Jump to content

Template talk:Infobox royalty/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3

Reign

Whatshisname IV
uncollapse me
Archduke of alignment
SuccessorYou, me, everyone
Sultan of short syllables
Reign22 April 1848 – 12 June 1866
Lord of line handling
Reign22 September 1848 – 12 September 1866
Baron of bad wrapping
Reign22 September 1848 – 12 September 1866
 22 September 1848 – 12 May 1866
Reign
22 September 1848 – 12 September 1866

Should the "reign" parameter be center-aligned like assumed office/in office from {{Infobox officeholder}}? There is no discussion about this before. Hddty. (talk) 06:53, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

I see no advantage in spreading it out over two lines rather than one. DrKay (talk) 16:05, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
Well in current format there are still two lines. Hddty. (talk) 05:12, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
I see only one. DrKay (talk) 12:57, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
Most oftenly there are two lines for former monarch (except if the article use nowrap like in George V). Also there is no need to write "present" to the current monarch. Hddty. (talk) 13:53, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
I concur. This is a good idea. Unless short syllable months are used, this parameter often causes some funky wrapping issues that need to be negated through what ultimately amounts to unnecessary nowrapping or the use of non-breaking spaces. Center-aligning the reign parameter would look better and improve readability. You'll notice my arbitrary example on the right. Jay D. Easy (talk) 06:22, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

10 reigns

Dear editors. The Romanian hospodar of Constantine Mavrocordatos reigned 10 times in the Moldavian and Wallachian Principals between 1730 and 1769. I entered these dates in the infobox, but the last tenth reign does not appear. What could be the reason for this?:

succession10 =Prince of Moldavia reign10 =29 June – 23 November 1769 predecessor10 =Grigore Callimachi successor10 =Grigore III Ghica

Only 9 reign periods appear? For example, if someone has held 15 important positions during their long life, can only some of them be shown? 12akd (talk) 11:59, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

It's because you've broken the code. The code has a limit of 9 successions. It's just programmed that way, unfortunately. I suppose nobody ever thought that somebody could reign 10 times. Without altering the facts, is there a way around this? Did Constantine have de facto or de jure rule during one of the periods that you mark as a gap? If so, you could probably show it as continuous with a disputed or alongside notation. Since the code is locked from editing, you'd need an admin to actually add a level 10 field.  – Whaleyland (Talk • Contributions) 00:28, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
Let's just add another field. Please sync with this version of the sandbox to add support for 10 reigns. Tested in the all param testcase. --Trialpears (talk) 01:04, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Thank you very much for dealing with the problem. I believe that even if he was not among the kings / princes - but in other positions (bishops, ministers) he held 10, but often up to 20 important positions throughout his life. Rulers do not remember more than ten rulings at first, but that does not mean that they never existed. (I'll think about it.) If ministers / politicians AND bishops / ecclesiastical dignitaries have a separate info box - then maybe over 10 would be worth expanding. 12akd (talk) 07:55, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

I think nine is already ridiculous. I think we should be using Template:Infobox officeholder for these types of people not this one. Celia Homeford (talk) 08:32, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
 Done However, whether {{infobox officeholder}} is more suitable is a question for that article's talk page. Sceptre (talk) 18:23, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your help. If I can find a ruler / governor for more time, I'll write here. 12akd (talk) 05:39, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Automatic short descriptions

I've been investigating the possibility of adding automatic short descriptions to this infobox and have created a version in the sandbox that does just this using the succession header. If you wish to see the feature in action replace {{Infobox royalty}} with {{Infobox royalty/sandbox}} and the generated short description will be displayed in plaintext at the top of the article for more convenient testing. If there already is a local short description for the article (not on wikidata) or an editor adds one in the future it will override the automatic one. Any opinions on this? Your input is highly appreciated, especially since I'm not too familiar with the conventions used in articles about royalty. If you want to see some test cases just ask! --Trialpears (talk) 21:00, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

I've now implemented it since there were no objections for well over a week. I've done further tests of about 30 more articles where the automatic short description was on par or better than the wikidata description and no inappropriate additions. Please tell me if you have any concerns and I will make sure they're addressed. --Trialpears (talk) 10:09, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Issue?

