Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Law Enforcement/Barnstar Proposal you are more than welcome to just delete it and use the Main Project talk page instead :). --Mifter (talk) 19:54, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the vote of confidence :), although one more favor :), could you move your support vote for the barnstar to the page that I created, as well as re-directing the notice on the bulletin board to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Law Enforcement/Barnstar Proposal. Once Again thanks for giving me control over the whole process :), and if you change your mind and decide you use the main talk page instead of the page that I created as I said above feel free to delete it :). Thanks --Mifter (talk) 20:20, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Law Enforcement Barnstar Proposal Poll

Hello there SGGH/Archive12,

We here at Wikiproject Law Enforcement are currently in the process of deciding wither or not to make this WikiProject Law Enforcement's official Barnstar award. Being that you are a member of Wikiproject Law Enforcement, we are humbly asking you to voice your opinion here about our new Barnstar.

Thank You and All the Best, Mifter (talk) 20:27, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

I know that you already know about the proposal, but everyone still has to get the same notice :) --Mifter (talk) 20:27, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

I have now given the template to every Wikiproject Law Enforcement Member except two who were blocked and one who was banned. Also, I was unable to give the template to this user User talk:The undertow because his talk page was full protected. Anyways, now its just a matter of waiting for people to vote in the poll :).--Mifter (talk) 21:05, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Sisindiran

Hey there. Is the text of the poem not copyrighted by someone? Or is it okay to have the text on wikipedia? SGGH ^speak! 08:43, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Dera sir,

The reference is: Wim van Zanten, Sundanese Music in the Cianjuran Style, Foris Publications Holland, 1989

Thank you--Hadiyana (talk) 08:56, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVI (April 2008)

The April 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:15, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Re: Hello

Hello baby. Sounding very formal on my talk page. What's up in wiki-world or in the real world? Assuming good faith both here and there. Anything you'd like copy/edited? Red Gown (talk) 03:52, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar!!

Thanks for the barnstar SGGH! --Fir0002 00:38, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

User page

This is just out of curiosity, my friend, but why do you delete your userpage sometimes? SGGH ^speak! 13:37, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Keeping it clean I guess. And running down my userspace edit count :). Blnguyen (bananabucket) 02:57, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Ahhh, didn't think of the second bit. SGGH ^speak! 07:31, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Explanation requested

Hi, could you explain yourself with respect to Max Freiherr von Waldberg? Your purported sources do not match the content of the article. --Michael Snow (talk) 05:41, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Ah, I see, the problem seems to have been that you assumed the citation to Kater in the Goebbels article covered all the material preceding it. In reality, the citation only relates to the specific sentence it accompanies. I've rewritten the von Waldberg article with a legitimate source. --Michael Snow (talk) 16:20, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Patrolling new pages

Hi. Thank you for your help with the vital work of patrolling new pages! Since you appear to be relatively new user and have not been marking new pages you review as patrolled, I was just wondering if you knew about this facility and its purpose. At Special:Newpages, pages that have not been patrolled are shown in yellow highlight, to indicate they have not been reviewed (and as "unreviewed" when using Special:NewPagesFeed a/k/a page curation). It may be a good idea to use the "mark this page as patrolled" link at the bottom of the new page if you think you have performed the standard patrolling tasks and do not wish a second opinion. Where appropriate, doing so saves time and work by informing fellow patrollers of your review of the page, so that they do not duplicate efforts. Thanks again for volunteering your time at the new pages patrol project. -- Andrew Mill (talk) 13:10, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted "Ukrainian Levkoy"

08:52, 10 May 2008 SGGH (Talk | contribs) deleted "Ukrainian Levkoy" ‎ (Speedy deleted per (CSD G12), was a blatant copyright infringement. using TW) I lost many time and lost materials. Please, restore article and make bot smartest. Best regards, Kupala, Kiyv, Ukraine Kupala (talk) 09:28, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

I can not write own text. All articles in the Internet are written or concerted with the author of Ukrainian Levkoy breed - by Helen Biryukova. The article must correspond the Russian and Ukrainian variants. The article also must be approved by Helen. Copyrights are not violated and correspond GDFL. Therefore for WIKI it is possible reason to consider an original variant. Can I now edit this article? Thank you for Your answer! Best regards, Kupala (talk) 17:27, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

