Talk:Women's suffrage

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Women's suffrage article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3: 365 days

Feminism Top‑importance

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gender studies Top‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles

Top

This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : see Unassessed Gender studies articles and Unknown-importance Gender studies articles
Cleanup : edit to see
Collaborate : see /Collaboration
Copyedit : edit to see
Deletion sorting : see /Sexuality and gender
Expand : edit to see
Infobox : see Gender studies articles needing infoboxes
Merge : edit to see
Notability : edit to see
NPOV : edit to see
Orphans : Brannon Masculinity Scale · Holy Virility · Media and gender · Michael Kaufman (author) · Women's education in Saudi Arabia
Photo : see Wikipedia requested photographs of gender studies
Split : History of feminism
Stubs : see Gender studies stubs
Translate : see /translation
Update : edit to see
Verify : Riot grrrl
Needs attention : see Gender studies articles needing attention

Human rights High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Women's History Top‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on September 19, 2004, September 19, 2005, September 19, 2006, and September 19, 2007.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[List of suffragists and suffragettes#Women's suffrage organizations|Women's suffrage organizations]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Regarding the Timeline

I have a few questions regarding the Timeline section:

Does this article actually need a Timeline section when there is already a History section?
Why is the Timeline organised by country, instead of chronological order?
Why would a "timeline" organised by country be necessary when there is a breakdown by continent immediately after it?

--MtPenguinMonster (talk) 08:47, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, as a quick reference, and as a valuable summary of the information. Nothing broken here. Randy Kryn (talk) 09:12, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Race in America, sec 2

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 10 January 2024 and 24 April 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lovebug416 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Everlark13 (talk) 14:24, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Map

It's surprising that the map color for the US does not reflect the date of the 19th amendment. Perhaps that is beacuse significant barriers to voting existed until at least the voting rights act of 1965. These barriers, however, did not single out women. If this broad interpretation holds, it's only a small step further to say that full suffrage is not yet realized because women can't vote from prison.

It seems to me that regardless of such quibbles the US should be colored 1920. Mdmi (talk) 15:46, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with this comment. The color is misleading here 172.58.30.212 (talk) 13:15, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Female suffrage in South Australia

Hello all

I have changed the date on which women won the vote and the right to stand for parliament in South Australia to 1895. I have added two reliable sources. The confusion is that the South Australian colonial parliament passed a Bill granting these rights in December 1894. However, the bill did not gain royal assent until February 1895 and this is the date it became law. The two cited sources explain this. I will progressively change the date throughout the article to 1895.

Happy to discuss Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 04:53, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You should not do that: instead, you should leave both dates in the article, and explain why their are two dates. That is how it is normally done. --Aciram (talk) 12:15, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's not right, we normally put in the date which the consensus of recent reliable sources states is the date on which women gained the legal right to vote (and in this case, also the right to stand for parliament). For women in the colony of South Australia that is February 1895. Put it this way: if the South Australian government had held a snap election in January 1895 would women have had the right to vote in that election? Answer: No. If the South Australian government had held a snap election in March 1895, would women have had the right to vote in that election? Answer: Yes. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 21:56, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: HIST 103 - Ancient and Modern Democracy

This article is currently the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2024 and 14 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Poobyojerg, Basuran, Wiltt chamberlain jr (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Hemerodromos (talk) 20:51, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]