Took me a while to realise that "Issue" actually means "Children" (at least I think it does?). Would there be any opposition if I rename it to just "Children", a term that we mere plebeians are more familiar with? Laurent (talk) 13:40, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Convert to wrapper

Parameter Infobox royalty Infobox person
1 No Yes
2 Yes Yes
3 No Yes
4 No Yes
5 No Yes
abovestyle No Yes
agent No Yes
alias No Yes
alma mater No Yes
alma_mater No Yes
alt Yes Yes
awards No Yes
baptised No Yes
baptized No Yes
birth_date Yes Yes
birth_name Yes Yes
birth_place Yes Yes
birthname No Yes
boards No Yes
body discovered No Yes
body_discovered No Yes
box_width No Yes
burial_coordinates No Yes
burial_date Yes No
burial_place Yes Yes
callsign No Yes
caption Yes Yes
child No Yes
children No Yes
citizenship No Yes
clan_name Yes No
consort Yes No
cor-type Yes No
cor-type1 Yes No
cor-type10 Yes No
cor-type2 Yes No
cor-type3 Yes No
cor-type4 Yes No
cor-type5 Yes No
cor-type6 Yes No
cor-type7 Yes No
cor-type8 Yes No
cor-type9 Yes No
coronation Yes No
coronation1 Yes No
coronation10 Yes No
coronation2 Yes No
coronation3 Yes No
coronation4 Yes No
coronation5 Yes No
coronation6 Yes No
coronation7 Yes No
coronation8 Yes No
coronation9 Yes No
credits No Yes
criminal charge No Yes
criminal penalty No Yes
criminal status No Yes
criminal_charge No Yes
criminal_charges No Yes
criminal_penalty No Yes
criminal_status No Yes
date of burial Yes No
death cause No Yes
death_cause No Yes
death_date Yes Yes
death_place Yes Yes
denomination No Yes
disappeared_date No Yes
disappeared_place No Yes
disappeared_status No Yes
domestic_partner No Yes
domesticpartner No Yes
dynasty Yes No
education No Yes
embed Yes Yes
employer No Yes
era No Yes
era dates Yes No
era name Yes No
ethnicity No Yes
family No Yes
family_name Yes No
father Yes Yes
footnotes No Yes
full name Yes No
given_name Yes No
height No Yes
height_cm No Yes
height_ft No Yes
height_in No Yes
height_m No Yes
home town No Yes
home_town No Yes
homepage No Yes
honorific prefix No Yes
honorific suffix No Yes
honorific_prefix No Yes
honorific_suffix No Yes
honorific-prefix No Yes
honorific-suffix No Yes
honors No Yes
honours No Yes
house Yes No
house-type Yes No
image Yes Yes
image caption No Yes
image size No Yes
image_caption No Yes
image_size Yes Yes
image_upright No Yes
imagesize No Yes
influenced No Yes
influences No Yes
investiture Yes No
issue Yes No
issue-link Yes No
issue-pipe Yes No
issue-type Yes No
judicial status No Yes
judicial_status No Yes
known No Yes
known for No Yes
known_for No Yes
label_name No Yes
landscape No Yes
misc No Yes
misc2 No Yes
misc3 No Yes
misc4 No Yes
misc5 No Yes
misc6 No Yes
module Yes Yes
module2 No Yes
module3 No Yes
module4 No Yes
module5 No Yes
module6 No Yes
monuments No Yes
more Yes No
moretext Yes No
moretext1 Yes No
moretext10 Yes No
moretext2 Yes No
moretext3 Yes No
moretext4 Yes No
moretext5 Yes No
moretext6 Yes No
moretext7 Yes No
moretext8 Yes No
moretext9 Yes No
mother Yes Yes
movement No Yes
name Yes Yes
nationality No Yes
native_lang1 Yes No
native_lang1_name1 Yes No
native_lang2 Yes No
native_lang2_name1 Yes No
native_lang3 Yes No
native_lang3_name1 Yes No
