User talk:MadMax

This user left Wikipedia. MadMax has not edited Wikipedia since September 26, 2007. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Archives:

Archive 1 (from former User page)
Archive 2 (2005)
Archive 3 (2006)
Archive 4 (2007)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:ICW_logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:ICW_logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. MECU≈talk 18:23, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barrel murders

Hello Max

I hadn't visited the 'Barrel murder' page since I tagged it about a year ago with a citation request for the idea that earlier killings of this type had taken place in NY since the 1870s. I see you've gone to some trouble to cite sources for this, thank you.

Can I still sound a note of caution, however? At least one of your references, to Thomas Hunt's web page, is I suspect in error. The address given for the 1900 barrel (11th St and Avenue A) is almost identical to the address for the discovery of the definitely-real 1903 barrel (11th St and Avenue D); I wonder if the two entries are somehow confused. I say this because I've found no reference to any such killing in 1900 (or indeed 1895), and I think the 1900 date is so close to 1903 that someone writing about the 1903 case would have referenced a murder of the same sort that took place only three years earlier, which I can say with some certainty, having recently read through all the barrel murder coverage in 9 NY papers, no one did.

In fact, reporters seem to have strained to find any parallels to the 1903 case. The New York Times, 26 April 1903 p.2, references a January 1900 case in which a courier was robbed of money, murdered, packed into a barrel and encased in plaster, but this happened in Denmark. The barrel was then shipped to New York, where the body was discovered (maybe this is the origin of Hunt's 1900 reference?) Evidently no more direct parallel was known, at least in the Times office, at this time.

I leave it to you to decide whether to make any amendments to the barrel murder page. For myself, I'm reasonably sure the 1903 killing was unprecedented in New York. Mikedash 14:21, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry man

I'm sorry I haven't responded to your post on my user page earlier, I've been in the States for 3 weeks on vacation and just got back - I didn't post it anywhere becaus I figured it'd make "certain individuals" think they had a free shot at the articles I keep an eye on. I cannot believe the Reckless Youth article was deleted! MPJ-DK 06:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the long delay to reply your message! I like the newsletter draft, and hopefully it will be continued. School is over now but there are still things to handle. When the summer vacation realistically starts I might come back and edit. Regards. Wooyi^{Talk to me?} 21:56, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

David Wise link

This will probably seem fairly trivial, but I just thought I'd let you know that your link to "David Wise" at User:MadMax/website/2 links to a video game musician of the same name, and not to "David Wise (journalist)" as you probably intended. --— Poga — 13:05, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Dino Casanova

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Dino Casanova, by Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Dino Casanova is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Dino Casanova, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Dino Casanova itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 06:38, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

T. Rantula

T. Rantula has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this person might not be notable enough for an article. Please review Wikipedia:Notability (people) for the relevant guidelines. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" template, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but if an editor is still not satisfied that it meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. NickelShoe (Talk) 16:26, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject:British Crime

As I shall Be living In the savannah for a month I shall have no access to the Internet at all and I am officially leaving the project under your control. Have Fun--Lucy-marie 00:12, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have returned and shall resume the upkeep of the project many thanks --Lucy-marie 15:00, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Cham Pain

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Cham Pain, by CultureDrone (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Cham Pain is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Cham Pain, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Cham Pain itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:37, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Cham-Pain

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Cham-Pain, by CultureDrone (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Cham-Pain is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Cham-Pain, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Cham-Pain itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:37, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Adonis.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Adonis.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 14:37, 8 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Image:Crea.JPG

I have tagged Image:Crea.JPG as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 15:15, 8 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Image:Fein.jpg

I have tagged Image:Fein.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 15:56, 8 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Image:N072143.jpg

I have tagged Image:N072143.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 12:14, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Michael_trigger_mike_coppola.jpg

I have tagged Image:Michael_trigger_mike_coppola.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 12:21, 9 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Image:McLean.JPG

I have tagged Image:McLean.JPG as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 12:32, 9 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Image:Lena_kleinschmidt.jpg

I have tagged Image:Lena_kleinschmidt.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 12:36, 9 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Notability of Tommy Comerford

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Tommy Comerford, by Nuttah68 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Tommy Comerford seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Tommy Comerford, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 15:26, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Emile Dupre

A tag has been placed on Emile Dupre, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Schutz 21:19, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No content in Category:Ladies Professional Wrestling Association championships

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Ladies Professional Wrestling Association championships, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Ladies Professional Wrestling Association championships has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Ladies Professional Wrestling Association championships, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 20:02, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uncyclopedia