I already have its permissions and authorities from it. It is impossible to describe breed and the standard by the own words))) Each word in such description has clear and certain significance. The description is academic and was discussed by many people, and also corresponds to terminology in felinology and genetics. When you will have an Ukrainian Levkoy, you will probably speak on-ukrainski))) I will try to acquire the American cat) Kupala (talk) 22:53, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Template:OzTestCaptain Advert

Thank you very much for updating the template and for your comments on Hugh Trumble at PR and FAC. They certainly improved the article. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 06:47, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Late Roman army

Hi SGGH

could you do me a favour and read Late Roman army. I'm not quite sure whether it would benefit from a copyedit regarding style and want your opinion. Thank you. Wandalstouring (talk) 13:31, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Just comment please. There are some minor content disputes that need to be solved before it is copyedited. Thanks Wandalstouring (talk) 07:50, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Ode

Want to do something exciting?
Do some citing!
Or if you'd rather be a doormat,
You could always fix some formats.

I'd certainly be grateful,
And it would be jolly fateful,
If Bradman won back his star,
That he lost at FAR.

Cheers, --Dweller (talk) 13:12, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

WP:WPLE Barnstar Proposal

Hi SGGH, I was just wondering if you could stop in at the Barnstar Proposal here and declare wither or not the proposal has succeeded and as such close the discussion and add the template for the barnstar to the Templates and Awards Page. I have left a hidden comment on the Barnstar Proposal Page outlining how to close the discussion to help you out :). I would also like to thank you for allowing me the responsibility for being able to run the entire process, it truly was a great experience :). All the Best, --Mifter (talk) 19:07, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

CSD

This is the version you would have seen when speedy deleting that. Please note that the under construction tag requests that you do not tag for deletion while the tag is in place, as I am literally writing it as we speak. That is the function of the under construction tag. I appreciate you didn't intend any harm, and as per regulations I have not removed the speedy tag, merely added the hang on. Kind regards, SGGH ^speak! 09:02, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Indeed, and thanks for following that procedure, even after the mistake i made. I should have issued a PROD on this article instead. Actually im merely doing so since often people start articles without ever finishing them. In general underconstruction tags never get checked as far as i know (I had one several months old one time), so im just making sure that i both have the article on my contributions to check at a later date, and to prevent incomplete articles slip trough.

Apologies for the inconvenience caused, Excirial ^{(Talk,Contribs)} 09:07, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Ah, okay. Now you have prodded it, in that case disregard my above, that's fine :) SGGH ^speak! 09:03, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for not taking issue with this, and good luck writing the article :) Excirial ^{(Talk,Contribs)} 09:07, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

New page for MILHIST copy-editors

The coordinators have decided to make it easier for copy-editors to watch the new requests by creating an own page for this purpose. On Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Logistics/Copy-editing/Requests all new and old requests are listed. Please add this page to your watchlist. Wandalstouring (talk) 11:42, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Request For Account Creator User Rights

Hi SGGH, as you may or may not know there has been a new user right created called Account Creators, users in this user group are not blocked from creating more than six accounts a day per IP as is enforced with other users. This right can be assigned by Admins the same way as rollback is (Thorough Special:Userrights), and being that you are the only sysop that I know, I am asking that you grant me this right. The whole reason that I wish to have the ability to create more than six accounts per day is that I often help out at Wikipedia:Request an account. The criteria for being granted to the right can be found here. If you think I need more time at Wikipedia:Request an account before I am given the rights, or if you do not feel comfortable giving out such a new user right, I understand completely :). Thanks and All the Best, --Mifter (talk) 16:49, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi again SGGH, when you left the message on my talk page about the rights, you said to come back ask you again after a few days of maxing out. So here I am again :) if you look at the log I have now created a total of 29 accounts per requests at WP:ACC. So I am once again asking you to take a look at the criteria found here and to decide wither or not I meet those criteria and to assign me the rights if you feel that I need them and I meet the criteria, if you think that I don't need the rights or do not meet the criteria then I understand completely :). Once again thanks for all of this and All the Best, --Mifter (talk) 20:11, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

separate footnotes

I think aping Thich Quang Duc should be pretty easy. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 06:19, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