native_lang4 Yes No
native_lang4_name1 Yes No
native_lang5 Yes No
native_lang5_name1 Yes No
native_name No Yes
native_name_lang No Yes
net worth No Yes
net_worth No Yes
networth No Yes
nickname No Yes
nocat_wdimage No Yes
notable works No Yes
notable_works No Yes
occupation Yes Yes
office No Yes
opponents No Yes
organisation No Yes
organization No Yes
organizations No Yes
other names No Yes
other_names No Yes
othername No Yes
parents No Yes
partner No Yes
partner(s) No Yes
partners No Yes
party No Yes
place of burial Yes No
post-nominals No Yes
posthumous name Yes No
pre-nominals No Yes
pre-type Yes No
pre-type1 Yes No
pre-type10 Yes No
pre-type2 Yes No
pre-type3 Yes No
pre-type4 Yes No
pre-type5 Yes No
pre-type6 Yes No
pre-type7 Yes No
pre-type8 Yes No
pre-type9 Yes No
predecessor Yes Yes
predecessor1 Yes No
predecessor10 Yes No
predecessor2 Yes No
predecessor3 Yes No
predecessor4 Yes No
predecessor5 Yes No
predecessor6 Yes No
predecessor7 Yes No
predecessor8 Yes No
predecessor9 Yes No
pronunciation Yes Yes
queen Yes No
reg-type Yes No
reg-type1 Yes No
reg-type10 Yes No
reg-type2 Yes No
reg-type3 Yes No
reg-type4 Yes No
reg-type5 Yes No
reg-type6 Yes No
reg-type7 Yes No
reg-type8 Yes No
reg-type9 Yes No
regent Yes No
regent1 Yes No
regent10 Yes No
regent2 Yes No
regent3 Yes No
regent4 Yes No
regent5 Yes No
regent6 Yes No
regent7 Yes No
regent8 Yes No
regent9 Yes No
regnal name Yes No
reign Yes No
reign-type Yes No
reign-type1 Yes No
reign-type10 Yes No
reign-type2 Yes No
reign-type3 Yes No
reign-type4 Yes No
reign-type5 Yes No
reign-type6 Yes No
reign-type7 Yes No
reign-type8 Yes No
reign-type9 Yes No
reign1 Yes No
reign10 Yes No
reign2 Yes No
reign3 Yes No
reign4 Yes No
reign5 Yes No
reign6 Yes No
reign7 Yes No
reign8 Yes No
reign9 Yes No
relations No Yes
relatives No Yes
religion Yes Yes
residence No Yes
resting place No Yes
resting place coordinates No Yes
resting_place No Yes
resting_place_coordinates No Yes
restingplace No Yes
restingplacecoordinates No Yes
royal house Yes No
siglum No Yes
signature Yes Yes
signature alt No Yes
signature_alt Yes Yes
signature_size No Yes
signature_type Yes No
spouse Yes Yes
spouse 1 Yes No
spouse 2 Yes No
spouse 3 Yes No
spouse 4 Yes No
spouse 5 Yes No
spouse 6 Yes No
spouse 7 Yes No
spouse 8 Yes No
spouse 9 Yes No
spouse-type Yes No
spouse(s) No Yes
spouses Yes Yes
spouses-type Yes No
status No Yes
style No Yes
suc-type Yes No
suc-type1 Yes No
suc-type10 Yes No
suc-type2 Yes No
suc-type3 Yes No
suc-type4 Yes No
suc-type5 Yes No
suc-type6 Yes No
suc-type7 Yes No
suc-type8 Yes No
suc-type9 Yes No
succession Yes No
succession1 Yes No
succession10 Yes No
succession2 Yes No
succession3 Yes No
succession4 Yes No
succession5 Yes No
succession6 Yes No
succession7 Yes No
succession8 Yes No
succession9 Yes No
successor Yes Yes
successor1 Yes No
successor10 Yes No
successor2 Yes No
successor3 Yes No
successor4 Yes No
successor5 Yes No
successor6 Yes No
successor7 Yes No
successor8 Yes No
successor9 Yes No
television No Yes
temple name Yes No
term No Yes
title Yes Yes
titletext Yes No
type Yes No
url No Yes
URL No Yes
website No Yes
works No Yes
years active No Yes
years_active No Yes
yearsactive No Yes