Are you the same user that's on Uncyclopedia? I'm only asking because that guy is one of my favorite contributors. --Ye Olde Luke 00:26, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment of V and W class destroyer

Hello. Just wanted to drop a line to let you know that while adding WikiProject tags to V and W class destroyer today, I downgraded the article from B- to Start-class. While the article is very good overall, it unfortunately fails the first criterion for B-class, specifically it lacks citations. Please let me know if you have any questions or issues. --Kralizec! (talk) 22:09, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Abbundando.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Abbundando.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 02:56, 26 September 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Image:Abbundando.jpg

I have tagged Image:Abbundando.jpg as a disputed use of non-free media, because there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please clarify your fair use rationale on the image description page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 06:05, 29 September 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Possibly unfree Image:LouisCohen.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:LouisCohen.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 18:00, 2 October 2007 (UTC) [reply]

2004 in piracy

If possible, could you please provide a source for the information in 2004 in piracy? Thanks. Picaroon (t) 20:59, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

White Lotus Society (Mortal Kombat)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article White Lotus Society (Mortal Kombat), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of White Lotus Society (Mortal Kombat). Judgesurreal777 (talk) 02:14, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Some of your subpages

I hope this alright with you, I would have asked first, but you seem to be inactive....I deleted some of the talk pages associated with your various subpages. Per Wikipedia:User page, you are not supposed to list categories or use those sorts of templates in userspace. I haven't messed with the content of the articles themselves, just deleted the talk pages. Nikki311 01:54, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Spillane.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Spillane.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:52, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Arifs (gang)

An editor has nominated Arifs (gang), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arifs (gang) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 02:59, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:HeenanFamily

A tag has been placed on Template:HeenanFamily requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 06:36, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Featherstone.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Featherstone.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:59, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DannyGreene.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:DannyGreene.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:59, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:OMadden.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:OMadden.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 00:55, 14 February 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:OMadden.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:OMadden.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:25, 8 March 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Lucchese.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Lucchese.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:08, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Bromley (Jamaica)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mark Bromley (Jamaica), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Mark Bromley (Jamaica). Doc^g 22:05, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Juggernaut (wrestler)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Juggernaut (wrestler), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Juggernaut (wrestler). Govvy (talk) 15:06, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Juggernaut (wrestler)

I have nominated Juggernaut (wrestler), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juggernaut (wrestler). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Govvy (talk) 21:15, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Andrew Nicholls

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Andrew Nicholls, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. mboverload @ 04:47, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Andrew Nicholls

A tag has been placed on Andrew Nicholls requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. mboverload @ 05:51, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

mobsters

Pleas look for available sources in at least the Google News Archive when writing these articles. People keep listing them for deletion, and some actually get deleted. I'll catch what I can, but it's your job primarily. DGG (talk) 21:04, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notice to deleting editors and admins

This editor seems inactive. Many of the inadequate articles he has made seem able to be well supported by extensive references, often in Google News & Google News Archive. . Please look for them before deleting. Almost fooled me, but I checked at the last minute. DGG (talk) 21:04, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Havemeyer.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Havemeyer.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.

That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

~~This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 14:39, 14 September 2008 (UTC)~~ [reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Adonis.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Adonis.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:36, 19 September 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:N072143.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:N072143.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:23, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image permission problem with Image:N072143.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:N072143.jpg. I noticed that that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:51, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:McLean.JPG

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:McLean.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:40, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:McLean.JPG

Thank you for uploading Image:McLean.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 11:34, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:McLean.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:McLean.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 10:34, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Piracy participation update

Hello MadMax,

WikiProject Piracy is currently undergoing some updates and changes, and we are trying to find out who is still active in the project. You are currently listed as a participant on the list of participants, and we would like for you to update your status. Please move your name to the section that best describes your activity in the project:

Active - still active and interested within the scope of the WikiProject.
Semi-Active - still active on Wikipedia, but not as active in regards to the WikiProject.
Former Members - a catch-all classification for those editors who are not active on Wikipedia, those that are still on Wikipedia, but no longer part of this WikiProject, or those that have otherwise not moved their names to another classification yet.

Thank you,
Adolphus79 (talk) 16:50, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Delroy Denton

I have nominated Delroy Denton, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delroy Denton. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. – iride scent 22:54, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Eaton Green

I have nominated Eaton Green, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eaton Green. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. – iride scent 22:55, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Kemar Jarrett

I have nominated Kemar Jarrett, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kemar Jarrett. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. – iride scent 22:57, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Brindle family

I have nominated Brindle family, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brindle family. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. – iride scent 23:24, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

‎ ((({{di-disputed fair use rationale}})))

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Bosko.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Bosko.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thefreezewarning (talk • contribs) 17:56, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of David Stanley Jacubanis

The article David Stanley Jacubanis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of non-trivial coverage in multiple, reliable sources that would satisfy WP:N or allow a full, neutral biography to be written about this individual. Despite being on the FBI's Ten Most Wanted list, there's no getting around the sourcing requirement (hence the reason why many at, say, FBI Ten Most Wanted Fugitives by year, 1950 are redlinked)...

