Thankyou so much for the hard work! I make it $110 that you've won. Please double check. If you would like to donate any of your winnings into the Women in Red Book Fund to raise money to buy books for editors of women topics who need them on demand please add your name and the amount you'd like to donate in the sub section below the prize winners on the main contest page.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:05, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
How about combining a Barnstar with a Christmas Card? That is why this message is appearing on your talk page. Simultaneously and at the same time, this barnstar is conferred upon you because during this past year you worked and contributed your time to improve the encyclopedia. You also have received far too little recognition for your contributions. In addition, this is a small attempt at spreading holiday cheer. I've appreciated all the things that you have done for me. The Best of Regards, Barbara (WVS)✐ ✉ and Merry Christmas 21:17, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Good Humor is awarded to you, a light-spirited Wikipedians who, by unshakably good humor, consistently and reliably lighten the mood by allowing me to abuse the Signpost with dubious and questionable humor. Instead of deleting my contributions, you actually 'approve' them and publish them. You make Wikipedia a better place to be. Best of Regards, Barbara (WVS)✐ ✉ 12:57, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
On 24 January 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Celia Cooney, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in an attempt to catch Celia Cooney, the New York City Police Department launched what was at the time the largest manhunt in the city's history? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Celia Cooney. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Celia Cooney), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
For your work in expanding and enhancing United States v. DuBay, thereby rescuing it from imminent deletion, I award you this Article Rescue Barnstar. TJRC (talk) 23:54, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
In recognition of the role you played in cleaning up my God-awful spelling and grammar in the World War I Op-Ed series published by the Military history WikiProject's newsletter The Bugle over the last four years, I hereby present you with this teamwork barnstar. It is thanks to so many different editors like you who took the time to copyedit the nearly four year long series that it ended up being as successful as it was, and I am grateful for your help since spelling and grammar are not my strongest suites. Yours sincerely, TomStar81 (Talk) 14:33, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for October to December 2018 reviews. MilHistBot (talk) 01:06, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space
By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this barnstar in recognition of the toil, tears, sweat and swear words you have devoted to making History of the Office of the Inspector General of the United States Army a top class featured article. What's next? Gog the Mild (talk) 19:37, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
For a year ago nominating someone else as a awesome Wikipedians, I award you with this image of a taco. May it fuel your hunger while you continue to recognize others for their efforts to improve content on Wikipedia. RightCowLeftCoast (Moo) 19:51, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this barnstar in recognition of your being a Reviewer Extroidinaire: thorough, painstalking, modest, cheery, always open to discussion on a point, but not giving way when you believe that a nominator has got it wrong. Getting a sign off from you always gives me an extra glow. Keep it up. Gog the Mild (talk) 23:32, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
For reviewing a number of my good article nominations, and kindly bearing with my idiosyncratic writing style. Hog Farm (talk) 18:40, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
For your wonderful Signpost report! I wrote on the history of the GA project and backlog drives a few years ago, and I enjoyed reading your suggestions and coverage of more recent events. If you ever want to do a follow-up or brainstorm how to implement ideas, let me know! — Wug·a·po·des 21:05, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this barnstar in recognition of the sterling work you are doing at The Signpost. Thank you. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:20, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
For finally running for RFA. I've thought you'd make a good admin for some time, and I'm glad to see you running. Hog FarmBacon 00:02, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for creating articles on women who have won the Pulitzer Prize. I'm happy to see that you decided to make multiple articles on women who have won this very important award. Keep up the good work! MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 02:38, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
I've noticed you closing a lot of AFDs on my watchlist since your RFA, and in my opinion at least, you've been doing a very good job at judging consensus/weight of arguments. Thank you for the good work you've been doing at AFD closures; I hope you stay active in that area! Hog FarmBacon 04:21, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this award in recognition of the thorough, detailed and actionable reviews you have carried out at FAC. This work is very much appreciated. Gog the Mild (talk) 16:33, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
Your much appreciated contributions of vast importance and boldness have aided Wikipedia in providing free, high-quality knowledge and facts to any person from anywhere in the world, save for China, Myanmar, N. Korea and Turkmenistan and some other places not to mention your personal rules of Wikipedian etiquette which is cool and all, but I have never seen a userpage in which I completely agree with every single quote (and I mean all of them!). You (and your userpage) are purely awesomesauce! Anonymous 7481 (talk) 05:11, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge award (fourth year)
Many thanks for your work to help rescue War of the Fifth Coalition at WP:FAR. What a great example of collaboration and Wikipedia at its best! - Dumelow (talk) 08:14, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
For reviewing at least 5 articles during the drive.
Thank you for reviewing or re-reviewing 8 articles, which helped contribute to an overall 1276-article reduction in the backlog during the drive. (t · c) buidhe 12:52, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
This is months late, but I just noticed that Francis Pharcellus Church became a Good article after you put in all that work last December, and that you also started The Examiner and Chronicle simply because it came up in discussion, you gathered some information, and so why not? Cheers to you!
For over 100 article reviews during 2020. Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:19, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this award in recognition of the thorough, detailed and actionable reviews you have carried out at FAC. Your latest in particular was a model. This work is very much appreciated. Gog the Mild (talk) 23:12, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
For exemplary service at the Resource Exchange, tirelessly delivering the reliable sources on which this encyclopedia depends, please accept this award. :) Thanks for everything you do at WP:RX, and especially for your most recent valuable (and massive!) help there! ——Serial 13:04, 14 November 2023 (UTC)