This should be converted to wrapper of {{Infobox person}} per WP:INFOCOL Capankajsmilyo(Talk | Infobox assistance) 00:13, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Please stop this disruptive spamming. Just take a look at the table above. There are major differences in the parameters supported by each template. Also, as I have already told you at one of the far too many pages on which you have spammed tables like this, your parameter list for {{Infobox person}} is incorrect. |1=, for example, is not supported by Infobox person. The documentation page for the tool you are using has a caveat explaining that you need to validate its output. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:46, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Infobox advisory detached from infobox

Per https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T248805 can I suggest that the advisory message and infobox are wrapped in an element <code><div class="infobox-container"> to make sure that the advisory message is connected to the template rather than displaying poorly on mobile. cc User:Danbloch Jdlrobson (talk) 16:37, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

 Fixed Jdlrobson (talk) 05:09, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

@Jdlrobson: Hiding the entire TfD tag on mobile does not seem to me to be a non-controversial change that should have been performed only 9 hours after a post on an unrelated template's talk page, especially given that it was declined in October 2019. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:01, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Notified: Template talk:Tfm, Wikipedia talk:Templates for discussion. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:01, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Well, it's been hidden since December 2018 for other variants https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/874733460?diffmode=source

The nomobile class is not great but ive suggested another alternative here. Dropping the float would also be acceptable or at least using TemplateStyles to restrict that style to Vector. I don't know the template well enough to advise what the best solution is here.

On the other hand the current presentation on mobile is extremely confusing and sometimes preventing content from being read on mobile (Minerva skin) and most of our readers are there. Fixing that in any way possible seems pretty urgent and non controversial to me. Jdlrobson (talk) 02:35, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

There have been numerous past proposals to restrict the visibility of the TfD tag to certain classes of editors, such as Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 139#Proposal: Deprecate the TfM template, or at least force people to put it in the template documentation, all of which failed to gain consensus. I viewed your edit as analagous to those. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:08, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
See also Template talk:Tfm#Template-protected edit request on 2 October 2019, where the edits you performed were declined with "noy done, please get consensus first. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:26, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
I think I speak for 99.99 percent of Wikipedia users when I say that I don't care about template merges and if I did I'd have the templates on my watchlist. Dan Bloch (talk) 02:56, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
That may be, but there's still been a lack of consensus to hide the TfD tag from any group of users, and the above edit was therefore a misuse of template editor privleges to make an underdiscussed controversial edit. * Pppery * it has begun... 14:40, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Reign parameter

Whatshisname IV
uncollapse me
Archduke of alignment
SuccessorYou, me, everyone
Sultan of short syllables
Reign22 April 1848 – 12 June 1866
Lord of line handling
Reign22 September 1848 – 12 September 1866
Baron of bad wrapping
Reign22 September 1848 – 12 September 1866
 22 September 1848 – 12 May 1866
Reign
22 September 1848 – 12 September 1866

Should the "reign" parameter be center-aligned like assumed office/in office from {{Infobox officeholder}}? (see proposed example on the right and bad wrapping from the current format)

Notified @DrKay and Jay D. Easy: who participated in the last discussion. Hddty (talk) 06:32, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Yes: obvious merit. GPinkerton (talk) 04:07, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Proposed changes

What do you think about the following change?

Infobox royalty/Archive 3
king
Tenure21 December 1959 – present
king
Tenure21 December 1959 – present

Arya.Go (talk) 17:54, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

I don't understand it. Why is the code so heavy on embedding other infoboxes and why are there 10 consort parameters? It seems unnecessarily complex for a relatively simple change from left alignment to center alignment. DrKay (talk) 07:41, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Not an improvement. Embedding multiple infoboxes, including a subtemplate, inside this infobox, makes it much more difficult to troubleshoot and modify. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:59, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Add new parameter

Hi, I added some new parameters to infobox royalty / sandbox ‌ Please apply it to infobox royalty Arya.Go (talk) 18:37, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

No. You were told explicitly above that using transclusions of infobox child is inappropriate. It is too code heavy and increases transclusion count through nested transclusions, which can lead to template limit problems. DrKay (talk) 20:20, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Religion

Jonesey95 I actually think religion is a lot more important for royalty than basically any other groups of people. Many wars have been fought over the religious affiliations of royalty and in many countries the monarch is/was also the head of the church. I can't see any other group of people where it's this relevant and not usually in the first sentence of the lead as with religious leaders. --Trialpears (talk) 00:41, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the note. I have restored the |religion= parameter. Someone else suggested that it should be restored as well. It might be worth adding a note to the documentation explaining that this infobox is one of a few "person" infoboxes that is an exception to the RFC. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:30, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Strongly agree with this. Religion is for example very important in the history of the Middle East, where it ranged from Christianity to Islam, Zoroastrianism and what not. Good to know what religion a specific monarch believed in, since it could vary quite a lot. --HistoryofIran (talk) 14:46, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Parameter suggestion (Oriental seals)

The infobox currently has a parameter for "Signature" which is great, but in Chinese history and Chinese cultural countries (Japan, Korea, Manchuria, the Ryukyu islands, and Vietnam) many royals had a personal seal that they would mark documents or a dynastic seal that would change every few generations, for example every Emperor of the Nguyễn Dynasty had separate personal seals for documents independent of the dynastic seal.

