User talk:Pee Tern

This user may have left Wikipedia. Pee Tern has not edited Wikipedia since 23 September 2009. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Current stuff

Translation

So, you were interested in it? I thought you were not, as it's definitely a different "evidence" than the one you had in mind. Or am I wrong? //Halibu tt 14:30, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes - sorry - see User talk:Pee Tern/2008-Jan-Jun#Evidence (2). Peet Ern (talk) 23:02, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PS: the wording was a bit wrong / confusing! Sorry. Peet Ern (talk) 23:14, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Messages at WT:LE

Hello, Pee Tern. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Law Enforcement.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Mifter (talk) 21:50, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dodgerblue777

Indeed, he does seem ignorant of the ways of Wikipedia, though it appears he's reasonably familiar with wikis. Perhaps he has experience on a private wiki somewhere. I'll keep an eye on him, and try to help.

Originally, I misunderstood your meaning since prod has a distinct meaning on Wikipedia. (Check out that link.) —EncMstr (talk) 05:33, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. prod meaning sorry - still learning here too - so what should I have said nudged . . . Peet Ern (talk) 05:39, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Oscar Werner Tiegs

Resolved

Paged retained.

A tag has been placed on Oscar Werner Tiegs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. mboverload @ 23:16, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Those number images

HTML name	Hex code R G B	Decimal code R G B
Brown colors
Cornsilk	FF F8 DC	255 248 220
BlanchedAlmond	FF EB CD	255 235 205
Bisque	FF E4 C4	255 228 196
NavajoWhite	FF DE AD	255 222 173
Wheat	F5 DE B3	245 222 179
BurlyWood	DE B8 87	222 184 135
Tan	D2 B4 8C	210 180 140
RosyBrown	BC 8F 8F	188 143 143
SandyBrown	F4 A4 60	244 164 96
Goldenrod	DA A5 20	218 165 32
DarkGoldenrod	B8 86 0B	184 134 11
Peru	CD 85 3F	205 133 63
Chocolate	D2 69 1E	210 105 30
SaddleBrown	8B 45 13	139 69 19
Sienna	A0 52 2D	160 82 45
Brown	A5 2A 2A	165 42 42
Maroon	80 00 00	128 0 0

If you could make one of each from 31 - 150, it would be nice. I'm using them as counters for my contribs.Mitch32^(UP) 16:25, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By number images, do you mean

, for example ?

I can do, but I do not have a lot of time at the moment, and will not have for some weeks, so it might be a few months before I can get to 150! If you are referring to

, do you have a preference for colour, red, green, or blue, or some other colour ?

Peet Ern (talk) 11:51, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

White on brown would be nice.Mitch32^(UP) 22:23, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but which brown . . . Peet Ern (talk) 22:38, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brown-brown-Mitch32^(UP) 22:40, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So this then 1 2 3 4 5 is good. It is supposedly brown, but it looks a rather redish brown on my screen? To my eye on my screen saddlebrown would be what I would call brown-brown Peet Ern (talk) 23:59, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To give you an idea:

Cheers Peet Ern (talk) 02:18, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The fourth one is best. :) -Mitch32^(UP) 00:00, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Police Infoboxes for the UK

Forgive me if I'm clearly being dense, but why is the change of infoboxes a "slow" process? Surely it can't be a particularly onerous task to alter the limited number of pages for the UK and similar forces, thus ensuring that they are all standard, rather than changing just one or two and leaving the rest as they are. Hammserfan 06/11/08, 19.55 GMT

I was referring to the overall process world wide . . .

The UK could be done anytime, but as we are all volunteers in our spare time, it is just a matter of limited time and priority etc. The ones that get done tend to be the ones that get looked at for some other reason and the InfoBoxes get done at the same time. The other thing that gets done too at the same time is a bit of research to try to fill in some of the data gaps. Thus it is not just a matter of a quick copy edit paste. I too intend to start to do them in a structured way myself soon . . .

Cheers Peet Ern (talk) 22:21, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've brought up the Obama family chart from your sandbox

Here: Template talk:Obama family#Ugly. Thanks. Just tips me hat but then 〜on thought bows deeply … 22:34, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. Peet Ern (talk) 03:22, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I would like to make a new chart for the Udalls

Namely of this: Udall family#Family tree or File:Udall Political Family.jpg. (One, incidentally, that would update its bottom bar to shoehorn in mention that the two congressional representative Udall cousins are now U.S. senators and lists Gordon Smith's term dates in the U.S. Senate.) Anyway, if you could send me some coded template (or a link to your sandbox where you'd have the same preliminary placement of info filled in?)...where you'd done the preliminary work of assigning each individual's nickname or initials from the existing chart into the appropriate slot in your new compounded-template, I would finish it filling in their full names and birthdates, etc. Whadya think?

The three constituent progenitor family names are

Hunt: Jefferson Hunt → John (Hunt) → Ida (Hunt (Udall)), in pink (red or whatever))
Lee: John D. Lee → J. David Lee → Louisa (Lee (Udall)) and Lela (Lee (Udall)), in green (or whatever); and, of course
Udall: David King Udall and Eliza (Stewart (Udall)), in blue (or whatever)

Just tips me hat but then 〜on thought bows deeply … 23:11, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the vote of support, but:

The current template is still under development, so it would not be appropriate to put it into main space articles yet.
It would better if you had a go, perhaps in a sandbox of yours, and let me know of any issues with useability, documentation, etc., so that I can improve the template.

