Jump to content

User talk:Padfoot79

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user has rollback rights on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User:Padfoot79)

Mens Rea

[edit]

I really think my band, Mens Rea, means something to people, so I think we do deserve a wikipedia page, at least as "Mens Rea Band". It was for a reason that I didn't edit "Mens Rea", but reather opened a new page for Mens Rea Band, as the latin term that was the inspiration for the band's name is, for the moment, more known to public than our band. I've put a lot of effort in writing the article and editing it (Till I couldn't do it anymore sisnce it was deleted), so I'd like to know why it was deleted, and to ask you to please let us have a value here

Thomas Ponniah

[edit]

I just wanted you to see the new article with an entry at WP:AFD, and wondered if you think notability is now established? (Mind meal (talk) 07:12, 13 February 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Economy of Ohio

[edit]
Updated DYK query On 20 February, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Economy of Ohio, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 06:21, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since you are a member of WikiProject Economics, I would like to direct your attention to Wikipedia:WikiProject Economics/Featured Article drive. We are currently deciding on an economics-related article to bring to Featured Article status and we would like your input. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 20:59, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to WikiProject Ohio!

[edit]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Padfoot79. You have new messages at Dank55's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

- Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 02:13, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to Dank55

[edit]

Sounds good. Lawyers shouldn't have trouble complying with policies. Jd027talk 02:21, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

[edit]

I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 02:07, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 02:07, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Peer review/Ulysses S. Grant/archive1

[edit]

I made some comments at Wikipedia:Peer review/Ulysses S. Grant/archive1 in case you are not watching it since it was archived. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 21:25, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to help - Ruhrfisch ><>°° 02:20, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

[edit]

Sorry about that i have fix it up. Cheers Kyle1278 20:01, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PBK Mediation

[edit]

Thank you. I am looking forward to working with you. If it makes a difference, my availability will be limited during the Passover holiday, but I should be back to normal on 4/20. Thank you again. -- Avi (talk) 15:58, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking the case. Good to see someone who's been on a similar case before, and successfully mediating it, taking this one. --Lhakthong (talk) 16:53, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am honored

[edit]

Thank you for the barnstar! I hope you'll join me at the barracades when the barbarian hordes inevitably launch an attack on my baby at AfD. But either way, thanks, and Happy April Fool's Day (although, it really is all true and verifiably sourced). -- Noroton (talk) 00:41, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent strategy. We can't fail! -- Noroton (talk) 00:55, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OR and Wikiversity

[edit]

block log looks clean. What am I missing? JoshuaZ (talk) 02:02, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm also a sysop at Wikiversity and I was involved in the banning of a user who was banned across all of the projects. I perform a lot of the cleanup work there, which includes blocks, deletions, and the rest. Ottava Rima (talk) 02:07, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MEDCAB

[edit]

Please do end the case. It's all rhetorical now. Drmargi (talk) 07:37, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kansas v. Colorado

[edit]

Hi. :) Kansas v. Colorado came due for investigation at CP today, and I see that you removed the tag. Since you didn't explain why in your edit summary, I'm uncertain of your reason. Since it relates to a Supreme Court case and Supreme Court documents are not protected by copyright, I've presumed that you might have removed it because the material is PD. I've tried to verify that the text represents a PD summary of the case, but so far I've only been able to find it at Duke Law. I don't see a licensing release at Duke Law or indication there that the summary was copied from a PD source. I've restored the copyvio tag, just until I could find out from you your rationale. I'll be watching your page and the article. Since you don't seem to edit routinely, I think I'll also ask for feedback from the law wikiproject so that the material doesn't remain blanked unnecessarily. Thanks. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:10, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

could i get you opinion

[edit]

Just wondering if I could get you opinion on something Talk:Manchester mayoral election, 2009 (New Hampshire) is where the discussion is. So there is an disagreement between me and another editor on what the page should be I believe it should be the one posted above and he thinks it should be Manchester, New Hampshire mayoral election, 2009 just wondering if you could contribute thanks Gang14 (talk) 22:38, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Economics census

[edit]

Hello there. Sorry to bother you, but you are (titularly at least) a member of WP:WikiProject Economics, as defined by this category. If you don't know me, I'm a Wikipedia administrator, but an unqualified economist. I enjoy writing about economics, but I'm not very good at it, which is why I would like to support in any way I can the strong body of economists here on Wikipedia. I'm only bothering you because you are probably one of them. Together, I'd like us to establish the future direction of WikiProject Economics, but first, we need to know who we've got to help.