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cheers, CP 02:48, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Shotgun Man

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Shotgun Man. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shotgun Man. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 02:20, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of Jewish American mobsters

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of Jewish American mobsters. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Jewish American mobsters. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:35, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of List of British mobsters

I have nominated List of British mobsters, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of British mobsters. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Scott Mac (Doc) 14:37, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of List of Irish American mobsters

I have nominated List of Irish American mobsters, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Irish American mobsters. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Scott Mac (Doc) 16:47, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conflicted licensing on image File:WhiteHandGang.jpg

The above noted image or media file appears to have conflicted licensing. As an image cannot be both 'free' and 'unfree', a check of the exact status of this media/image concerned is advised.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:03, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello MadMax! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 140 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Anthony Scotto - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Graham Cardwell - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Shigeri Akabane - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Apolo Dantés - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Frank Maltese

The article Frank Maltese has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

small-time. Not worth a bio, no real sources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Scott Mac (Doc) 16:47, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hyman Abrams

--Lời chào và lời chào (talk) 04:48, 26 March 2010 (UTC)#Lời chào và lời chào[reply]

AfD nomination of Philip Paul and others

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated articles are Philip Paul, Hyman Abrams. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to the relevant discussion pages: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip Paul for Philip Paul, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hyman Abrams for Hyman Abrams. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Organized crime associates

Category:Organized crime associates, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Robofish (talk) 19:59, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bellomo.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bellomo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 20:49, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Bellomo.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bellomo.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 17:52, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CAC logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CAC logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:39, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Fein.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Fein.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:49, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:JohnDio.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JohnDio.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:00, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:JohnDio.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JohnDio.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:02, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LouisCohen.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LouisCohen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:54, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fein.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fein.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:55, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Zelig.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Zelig.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:26, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fein.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fein.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:59, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:File:LouisCohen.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:File:LouisCohen.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Free or unfree (talk) 14:47, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:MetalManiac.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:MetalManiac.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 09:46, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:MetalManiac.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:MetalManiac.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 20:46, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hugh Feeney for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hugh Feeney is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hugh Feeney until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. joe decker ^{talk to me} 18:30, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Louie the Lump.jpg needs authorship information.

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Louie the Lump.jpg appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided),authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which:{{subst:usernameexpand|MadMax}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
or use the {{own}} template.

If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 02:52, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Olive Balchin

Hello, MadMax, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you worked on, Olive Balchin, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

It helps to explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the Help Desk. Thanks again for contributing! Black Kite (t) 23:35, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:MadMax/Organized crime

User:MadMax/Organized crime, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:MadMax/Organized crime and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:MadMax/Organized crime during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 16:13, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of East Coast Wrestling Association alumni for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of East Coast Wrestling Association alumni is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of East Coast Wrestling Association alumni until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. BarryTheUnicorn (talk) 18:54, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mobsters by era

Category:Mobsters by era, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 19:18, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Winchell.JPG)

Thanks for uploading File:Winchell.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:00, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Duffy (mobster) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Duffy (mobster) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Duffy (mobster) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 21:32, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Ansell for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Ansell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Ansell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 21:31, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Sicilian mafiosi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Sicilian mafiosi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Sicilian mafiosi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fiddle Faddle 18:29, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Want some help with Spartacus?

Hi. I would like to offer some help with the lists in the Spartacus website. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 02:19, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Apollonia Vitelli-Corleone for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Apollonia Vitelli-Corleone is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apollonia Vitelli-Corleone until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Green Cardamom (talk) 19:07, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of William Lundy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Lundy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Lundy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 11:55, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of British mobsters

The article List of British mobsters has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

nothing here

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Govindaharihari (talk) 16:21, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of British mobsters for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of British mobsters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of British mobsters (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Safiel (talk) 17:21, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lung Kong Tin Yee Association

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lung Kong Tin Yee Association requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. causa sui (talk) 07:15, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of William Baldwin (lawyer)

The article William Baldwin (lawyer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claim to notability, and given that it's unreferenced, it's hard to proof whether is notable or not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Schwede 66 07:34, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:MadMax/Ronnie D. Lishus

