User talk:Gang14

Welcome!

Hello, Gang14, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Phr (talk) 05:21, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

UMass Lowell / Big 8

Hey, I noticed that addition to the UMass Lowell page about the "big 8" student organizations. I'm only vaguely familiar with it and I think it's worth while but there's no context that explains why/if it's important. I'm sure it's changed since I graduated or I'd do it myself. Maybe just a quick line about what the big eight is and a rundown of what each group is - especially explaining the acronyms (like V-Pac?). -Midnightdreary 01:45, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I like it much better now, great job. I added a little myself - check and make sure I didn't ruin anything! -Midnightdreary 13:54, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

EM field generator

In Miscellaneous technology in Stargate you claim that the EM field generator is Ancient tech, this is NEVER proven and add to the fact that McKay said it was only built 500 years ago and the Ancients left Pegasus 10000 years ago. Just because it was powered by a ZPM doesn't mean it was built by the Ancients so please don't remove it again. Vala M (talk) 16:43, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Image copyright problem with Image:Law-1-.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Law-1-.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well. For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:28, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Rfkjr.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rfkjr.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well. For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:26, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Ayer Mill.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Ayer Mill.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images. For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:05, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Boston-marathon_logo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Boston-marathon_logo.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well. For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:27, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Wood_mill.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Wood_mill.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well. For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:43, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:WoodyLaw.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:WoodyLaw.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well. For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:02, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lawrence, MA Seal.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Lawrence, MA Seal.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:56, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit War

Pillars

Please review Wikipedia's five pillars for editing. unsigned by 69.91.209.49 17:54, 27 April 2007

3RR warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Thank you. Heimstern Läufer 04:06, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Third opinion on edit war

As requested, I have posted an opinion at Talk:Marty Meehan about the revert war that you have been involved with. Whether or not you are willing to accept my opinion, may I suggest that both of you take a deep breath and edit some different pages for a while? The issue over which you are fighting is so tiny in comparison to the energy you are both expending. Just so you know who has given this opinion: I'm a UK citizen who has never visited the US and has no connection with US politics. I've read the Meehan page but can't now remember which party he's from. Hopefully this makes me reasonably even-handed on this. You may or may not like my recommendation (to remove the few sentences on possible candidates for a future election) but I can promise you it comes from a neutral standpoint. Best wishes - Kim dent brown 11:36, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Automated reverting

Is only for vandalism, and not for content disputes, where you are expected to use the edit summary to explain or provide justification for your edits. -- Vary | Talk 16:03, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thats what I was doing just because you think your right doesn't mean its true Gang14 20:15, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, then try assuming a little more good faith, please. When there's an ongoing discussion on the talk page and in edit summaries, you're probably looking at a content dispute, not vandalism. -- Vary | Talk 20:23, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Harvey Milk

This is a warning that you are engaging in an edit war in Harvey Milk. If you revert to insert the inappropriate image once more, you may be blocked. --Moni3 (talk) 23:01, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Politics/Government

Polls

Your edit giving Michigan to McCain was incorrect. Use polls from the entire month and find the average. Do not simply take the most recent poll which could be an outlier and use that to make judgments about who is leading in the state. (This is irrelevant now that a new April poll has Giuliani ahead, but I am just letting you know)

- isaiah13066

United States Senate elections, 2008

I saw that you took off the Blue. While it did lead back hundreds of years ago. I just wanted to tell you, I support that change. Politics rule 11:29, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Steve Marchand

Comments added. Cornell Rockey 20:37, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Georgia's 10th congressional district special election, 2007

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. Otherwise, your valid edit might be mistaken for vandalism and reverted --Jhortman 16:33, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No biggie... just a friendly reminder. :-) --Jhortman 17:39, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Murphy

FYI. Cheers - Videmus Omnia 20:00, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maxine Waters quote

I appreciate all the help you've given me on the Maxine Waters article. I've taken the initiative of creating a Wikiquotes page dedicated to her and have provided the link on the Wikipedia article. Thanks for the suggestion.Light Bulb 08:58, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barack Obama Edit

Exuse me sir, but was unfactual about my edits to the Barack Obama Page? unsigned by Haydenstone2 06:41, 6 July 2007

Speedy deletion tagging

I've removed Independent Party of Connecticut and Independent Party of Oregon from the candidates for speedy deletion category. Please give a reason for deletion when tagging articles, preferably with one of the templates found at the bottom of Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion. --- RockMFR 18:06, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Featured List nomination

