Talk:World of Warcraft: Legion

Video games Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (6 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (2 participants)
Dr. Wily (8 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Issues with the article

I'm unsure whether Alleria and Turalyon are notable enough to be included in the lead as returning characters. At best they're fan service as we've been asking for a while, and we know nothing of their importance to the expansion. Considering that Illidan is returning, I would be hesitant to have them instead in the lead.

Opinions? I've got a few updates and clarifications I'll throw in over the coming days aside from that. KieranTribe 08:59, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is notable enough to include, but it can be put somewhere else in the article. The return of Illidan should be in the lead instead. --Frmorrison (talk) 15:04, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Aye. Thanks for the edit. Kieran Tribe 13:17, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm skeptical as to whether or not the presentation of the plot qualifies as "encyclopedic". The final paragraph [of the plot] in particular appears to end on a cliffhanger, which, in my opinion, does not fit the encyclopedic tone Wikipedia strives to present. In a true encyclopedia, there would not be suspense; everything is straight-forward and presented as you would expect it to be. I would suggest rewriting or at least rephrasing the section containing the plot. 11:14 PM, 05/21/19 (MDT)