User:MadMax/Ronnie D. Lishus, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:MadMax/Ronnie D. Lishus and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:MadMax/Ronnie D. Lishus during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 02:37, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:MadMax/Tony Puccio

User:MadMax/Tony Puccio, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:MadMax/Tony Puccio and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:MadMax/Tony Puccio during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 02:42, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:MadMax/Bob Shupe

User:MadMax/Bob Shupe, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:MadMax/Bob Shupe and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:MadMax/Bob Shupe during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 01:53, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Kid USA, from its old location at User:MadMax/Kid USA. This is because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 19:46, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Sunny Beach (wrestler), from its old location at User:MadMax/Sunny Beach (wrestler). This is because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 20:14, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Billy Firehawk, from its old location at User:MadMax/Billy Firehawk. This is because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 20:17, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Muhammad the Butcher, from its old location at User:MadMax/Muhammad the Butcher. This is because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:10, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Ronnie Vegas, from its old location at User:MadMax/Ronnie Vegas. This is because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:13, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Terik the Great, from its old location at User:MadMax/Terik the Great. This is because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:18, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:MadMax/Mike Kahlua

User:MadMax/Mike Kahlua, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:MadMax/Mike Kahlua and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:MadMax/Mike Kahlua during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:33, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:MadMax/2

User:MadMax/2, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:MadMax/2 (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:MadMax/2 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:35, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:MadMax/Charlie Cook

User:MadMax/Charlie Cook, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:MadMax/Charlie Cook and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:MadMax/Charlie Cook during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:09, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:MadMax/3

User:MadMax/3, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:MadMax/3 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:MadMax/3 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 21:26, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Max Thrasher, from its old location at User:MadMax/Max Thrasher. This is because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 21:36, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:MadMax/1

User:MadMax/1, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:MadMax/1 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:MadMax/1 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 21:40, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Muhammad the Butcher

Hello, MadMax. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Muhammad the Butcher".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Nikki♥311 05:43, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Billy Firehawk

Hello, MadMax. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Billy Firehawk".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Nikki♥311 09:53, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Max Thrasher

Hello, MadMax. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Max Thrasher".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Nikki♥311 09:56, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Moretti.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Moretti.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:22, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:MadMax/Organized crime/to do

A tag has been placed on User:MadMax/Organized crime/to do requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 20:42, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Sunny Beach (wrestler) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sunny Beach (wrestler), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:59, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Kid USA concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Kid USA, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:49, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ronnie Vegas concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ronnie Vegas, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kid USA

Hello, MadMax. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Kid USA".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 09:47, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sunny Beach (wrestler)

Hello, MadMax. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Sunny Beach".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. —MRD2014 T C 20:02, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ronnie Vegas

Hello, MadMax. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Ronnie Vegas".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:52, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:MadMax/Timeline of terrorism

User:MadMax/Timeline of terrorism, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:MadMax/Timeline of terrorism and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:MadMax/Timeline of terrorism during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 20:24, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Missing

Hi. You are now listed as missing. Should you ever return or choose not to be listed, you are welcome to remove your name. Chris Troutman (talk) 01:35, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Terik the Great

Hello, MadMax. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Terik the Great".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 06:35, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:O'Donnell.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:O'Donnell.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:22, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Andynicholls.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Andynicholls.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:17, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MetalManiac.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MetalManiac.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WPBRITCRIME Announcements

Template:WPBRITCRIME Announcements has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:38, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bart Sawyer

The article Bart Sawyer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:GNG. No significant coverage in reliable independent sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nikki♥311 00:24, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Abbundando.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Abbundando.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Miguel Perez Jr.

The article Miguel Perez Jr. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nothing to suggest that he is notable for more than one event - a WP:BLP1E

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 20:47, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anthony Casso

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anthony Casso requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Casso. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:11, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:Gypright.jpg

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

File:Gypright.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:23, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gypright.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gypright.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:24, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David Huck for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Huck is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Huck until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mccapra (talk) 04:29, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of John Pixley

The article John Pixley has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable individual.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 23:41, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jordan Harris (animator)

The article Jordan Harris (animator) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable BLP and inappropriately sourced using only IMDB

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 07:42, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cauliflower Alley Club (logo).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cauliflower Alley Club (logo).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. HapHaxion _{(talk / contribs)} 00:53, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Donough MacCarty, 1st Earl of Clancarty

On 28 March 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Donough MacCarty, 1st Earl of Clancarty, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that both grandfathers of Donough MacCarty, who fought for the Irish Catholic Confederation, were Protestants? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Donough MacCarty, 1st Earl of Clancarty. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Donough MacCarty, 1st Earl of Clancarty), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Organised crime newsletter

Hello, MadMax.

