Template talk:Saints Row

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Gilman Louie (1 participant)
Yoshimitsu (1 participant)
Dr. Wily (2 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (2 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Train simulator (disambiguation) (8 participants)
Preston Arsement (4 participants)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (6 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (7 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Red Faction

[1] There is no inherent connection between Red Faction and SR that needs to be explicated in the navbox. Dev links in Related are also overkill. Per the bold/revert/delete cycle, onus is on you to take your disputed additions to the talk page for consensus, otherwise you're edit warring. czar 00:06, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Red Faction is inherently connected to Saints Row and its universe. It is also a little hypocritical to complain about people edit warring when it seems that you were the one removing Red Faction from the navbox (which has been there since 2015) without consulting the talk page first. Long story short, Red Faction belongs in this navbox, but do what you want with the dev links if it really bothers you that much. -- MAinternational (talk) 17:37, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this connection doesn't make sense. The two are connected by the same developer, which is already covered at Template:Volition. Removing this by consensus. 24.114.51.211 (talk) 14:46, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]