User:Balloonman/CSD Survey/1.9
| Quicklinks |
|---|
| Other Excellent articles on CSD |
Original Article
[edit]Avatar The Last Airbender Nick Swoboda was born in Spokane Washington on May, 21, 1996 He has been in the popular nickelodeon T.V. show Avatar The Last Airbender
COMMENT: Google search will show that Nick Swoboda is an actor on Avatar The Last Airbender.
Nomination Criteria
[edit]A1 No context. Very short articles lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Example: "He is a funny man with a red car. He makes people laugh." Context is different from content, treated in A3, below.
Deletion Options
[edit]| rationale | Count | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Agree with ratioinale to speedy delete. | 5 | 5.6 |
| Disagree with rationale. Enough information exist to identify subject, but deletable by other criteria | 11 | 12.4 |
| Disagree with rationale. Enough information exist to identify subject, but this is a case where IAR applies. | 0 | 0 |
| Disagree with speedy deletion (should be PRODDED, sent to AFD, or kept.) | 73 | 82 |
Survey Comments
[edit]| Common rationale | Count |
|---|---|
| A7 | 3 |
| Cleanup | 2 |
- I would probably PROD or AFD it. If the result of either was "keep", move it to Nick Swoboda and make this page into a redirect to the page about the show.
- Depends on article title. If it's Avatar The Last Airbender, then check for vandalism/good faith removal of content. If it's Nick Swoboda then prod/afd
- I would decline and add a reference or two. If I had time, I'd expand it myself.
- Context established and notability asserted. Crap article but not speedy-able.
- Actors tend to have some fanbase, and I'm cautious about deleting them without rationale
- I'd clean up; if someone felt strongly that this should be deleted, since it identifies the subject and contains a claim of notability, full discussion should be held.
- Should be redirected to ATLA page. Is blatantly not deletable under A1; only A7 could possibly apply.
- Would search for refs; if he only appeared in one episode with one line, would probably prod or AFD
- Spokane ftw! Anyway, it makes at least some semblance of an attempt at a notability rationale, so it's got to go to AfD or PROD
- would check history for this page ?vandalism
- The rationale is weak, but it passes.
- I'd take a look to see if Swoboda is just an extra, and if he was, then PROD. Otherwise not a speedy.
- Keep/AfD, or even speedy redirect are best.
- Depends on the roles: check IDMb. If significant, keep. If not, A7
- Possibly a snow AFD, but not a speedy
- Possibly notable. AfD if no significant sources on Google. Consensus needs to be gained on whether he passes the subjective WP:ENTERTAINER criteria.
- A1 doesn't apply; the article is short, but there's plenty of context. Probably not notable, but being an actor on a Nickelodeon show is a good enough assertion.
- If this is an article on the program then would just edit the article, otherwise if on person would either tag or prod
- You really should fix the spelling of "ratioinale" throughout
Balloonman's analysis
[edit]A1 is clearly incorrect. There is enough information to identify Nick Swoboda as an actor on Avatar the Last Airbender.
It could be argued that it passes A7 because it makes a claim to importance/significance via his role in Avatar. I'm not sure that it does. The article does not make a claim that Nick Swoboda is notable, but rather that he played a role on a notable TV series. His role amounted to two episodes and based upon the claims currently in the article, it fails BIO/N/entertainer. Thus, I would not complain if somebody deleted this article A7.
I would PROD this as failing to meet WP:entertainer, WP:N, and WP:BIO. Give the author a chance to save the article.