User talk:MtPenguinMonster
Index
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
See also sections
[edit]See also sections should not repeat links already present in the lead or body of the article. Skyerise (talk) 09:37, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:João da Silva Guimarães
[edit]Hello, MtPenguinMonster. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:João da Silva Guimarães, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:06, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
Thank you!!
[edit]XRozuRozu has eaten your {{subst:cookie}}! The cookie made her happy and she'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{subst:cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!
xRozuRozu (t • c) 22:46, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:K-factor (electrical engineering)
[edit]Hello, MtPenguinMonster. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:K-factor (electrical engineering), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:05, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Lake Mahalona
[edit]Hello, MtPenguinMonster. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lake Mahalona, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:07, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
Trouted
[edit]Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE 187.222.149.22 (talk) 22:27, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
A cup of coffee for you!
[edit]I think you might prefer this one! :)))
(thanks again for your contributions!!) xRozuRozu (t • c) 00:54, 24 September 2024 (UTC) |
- Thanks! --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 02:24, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed you unmerged references in this article some months ago [1]. I'm just curious what the reason for this was? Bogazicili (talk) 20:19, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- A lot of the references used quotes. I think that using unmerged references makes it more clear which quote corresponds to which source. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 00:43, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the feedback. I think bulleted merged references would be clearer? What do you think? I think the original intent in merging references in the lead was that they would be less of a distraction. Many FA articles do not even have references in the lead. Bogazicili (talk) 17:53, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- I agree that merging references can be good for making the article less cluttered. However, if a source is quoted, it is good to have the quote and its source in their own
<ref>
tag to make it as clear as possible that the quote corresponds to the source. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 02:58, 10 October 2024 (UTC)
- I agree that merging references can be good for making the article less cluttered. However, if a source is quoted, it is good to have the quote and its source in their own
- Thanks for the feedback. I think bulleted merged references would be clearer? What do you think? I think the original intent in merging references in the lead was that they would be less of a distraction. Many FA articles do not even have references in the lead. Bogazicili (talk) 17:53, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Photographic Chemical
[edit]Hello, MtPenguinMonster. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Photographic Chemical".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:09, 14 October 2024 (UTC)