Talk:Xevious 3D/G
Appearance
Xevious 3D/G has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Xevious 3D/G/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Abryn (talk · contribs) 16:06, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- "however Electronic Gaming Monthly and IGN commented it was only present in the Japanese version and that the slowdown was removed from the North American release.[14]" should be a note in the development section to point out the change in localizing the game to North America. ie, "the Japanese version featured slowdown, which was removed in the North American version."
- Fixed. Namcokid47 (talk) 21:30, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
- Screenshot lacks a proper source.
- Fixed. Namcokid47 (talk) 21:26, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
- Passed, nice job. - Bryn (talk) (contributions) 21:34, 31 August 2019 (UTC)