This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of Kent in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mills, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mills on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MillsWikipedia:WikiProject MillsTemplate:WikiProject MillsMills articles
The information is real. I find it incredible that you delete it for no reason. I saw the episode today in Spain. I am a fan of the program and they put it every day on a channel in Spain. I haven't found the episode on the internet because I don't know what season it is from. You are not right to delete the information. 37.29.195.177 (talk) 19:19, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Let me see how to explain it. It is real. The chapter exists. I'm not saying that I've seen it, I'm saying that if it weren't exust I couldn't have seen it. It's factual. If I can't find out the full season and chapter at the end I will put the link of all the seasons and chapters where one appears. And since it is within that link, you look for it because it will be a real link where the mill is in some chapter with the two volunteers and in which they specifically sell a soft pig to raise money for its restoration. I hope you have understood it. If I can't find the specific chapter, I'll put the link with everyone and you can look for it within the link. If it didn't exist I couldn't have seen it. Irrefutable and factual. 46.222.20.22 (talk) 03:40, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think you don't understand. The show link is the most reliable source because it is the one that produced that video. What you say from a reliable source does not make sense. There is no more reliable source than that. And it's not about searching for it, it's about Wikipedia's rules saying a link where that information is. Well, that information is in that link. I don't know if you already understood it? According to Wikipedia rules, it is legal to post that link. This is all because the information I provide is real and removing it is a mistake. I will post another day again the information and the link to the programs, and there is the information. Anyone who wants to remove something true must consider the link as real and legal according to Wikipedia's rules that the information is real. I think you are not understanding anything. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.222.20.22 (talk) 15:49, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I add this to the answer I just wrote. I'm waiting to see if I can find out the season and the specific episode and if not, I will simply put the link where the episode is SURELY located, as I have already explained. 46.222.20.22 (talk) 16:31, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm explaining it to you again because I see that you don't have the capacity to understand it. This link contains the chapter information; https://www.justwatch.com/es/serie/maestros-de-la-restauracion
I might be more precise if I knew the exact chapter number. Do you already understand it? That link contains the chapter with the information. Have you already understood it? I have decided to explain it to you until you understand it. I see you don't have much understanding. But I have a lot of patience with people who have little compression capacity like you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.222.20.22 (talk) 19:55, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm serious. I'm right and you are acting like little children. The last thing is so that you can see that it is real news. He was previously eliminated twice for no reason. You don't know how to work. I'm sorry. 46.222.20.22 (talk) 07:22, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you're so smart, how come you haven't noticed that three different editors have reverted your additions? You can't be very smart. Since you are not right, you seek to make believe parallel reasoning to want to be at the top. You say something in the form of a question that is not real, that is half-truths, and that is why you want to make others believe that it is true. Seriously, there are reliable sites on the Internet where you can search for techniques to improve. Think about it. You're trying to confuse me to try to keep me on top. It hasn't worked for you. Whatever you want me to explain to you, I will continue explaining it to you. 46.222.20.22 (talk) 11:50, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for continuing to prove me right by trying to use nonsensical and unreasonable reasoning. And yes, I speak English, but not native English. and I read it before sending and it is perfectly explained. I'm sorry, but it hasn't worked for you again. I'm right and your strategy is not working for you. 46.222.20.22 (talk) 12:20, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]