Jump to content

Talk:Wizards & Warriors III: Kuros: Visions of Power

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleWizards & Warriors III: Kuros: Visions of Power has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 20, 2011Good article nomineeListed

Fair use rationale for Image:Wizards and Warriors III-Kuros Visions Of Power.jpg

[edit]

Image:Wizards and Warriors III-Kuros Visions Of Power.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 12:00, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Wizards and Warriors III 2.png

[edit]

Image:Wizards and Warriors III 2.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 12:00, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Wizards and Warriors III 1.png

[edit]

Image:Wizards and Warriors III 1.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 12:00, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Wizards & Warriors III: Kuros: Visions of Power/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 21:59, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    First off, there is a weirdly disconnected single-line paragraph in the lead that doesn't really need to be disconnected. The line of the reviewer saying it is his personal favourite is written in way that implies that it is in contrast to those who like it the best of the three games. Also, redirect Zippo Games to Rare. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 02:54, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    I removed that one orphaned paragraph, as there was enough info in the lead anyways. As far as the redirect is concerned, I don't know if that would make sense. I mean, until the very end of the company's existence (when Rare eventually bought the company), Zippo Games was a completely separate company from Rare, and after it shut down, the Pickford brothers founded their own indie game company, Zee-3 (which is much of the development info comes from). –MuZemike 19:56, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    What makes HonestGamers a reliable source? - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 02:54, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Instead of arguing about it, I decided to remove the one sentence and replace that source with the much more reliable GamePro source. (diff: [1]) –MuZemike 19:56, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Second image uses a generic fair use rationale, while the first image is directly linked to the file instead of the site that uses it. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 02:54, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    I strengthened the fair-use rationales for both images. –MuZemike 20:35, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Looks good. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 20:42, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]