In Chinese cultural countries these seals basically fulfilled the same function as signatures so it would be handy to add them to Vietnamese royal and imperial infoboxes, as often Vietnamese historic documents and decrees are identified through these seals. --Donald Trung (talk) 11:44, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Myeongseong
SealMyeongseong's signature
There are already parameters for that. DrKay (talk) 12:04, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
I tried adding this to Bảo Đại:

| signature_alt = Seal of Bảo Đại (1949-1954).jpg | signature_type = Seal of Bảo Đại as the Chief of [[State of Vietnam]] (used between 1949 and 1954).


But then it either only displays his signature or his seal, his father also had both a seal and a signature, so this field is only useful for Oriental royalty before signatures were used, in modern Japan personal seals are still commonly used. --Donald Trung (talk) 12:07, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Let me try it by actually showcasing the parameters as I never saved the draft.


Bảo Đại (保大)
Seal of Bảo Đại as the Chief of State of Vietnam (used between 1949 and 1954).Seal of Bảo Đại (1949-1954).jpg

I don't want to replace "File:BaoDaiSignature.svg", I simply want to add "File:Seal of Bảo Đại (1949-1954).jpg", this is only possible like this:


Bảo Đại (保大)
SealBảo Đại (保大)'s signature

But then I no longer have the siggy (signature). --Donald Trung (talk) 13:05, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Personally, I'd prefer it to be one or the other. Infoboxes are supposed to be simple and succinct. Something with a lengthy caption or additional images should be placed in the article as a thumbnail instead of in the infobox. There's space for example in the honors section, though ideally the seal should be next to the text about the early 1950s. DrKay (talk) 13:08, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Request to add a parameter

Hello, I have put some important parameters that are needed in the Infobox royalty on the training page of the Template:Infobox royalty/sandbox. add after checking. Parsbod (talk) 00:28, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

If you are talking about the military parameters, see this template's documentation for an explanation of how to embed {{Infobox military person}}. For an example of how it is done in a real article, see Charles, Prince of Wales. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:00, 14 September 2021 (UTC)


Yes, I got it. I just think we should replace the parameter

must use this parameter 👇

Personal details

like the Infobox officeholder_Parsbod (talk) 01:17, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Reign

I suggest that the reign parameter, like the term_start and term_end parameters in the infobox officeholder, be in the middle. I did this in the infobox royalty / sandbox. Parsbod (talk) 19:07, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

I think it looks worse than the status quo. If you think there is a test case that makes it look better, please add it to the testcases page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:42, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Coronation

We ought to add another country for cor-type with ksa. Saudi Arabia does not have coronations. Rather when a new king comes to the throne, a bay'ah is held, a ceremony where the subjects pledge alleigance to the king. Векочел (talk) 23:54, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

That can be done with the existing parameter |cor-type = Bay'ah. Celia Homeford (talk) 09:04, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Auto SD glitch

I found that Yusuf Ali Kenadid has |title=1st Sultan of the Sultanate of Hobyo, and the auto-generated SD was 1St Sultan... (note the capital S). I've add a SD to this article, but there may be others. Jonesey95, is this related to the auto-cap of the first letter fix? MB 06:44, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

That's a bit of GIGO per MOS:1ST, but I have adjusted the auto SD to try to capitalize the first character, whether it is a letter or not. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:36, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Need for multiple "era name" fields

Any chance of getting "era name 2", "era name 3" paired with "era dates 2", "era dates 3" &c. added to the template? A number of Chinese emperors have multiple eras (e.g. Emperor Xuan of Han, Emperor Gaozong of Song) and the only way to deal with them now is to put all info in the "era dates" field. Thanks. —  AjaxSmack  17:15, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Partner

Could we add |partner= for notable, unmarried partners? Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 22:55, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 9 August 2022

Could you include an option to insert both a personal and kingdom coats of arms images please. Titus Gold (talk) 12:35, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