Whatever your area of expertise or level of qualification, if you're interested in helping with the WikiProject (even if only as part of a larger commitment to this wonderful online encyclopedia of ours), would you mind adding your signature to this page? It only takes a second. Thank you.

Message delivered on behalf of User:Jarry1250 by LivingBot.

prod of Gooooo(however-many-ooos)gle

[edit]

Hi - I've left your prod tag on the article, but I've also tagged it as WP:CSD#G3 as blatant vandalism. He's created more than one page like this; he's a suspected sockpuppet (the link to the SPI is on his talk page) and he's causing disruption everywhere he can. I've given a final warning, so if you see him disrupt the encyclopedia and/or create a new page like this,tag it as G3 and report him at WP:AIV. I'll be around for a while tonight too. Thanks for your vigilance and good work! :-) KrakatoaKatie 02:24, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join WikiProject United States

[edit]

Hello, Padfoot79! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 18:12, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States

[edit]

The September 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 21:28, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States

[edit]

The December 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 03:04, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012 Newsletter for WikiProject United States and supported projects

[edit]

The January 2012 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 19:25, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decemmber 8 - Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle - You're invited
Seattle Public Library
  • Date Saturday, December 8, 2012
  • Time 10 a.m. – 3 p.m.
  • Location Seattle Public Library Meeting Room 1 on Level 4, Central Library, 1000 4th Avenue, Seattle WA, 98104
  • Event An editathon on Seattle-related Wikipedia articles with Wikipedia tutorials and Librarian assistance on hand.
  • Hashtag #wikiloveslib or #glamwiki.
  • Registration http://wll-seattle.eventbrite.com or use on-wiki regsistration.

Yours, Maximilianklein (talk) 03:36, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/RfC Reviewer permission

[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/RfC Reviewer permission. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:25, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comment

[edit]

As you previously participated in related discussions you are invited to comment at the discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/RfC for AfC reviewer permission criteria. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:35, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RfC - Helper Script access

[edit]

An RfC has been opened at RfC to physically restrict access to the Helper Script. You are invited to comment. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:41, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The National Dwarf Fashion Show

[edit]

It is my belief that this page meets the criteria for a wikipedia article the company The National Dwarf Fashion Show has:

a) Received both international and national press coverage National

- Entertainment Tonight
- Life Time Network

International

-Europe1
-France24

b) Has contributed to major fashion week events including: New York, New York, Paris, and Berlin

c) Has collaborated with Donnons Leur Une Chance which has a french wikipedia page

d) Has worked with celebrities including: Jordanna James and Jordanna James from the TV show Little Women

e) Has show cased well know designer Sema Gedik collections

Nerdypunkkid (talk) 20:24, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: List of Startup Grind Directors

[edit]

Hello Jd027. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of List of Startup Grind Directors, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 22:15, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Would you like to exsplain how an expansion basketball team is a "Blatant Hoax"?

GALVESTON STINGRAYS

GALVESTON STINGRAYS SEND ME AN EMAIL I WILL SEND YOU THE AGREEMENT TO PROVE IT TO YOU

Ncfirefighter13 I completely believe you. However, that is not the standard for publishing an article. As noted at WP:V and WP:NOR, readers must be able to verify the statements in published, credible sources. Jd027 (talk) 03:00, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • You should just come back in 5 days when it's announced. Or if you got the Galveston newspaper to write an article about it beforehand, that would work as well. Jd027 (talk) 03:01, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Email

[edit]

Hi,

Not a fan of the YGM template, so this is a text-only version to say: You've got mail. -- Euryalus (talk) 10:04, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

[edit]

You have been indefinitely blocked by the Arbitration Committee.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, then appeal by emailing the Arbitration Committee (direct address: arbcom-en@wikimedia.org).


Administrators: This block may not be modified or lifted without the express prior written consent of the Arbitration Committee. Questions about this block should be directed to the Committee's mailing list.

-- Euryalus (talk) 14:21, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2019 US Banknote Contest

[edit]
US Banknote Contest
November-December 2019

There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons.

In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate.


If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Economy of Ohio

[edit]

Economy of Ohio has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 20:01, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]