109th United States Congress has been nominated for Featured List status. Please comment here. —Markles —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 12:43, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barney Frank

Barney Frank article

I was going to revert the latest assault on the Barney Frank article but I figured I'd see if our anon POV warrior was at all open to reason by writing him a more detailed explanation. Now he can see your reversion plus my explanation of it! Perhaps he'll start to get a clue... maybe it's not the case that everyone except him is out of step. As an aside, looking at Talk:Barney Frank, I get the impression that the article attracts far more than its share of anons who evince intense hostility toward the bio subject. I wonder if there's any other Representative who's such a target. JamesMLane t c 05:47, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barney Frank

Could I plz get your input as a past contributer on the talk page on the section Lead (again). Soxwon (talk) 02:45, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category changes

Please don't remove Category:Jewish politicians from other categories. The matter is still under consideration at WP:CFD. Your edits are inappropriate because the category is not inevitably going to be deleted, and so the category structure should be preserved. Those contributing to, or closing, the debate, should be allowed to see the whole picture of the category's use, not just the bit that you permit. In any case, if the discussion is closed as "delete", then your action is unnecessary. I am reverting your other changes. Regards, Bencherlite ^Talk 10:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ron Paul Revolution

Ron Paul Revolution http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ron_Paul_Revolution#Ron_Paul_Revolution If you have time I would like to hear your comments on this page. Thanks--Duchamps comb (talk) 19:53, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why'd you revert my 2 edits to Robert Reich?

They're both true. Haplolology ^Talk/_{Contributions} 17:39, 14 January 2008 (UTC) I'm familiar with the IPA and the custom of putting pronunciations immedaitely after the name. I put it at the end of the paragraph because I wasnt just showing how to pronounce the name, but also the reason why it has the unusual pronunciation that it does. As for the platform joke, I could find a citation if you really think it needs one. Haplolology ^Talk/_{Contributions} 19:33, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Andre Carson - "Carson sworn in as 7th Dist. congressman"

The article originally said he was taking it on a Bible but I see they've changed it... somebody at Indystar must've made a mistake... Ithought it was odd that a Muslim would take an oath on a Bible, the Constitution makes more sense.--Dr who1975 (talk) 01:30, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

United States Presidential Election 2008 Mediation

Hi, I've accepted the United States Presidential Election 2008 Mediation, and you are listed as one of the participants. Please feel free to comment and participate in the discussion on the mediation page. BrownHornet21 (talk) 00:23, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Ohio's 11th congressional district special election, 2008

You are invited to contibute to the deletion discussion on this page.--Dr who1975 (talk) 17:59, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gilchrist

Gilchrist1

Hi. Well, I don't know when he changed, but his website says he is now a Republitard. I think the biggest indicator he likely won't run is that he said he would run if McCain entered the race. McCain entered, but Jim hasn't said anything about running after McCain's entrance. Also, candidates are usually expected to be registered with the party they are running with. Tim Long 21:33, 8 July 2007 (UTC) Yes, but I would imagine Ron Paul changed his registration when he ran with the LP. Tim Long 21:56, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gilchrist2

"Since when does being part of one political party stop your from being a candidate for another and when did he switch over? Gang14 19:32, 8 July 2007 (UTC) - - :Not always for example Ron Paul has always been a Republican and he ran under the Libertarian Party. So truthfully party doesn't matter unless its the major two sadly. But I see your point since he hasnt been heard from since McCain jumped in. Gang14 21:55, 8 July 2007 (UTC) - - ::Yea I thought that too but not the case. another example Joe Lieberman ran under the Connecticut for Lieberman Party recently and he's still a registered Dem. Gang14 21:59, 8 July 2007 (UTC)" Here it is if you need it for something. Tim Long 22:10, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mississippi

Merge of Mississippi 2008 election and 2008 special election articles

There has already been discussion on this and the consensus was to keep the articles seperate. See Talk:United States Senate election in Mississippi, 2008 for the discussion. Thusly, I have removed your merge tags. Thanks. -- ALLSTARecho 17:09, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mississippi Election Discussions

Now that the courts have decided both of Mississippi's Senate elections will be held on the same day, I have opened a new discussion about merging the two articles.
Talk:United States Senate election in Mississippi, 2008#Merge 3
I have also opened a debate about potentially splititng the special election controversy section into it's own article. Talk:United States Senate special election in Mississippi, 2008#Split Controversy Section Please read over each debate and weigh them on their individual merits. The subjects are not necessarily linked to each other.--Dr who1975 (talk) 23:08, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Michael J. Sullivan (mayor)

