Talk:Wicked Workshop

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Jackpot World (0 participants)
Bejeweled Stars (5 participants)
Melee (game terminology) (2 participants)
Solo leveling: Unlimited (3 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (4 participants; relisted)
Araya (video game) (3 participants; relisted)
Chao (Sonic the Hedgehog) (8 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (11 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Mobile games

Originally when I made the Wicked Witch article I included the full list from their website of the games they stated they had produced including some rare references to their mobile phone games and the more common references for the DS titles that were being released at the time. I never created articles for the mobile phone games because I didn't have a lot of information on them. Soon after someone deleted the mobile section, I think questioning its noteworthiness in relation to the rest of the article and again since, they have been re-added with articles for most of them. Many of these articles recieved a speedy delete nomination, probably because they only cited a single reference. Because there are a few articles and the discussion pages seem to be basically identical I thought it might be better to raise arguments for and against the deletion of the mobile games here. If they really are on the fringe of notability then no doubt the articles won't get frequented enough to have a thorough discussion.--Senor Freebie (talk) 13:08, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Key people

This page's key people section should probably be removed since it's a link from 2010 and is likely outdated. Jcc724 (talk) 18:37, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I checked Visser's LinkedIn and it says he left in January. The others were not really roles you would feature in the infobox. I removed the entire list. IceWelder [✉] 19:21, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]