Template talk:Paradox Development Studio games

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (7 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (3 participants)
Dr. Wily (8 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Links

I reverted to my last version because:

Arsenal of Democracy and For the Glory are not developed, but only published, by Paradox (such as Galactic Civilizations II or Lead and Gold, see full list), and certainly should not be included in the official EU/HoI series.
The games expansions don't have their own articles (see Europa Universalis III#In Nomine for example): why include links to subsections, if there are ones to main articles?

Okay for Crusader Kings section, if the sequel was announced. --Enok (talk) 06:46, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New Template

I created a new template based on this, since Paradox has split into two companies since January. The developer is now called Paradox Development Studio, so I changed the name and made all the links go there instead. Maybe you can change this template to be about games published by paradox Interactive instead? Since they are a pure publisher now. Darakir (talk) 11:40, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

East vs. West – A Hearts of Iron Game

I removed East vs. West – A Hearts of Iron Game because it wasnt developed by paradox development studios which is what the template is for. It was published by paradox interactive and developed by Bl-Logic.— dain- talk 12:35, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Imperator as a new IP

Both Game Informer called this a new series while PCGamesN stated that it is distinct from EU: Rome 2. Per the WP:BRD cycle you should discuss here before you revert me. Paradox never said anything about having a Rome series and you need to present your argument with reliable sources.