This page does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, please take the issue to articles for deletion and nominate the article if you think it should be removed. Please include a full reason behind the nomination. Camw (talk) 08:45, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, now that I read the most current revision to WP:POLITICIAN, I think that per policy, they are correct the article should stay. I think it's a little silly, but the rules are the rules. CSZero (talk) 17:12, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

John Tyler

Hello, Gang14, I have re-added the material that you removed from the John Tyler page. While you are correct that statehood of Texas occurred during the administration of James Polk, the annexation of the Republic of Texas occurred during the administration of John Tyler, which is what the article originally stated. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at my talk page. Regards, Jd027^talk 21:43, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tennessee House of Representatives

The recent edits of the Tennessee House of Representatives page have been reverted. Speaker Williams never caucused with the Democrats, he just got an invitation from Dem leader Odom to do so if he desired. Terrancee (talk) 21:36, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template; Elections Vermont

Thank you for your improvements to this template. However, the template also included Burlington elections which are not at the statewide level. This is of parochial interest to Burlington only. I commented it out, pending removal to somewhere else. Student7 (talk) 11:28, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Manchester, New Hampshire mayoral election, 2009

Hey, is there any way we can make this into a featured article? I can take some pictures on election day if you'd like. Doc Quintana (talk) 12:57, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Congressional Baseball

Langley High School (Fairfax County, Virginia)

Hello. I noticed that you recently added a "See also" link pointing to Congressional Baseball Game to the Langley High School (Fairfax County, Virginia) page. Can you please explain what the connection is between the two subjects, and would you also consider writing a section summarizing it to put in the Langley High School article? Thanks, FlamingSilmaril (talk) 02:00, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Congressional Baseball Game

On April 5, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Congressional Baseball Game, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Shubinator (talk) 18:02, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lawrence

agree

With your removal of the recent additions from Lawrence, MA. I had actually not researched them enough before I undid it. Mea culpa. I have tagged them as 'people from Lawrence, MA' and hope they are happy with that. EraserGirl (talk) 12:25, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lawrence Massachusetts

Please do not vandalize my edits. Merrimack College has a division at 94 Bradford St. Mass School of Law does not. ONLY schools with a presence inside the city limits should be listed. EraserGirl (talk) 04:09, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hockey

FYI

Someone has listed List of Latino ice hockey players for deletion. Feel free to join the conversation here. Zagalejo^^^ 04:06, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of ice hockey players of Latino descent

The article List of ice hockey players of Latino descent has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Arbitrary list that is also original research and has lacked citations for a long time.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Львівське (talk) 03:06, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of current members of the United States Congress by wealth

Do you want to check your coding on this page? Also, I'm not sure Alcee Hastings is actually two trillion dollars in debt. --NellieBly (talk) 03:50, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited List of current members of the United States Congress by wealth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Republican (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Burlington mayoral election, 2009

Hello, Gang14, and thank you for your contributions!

Some text in an article that you worked on Burlington mayoral election, 2009, appears to be directly copied from another Wikipedia article, Burlington, Vermont mayoral election, 2009. Please take a minute to double-check that you've properly attributed the source text in your edit summary.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Burlington mayoral election, 2009 at any time. MadmanBot (talk) 00:22, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yep the bot made a mistake Gang14 (talk) 00:24, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Boston city council election, 2011, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Doug Bennett and Michael Flaherty (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:32, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of ice hockey players of Latin American descent for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of ice hockey players of Latin American descent is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of ice hockey players of Latin American descent until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. MSJapan (talk) 04:02, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Óttarr Proppé

Hello, Gang14. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Óttarr Proppé, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Óttarr Proppé to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, OccultZone (Talk) 13:34, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lawrence, Massachusetts

I noticed you removed some names from the notable people section of Lawrence, Massachusetts. I'm not sure why. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:27, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Gang14. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Gang14. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Survey Invite

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they affect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take no more than 1-2 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9S3JByWf57fXEkR?Q_DL=56np5HpEZWkMlr7_9S3JByWf57fXEkR_MLRP_3mziz9j9LcD8H8p&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 22:23, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Gang14. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2009 Manchester, New Hampshire municipal election for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2009 Manchester, New Hampshire municipal election is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 Manchester, New Hampshire municipal election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SecretName101 (talk) 01:18, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]