I don't agree with this suggestion. We generally avoid addition of flags or coats of arms as described at Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Icons. Please get consensus for this addition before using the protected edit template. Celia Homeford (talk) 13:22, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for your input. As far as I can see, Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Icons simply suggests that personal icons should not be used instead of national ones. It does not say that arms cannot be used. Many pages of royal individuals have images of arms or insignia on them.
In medieval periods in particular, royals had personal coat of arms which would be apt for an infobox. An option could be for personal coat of arms only, although i would prefer being able to include both the personal and family coat of arms. Titus Gold (talk) 20:20, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Royal cypher

It's in the news, but a royal cypher is a symbol of identification of the monarch. Might this be something we want to add as an option to the infobox? -ProhibitOnions (T) 21:18, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

No. For the same reasons I gave in the section immediately above this one. Celia Homeford (talk) 07:54, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Cyphers are much more commonly used than personal coats of arms, at least in the case of the UK monarch, adorning buildings, letters, pillar boxes, government notices, etc. During the funeral of the Queen, the EIIR cypher was a frequent sight, understood in a way the coat of arms would not have been. It's also easily identifiable in a low-resolution image (ie, an infobox) in a way that a coat of arms is not - or for that matter, a signature, which IS included. Hence my question. -ProhibitOnions (T) 08:38, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Royals with non-royal political offices

Could we possibly add the option to add political positions that a royal holds (ministerial, presidential, etc.). The UAE is a federation of monarchies, so some politicians in the UAE federal government, including the president and vice president are members of royal families. The president of the UAE (Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan) also rules the Emirate of Abu Dhabi which is an absloute monarchy.

Some fields that I feel would be helpful to add to the this template come from Template:Infobox officeholder, I tried adding the fields using plug ins but the plugged in office headers are grey unlike the reign headers in the the royalty infobox. Current workaround {{labeldata}} instead of the fields in the template.

native_name = native_name_lang = honorific_prefix = office = status = term_start = term_end = subterm = suboffice = alongside =

'

allegiance = branch = serviceyears = rank = unit = commands = battles = Vyvagaba (talk) 16:12, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

The infobox already has the function. At Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, the political office is in the infobox. DrKay (talk) 17:07, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your reply. The infobox treats political positions exactly like a royal position; unlike other political office holders, the infobox does't show "Incumbant" when in the person is in office, and doesn't give the option to add a status under the office (Acting), also the infobox has no option to add a native name and military credentials. Vyvagaba (talk) 17:46, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
@Vyvagaba: see Napoleon, which incorporates {{Infobox officeholder/office}} to achieve what you're describing. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 05:29, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
Great, thank you so much! Vyvagaba (talk) 11:26, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Template-protected edit request on 27 April 2023

Hi! Currently, in data77 both the family_name and clan_name parameters (or fields or display names or whatever) display as text wikilinked to the article Chinese surname. I suspect this is because of an article split and remerge last year.

family_name should be changed to wikilink to Chinese surname#Xing
clan_name should be changed to wikilink to Chinese surname#Shi.

Some subjects bore both kinds of surname (arbitrary example: Xiong Yong), and the anchors disambiguate in a way the translated terms don't. Folly Mox (talk) 23:06, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Edit template-protected}} template. This very well may be on purpose. - FlightTime (open channel) 23:11, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
@FlightTime: where can I request a database query that lists which articles have one but not both of these parameters defined? Seeing the effects on that class of article would be my first step in a discussion about disambiguating the wikilinks. Folly Mox (talk) 23:32, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
@Folly Mox: No, I don't work with data reports, but if I had to find out I'd ask at the Help Desk. - FlightTime (open channel) 23:37, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
You should be able to use the monthly report generated by the TemplateData section of the documentation, but it appears that the TemplateData section has some invalid code in it: "family_name", "clan_name", and "given_name" are listed as aliases of "full name", which is not correct. If that apparent error is corrected before 1 May (which can be done by anyone, since the TemplateData code is not protected), next month's report will run about a week later and should contain links to lists of each article using those parameters. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:59, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Hence the consensus call, wait for someone to chime in that knows templates and particularly, this one. - FlightTime (open channel) 00:06, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

I didn't know what "Issue" meant because this word isn't used often in this sense in common language. It should be a link but I'm not allowed to edit. Akeosnhaoe (talk) 01:09, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

 Done ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 14:10, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Naming convention

Should nicknames like "... the Great", etc. used on "name = " section or should we use their order in the monarchy, like "... II" for example. I have seen different ones, so I was wondering which is correct. Beshogur (talk) 15:17, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template_talk:Infobox_royalty/Archive_3&oldid=1256388929"