Cheers. Peet Ern (talk) 03:46, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for responding -- and, OK, I'll take a look. Just tips me hat but then 〜on thought bows deeply … 04:42, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Gabba reference on the Brisbane page

Thank you for saying that you would fix this up. I appreciate it very much. The reason why I tried to add the reference was because somebody had incorrectly stated, on the template on the Brisbane page, that The Gabba was called the 'Woolloongabba cricket ground', whereas the official name of the ground is actually Brisbane Cricket Ground.

I will leave it to you to do what you think is best for the template. All the best. Figaro (talk) 08:22, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually the "somebody was me", because that is what "we" called it as children, because our grand father did . . . I am not fussed at all, as long as the article is correct. It might be intersting to know if it has always been offically called the Brisbane Cricket Ground ? Peet Ern (talk) 21:08, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

autonumbered tables

Hello Pee. The table seems quite nice, thank you. I still have some questions about it. How can I change the lay out of the table, for instance add some grid as in the class="wikitable". And when there is some tie in the ranks, does the table work?Japf (talk) 12:03, 18 April 2009 (UTC) I shouln't be so hasty. You have already answered the second question in the "doc". But I still don't know how to change the table layout.Japf (talk) 12:12, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

At the moment it is not possible to add grid lines. I will have to modify the template and try to add the feature of grid lines as an option. This will take me some time because I do not get much wikitime. If the template is okay as it is I will move it in to Template space, and then work on the extra option/s as time permits. Peet Ern (talk) 13:28, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. For the moment you can move it to the template space. The layout is secondary.Japf (talk) 10:44, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Peet

Since it already passed a month with no changes from you, I will move my self the template for its right place.Japf (talk) 21:49, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unfourtunately I could't manage to do it.Japf (talk) 22:54, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Rank	Name	Sex	Birth	Death	Age


1	Maria de Jesus	F	10 September 1893	2 January 2009	115 years, 114 days


2	Maria do Couto Maia	F	24 October 1890	25 July 2005	114 years, 274 days


3	Catarina Carreiro	F	9 January 1891	13 February 2004	113 years, 35 days


4	Clara dos Santos	F	26 March 1894	25 October 2006	112 years, 213 days


5	Augusto Moreira	M	6 October 1896	13 February 2009	112 years, 130 days


6	Antonio de Castro	M	6 January 1898	Living	126 years, 308 days


7	Maria Nunes da Silva	F	7 July 1898	Living	126 years, 125 days

Hi Peet, I spend an hour or two trying to figure out what is going wrong with this. If I paste your text from User:Pee_Tern/Sandbox/Template/autonumbered_list/doc#Multiple_fields and just change the template to say {{autonumbered list}} it doesn't work. I change the columns=1 and it gets closer (but still the headings don't appear - I wonder if you or someone else has changed/deleted a template that this uses - except the example that I just pointed at works perfectly (or apparently so). Any clue why ? I've learnt too much about templates trying to figure it out, but I'm still nowhere :) EdwardLane (talk) 03:23, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still interested in a solution to this discrepancy, I see that you've been back online a little lately so perhaps you might see this message (cross virtual appendages). EdwardLane (talk) 16:49, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of footballers in England and Scotland by number of league appearances

I have learned that you have managed to put autonumbering in tables. I am no good with anything other than basic tables, and was wondering if you had the time, if you could add a 'Rank' column to this table, down the left hand side (i.e. before 'Name'). If not, could you at least possibly tell me how to do it? Many thanks, Giant Snowman 07:51, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Constatus bgcolor

Template:Constatus bgcolor has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 23:35, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Constatus name

Template:Constatus name has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 23:36, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Countrynationalleacat

Template:Countrynationalleacat has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. meco (talk) 21:50, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Codifiednavbar

Template:Codifiednavbar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. — Edokter • Talk — 01:40, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:National law enforcement agencies

Category:National law enforcement agencies, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Green Giant (talk) 09:31, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Federal law enforcement agencies

Category:Federal law enforcement agencies, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Green Giant (talk) 09:34, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:National law enforcement agencies of Gibraltar

Category:National law enforcement agencies of Gibraltar, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Green Giant (talk) 13:55, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Law enforcement agencies by geographic area

Category:Law enforcement agencies by geographic area, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. KarlB (talk) 20:22, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think this account is no longer active

Just FAO any visitors to this page, I don't see any contributions from this account since 2009. I don't know if user pages are ever 'closed' or what template that would use. EdwardLane (talk) 09:59, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Files missing description details

Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as:

are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the images may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 01:31, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Pee Tern/Sandbox/Template/Infobox Corrections agency/doc

User:Pee Tern/Sandbox/Template/Infobox Corrections agency/doc, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Pee Tern/Sandbox/Template/Infobox Corrections agency/doc and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Pee Tern/Sandbox/Template/Infobox Corrections agency/doc during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Revent (talk) 22:06, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Pee Tern/Sandbox/Template/Infobox Probation agency/doc

User:Pee Tern/Sandbox/Template/Infobox Probation agency/doc, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Pee Tern/Sandbox/Template/Infobox Probation agency/doc and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Pee Tern/Sandbox/Template/Infobox Probation agency/doc during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Revent (talk) 22:06, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Balanced columns list

Template:Balanced columns list has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 09:09, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Snapshotinfoboxes for law enforcement agencies

Category:Snapshotinfoboxes for law enforcement agencies, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 20:56, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:New South Wales Police Force

Template:New South Wales Police Force has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox law enforcement agency. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 22:22, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox law enforcement agency

Template:Infobox law enforcement agency has been nominated for merging with Template:New South Wales Police Force. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 22:22, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Finedetail

Template:Finedetail has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 21:59, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Pee Tern/Sandbox/Template/Infobox Law enforcement agency/main

Hello, Pee Tern. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sandbox/Template/Infobox Law enforcement agency/main".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.