This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
William Levett (rector of Buxted) is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AnglicanismWikipedia:WikiProject AnglicanismTemplate:WikiProject AnglicanismAnglicanism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sussex on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SussexWikipedia:WikiProject SussexTemplate:WikiProject SussexSussex-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
I have converted a lot of the references to the standard author, title, booktitle, publication format. However there are a number of articles that have some of these missing. I have indicates these issues by <!-- comments -->, which are only visible when editing. There are more Google Books references that need hard copy citations. The correct pages and citation should be available in the bibliography on the Royal Historial Society's website. The name of the printer and publisher is normally unnecessary in the case of serials (save in cases of ambiguity), but thyey do need volume, year and pages. There are a few statements that are perhaps based on a weak or derivative source, for example the commetns on wrought iron guns -- where there is modern literative. I am surprised that there is no citation of:
B.G. Awty, 'Cast-iron cannon of the 1540s', Sussex Arch. Coll. 125 (1987), 115-23
B.G. Awty, 'The Arcana family of Cesana as gunfounders and military engineers', Trans. Newcomen Soc. 59 (1987-8), 61-80
B.G. Awty, 'Parson Levett and English cannon founding' Sussex Arch. Coll. 127 (1989), 133-45
Or at any rate the last of these, which is clearly relevant and probably not overtaken completely by Awty & Whittick. This may well be the source for some of the derivative statements in tertiary (or worse) works.
I regard this as a substantial article, but one that probably still needs some tightening up to become a good article. Peterkingiron (talk) 00:40, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This article hardly reads as a wikipedia article at all. For a biography, it contains tons of non-biographic information that, while it is interesting, does not belong here and instead should be in some other article about cannon making in England. Furthermore, the article contains excessive praise on pretty much everything covered in this article, and especially the subject himself, is praised into the heavens. Omegastar (talk) 00:05, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I am inclined to agree. This is a relatively recent article. I had hoped that its author would read my previous commetn and amend the article in the light of it. The article needs pruning of extraneous material (which is coverd in other articles), the provision of subheadings, wikifying, and other changes. However, I do not have time to do everything that I would like. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:52, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
