Talk:Warmonger: Operation Downtown Destruction

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (7 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (3 participants)
Dr. Wily (8 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Proposed deletion

I can see why this page might be criticised for the way it is written, but does the proposer (Gotonull) have any constructive criticism? I'm not involved with the game - I just thought it was strange that there was no page for the game, so I made an admittedly flawed page. If someone with more experience at writing at a wikipedia level of neutrality, preferably with a little knowledge of the subject, could help re-write some of the page it would be much appreciated. Jamesmarshall90 (talk) 13:11, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Should not be deleted

Not affiliated with the game, developers, distributors, etc. in any way and consider the article to be acceptably informative. Ricktempest (talk) 19:13, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, come on, the game sucks worse than an old man trying to finish his Jolly Rancher while missing all his teeth. Ha. Leonnatus (talk) 20:57, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your disappointment with the game is no reason to propose a deletion of the page. The article's informative, and on a valid subject. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.160.197.68 (talk) 03:43, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]