You are receiving this one-time message because in the past, you have shown immense interest in the articles coming under the scope of Wikipedia:WikiProject Organized crime, or you have contributed to these articles substantially.

It is my pleasure to tell you that we starting a semi-annual newsletter, and if you would like to receive this quarterly newsletter, then kindly add your name in list at Wikipedia:WikiProject Organized crime/newsletter. Regards, —usernamekiran (talk) sign the (guestbook) 19:06, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Viv Graham for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Viv Graham is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viv Graham until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JeffUK 12:50, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Piracy

Template:Piracy has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 20:28, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkl talk 09:31, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merger of Template:WikiProject Serial Killer task force

Template:WikiProject Serial Killer task force has been nominated for merging with Template:WikiProject Crime. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 19:23, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merger of Template:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography

Template:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography has been nominated for merging with Template:WikiProject Crime. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 03:24, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WP Organized crime talk

Template:WP Organized crime talk has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:30, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Andrew Von Etter

The article Andrew Von Etter has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable criminal. Only coverage is in context of being a suspect in a non-notable murder of a non-notable person and being found murdered in the trunk of his own car.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Schazjmd (talk) 16:43, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:British crime opentask

Template:British crime opentask has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 12:54, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Crime opentask

Template:Crime opentask has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 19:38, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Turkish organised crime in Great Britain for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Turkish organised crime in Great Britain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turkish organised crime in Great Britain until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chidgk1 (talk) 15:43, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:ICW_logo.jpg)

Barrel murders

Sorry man

Newsletter

David Wise link

Redirect of Dino Casanova

T. Rantula

Wikiproject:British Crime

Redirect of Cham Pain

Redirect of Cham-Pain

Fair use rationale for Image:Adonis.JPG

Image:Crea.JPG

Image:Fein.jpg

Image:N072143.jpg

Image:Michael_trigger_mike_coppola.jpg

Image:McLean.JPG

Image:Lena_kleinschmidt.jpg

Notability of Tommy Comerford

Emile Dupre

No content in Category:Ladies Professional Wrestling Association championships

Uncyclopedia

Assessment of V and W class destroyer

Non-free use disputed for Image:Abbundando.jpg

Image:Abbundando.jpg

Possibly unfree Image:LouisCohen.jpg

2004 in piracy

White Lotus Society (Mortal Kombat)

Some of your subpages

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Spillane.jpg

AfD nomination of Arifs (gang)

Speedy deletion of Template:HeenanFamily

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Featherstone.jpg

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DannyGreene.jpg

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:OMadden.jpg

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:OMadden.jpg

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Lucchese.jpg)

Mark Bromley (Jamaica)

Juggernaut (wrestler)

AfD nomination of Juggernaut (wrestler)

Proposed deletion of Andrew Nicholls

Speedy deletion of Andrew Nicholls

mobsters

Notice to deleting editors and admins

Image copyright problem with Image:Havemeyer.jpg

Fair use rationale for Image:Adonis.JPG

Fair use rationale for Image:N072143.jpg

Image permission problem with Image:N072143.jpg

Possibly unfree Image:McLean.JPG

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:McLean.JPG

File:McLean.JPG listed for deletion

WikiProject Piracy participation update

AfD nomination of Delroy Denton

AfD nomination of Eaton Green

AfD nomination of Kemar Jarrett

AfD nomination of Brindle family

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Bosko.jpg

Proposed deletion of David Stanley Jacubanis

AfD nomination of Shotgun Man

AfD nomination of List of Jewish American mobsters

Articles for deletion nomination of List of British mobsters

Articles for deletion nomination of List of Irish American mobsters

Conflicted licensing on image File:WhiteHandGang.jpg

Unreferenced BLPs

Proposed deletion of Frank Maltese

Proposed deletion of Hyman Abrams

AfD nomination of Philip Paul and others

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Organized crime associates

Orphaned non-free image File:Bellomo.JPG

Possibly unfree File:Bellomo.JPG

Orphaned non-free image File:CAC logo.jpg

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Fein.jpg

Orphaned non-free image File:JohnDio.jpg

Orphaned non-free image File:JohnDio.jpg

Orphaned non-free image File:LouisCohen.jpg

Orphaned non-free image File:Fein.jpg

Orphaned non-free image File:Zelig.JPG

Orphaned non-free image File:Fein.jpg

File:File:LouisCohen.jpg listed for deletion

Non-free rationale for File:MetalManiac.jpg

Replaceable fair use File:MetalManiac.jpg