User talk:CSJJ104

Welcome!

Hello, CSJJ104 and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! BelovedFreak 11:04, 8 November 2011 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content Miscellaneous User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Perth Academy

Thankyou for your contributions so far. Please be careful in the changes you make - some things are undoing improvements made by other editors. For example, you changed a link from Perth (which in the edit box looks like [[Perth, Scotland|Perth]] to Perth. The latter is a link to a page that lists all articles about places named Perth. We obviously want to link to the place in Scotland. Similarly, you added {{school-stub}} template when a more specific one, {{Scotland-school-stub}} had already been added. Wikipedia is a steep learning curve and you are certainly not expected to know all the intricacies of article writing at first. :) Please try to be careful about undoing improvements made by others though. If you check the history of the page, you can read the edit summaries that will explain why changes have been made. For example, it's not usual to have a list of subjects offered by the school as this is not really encyclopaedic information. The curriculum can certainly be discussed in prose style. See The Judd School and Stuyvesant High School as examples of some of our best and most developed school articles. Let me know if you have any questions.

Trouble with ProveIt citations

I apologize if my added citations to Vatican Library did not conform to the preferred standard, I have been using ProveIt and only recently started using citations as a regular part of my repertoire. Can you recommend another citation gadget that can make my contributions less disruptive? --NickPenguin_(contribs) 20:10, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

@NickPenguin: No problem, personally I use the default refToolbar 2.0b and find this is a good tool for quickly adding details to a citation template aiding consistency. WP:CT gives details of some templates used for this purpose, if that is of interest, although it is also noted that if an article already has a consistent citation format, then to stick to that. Not a situation I personally felt applied to Vatican Library. CSJJ104 (talk) 20:36, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

By the way, I really appreciate all the work you have been doing with the citations for the TAFI articles, especially with the duplicate citations and correcting template usage. Also, I have started using the refToolbar like you have suggested. --NickPenguin_(contribs) 18:47, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Today's articles for improvement

• Hello CSJJ104:

This week's voting for TAFI's upcoming weekly collaboration has begun at Week 20 of 2015. Thanks for participating!

Sent by User:Northamerica1000 using mass messaging

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi CSJJ104! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 13:13, Sunday, June 7, 2015 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Thank you!

		The Original Barnstar
		is hereby awarded to CSJJ104 for creating the Outline of the Cold War, which is now in article space. Thank you for making such a good start in filling this gap in the navigation system! The Transhumanist 05:06, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

By the way, this outline has entered a new phase of construction, in case you are ready for another round of fleshing out this subject. I look forward to seeing your further additions. The Transhumanist 05:21, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject Women in Red/The World Contest

Hi. This month The Women in Red World Contest is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There is over £3000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. Wikimedia UK is putting up £250 specifically for editors who produce the most quality new women bios for British women, with special consideration given to missing notable biographies from the Oxford Dictionary of Biography and Welsh Dictionary of Biography. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate independently this is also fine, but please add any articles created to the bottom of the main contest page even if not competing. Your participation in the contest and contributing articles on British women from your area or wherever would we much appreciated. Thanks.