Talk:Xevious

Xevious has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 27, 2019. (Reviewed version).

Video games High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Gilman Louie (1 participant)
Yoshimitsu (1 participant)
Dr. Wily (2 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (2 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Train simulator (disambiguation) (8 participants)
Preston Arsement (4 participants)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (6 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (7 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Release Date

arcade-history.com lists the game as released in dec. 1982 in Japan.
arcade-museum.com also says 1982.
The japanese flyer and in-game copyright says 1982.

Is there a source for the release date being 1983? Schmid (talk) 06:20, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Xevious Scramble Mission

Someone please add information about Xevious Scramble Mission and the Let's! TV play classic series.

Similar game?

I haven't played this game, but it appears to be almost exactly like Ambrosia Software's Mars Rising and Deimos Rising. puddingsucks 06:02, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like Ambrosia have 'lovingly recreated' the basic premise, yep. --Air 18:06, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How to pronounce the title?

Is it pronounced "ecks-eh-vus", or "zee-vee-us"? Either way I think it could be argued that the pronunciation should appear in the article. ekedolphin 08:36, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It would be worth describing if only there were something to base it on. I call it "zee-vee-us", but who's to say what's correct? It's a made-up name, so presumably whoever made up the name gets to decide. In Japanese it's clearly ゼビウス　("zebiusu"), but if "devious" is pronounced "dee-vee-us" in English then "zee-vee-us" seems reasonable. The description of the TV commercial strongly implies that indeed that was how it was pronounced. -- Paul Richter 08:15, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is pronounced zee-vee-iss.66.72.201.167 (talk) 21:40, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So is it a made-up name? Does it not mean anything e.g. in Japanese? What does the word "xevious" mean? If the title has no meaning then that should be written into the article, I suggest.--Szipucsu (talk) 19:18, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As the katakana indicate, it is pronounced "zeh-vee-us". Everything points to the title being a made-up word. Despatche (talk) 02:19, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I often pronounce it Zi-viy-you, but I think zee-vee-us is correct — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:304:B162:81C9:E812:15DB:1571:158F (talk) 00:33, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, considering that the name "Xavier" is pronounced with the a, then wouldn't Xevious be pronounced "ecks-ee-vee-us"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.182.66.252 (talk) 23:04, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

when in the future is this? and whats the name of the aliens?

id like to know when in the future this is. my guese is this takes place in the 22nd century or later. what is the name of the guys you fight? i think there aliens but they may just be people on earth that are being terroists or rebling or something. id like to learn more of the plot. i have this game for Atari 7800 but i threw the box away and that may have said the plot details. necropolis 99.51.212.6 (talk) 12:50, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The hidden side of Xevious

Many players of Xevious have never suspected there are invisible underground targets, several on many levels, that can only be found by direct hits with the blaster. These greatly improve the score. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Freesumpin (talk • contribs) 12:19, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Xevious/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Indrian (talk · contribs) 20:54, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It might take me a couple of days to get to this, but I would love to review this article on such an important game. Indrian (talk) 20:54, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I hope I'm not coming off as impatient, but do you plan to review this soon? I'm fine with waiting if it's in your plans. Thanks. Namcokid47 (talk) 13:24, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Does not come off as impatient at all. I should have it reviewed before the end of this coming week. Indrian (talk) 14:47, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  - Ok, thanks. Namcokid47 (talk) 15:05, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Hey there, it's been about two months since I've seen any activity on this nomination page. Do you still plan to review it? Namcokid47 (talk) 18:28, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  - Yeah, I'm really sorry. Got hit with a big project in the real world that knocked me off course here. I should get to it in the next few days. If for some reason I don't and you want a new reviewer at that point, I will completely understand. Indrian (talk) 20:47, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Indrian: @Namcokid47: I took a quick glance review, and I do have concerns. I'm not sure an Amazon page is considered a reliable source for Xevious VHS. In addition, the development section for the first paragraph doesn't explicitly state that the game they're working on is Xevious itself, so that needs to be clarified. I'm not sure if it's necessary to keep information on Endo developer on when he was hired, but the development section doesn't inform on what his role was for developing the game. The infobox says designer but the infobox should reflect what's on the article. Sales information should be in the Reception section, Release dates and ports should be kept in the Release section. If you want, i could take over the review if you feel comfortable with that.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 16:20, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'd be okay with that. In the meantime I'll start fixing the issues you brought up.Namcokid47 (talk) 17:49, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do take it over. I took this with the best of intentions but got hit with real life right afterwards. Indrian (talk) 18:50, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A few things that drew my attention. I'm not sure if critical acclaim is the right choice considering how few reviews there are of the game. Narusawa reference seems a little sparse, is that a book or is it a reference to another citation in the article? Could i get more clarification on that?Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 17:46, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly that whole section should be bulked up with information, I didn't do a good job with that. I found a few print-based sources from around the game's original release which should help justify the "critical acclaim" the second paragraph says. Narusawa is also infact a book, which I've since made more clear in the article. Namcokid47 (talk) 18:41, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Its looking pretty good. I'm still going to double-checking some areas.18:49, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

I still think the Development section needs work, but perhaps this isn't an issue for GA. I will promote it to GA now.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 19:34, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Music Credits

There are credits in the game's ROM file of the NES version. How are credits from the game not considered a reliable source?

Additionally, there are soundtracks of the arcade version officially released by Namco that credit the composer for the arcade version. Doommaster1994 (talk) 01:24, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I personally don't know if its even relevant to give composer credits of a port unless there's external coverage citing why the sound of the original and the port are different. I made the same mistake when i was working on Edge (video game). Why is listing this specific composer for the NES version relevant?Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 20:09, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly. Not to mention that the composer isn't even mentioned in the game through a credit screen or anything, she's credited in the ROM file as a hidden easter egg. Unless there's a good reason to have her listed and a reliable source can be found, there's no reason to have it there. Namcokid47 (talk) 20:32, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AtariProto

its better to discuss it rather than having an edit war. this is a recently promoted GA article, after all.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 15:49, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I fail to see how AtariProtos is reliable. From a cursory glance it just appears to be a fan site dedicated to prototype games, which is already a red flag. Plus the Kotaku article that talks about the cancelled 2600 version also mentions the 5200 version, so the AtariProtos source is even more pointless in that regard. Namcokid 47 ^(Contribs) 16:24, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, if the editors really want to use this, they should discuss it in WT:VG/RS on whether it's reliable or not.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 15:15, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Guidebook source

What is the guidebook that is cited multiple times throughout the article? Where is it from? Is it available for viewing somewhere? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1003:B12E:B84E:ECAC:91C3:AEEB:7A06 (talk) 04:01, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]