The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by CSJJ104 (talk) 16:43, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
... that the English River within the East English River Provincial Park has no regulated flow and no pollution, unique in northwestern Ontario? Source: ref #3: "Perhaps one of the most unique features of East English River Provincial Park is the fact that it is not regulated by dams and has no upstream point source of pollution".
Overall: @P199. Hook is interesting, QPQ is done, article is new and long enough. The article is good overall. However, I do feel that the overuse of the 3rd citation does hurt the article quite a bit. I will still approve the nomination because nothing in the rules explicitly states that the overuse of a citation prevents approval though my judgment may be wrong. good job though. Onegreatjoke (talk) 22:52, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
forgot to do this. Onegreatjoke (talk) 22:54, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
@P199. Hook is interesting, QPQ is done, article is new and long enough. The article is good overall. However, I do feel that the overuse of the 3rd citation does hurt the article quite a bit. I will still approve the nomination because nothing in the rules explicitly states that the overuse of a citation prevents approval though my judgment may be wrong. good job though. Onegreatjoke (talk) 22:52, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
forgot to do this. Onegreatjoke (talk) 22:54, 1 October 2022 (UTC)