Talk:Wiwa v. Royal Dutch Shell Co.

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Africa: Nigeria

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Nigeria portal This article is supported by WikiProject Nigeria.

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Link between Shell and the charges

There is no clear link between the charges, Shell and the crimes committed. For it to have gone as far as it did, there must have been a clear link. Could someone add some detail that explains the links, and what the company or it's employees were involved in.

Surely there is some substance and this is not merely an extortion attempt.Andbrew.downes (talk) 19:16, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed; it would be nice to have more (or really, any) detail as to the substance of the case. Qqqqqq (talk) 21:35, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality and conflict of interest

More than a bit one-sided given that the viewpoint of Shell is only mentioned in one sentence at the end of the article whereas the rest of the article is devoted to the viewpoint of the plaintiffs. And if one wonders why the article is so one-sided an answer might be found in the edit history, as anti-Shell activists edited here. Stepopen (talk) 16:59, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 04:01, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]