New Messages from Mifter

Hello, SGGH. You have new messages at Mifter's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Mifter (talk) 23:04, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Greco-Persian Wars

Could you please check Greco-Persian Wars for formal language. An anonymous has complained and made a good correction. Thanks. Wandalstouring (talk) 07:42, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Hamence

I saw that pop up in my watchlist a few times. :-) It's getting late here but I will take a look at over the next few days Cheers, Mattinbgn\^talk 12:24, 20 May 2008 (UTC).

Was there something wrong with these wikilinks? They seemed appropriate and informative to me. Cheers, Mattinbgn\^talk 11:06, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Looking at your recent edits, I think I follow what happened now. Sorry, I have never used AWB and don't know how it works. I think there are possibly some other terms linked twice I may have inadvertently re-added. I'll let you tidy rather than keep stepping on your feet! Cheers, Mattinbgn\^talk 11:36, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Project tags

Hello SGGH

On Provost Sergeant and Regimental Police I tagged with this projects banner on the talk page, as both these articles surely come under the projects remit. While doing this User:Blackshod has just reverted the banner saying I should read the article and that me placing it is "Random", I just thought I would make you aware so if it happens again maybe you could oversee things and try and keep the tags there and also if you have time it might be an idea if you could read these articles and see if you agree with me? Many thanks. Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs)☺ 14:53, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Sorry didnt realise, Police,Mad,Jack (talk · contribs)☺ 15:02, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

New Symbol

Have been tweaking with a new symbol for WP:LE. Got much further along than I was this morning, but would like you to take a look and see if it's up to par. Might need a different cuffs photo to work with (something with a transparent background?) Otherwise I could ask you to mask it in Photoshop (or download the trial and do it myself, but that will take longer). I hope you like it. It's all for you. :) Red Gown (talk) 21:07, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Request for Peer Review help

Thank you for you work as a peer review volunteer. Since March, there has been a concerted effort to make sure all peer review requests get some response. Requests that have gone three days or longer without a substantial response are listed at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog. I have three requests to help this continue.

1) If you are asked to do a peer review, please ask the person who made the request to also do a review, preferably of a request that has not yet had feedback. This is fairly simple, but helps. For example when I review requests on the backlog list, I close with Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Yours, ...

2) While there are several people who help with the backlog, lately I have been doing up to 3 or 4 peer reviews a day and can not keep this up much longer. We need help. Since there are now well over 100 names on the PR volunteers page, if each volunteer reviewed just one PR request without a response from the list each month, it would easily take care of the "no response" backlog. To help spread out the load, I suggest those willing pick a day of the month and do a review that day (for example, my first edit was on the 8th, so I could pick the 8th). Please pick a peer review request with no responses yet, if possible off the backlog list. If you want, leave a note on my talk page as to which day you picked and I will remind you each month.

3) I have made some proposals to add some limits to peer review requests at Wikipedia_talk:Peer_review#Proposed_limits. The idea is to prevent any one user from overly burdening the process. These seem fairly reasonable (one PR request per editor per day, only four total PR requests per editor at a time, PR requests with cleanup banners can be delisted (like GAN quick fail), and wait two weeks to relist a PR request after it is archived), but have gotten no feedback in one week. If you have any thoughts on these, please weigh in.

Thanks again for your help and in advance for any assistance with the backlog. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 21:30, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

PS Thanks for all your help already Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 21:30, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

• Thanks for the update - good luck on exams and see you when you are able - no worries until then though, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 18:59, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Sir Geoff again

The usual British spelling is tumour - or at least that's the version given first in the OED. David Underdown (talk)

Ron Saggers

Absolutely no worries, it's a pleasure working with good editors like yourself and User:Mattinbgn. I may well move onto a review of Ron Hamence at the start of next week unless someone else signs up. Peanut4 (talk) 22:14, 30 May 2008 (UTC)